1. Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL. Board invited review: the purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: a review of theory, estimates, and implications. J Anim Sci 2017;95:3467–78.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1669
4. Bijma P, van Arendonk JAM. Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred information. Anim Sci 1998;66:529–42.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S135772980000970X
6. Habier D, Götz KU, Dempfle L. Estimation of genetic parameters on test stations using purebred and crossbred progeny of sires of the Bavarian Piétrain. Livest Sci 2007;107:142–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.09.012
7. Edea Z, Hong JK, Jung JH, et al. Detecting selection signatures between Duroc and Duroc synthetic pig populations using high-density SNP chip. Anim Genet 2017;48:473–7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12559
9. Harris AJ, Patience JF, Lonergan SM, Dekkers CJM, Gabler NK. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake. J Anim Sci 2012;90:Suppl 4164–6.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.53855
10. Sargolzaei M, Iwaisaki H, Colleau JJ. CFC: a tool for monitoring genetic diversity. In : 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 2006 Aug 13Ȝ18; Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
12. Cai W, Casey DS, Dekkers JCM. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. J Anim Sci 2008;86:287–98.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0396
14. Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, VanRaden PM, et al. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:3431–6.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1758
15. Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In : Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production; 2002; p. 743–4.
17. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:743–52.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2730
20. Noguera JL, Varona L, Babot D, Estany J. Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: I. Bayesian variance component estimation. J Anim Sci 2002;80:2540–7.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/80.10.2540
21. Arango J, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Culbertson M, Herring W. Threshold-linear estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing mortality, litter size, and test performance of Large White sows. J Anim Sci 2005;83:499–506.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.833499x
22. Chen P, Baas TJ, Mabry JW, Dekkers JCM, Koehler KJ. Genetic parameters and trends for lean growth rate and its components in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. J Anim Sci 2002;80:2062–70.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/80.8.2062
23. Suzuki K, Ishida M, Kadowaki H, Shibata T, Uchida H, Nishida A. Genetic correlations among fatty acid compositions in different sites of fat tissues, meat production, and meat quality traits in Duroc pigs. J Anim Sci 2006;84:2026–34.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-660
24. Hicks C, Satoh M, Ishii K, Kuroki S, Fujiwara T, Furukawa T. Effect of sex on estimates of genetic parameters for daily gain and ultrasonic backfat thickness in swine. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 1999;12:677–81.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.677
25. Hoque MA, Kadowaki H, Shibata T, Oikawa T, Suzuki K. Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livest Sci 2009;121:45–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.05.016
26. Mrode RA, Kennedy BW. Genetic variation in measures of food efficiency in pigs and their genetic relationships with growth rate and backfat. Anim Sci 1993;56:225–32.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100021309
27. Kadarmideen HN, Schwörer D, Ilahi H, Malek M, Hofer A. Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs. J Anim Sci 2004;82:3118–27.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113118x
28. Do DN, Strathe AB, Jensen J, Mark T, Kadarmideen HN. Genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency and related traits in boars of three pig breeds. J Anim Sci 2013;91:4069–79.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-6197
29. Li X, Kennedy BW. Genetic parameters for growth rate and backfat in Canadian Yorkshire, Landrace, Duroc, and Hampshire pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:1450–4.
https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7261450x
30. Saintilan R, Mérour I, Brossard L, et al. Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs: relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion traits. J Anim Sci 2013;91:2542–54.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5687
32. Saintilan R, Mérour I, Schwob S, Sellier P, Bidanel J, Gilbert H. Genetic parameters and halothane genotype effect for residual feed intake in Piétrain growing pigs. Livest Sci 2011;142:203–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.07.013
33. Boddicker N, Gabler NK, Spurlock ME, Nettleton D, Dekkers JCM. Effects of
ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. J Anim Sci 2011;89:40–51.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3106
38. Nakavisut S, Crump R, Suarez M, Graser HU. Genetic correlations between the performance of purebred and crossbred pigs. In : Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics; 2005; p. 99–102.
40. Grubbs JK, Fritchen AN, Huff-Lonergan E, Dekkers JCM, Gabler NK, Lonergan SM. Divergent genetic selection for residual feed intake impacts mitochondria reactive oxygen species production in pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:2133–40.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5894
41. Colpoys JD, Abell CE, Young JM, et al. Effects of genetic selection for residual feed intake on behavioral reactivity of castrated male pigs to novel stimuli tests. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2014;159:34–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.06.013
42. Dunkelberger JR, Boddicker NJ, Serao NVL, Young JM, Rowland RRR, Dekkers JCM. Response of pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake to experimental infection with the PRRS virus. Livest Sci 2015;177:132–41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.04.014