Dry matter and organic matter (OM) degradation parameters, and the ED values of the SSB are presented in
Table 3. Soluble fraction
a of DM and OM was 44.2% and 64.6% DM, fraction
b of DM and OM was 23.00% and 19.40% DM, and constant
c and OM was 0.04 and 0.04, respectively. The ED2, ED5, and ED8 of DM were 59.83, 54.75, and 52.16, respectively and those of OM were 77.78, 73.52, and 71.34, respectively. The SSBs are separated from the mixture of starch sugar liquid and filter using physical methods such as a blade (
Figure 1) and this process might influence the physical and chemical composition of the SSBs. In a previous experiment, the SSB collected from multiple time-points showed a high variation among physical and chemical characteristics [
22]. This high variation in the SSB is one of the factors that could make it difficult to use as a feed ingredient. The DM, CP, EE, ash, NDF, and ADF content in the SSB used in the previous experiment was 61.4%, 14.4%, 23.26%, 32.6%, 35.7%, and 31.3% of DM, respectively [
22]. As a high ash content, containing silica, could have negative effects when fed to ruminants [
6,
7], a low percentage of the SSB (3% of DM) was fed to dairy cows in the previous study [
22]. However, the SSB used in this study showed lower ash content (13.0% of DM) than that in the previous study (32.6% of DM; [
22]), approximately half on an as-dry basis. Therefore, it was considered that a larger amount could be used, and approximately 4.35% DM of SSB was fed to Hanwoo steers in this experiment. Furthermore, the silica content of SSB used in this experiment showed 12.14% of DM (
Table 1), feeding 4.35% of DM SSB to a ruminant is equivalent to feeding 0.53% DM silica, and it is considered that could be fed without any negative effects. The SSB used in this experiment showed a lower range of ED values than obtained in the previous study (63.3% vs 70.5% [
22]). Furthermore, the ED value of the SSB in this experiment was lower than the commonly observed ED value for corn grain and soybean [
23,
24]. However, it is noteworthy that the degradation parameter constant c of the SSB in this study (constant c, 0.04) was lower than that of the SSB in the previous study (constant c, 0.23) [
22]. Considering degradation parameters, fraction b indicates the potential degradability of the component of DM or CP which will, in time, degrade and constant c value indicates the rate constant for the degradation of fraction
b [
10]. It has been reported that as constant c value becomes closer to zero, the digestibility of feed ingredients in the rumen increases [
25,
26]. Considering the result of the
in situ disappearance evaluation, the difference observed between the SSB used in this and the previous study could imply that the nutritional value of SSBs can be increased by changing the starch sugar production process.
Body weight, ADG, DMI, and gain:feed with the SSB supplementation are presented in
Table 4. In the feeding trial, a significant difference in the ADG, DMI, and gain:feed was not observed with an as-fed total mixed ration including 7.0% (as-fed basis) of SSB when compared to that with the control. In this experiment, the chemical composition of the SSB was similar to that of rice bran; most of the rice bran was replaced by the SSB in the experimental feed. Although a significant difference was not observed between the control and SSB treatment groups, the magnitude of ADG and gain:feed in the SSB treatment group was greater than in the control. Regarding carcass traits, there was no significant difference in most traits except for the dressing percentage (
Table 5). It has been reported that a high positive correlation exists between live weight and dressing percentage [
27], with a greater correlation in young calves [
28]. In contrast, considering cows, it has been reported that the type of diet fed had no association with dressing percentage in Holstein cows [
29]. Therefore, the significant difference in dressing percentage between control and SSB treatment groups (p< 0.05) can be considered to have been affected by the initial and final BW. Although there was insufficient evidence to suggest that SSB in the diet improves the dressing percentage of Hanwoo steers; it was clear that the SSB is a sufficient substitute for rice bran at 7.0% (as-fed basis).
In the LM FA profiles, there was no significant difference in each FA (
Table 6). Regarding FA content, there was no significant difference between the control and SSB treatment groups. However, there was a significant difference in the ratio of UFA to SFA between the two groups (p<0.05). Diet and feeding time are more important determinants of meat fat content and FA composition than cattle breed type [
30] and most intramuscular fat is synthesized during a late finishing period in ruminants [
31]. Although this feeding experiment was of a short term of 80 days, this was sufficient to evaluate the effect of feed on intramuscular fat synthesis. It is well established that there is an increase in monounsaturated fatty acids and a decrease in SFA with increasing time on a grain-based diet [
32]. In this study, SFA in LM was greater in the SSB treatment group than in the control (p<0.05), because the non-fiber carbohydrate content of the SSB was lower than that of rice bran. A previous study reported that as carcass quality grade in Hanwoo increased, the ratio of monounsaturated fatty acids to SFA also increased [
33]. In this study, although the number of the highest quality grade (1
++ grade) steers was more observed with the SSB group than in the control, it needs to be stressed that the lowest quality grade (2 grade) steers were greater in the SSB group than the control. In other words, the possibility that feeding a high level of SSBs could negatively affect the intramuscular fat synthesis of Hanwoo should be considered. In summary, SSBs are a worthwhile by-product to use as an energy and protein source in ruminants. However, it is suggested that feeding is not implemented at more than a 4.0% of dry basis in Hanwoo.