Evaluation of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein as a new protein source for broiler chickens in replacement of soybean meal

Article information

Anim Biosci. 2024;37(7):1236-1245
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 April 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0419
1Key Laboratory for Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*Corresponding Author: Aijuan Zheng, Tel: +86-10-8210772, E-mail: zhengaijuan@caas.cn
Received 2023 October 16; Revised 2023 December 21; Accepted 2024 January 17.

Abstract

Objective

The object of this study was to investigate the effect of replacing soybean meal with Clostridium autoethanogenum protein (CAP) in broiler diets on growth performance, blood indicators, antioxidant capacity, and immune function.

Methods

A total of 180 Arbor Acres broilers were randomly divided into three treatments, each treatment with six replicates and 10 broilers per replicate for a 42-day feeding trial. The control group (CON) was fed corn-soybean meal based diet. The CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups were considered to use CAP to replace 25% or 50% of soybean meal in the diet, respectively. The average daily gain and average daily feed intake of broilers at 1 to 21 d, 22 to 42 d, and 1 to 42 d were measured, and the feed conversion ratio was calculated. At the 42nd day of age, two broilers with similar weights and fasted for 12 h were selected in each replicate for blood collection from the brachial wing vein. The blood routine indicators, serum biochemical indicators, serum antioxidant capacity, and immunoglobulin content of broiler chickens were measured.

Results

Replacement of soybean meal with 25% (CAP-1) and 50% (CAP-2) CAP significantly increased the average daily gain of 22 to 42 d and 1 to 42 d and decreased the average daily feed intake and feed conversion rate (p<0.05). The CAP-1 group, and CAP-2 group significantly increased hemoglobulin in the blood of broilers, while the CAP-2 group increased hematocrit content (p<0.05). Compared with the control group, the contents of superoxide dismutase and immunoglobulin A in serum of the CAP-2 group were significantly increased, while the contents of malondialdehyde in CAP group were significantly decreased (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Replacing soybean meal with CAP led to significant improvements in the growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and immunoglobulin content of broilers.

INTRODUCTION

Proteins play a crucial role as the fundamental components of body tissues and contribute significantly to the growth and upkeep of poultry muscles [1,2]. In the commercial poultry industry, over 70% of the production costs are attributed to feed, with soybean meal (SBM) the main feed for the broiler chickens, its price is a key factor for the cost [3]. Due to the increasing costs and source restricting of SBM, alternative protein sources should be urgently developed and utilized in feed production to reduce the industry’s reliance on SBM [4,5].

Single cell protein (SCP), also referred to microbial protein, is a protein-rich substance that contains amino acids, vitamins, minerals, nucleotides, and immune polysaccharides [6,7]. Clostridium autoethanogenum protein (CAP) is a newly developed and efficient SCP [8]. It is produced as a byproduct during the ethanol production process by utilizing carbon monoxide and ammonia from steelmaking waste gas [9]. The CAP is obtained through centrifugation and drying separation of the fermentation broth produced the Clostridium autoethanogenum, which has high protein content and a well-balanced amino acid profile [10]. Currently, no virulence genes have been found in the genome sequence of Clostridium autoethanogenum, and CAP contains fewer antinutritional factors when compared to traditional plant and animal protein sources [9,11]. In aquaculture, replacing fish meal in feed with CAP has a positive impact on the growth and development of aquatic animals such as herring, grass carp, and carp, which has confirmed its safety and feasibility in feed [12].

Only one previous has reported that replacing 29% SBM with CAP in the diet significantly improved the production performance and antioxidant capacity and increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria of Cobb broilers in the gut [7]. However, variations in the level of CAP addition and the use of different poultry breeds may lead to differences in outcomes. In the initial phase of this experiment, there was a systematic analysis of the chemical and amino acid composition of CAP, along with the evaluation of protein and amino acid digestibility, metabolic energy value, and net energy value of CAP in the ileum of Arbor Acres broiler chickens. Based on the above analysis, this study investigated the impact of CAP on the growth performance, blood parameters, antioxidant capacity, and immune function of Arbor Acres broilers. The findings offer valuable insights into the potential application of CAP in broiler chickens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement

The research was licensed by the ethical approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Feed Research of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (Statement No. AEC-CAAS-20191106, Beijing, China). The CAP was kindly provided by Xinjiang Jinlan Plant Protein Co., Ltd. (Xinjiang, China). The chemical composition, ileal protein, and amino acid digestibility of CAP were analyzed, and the results were presented in Table 1 (chemical composition), Table 2 (ileal protein digestibility), and Table 3 (amino acid digestibility). The analysis methods of chemical composition, ileal protein, and amino acid digestibility were referenced on articles published in our laboratory [13].

The chemical composition, and amino acid composition of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein

The dry matter and protein digestibility of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein in the broilers’ ileum

The apparent and standardized amino acid digestibility of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein in the broilers’ ileum (n = 6)

Animals and diets

A total of 180 Arbor Acres broilers with the same genetic background and similar body weight (48.28±0.05 g) aged 1-day-old were arranged in metal cages (140 cm×70 cm×40 cm, Xiping Mufeng agricultural and animal husbandry equipment Co., Ltd., Henan, China). The broilers were randomly divided into three treatments, each treatment with six replicates and 10 broilers per replicate for a 42-day feeding trial. The control group (CON) was fed corn-SBM based diet, which was formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements of broilers [14]. The CAP-1 group used CAP to replace 25% of SBM, while the CAP-2 group replaced 50% of SBM in the diet. The ingredients and nutrient content of the experimental diets are shown in Table 4, ensuring the same digestive energy and crude protein for each processing group. The Arbor Acres broilers were raised in Nankou Experimental Base of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Changping, Beijing, China). Broilers were raised in environmentally controlled facilities with fiberglass feeders and plastic grid floors, with feed and purified water provided ad libitum. Adjust test conditions such as temperature, humidity, and light to meet Arbor Acre broiler management guidelines. Newcastle disease virus vaccine was inoculated on the 7th and 21st day and inactivated infectious bursal disease vaccine was inoculated on the 14th and 28th day (Shanghai Haili Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

Ingredients and nutrient content of experimental diets (%, as-is basis)

Performance parameters

Two nutrition stages, including starter stage (1 to 21 d) and grower stage (22 to 42 d), were designed for this experiment. The average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) of broilers at 1 to 21 d, 22 to 42 d, and 1 to 42 d were measured, and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated. The number of deaths of broilers was recorded and weighed daily, which was used to correct the FCR of broilers.

Blood sample collection and analysis

On the 42nd day of age, two broilers with similar weights and fasted for 12 h were selected in each replicate for blood collection from the brachial wing vein. Approximately 5 mL was placed in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dipotassium salt (EDTA-K2) tube and then stored at −20°C for hematological analysis. The white blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte absolute value (LYM), intermediate cell absolute value (MID), granulocyte absolute value (GRA), red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (HCT), platelet count (PLT), and platelet count (PCT) in the blood were determined by an automatic hematology analyzer (TEK8550, Jiangxi Tecom Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangxi, China).

Serum sample collection and analysis

The blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000×g and 4°C for 15 min to collect serum, and the serum was stored at −80°C for future analysis. The contents of total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lipoprotein (LP), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (T-CHO), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in serum were determined by the automatic biochemical analyzer (AU5800; American Beckman Coulter Co., Ltd., USA).

Serum antioxidant enzymes, total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC; A015-1-2, Colorimetric method), superoxide dismutase (SOD; A001-3-2, WST-1 method), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px; A005-1-2, Colorimetric method), malondialdehyde (MDA; A003-1-1, TBA method), immunoglobulin A (IgA, H108-1-2), immunoglobulin M (IgM, H109-1-2), and immunoglobulin G (IgG, H106-1-1) were measured according to the methods of assay kit. All experimental steps were carried out in strict accordance with the instructions of the reagent company (Nanjing Jiancheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China).

Statistical analysis

The experiment data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the general linear model in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Variations among the treatments were compared using Tukey’s multiple range tests. Results were presented as the mean and standard error of the mean. All statements of significance are based on a probability of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Growth performance

Table 5 presents the impact of replacing SBM with CAP in broiler chicken diets on growth performance. In the start phase (1 to 21 d), there were no significant changes in ADG, ADFI, and FCR among the CON, CAP-1, and CAP-2 groups (p>0.05). In the grower phase (22 to 42 d), ADG was significantly increased in the CAP-1 group compared to the CON group (p<0.05), but not significantly different to the CAP-2 group (p>0.05). CAP-2 group showed lower ADFI compared to the CON and CAP-1 groups (p<0.05), with the CAP-1 group being intermediate (p<0.05). The FCR of the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups were lower than the CON group, but there was no significantly variation between the treatment groups (p>0.05). Throughout the entirety of the experiment, spanning from 1 to 42 days, the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups demonstrated higher ADG and lower FCR when compared to the CON group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference observed between the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups (p>0.05). Additionally, as the proportion of SBM in CAP substitute feed increased, the ADFI of broiler chickens in the CON, CAP-1, and CAP-2 groups decreased in a sequential manner (p<0.05).

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal on growth performance of broiler chickens

Blood routine

Table 6 displays the effects of the CAP substitute for SBM on the hematology of broiler chickens. The Hb in the blood of both the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups showed a significant increase when compared to the CON group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (p>0.05). Additionally, the HCT of the CAP-2 group was higher than the CON group (p<0.05), but there was no significant alteration to the CAP-1 group (p>0.05). The substitution of CAP for 25% and 50% SBM in the diet did not have a significant effect on blood WBC, LYM, MID, GRA, RBC, PLT, and PCT indexes (p>0.05).

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal on blood routine of broiler chickens

Serum biochemistry

Table 7 presents the impact of replacing SBM with CAP on the serum biochemical indicators in broilers. No statistically significantly differences were observed for the TP, ALB, ALP, GLB, LDH, ALT, AST, LP, TG, total cholesterol, and BUN in the CON, CAP-1, and CAP-2 groups (p>0.05).

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal on serum parameters of broiler chickens

Serum antioxidant capacity

Table 8 shows the impact of CAP substitution for SBM on the serum antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens. The SOD activity of the CAP-2 group was increased compared to the CON and CAP-1 groups (p<0.05). Additionally, the levels of MDA content in the serum of both the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups were significantly lower compared to the CON group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference observed between the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups (p>0.05).

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal in the diet on serum antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens

Serum immunoglobulin content

The effect of CAP replacing SBM on the serum immunoglobulin content of broiler chickens is shown in Table 9. The study found that there was no significant difference in serum IgA levels between the CON and CAP-1 groups (p>0.05), but lower than the CAP-2 group (p<0.05). Compared to the CON group, the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups in serum IgG content were significantly increased (p<0.05), and the CAP-2 group higher than the CAP-1 group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant alteration in serum IgM content between the CON group and treatment groups (p>0.05).

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal in the diet on serum immunoglobulin content of broiler chickens

DISCUSSION

Soybean meal is the main source of protein for China’s feed industry, which mostly depends on imports from abroad and is greatly affected by prices [15]. In recent years, the price of SBM continues to rise, and the demand exceeds supply [16]. The search for a new, efficient, and sustainable protein source to replace SBM is crucial to address the shortage of feed protein resources, while use of CAP can be a significant solution to this issue. The present study systematically analyzed the chemical composition, amino acid composition and ileal digestibility of CAP in Arbor Acres broiler chickens. The protein content of CAP (84.77%) was significantly higher than that of SBM (43% or 46%), and the content of amino acids, such as Met (2.29%), Lys (7.74%), and Thr (3.69%), were also significantly increased, which is more in line with the requirements of broilers for amino acids [17]. Additionally, the ileal apparent protein digestibility (82.04%) and standardized protein digestibility (93.81%) indicated that the high content of protein in CAP was easily digested and absorbed by broilers. Amino acids are an essential part of protein, and the amino acids required for growth and development of broiler chickens are mainly provided by the feed [18,19]. Most of the amino acids in the terminal ileum are digested and absorbed in the small intestine, which can truly reflect the digestion and absorption of amino acids in animals [20]. This experiment showed that the ileal digestibility of Lys, Met, Arg, Ile, Leu, Thr, Val, Ala, Gly, Glu, Pro, Ser, Cys, and Asp in broiler CAP were significantly higher than that of SBM, while the digestibility of His was slightly lower than that of SBM [2]. In feed formulation, Lys serves as the reference amino acid for the ideal protein model and is considered the most crucial amino acid for broiler chickens [21]. Met is the first limiting amino acid for broiler chickens, and it is of great significance in improving the growth performance, feed efficiency, and survival rate of broilers [22]. Furthermore, dietary amino acids such as limiting amino acids (Lys, Met, Arg, Thr, His, Try, Val, Leu, Iso, and Phe) and non-limiting amino acids (Gly, Ser, Pro, Ala, Asp, Glu, Cys, and Tyr) are essential for health [2325]. Importantly, the experiment observed that the apparent metabolizable energy (4.2 kcal/g) and net energy (2.2 kcal/g) of CAP were superior to that of SBM [26]. Broiler metabolizable energy and net energy are important indicators for evaluating feed energy utilization efficiency [2729]. In summary, substituting CAP for SBM can improve the utilization rate of energy and amino acids in broilers, which confirms the feasibility of using CAP in broilers.

Several researchers have investigated the use of CAP as an effective protein source for fish [30]. For example, replacing fish meal with CAP in the diet can improve the performance of farmed species [31]. However, few studies have been conducted on CAP in poultry. Previous studies found that the CAP instead of 8% to 36% SBM significantly increased the ADFI of Cobb broilers, and decreased F/G in the early growth period (1 to 21 d) and reduced the F/G in overall study [7]. The study found that replacing 25% and 50% SBM with CAP had no significant impact on the growth performance of broilers aged 1 to 21 days. However, in the later growth period, broilers supplemented with CAP showed increased ADG and decreased ADFI and FCR. Throughout the entire growth period, broilers supplemented with CAP had significantly increased ADG and decreased ADFI and FCR compared to the CON group. The production performance in this experiment differed from previous ones due to a higher proportion of CAP replacing SBM. It is worth noting that the deviation of test results can also be caused by the difference between broiler breeds or the CAP additive amount. Meanwhile, the small intestine is not fully developed at the early stage of growth, which leads to low digestion and absorption capacity of nutrients, and ultimately affected the improvement of broiler growth performance [3234]. In comparison to SBM, CAP contains abundant amino acids that are easily absorbed by broilers, leading to positive growth performance in the late growth stage (22–42). Current production data suggests that increasing the amount of CAP in feed instead of SBM can further improve the performance of broiler chickens. As a result, the application of CAP in broiler chickens has significant potential for development.

Blood biochemical indicators are usually used to reflect changes in metabolism and organ function [35]. In this study, the replacement of SBM with 25% and 50% CAP significantly increased blood Hb and HCT levels in broilers. Hb and HCT are generally positively correlated with growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and immunity [36,37], which may be one of the reasons for improved broiler health. In contrast, the study found that the use of CAP-1 and CAP-2 did not have a significant impact on the serum biochemical indicators in broilers. This suggests that substituting SBM with 25% and 50% CAP as a protein supplement for broilers does not have any negative effects on their blood.

Broiler chickens are highly susceptible to feed, heat stress, and pathogen infection, resulting in a stress response in the early development of poultry [38,39]. Oxidative stress refers to the disruption of the balance between antioxidants and free radicals that generate various reactive oxygen species (ROS) [40,41]. ROS damages proteins and nucleic acids while producing a large amount of MDA, causing tissue damage, and reducing antioxidant capacity [42]. Antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and GSH-Px can remove excess ROS and maintain homeostasis in the internal environment [43,44]. In this study, the CAP-2 group significantly increased the SOD content in broiler serum. Serum MDA levels were significantly reduced in the CAP-1 and CAP-2 groups compared with CON group. This result is the same as previous studies [7], which showed that replacing SBM with 25% and 50% CAP significantly improved the antioxidant capacity of broilers, thereby reducing the damage caused by oxidative stress.

Previous studies have shown that increasing the antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens improves immune function [45]. IgA, IgM, and IgG are important immunoglobulins in broilers, which can resist viruses and toxins, protect the immune system, and maintain the health of the body [46,47]. IgG is secreted by plasma cells and has antiviral and antibacterial effects [40]. IgM has a strong bactericidal effect, activates antibodies, and regulates immune function [48]. As the first line of defense against pathogen invasion, IgA can slow down viral replication and improve intestinal barrier function [49]. Replacing SBM with 50% CAP significantly increased the serum IgA and IgG levels of broiler chickens, which may be enhance the immune function of broiler chickens by improving the intestinal mucosal barrier.

CONCLUSION

This experiment systematically analyzed the chemical composition, amino acid composition, and ileal digestibility of CAP, and confirmed the feasibility of using high-level CAP instead of SBM in Arbor Acres broilers. The results showed that the protein content and amino acid composition of CAP were more conducive to the growth and development of Arbor Acres broilers. Moreover, the present experiment showed that CAP could increase the ADG of broilers, reduce the ADFI and FCR. Furthermore, the CAP replacement of SBM significantly improved the antioxidant capacity and immune function in broilers. In summary, the CAP has shown a positive role as a new protein material to replace SBM for broiler chickens, which provides an application of a new direction for non-grain feed sources.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

FUNDING

Supported by National Key R&D Program Project (2023YFD 1301602) and Major Scientific Research Task of Science and Technology Innovation Engineering of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2023-IFR-11).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful for the support by Professor Yang Peilong and Meng Kun to design of the present study.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

The datasets analysed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

1. An SH, Kong C. Influence of dietary crude protein on growth performance and apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in corn-soybean meal-based diets fed to broilers. Poult Sci 2023;102:102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102505.
2. Qiu K, Wang XC, Wang J, et al. Comparison of amino acid digestibility of soybean meal, cottonseed meal, and low-gossypol cottonseed meal between broilers and laying hens. Anim Biosci 2023;36:619–28. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0073.
3. Yaqoob MU, Yousaf M, Imran S, et al. Effect of partially replacing soybean meal with sunflower meal with supplementation of multienzymes on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, ileal digestibility, digestive enzyme activity and caecal microbiota in broilers. Anim Biosci 2022;35:1575–84. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0553.
4. Jiang Q, Wu W, Wan Y, et al. Energy values evaluation and improvement of soybean meal in broiler chickens through supplemental mutienzyme. Poult Sci 2022;101:101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101978.
5. Schäfer L, Grundmann SM, Maheshwari G, et al. Effect of replacement of soybean oil by Hermetia illucens fat on performance, digestibility, cecal microbiome, liver transcriptome and liver and plasma lipidomes of broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2023;14:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00831-6.
6. Karim A, Gerliani N, Aïder M. Kluyveromyces marxianus: an emerging yeast cell factory for applications in food and biotechnology. Int J Food Microbiol 2020;333:108818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108818.
7. Wu Y, Wang J, Jia M, et al. Clostridium autoethanogenum protein inclusion in the diet for broiler: enhancement of growth performance, lipid metabolism, and gut microbiota. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1028792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1028792.
8. Norman ROJ, Millat T, Winzer K, Minton NP, Hodgman C. Progress towards platform chemical production using Clostridium autoethanogenum. Biochem Soc Trans 2018;46:523–35. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20170259.
9. Ma S, Liang X, Chen P, et al. A new single-cell protein from Clostridium autoethanogenum as a functional protein for largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Anim Nutr 2022;10:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2022.04.005.
10. Wei HC, Yu HH, Chen XM, et al. Effects of soybean meal replaced by Clostridium autoethanogenum protein on growth performance, plasma biochemical indexes and hepatopancreas and intestinal histopathology of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idllus). Chin J Anim Nutr 2018;30:4190–201.
11. Humphreys CM, McLean S, Schatschneider S, et al. Whole genome sequence and manual annotation of Clostridium autoethanogenum, an industrially relevant bacterium. BMC Genomics 2015;16:1085. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2287-5.
12. Yao W, Yang P, Zhang X, et al. Effects of replacing dietary fish meal with Clostridium autoethanogenum protein on growth and flesh quality of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture 2022;549:737770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737770.
13. Chen X, Zhao M, Zheng A, et al. Evaluation of the application value of cottonseed protein concentrate as a feed protein source in broiler chickens. Animals (Basel) 2023;13:3706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233706.
14. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry 9th rev edth ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.
15. Chen J, Niu X, Li F, Li F, Guo L. replacing soybean meal with distillers dried grains with solubles plus rumen-protected lysine and methionine: effects on growth performance, nutrients digestion, rumen fermentation, and serum parameters in Hu sheep. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082428.
16. Erdaw MM, Perez-Maldonado RA, Iji PA. Supplementation of broiler diets with high levels of microbial protease and phytase enables partial replacement of commercial soybean meal with raw, full-fat soybean. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2018;102:755–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12876.
17. Lagos LV, Stein HH. Chemical composition and amino acid digestibility of soybean meal produced in the United States, China, Argentina, Brazil, or India. J Anim Sci 2017;95:1626–36. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1440.
18. Siegert W, Ganzer C, Kluth H, Rodehutscord M. Effect of amino acid deficiency on precaecal amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2019;103:723–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13066.
19. He W, Li P, Wu G. Amino acid nutrition and metabolism in chickens. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:109–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54462-1_7.
20. Zhou J, Wang L, Yang G, Yang L, Zeng X, Qiao S. Pea starch increases the dry matter flow at the distal ileum and reduces the amino acids digestibility in ileal digesta collected after 4 hours postprandial of pigs fed low-protein diets. Anim Biosci 2022;35:1021–9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0354.
21. Jespersen JC, Richert S, Cesar de Paula Dorigam J, Oelschlager ML, Dilger RN. Effects of lysine biomass supplementation on growth performance and clinical indicators in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2021;100:100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.068.
22. Miao ZQ, Dong YY, Qin X, et al. Dietary supplementation of methionine mitigates oxidative stress in broilers under high stocking density. Poult Sci 2021;100:101231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101231.
23. Kumar CB, Gloridoss RG, Singh KC, Prabhu TM, Suresh BN. Performance of broiler chickens fed low protein, limiting amino acid supplemented diets formulated either on total or standardized ileal digestible amino acid basis. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:1616–24. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0648.
24. Cappelaere L, Le Cour Grandmaison J, Martin N, Lambert W. Amino acid supplementation to reduce environmental impacts of broiler and pig production: a review. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:689259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.689259.
25. Kidd MT, Maynard CW, Mullenix GJ. Progress of amino acid nutrition for diet protein reduction in poultry. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00568-0.
26. Liu W, Liu GH, Liao RB, et al. Apparent metabolizable and net energy values of corn and soybean meal for broiler breeding cocks. Poult Sci 2017;96:135–43. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew195.
27. Morgan NK, Keerqin C, Wallace A, Wu SB, Choct M. Effect of arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides and arabinoxylans on net energy and nutrient utilization in broilers. Anim Nutr 2019;5:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.05.001.
28. Xie K, He X, Hou DX, Zhang B, Song Z. Evaluation of nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of different sources of rice and rice milling byproducts in broilers. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071894.
29. Yu C, Yang W, Jiang S, Wang T, Yang Z. Effects of star anise (Illicium verum Hook.f.) essential oil administration under three different dietary energy levels on growth performance, nutrient, and energy utilization in broilers. Anim Sci J 2021;92:e13496. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13496.
30. Chen J, Wang H, Yuan H, et al. Effects of dietary Clostridium autoethanogenum protein on the growth, disease resistance, intestinal digestion, immunity and microbiota structure of Litopenaeus vannamei reared at different water salinities. Front Immunol 2022;13:1034994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1034994.
31. Yang P, Li X, Yao W, Li M, Wang Y, Leng X. Dietary effect of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein on growth, intestinal histology and flesh lipid metabolism of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) based on metabolomics. Metabolites 2022;12:1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12111088.
32. Shang Y, Kumar S, Oakley B, Kim WK. Chicken gut microbiota: importance and detection technology. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00254.
33. Hu Y, Wang L, Shao D, et al. Selectived and reshaped early dominant microbial community in the cecum with similar proportions and better homogenization and species diversity due to organic acids as AGP alternatives mediate their effects on broilers growth. Front Microbiol 2020;10:2948. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02948.
34. Zhang Q, Zhang S, Wu S, Madsen MH, Shi S. Supplementing the early diet of broilers with soy protein concentrate can improve intestinal development and enhance short-chain fatty acid-producing microbes and short-chain fatty acids, especially butyric acid. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2022;13:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00749-5.
35. Akter N, Islam MS, Zaman S, Jahan I, Hossain MA. The impact of different levels of L-methionine (L-Met) on carcass yield traits, serum metabolites, tibial characters, and profitability of broilers fed conventional diet. J Adv Vet Anim Res 2020;7:253–9. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2020.g417.
36. Attia YA, Al-Khalaifah H, Abd El-Hamid HS, Al-Harthi MA, Alyileili SR, El-Shafey AA. Antioxidant status, blood constituents and immune response of broiler chickens fed two types of diets with or without different concentrations of active yeast. Animals (Basel) 2022;12:453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040453.
37. Hassan MI, Khalifah AM, El Sabry MI, Mohamed AE, Hassan SS. Performance traits and selected blood constituents of broiler chicks as influenced by early access to feed post-hatch. Anim Biotechnol 2023;34:2855–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2124164.
38. Rehman ZU, Meng C, Sun Y, et al. Oxidative stress in poultry: lessons from the viral infections. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018;2018:5123147. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5123147.
39. Zaboli G, Huang X, Feng X, Ahn DU. How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality? - a review. Poult Sci 2019;98:1551–6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey399.
40. Zhang H, Yu X, Li Q, et al. Effects of rhamnolipids on growth performance, immune function, and cecal microflora in Linnan yellow broilers challenged with Lipopolysaccharides. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10:905. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080905.
41. Wang X, Wang C, Wang Z, et al. Antioxidant effect of taurine on chronic heat-stressed broilers. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022;1370:161–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93337-1_16.
42. Hu H, Bai X, Xu K, Zhang C, Chen L. Effect of phloretin on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters and antioxidant profile in heat-stressed broilers. Poult Sci 2021;100:101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101217.
43. Lauridsen C. From oxidative stress to inflammation: redox balance and immune system. Poult Sci 2019;98:4240–6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey407.
44. Liu SJ, Wang J, He TF, Liu HS, Piao XS. Effects of natural capsicum extract on growth performance, nutrient utilization, antioxidant status, immune function, and meat quality in broilers. Poult Sci 2021;100:101301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101301.
45. Bai K, Feng C, Jiang L, et al. Dietary effects of Bacillus subtilis fmbj on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, and its antioxidant capacity of broilers. Poult Sci 2018;97:2312–21. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey116.
46. Wang Y, Li L, Gou Z, et al. Effects of maternal and dietary vitamin A on growth performance, meat quality, antioxidant status, and immune function of offspring broilers. Poult Sci 2020;99:3930–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.044.
47. Liu T, Zhou J, Li W, et al. Effects of sporoderm-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum on growth performance, antioxidant function and immune response of broilers. Anim Nutr 2020;6:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2019.11.005.
48. Song ZH, Cheng K, Zheng XC, Ahmad H, Zhang LL, Wang T. Effects of dietary supplementation with enzymatically treated Artemisia annua on growth performance, intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities, immunity, and antioxidant capacity of heat-stressed broilers. Poult Sci 2018;97:430–7. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex312.
49. Iqbal Z, Kamran Z, Sultan JI, et al. Replacement effect of vitamin E with grape polyphenols on antioxidant status, immune, and organs histopathological responses in broilers from 1- to 35-d age. J Appl Poult Res 2015;24:127–34. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfv009.

Article information Continued

Table 1

The chemical composition, and amino acid composition of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein

Items1) CAP Soybean meal
Chemical composition (%, n = 6)
 DM 97.52 89.00
 CP 84.77 46.00
 EE 0.53 1.90
 CF 4.53 5.90
 Ash 5.80 6.10
Indispensable amino acids (%, n = 6)
 Lys 7.74 2.87
 Met 2.29 0.61
 Arg 2.63 3.23
 Thr 3.69 1.70
 His 1.87 1.18
 Try 0.52 0.57
 Val 4.98 2.24
 Leu 5.52 3.49
 Iso 4.96 1.82
 Phe 3.06 2.21
 Total IAA 37.36 19.92
Dispensable amino acids (%, n = 6)
 Gly 3.82 1.84
 Ser 3.54 1.78
 Pro 2.8 2.37
 Ala 9.39 1.96
 Asp 8.31 5.03
 Glu 8.96 8.11
 Cys 0.70 0.64
 Tyr 0.52 1.60
 Total DAA 38.04 23.33
Energy values (kcal/g, n = 6)
 AME 4.20 2.49
 NE 2.20 1.58

CAP, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; CF, crude fibre; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Arg, arginine; Thr, threonine; His, histidine; Try, tryptophan; Val, valine; Leu, leucine; Iso, isoleucine; Phe, phenylalanine; IAA, indispensable amino acids; Gly, glycine; Ser, serine; Pro, Proline; Ala, alanine; Asp, aspartic acid; Glu, glutamic; Cys, cystine; Tyr, tyrosine; DAA, dispensable amino acids; TIAA, total Indispensable amino acid; TDAA, total dispensable amino acid; AME, apparent metabolizable energy; NE, net energy.

Table 2

The dry matter and protein digestibility of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein in the broilers’ ileum

Items Digestibility
Apparent ileal digestibility of dry matter (n = 6)
 Dry matter (%) 88.69
Apparent ileal digestibility of protein (n = 6)
 Crude protein (%) 82.04
Standardized ileal digestibility of protein (n = 6)
 Crude protein (%) 93.81

Table 3

The apparent and standardized amino acid digestibility of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein in the broilers’ ileum (n = 6)

Amino acids Ileal amino acid digestibility

Apparent (%) Standardized (%)
Lysine 94.77 94.73
Methionine 92.12 92.24
Arginine 91.18 91.41
Histidine 78.11 78.42
Isoleucine 90.37 90.42
Leucine 90.53 90.54
Threonine 85.69 85.96
Valine 89.80 89.86
Alanine 89.32 89.24
Glycine 86.39 86.74
Glutamic acid 89.26 89.10
Proline 85.26 85.52
Serine 84.47 84.79
Cysteine 72.43 73.39
Aspartic acid 88.63 88.38

Table 4

Ingredients and nutrient content of experimental diets (%, as-is basis)

Items Contents

1 to 21 d 22 to 42 d


CON1) CAP-11) CAP-21) CON1) CAP-11) CAP-21)
Corn 55.18 59.36 62.48 58.02 61.77 65.60
46% Soybean meal 30.26 24.92 19.69 23.98 19.02 13.95
84.77% CAP 0.00 2.50 5.00 0.00 2.50 5.00
Vegetable oil 2.06 0.86 0.00 3.08 1.94 0.76
49.42% Peanut meal 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
DDGS 5.00 5.00 5.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
NaCl 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
CaHPO4 1.73 1.75 1.79 1.44 1.47 1.50
Limestone 1.41 1.44 2.02 1.20 1.23 1.26
L-Lysine 0.39 0.30 0.21 0.37 0.28 0.19
DL-Methionine 0.32 0.21 0.13 0.28 0.17 0.11
L-Threonine 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
L-Tryptophan 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
Choline chloride 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.15
Premix2) 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
Nutrients3)
 Digestive energy (kcal/kg) 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,100
 Crude protein 20.50 20.50 20.50 18.50 18.50 18.50
 Calcium (%) 1.000 1.000 1.198 0.850 0.850 0.850
 Phosphorus 0.679 0.660 0.641 0.624 0.607 0.589
 Nonphytate phosphorus 0.450 0.450 0.450 0.420 0.420 0.420
 Lysine (%) 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.100 1.100 1.100
 Methionine (%) 0.632 0.553 0.500 0.566 0.490 0.450
 Threonine (%) 0.800 0.800 0.803 0.720 0.720 0.720
 Methionine+Cysteine (%) 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.850 0.850 0.885
 Tryptophan (%) 0.260 0.240 0.240 0.221 0.201 0.200

CAP, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein; DDGS, dry distillers grains with solubles.

1)

CON group, basal diet in control group; CAP-1 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 25% soybean meal in the diets; CAP-2 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 50% soybean meal in the diets.

2)

The premix provided the following per kilogram diet: (1 to 21 d) vitamin A 10,000 IU, vitamin D3 2,000 IU, vitamin E 10 IU, vitamin K3 2.5 mg, vitamin B1 1.8 mg, vitamin B2 4 mg, vitamin B3 50 mg, vitamin B5 11 mg, vitamin B9 0.5 mg, vitamin B12 0.7 mg, biotin 0.12 mg, Cu (as copper sulfate) 8 mg, Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 80 mg, Mn (as manganese sulfate) 60 mg, Zn (as zinc sulfate) 80 mg, Se (as sodium selenite) 0.15 mg, I (as potassium iodide) 0.35 mg. (22 to 42 d) vitamin A 8,000 IU, vitamin D3 1,500 IU, vitamin E 8 IU, vitamin K3 2.0 mg, vitamin B1 1.5 mg, vitamin B2 3 mg, vitamin B3 40 mg, vitamin B5 9 mg, vitamin B9 0.4 mg, vitamin B12 0.6 mg, biotin 0.10 mg, Cu (as copper sulfate) 6 mg, Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 60 mg, Mn (as manganese sulfate) 50 mg, Zn (as zinc sulfate) 60 mg, Se (as sodium selenite) 0.12 mg, I (as potassium iodide) 0.30 mg.

3)

Digestive energy, amino acids, calcium, phosphorus, and nonphytate phosphorus are calculated values, while other values are measured values.

Table 5

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal on growth performance of broiler chickens

Items Group1) SEM p-value

CON CAP-1 CAP-2
1 to 21 d
 ADG (g) 31.99 30.58 31.02 0.648 0.543
 ADFI (g/d) 46.89 45.91 46.87 0.926 0.482
 FCR 1.51 1.50 1.51 0.038 0.892
22 to 42 d
 ADG (g) 68.65b 75.04a 73.01ab 1.063 0.038
 ADFI (g/d) 87.60a 84.53b 79.55c 3.391 <0.001
 FCR 1.28a 1.13b 1.09b 0.046 0.035
1 to 42 d
 ADG (g) 50.32b 52.81a 52.02a 1.162 0.032
 ADFI (g/d) 67.25a 65.22b 63.21c 1.611 <0.001
 FCR 1.34a 1.23b 1.22b 0.021 0.021

SEM, standard error of the mean; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion rate.

1)

CON group, basal diet in control group; CAP-1 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 25% soybean meal in the diets; CAP-2 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 50% soybean meal in the diets.

a–c

Means followed by different letters in a row differ significantly (p<0.05).

Table 6

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal on blood routine of broiler chickens

Items Group1) SEM p-value

CON CAP-1 CAP-2
WBC (109/L) 111.22 115.07 113.3 1.258 0.485
LYM (109/L) 63.57 61.13 61.8 0.452 0.065
MID (109/L) 15.84 16.48 16.14 0.213 0.498
GRA (109/L) 31.81 37.46 35.37 1.350 0.235
RBC (1012/L) 2.59 2.76 2.85 0.052 0.115
Hb (g/L) 95.33b 106.67a 109.83a 2.415 0.024
HCT (L/L) 0.235b 0.256ab 0.269a 0.006 0.029
PLT (109/L) 14.17 16.5 9.33 1.538 0.153
PCT (L/L) 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.002 0.176

SEM, standard error of the mean; WBC, white blood cell count; LYM, lymphocyte absolute value; MID, intermediate cell absolute value; GRA, granulocyte absolute value; RBC, red blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; PLT, platelet count; PCT, platelet count.

1)

CON group, basal diet in control group; CAP-1 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 25% soybean meal in the diets; CAP-2 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 50% soybean meal in the diets.

a,b

Means followed by different letters in a row differ significantly (p<0.05).

Table 7

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal on serum parameters of broiler chickens

Items Group1) SEM p-value

CON CAP-1 CAP-2
TP (mg/mL) 115.04 107.55 122.67 4.413 0.399
ALB (mg/mL) 36.63 35.44 39.12 1.715 0.697
ALP (ng/mL) 122.1 148.68 145.46 0.065 0.149
GLB (g/L) 21.25 22.83 25.66 1.158 0.308
LDH (ng/mL) 10.92 12.28 14.39 0.623 0.062
ALT (mmoL/L) 124.71 184.26 156.76 11.569 0.104
AST (ng/mL) 260.05 250.97 258.11 10.680 0.943
LP (μg/mL) 287.78 264.87 298.83 13.166 0.590
TG (mg/mL) 0.43 0.47 0.51 0.023 0.437
T-CHO (μmol/dL) 961.4 1,043.7 1,141.2 55.390 0.441
BUN (mg/mL) 938.8 1,019.2 1,114.4 54.094 0.441

SEM, standard error of the mean; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GLB, globulin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; LP, lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; T-CHO, total cholesterol; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.

1)

CON group, basal diet in control group; CAP-1 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 25% soybean meal in the diets; CAP-2 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 50% soybean meal in the diets.

Table 8

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal in the diet on serum antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens

Items Group1) SEM p-value

CON CAP-1 CAP-2
T-AOC (U/mL) 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.007 0.441
SOD (U/mL) 218.94b 252.49b 331.94a 16.662 0.008
MDA (nmoL/mL) 12.28a 9.92b 9.98b 0.401 0.012
GSH-Px (U/mL) 147.01 135.47 135.48 4.128 0.446

n = 6.

SEM, standard error of the mean; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase.

1)

CON group, basal diet in control group; CAP-1 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 25% soybean meal in the diets; CAP-2 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 50% soybean meal in the diets.

a,b

In the same row, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p<0.05).

Table 9

Effects of Clostridium autoethanogenum protein substitute for soybean meal in the diet on serum immunoglobulin content of broiler chickens

Items (μg/mL) Group1) SEM p-value

CON CAP-1 CAP-2
IgA 142.35b 165.59b 207.92a 10.686 0.007
IgM 614.95 629.39 640.34 9.859 0.103
IgG 1,328.03c 1,450.93b 1,769.05a 66.852 <0.001

n = 6.

SEM, standard error of the mean; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IgG, immunoglobulin G.

1)

CON group, basal diet in control group; CAP-1 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 25% soybean meal in the diets; CAP-2 group, Clostridium autoethanogenum protein replaces 50% soybean meal in the diets.

a–c

In the same row, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p<0.05).