The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of condensed tannin from black acacia (Acacia mearnsii) as a substitute additive for zinc oxide and growth-promoting antibiotics on the performance, digestibility, and intestinal health of piglets in the nursery phase.

Methods

A total of 200 PIC piglets that were 22 days old and weighed 6.0±0.9 kg were subjected to four treatments in the nursery phase (22 to 64 days of age): CONTR (control diet); ENR+ZnO (control diet + 10 mg/kg of enramycin + 2,500 mg/kg of zinc oxide during the first 21 days); BUT (control diet + 900 mg/kg of sodium butyrate) and TAN (control diet + 2,000 mg/kg of condensed tannin). The experimental design was a randomized block with 4 treatments and 10 replicates, with a pen of five animals each as the experimental unit. The zootechnical performance, diarrhea index score, dietary digestibility and metagenomics of the deep rectum microbiota were evaluated.

Results

The TAN had greater weight gain in the nursery phase and final weight (p<0.05) than the CONTR (394 vs 360 g/d, and 22.6 vs 21.1 kg, respectively), with these values being intermediate for the ENR+ZnO and BUT (365 and 382 g/d, and 21.3 and 22.1 kg, respectively). There was no difference between treatments for semi-liquid diarrhea (score 2), but CONTR had more cases of severe diarrhea (score 3; p<0.05) than ENR+ZnO, BUT and TAN, with 42, 18, 29, and 21 cases, respectively. The treatments had no impact on rare taxa or the relative abundances of taxonomic groups (uniformity), but the use of TAN promoted an increase in the abundances of Brevibacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. compared to the other treatments (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of condensed tannin from black wattle as a performance-enhancing additive was effective, with effects on performance and intestinal health, demonstrating its potential as a substitute for zinc oxide and enramycin in the diets of piglets in nursery phase.

Keywords: Additives; Digestibility; Intestinal Microbiota; Sodium Butyrate; Tannin

INTRODUCTION

Modern swine farming, even with innovative technologies, results in unavoidable stressful conditions at the time of weaning, limiting the digestion and absorption of nutrients, water, and electrolytes, in addition to impairing the protective barrier of the gastrointestinal tract [1]. Consequently, intestinal permeability increases, which favours the establishment of pathogens such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), increasing the frequency of cases of diarrhea [2].

Antibiotics have been used for decades in prophylactic conditions or as growth promoters, effectively addressing the limitations and challenges inherent in the post-weaning period by promoting improved weight gain and feed conversion ratio, and reducing diarrhea and mortality in nursery piglets [2,3]. However, their use presents significant risks, including the selection and multiplication of resistant pathogens [4], masking of subclinical conditions that lead to decreased performance, and potential risks to human health, resulting in their global banishment [3]. Similarly, zinc oxide, commonly used at doses between 2,000 and 3,000 mg/kg to reduce the symptoms and severity of post-weaning diarrhea, has proven to be highly effective. Nevertheless, its high-dose use poses an environmental risk [5], as a substantial portion of the zinc (60% to 80%) is excreted in the feces [6], leading to bans on its use at high concentrations in many countries [3].

The use of alternative additives as substitutes for antimicrobials is gaining ground within the swine industry, aiming for similar or superior results compared to antimicrobials and zinc oxide without posing risks to animals, the environment, or humans. In this context, tannins, which are naturally occurring polyphenolic compounds found in various plant species, have emerged as a promising alternative additive due to their astringent, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties. They can be divided into two categories: hydrolysable and condensed tannins, each offering unique benefits and applications [7]. Condensed tannins, or proanthocyanidins, are polymers of flavonoids that are not susceptible to hydrolysis and are consequently poorly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract [8]. This class of tannins is found in many vegetables, particularly in black wattle (Acacia mearnsii), a tree native to Australia that is among the richest sources of this compound [9].

Regarding its potential as a feed additive for production animals, tannins act as a performance enhancer by optimizing protein metabolism, increasing the absorption of amino acids, and due to factors associated with improved intestinal health [10]. Their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties may help modulate the intestinal microbiota, reducing the incidence of diarrhea, especially in the post-weaning phase, when the animal is more vulnerable to this condition [10]. The antimicrobial effects of tannins result from distinct actions that include structural or functional changes in the bacterial membrane, damage to the physicochemical properties mainly linked to the hydrophobicity of the bacterial cell surface [11] and competition that they exert with signalling molecules of the bacterial membrane receptors involved with quorum sensing [12].

In swine, tannin use is not as popular as other alternative additives; however, Girard et al [13], when using 1% chestnut tannin extract, were successful in controlling diarrhea in piglets challenged with E. coli ETEC F4, and Ma et al [14], using tannin from quebracho (Schinopsis lorentzii) for nursery piglets, also found an improvement in the incidence of diarrhea, with positive repercussions on intestinal morphometry. In turn, Biagi et al [15], evaluating increasing doses of Brazil nut (Castanea sativa mill) tannin for weaner piglets, found positive effects on health and performance compared to a group that did not receive this additive.

Given the widespread use of butyrate and other acids as feed additives to replace antibiotics as growth promoters and zinc oxide [16], particularly following European restrictions on these substances—and considering the systematic use of enramycin in conjunction with zinc oxide in major pig-producing countries such as China and the USA for controlling diarrhea in piglets [17], this study explores alternative solutions. Recognizing the diverse sources and limited information available on the potential of condensed tannins for production and animal health, we hypothesized that the use of condensed tannin from black wattle (A. mearnsii) could effectively replace these traditional additives. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of black wattle extract in enhancing performance, controlling diarrhea, improving digestibility, and modulating the intestinal microbiota as compared to the established treatments of enramycin with zinc oxide and sodium butyrate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics committee

All procedures performed in this study were previously reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Research and Experimental Animals of Akei Animal Research; the approval reference number is 014/20.

Animals

A total of 200 piglets, half castrated males and half females, of the PIC genetic line (Camborough X AG 337) that had an average age of 22 days, and a live weight of 6.0±0.9 kg were used.

Experimental design and treatments

The experimental design was randomized blocks (which were formed based on the initial weights of the animals and sex), with four treatments and 10 replicates per treatment. A pen with five animals of the same sex formed the experimental unit. The animals had free access to feeds and water throughout the experimental period (22 to 64 days of age), and the nutritional program [18] was divided into four phases: pre-initial I (22 to 29 days), pre-initial II (29 to 43 days), initial I (43 to 50 days) and initial II (50 to 64 days; Table 1). The following treatments were applied within each nutritional phase: CONTR, control diet (free of growth promoting additives); ENR+ZnO, control diet with the addition of antibiotics (10 mg/kg enramycin) + 2,500 mg/kg zinc oxide in pre-initial phases I and II; BUT, control diet with the addition of 900 mg/kg sodium butyrate; TAN, control diet with the addition of condensed tannins (2,000 mg/kg).

Table 1

Composition and nutritional values of the rations used in the experimental procedures for the pre-initial I and II and initial I and II phases (as-is basis)

In the TAN treatment, extract of the black wattle (A. mearnsii) plant was added to the rations with the product Tanfeed, which contains approximately 47.8% tannin. This served as a source of condensed tannins at a concentration of 2,000 mg/kg. The tannin dose was based on Caprarulo et al [10] review.

Experimental management

Piglets were weighed at 0, 7, 21, 28, and 42 d of experiment individually to calculate the average daily gain (ADG). Feed intake was recorded during the experimental period for each pen every two weeks to calculate the average daily feed intake (ADFI). The ADG:ADFI (G:F) for each pen was calculated subsequently.

The diarrhea score was determined daily and classified as follows: 0, stools of normal consistency; 1, soft stools; 2, pasty stools; and 3, aqueous stools [19]. The diarrhea severity index was calculated according to the equation:

Diarrhea severity index=sum of diarrhea scores (2: pasty and 3: aqueous stools)number of total animals evaulated that day (42 days×50 pigles)

On the 21st day of the experiment, feces were collected from the deep rectum using a swab. Forty animals were sampled, and one animal from each replicate was randomly chosen. The content (approximately 2 g) was transferred to an Eppendorf tube, which was refrigerated for maintenance and immediately frozen at −80°C. The samples were subjected to metagenomic analysis using the ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep kit from Zymo Research (No. D6010; Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) to extract DNA from the samples, following the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. The extracted DNA was quantified by spectrophotometry at 260 nm (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). To evaluate the integrity of the extracted DNA, all samples were run by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

A segment of approximately 460 bases of the V3–V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA ribosomal gene was amplified using universal primers and the following PCR conditions: 95°C for 3 min; 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; followed by a step at 72°C for 5 min. The metagenomic library was constructed from these amplicons using the Nextera DNA Library Preparation Kit from Illumina (No. FC-131-1096; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The amplicons were pooled and subsequently sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer (No. SY-410-1003; Illumina, USA) [20].

The sequencer readings were analysed on the quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME) platform [21]. The sequences were classified into bacterial genera through the recognition of operational taxonomic units (OTUs), in this case, the homology between the sequences and those in a database. The 2017 update (SILVA 128) of the SILVA ribosomal sequence database [22] was used to compare the sequences.

At 42 days of age, during initial phase I, the animals were subjected to experimental diets containing 0.3% chromic oxide as an indigestible marker. This decision aligns with findings by Tang et al [23], who noted that intestinal barrier function is impaired at the beginning of weaning but begins to recover after two weeks. An adaptation period of at least 5 days was necessary for accurate digestibility measurements in pigs fed diets with 1.8% to 3.3% crude fiber. Previous studies indicate that fecal chromium concentrations stabilize by day 5, ensuring consistent apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) values [24,25]. After 5 days of consumption of each of these diets, feces were collected from the animals for three consecutive days, totaling one pool of feces per pen, with a volume of approximately 500 g. Afterwards, the feces were stored at −20°C until they were dried in a forced ventilation oven at 62°C for 72 h. The samples were subjected to determination of dry matter, performed by drying in a forced air oven (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 105°C for 6 h (method 934.01); ash and crude protein, analysed using the methods 942.15 and 990.03, respectively [26]; and gross energy, determined by an automatic adiabatic oxygen pump calorimeter (Parr 1281, Automatic Energy Analyzer; Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). The chromium content in the diets and feces was measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). With these data, the ATTD [27] in initial phase I was calculated using the following equation:

ATTD (%)=100-[(%Chromiumfeces%Chromiumfeed)×(%Nfeces%Nfeed)×100]

Where, %Chromium_feces is the percentage of the chromium indicator in the feces; %Chromium_feed is the percentage of the chromium indicator in the feed; %N_feces is the percentage of the nutrient in the feces; %N_feed is the percentage of the nutrient in the feed.

Statistical analyses

In this study, the experimental design was a randomized complete block design, considering the sex (male and female) and initial weight of the piglets as blocking factors. These factors were used to classify piglets into five weight categories, aiming to ensure homogeneity within each block. The fixed effects in the model included the treatment itself, the block defined by sex and weight category, and the interaction between treatment and block. Random effects were accounted for by the variability between pens within each block, recognizing that individual pen characteristics might influence outcomes. The statistical model was:

Yijkl=μ+τi+βj+(τβ)ij+γk(j)+ɛijkl

In the statistical model employed, Y_ijkl denotes the observed measurement, where μ represents the overall mean. The fixed effects are captured by τ_i, which represents the effect of the ith treatment, and β_j, which denotes the effect of the jth block, such as sex and weight categories. The interaction between these treatments and blocks is expressed as (τβ)_ij. The model also includes random effects, denoted by γk(j), which account for the variability among pens within each block. Lastly, ε_ijkl captures the residual error for the lth observation in the kth pen of the jth block under the ith treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using R statistical software, version 3.5.0. Means were compared using Tukey's test, and differences were considered statistically significant at a p-value of ≤0.05. Trends were noted where p-values ranged between 0.05 and 0.10. Additionally, Chi-square tests were used to compare the frequency of diarrhea across treatments, applying the same criteria for significance.

The differences in the alpha diversity observed and relative abundance between the groups were estimated by the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the differences between the different treatments were estimated by post-hoc Dunn test. The effect of treatments on beta diversity was assessed between groups using permutational multivariate analysis of variance [28], with multiple comparisons corrected by the Bonferroni test.

RESULTS

The phase-by-phase zootechnical performance throughout the experimental period is shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between treatments during the pre-initial phase I (22 to 29 days of age). However, during the pre-initial phase II (29 to 43 days of age), the treatment with TAN showed significant improvements over the CONTR group in several zootechnical parameters: ADFI (p = 0.041), ADG (p = 0.006), G:F (p = 0.007), and body weight (p = 0.036). Additionally, there were trends indicating better body weight at the end of the initial phase I (p = 0.067) and at the end of the experiment (p = 0.085), as well as improved ADG over the entire nursery phase (p = 0.067).

Table 2

Means (±SEM) of average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) and initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW), according to the experimental phases and throughout the study period

Relative to the other treatments (ENR+ZnO and BUT), the results were intermediate and similar to those of the other groups (CONTR and TAN), mainly for ADG considering the total test period and final weight, with some specific advantages for the ADFI (p = 0.041) and ADG (p = 0.006) compared to the CONTR in pre-initial phase II.

Table 3 shows the cases and severity of diarrhea throughout the study period, with significant reductions in the most severe score and in the total score (scores 2 plus 3) for all treatments that received additives compared to the CONTR group (p<0.001).

Table 3

Incidences and severity of diarrhea, according to the treatments

The evaluation of the alpha diversity of the microbiota of the feces from the deep rectum, demonstrated by the Chao1 bias-corrected index (Figure 1A) and Shannon entropy (Figure 1B), indicated that the treatments with additives did not affect either the number of different species in each group (richness), including the rare species, or the relative abundance of each taxonomic group present in the samples (uniformity).

Figure 1

Chao1’s alpha diversity index (A). Shannon’s alpha diversity index (B). Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn test were performed (p>0.05). CONTR, control diet (free of growth promoting additives); ENR+ZnO, control diet with the addition of antibiotics (10 mg/kg enramycin) + 2,500 mg/kg zinc oxide in pre-initial phases I and II; BUT, control diet with the addition of 900 mg/kg sodium butyrate; TAN, control diet with the addition of 2,000 mg/kg condensed tannins. Chao1's alpha diversity index measures the richness of the microbial community, estimating the total number of species present in a sample. Shannon’s alpha diversity index quantifies the diversity within microbial communities, considering both abundance and evenness of the species present.

When analyzing the beta diversity (Figure 2A and 2B), there was no formation of sample clusters according to treatment when considering the phylogenetic dissimilarity and abundance of the identified taxa, confirming the absence of significant differences between treatments.

Figure 2

Weighted Unifrac Beta Diversity distance measures (A). Bray-Curtis Beta Diversity dissimilarity measures (B). Ellipses were automatically plotted with ggforce R package. CONTR, control diet (free of growth promoting additives); ENR+ZnO, control diet with the addition of antibiotics (10 mg/kg enramycin) + 2,500 mg/kg zinc oxide in pre-initial phases I and II; BUT, control diet with the addition of 900 mg/kg sodium butyrate; TAN, control diet with the addition of 2,000 mg/kg condensed tannins. Weighted UniFrac beta diversity distance measures: This index assesses the similarity between microbial communities, taking into account both the phylogenetic distances and the relative abundances of different species present. Bray-Curtis beta diversity dissimilarity measures: This measure quantifies the dissimilarity between two microbial communities based on the counts of species they contain. Unlike UniFrac, Bray-Curtis does not consider phylogenetic relationships and is purely a measure of species abundance and composition differences.

For the distribution of each experimental group, there was no prevalence of any representative of the taxonomic groups (classes, orders, families, and quantified genera) among the treatments; however, greater abundances were found at the family and genus levels for the CONTR and ENR+ZnO. As shown in Figure 3, the family Coriobacteriaceae (Figure 3A) and the genus Actinomyces (Figure 3B) were the most abundant taxa in the treatment that did not receive any additive promoting intestinal performance and health (CONTR). Similarly, the abundance of Actinomyces was higher in the CONTR group compared to the ENR+ZnO and BUT groups (p<0.001). As shown in Figure 4A, the family Peptostreptococcaceae was more abundant in the animals that received ENR+ZnO compared to the CONTR and BUT groups (p = 0.046). The abundance of the genus Methanobrevibacter was similar across all treatments (Figure 4B). In contrast, Figure 5A shows that Brevibacillus spp. were more abundant in the TAN group compared to the CONTR, ENR+ZnO, and BUT groups (p<0.001). Meanwhile, Figure 5B indicates that Enterococcus spp. showed no difference in abundance between the TAN, BUT, and CONTR groups, but the abundance was decreased in the ENR+ZnO group (p = 0.030).

Figure 3

Proportion of sequences from Coriobacteriaceae in tested groups (A). Proportion of sequences from Actinomyces in tested groups (B). Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn test were performed (p<0.05). CONTR, control diet (free of growth promoting additives); ENR+ZnO, control diet with the addition of antibiotics (10 mg/kg enramycin) + 2,500 mg/kg zinc oxide in pre-initial phases I and II; BUT, control diet with the addition of 900 mg/kg sodium butyrate; TAN, control diet with the addition of 2,000 mg/kg condensed tannins.

Figure 4

Proportion of sequences from Peptostreptococcaceae in tested groups (A). Proportion of sequences from Methanobrevibacter in tested groups (B). Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn test were performed (p<0.05). CONTR, control diet (free of growth promoting additives); ENR+ZnO, control diet with the addition of antibiotics (10 mg/kg enramycin) + 2,500 mg/kg zinc oxide in pre-initial phases I and II; BUT, control diet with the addition of 900 mg/kg sodium butyrate; TAN, control diet with the addition of 2,000 mg/kg condensed tannins.

Figure 5

Proportion of sequences from Brevibacillus in tested groups (A). Proportion of sequences from Enterococcus in tested groups (B). Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn test were performed (p<0.05). CONTR, control diet (free of growth promoting additives); ENR+ZnO, control diet with the addition of antibiotics (10 mg/kg enramycin) + 2,500 mg/kg zinc oxide in pre-initial phases I and II; BUT, control diet with the addition of 900 mg/kg sodium butyrate; TAN, control diet with the addition of 2,000 mg/kg condensed tannins.

Table 4 shows the digestibility coefficients of the dry matter, crude protein, mineral matter and gross energy of the experimental diets. No differences were observed between TAN and the other treatments. Only the ENR+ZnO showed an improvement in the index (p = 0.011) of mineral matter digestibility compared to the CONTR and BUT treatments, although ENR+ZnO did not differ from the group that received TAN.

Table 4

Means of the apparent total tract digestibility (%) of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), mineral matter (MM) and gross energy (GE) of initial phase I according to the experimental treatments

DISCUSSION

The benefits of the use of condensed tannin of black wattle (A. mearnsii) for growth performance of pigs indicate that this active ingredient was effective for the parameters investigated, as demonstrated by the results of this study (Table 2). The findings indicate that, depending on the characteristics of the molecule and dose used, the risk that tannins may be an inhibitor of feed consumption due to its rancid odour and bitter taste, in addition to constituting an antinutritional factor, is not valid [29]. Such ideas, which led to a negative perception about the molecule, result from its use at high concentrations and from tannins with different molecular bases [30].

Therefore, the results of this study confirm that to achieve the benefits we observed, the chemical structure, origin and dosage of the tannin used must be taken into account. Working with 1% chestnut tannin extract for prevention in piglets challenged or not by E. coli F4, Girard et al [13] observed no reduction in the feed intake of the animals, showing that there was no antinutritional effect due to the tannins. These results were also observed in our study.

The positive responses obtained with the condensed black wattle (A. mearnsii) tannins (TAN) are also due to the good feed intake among pigs in the group given this additive, which is outstanding relative to the feed intake in other treatments, with significant advantages compared to the CONTR group in the phase between 29 and 44 days of age (Table 2). In the study by Ma et al [14], the inclusion of up to 0.3% quebracho tannin in piglet feed did not affect feed intake or weight gain. These results, which differ from those obtained for TAN, may be related to the amount and type of tannin used, age of the animals, basal diet ingredients and state of hygiene and storage.

Regarding feed consumption, a meta-analytic study suggests that low concentrations of tannins from various sources can enhance this zootechnical parameter, positively impacting performance in weaned piglets [31]. This benefit is believed to stem from the ability of tannins to form complexes with macromolecules and proline-rich protein compounds, which remain stable across different pH levels in the digestive tract. This increases the efficiency of nutrient utilization from the diet and mitigates the negative impact on palatability and feed consumption [32,33].

The positive results observed in the zootechnical performance of pigs treated with TAN, as detailed in Table 2, are particularly noteworthy because they are comparable to those of ENR+ZnO and BUT, which are both recognized and widely used additives. These effects can be attributed to the beneficial impact of tannins on protein metabolism, which enhances amino acid absorption and improves intestinal health, aligning with the findings of several studies [29,34]. In addition, the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties of tannins should be considered, as they may help in the modulation of intestinal microbiota, reducing the incidence of diarrhea, especially in the post-weaning phase, when animals are more vulnerable to this condition [10].

Our results are similar to those obtained by Biagi et al [15], who added 1.13, 2.25, and 4.5 g of nut (Castanea sativa mill) tannin per kilogram of feed for weaner piglets. Compared to a group that did not receive this additive, an improvement in feed efficiency, a reduction in caecal ammonia concentrations and a promotion of health status were observed; the authors attributed these effects to the antimicrobial properties of the tannins and the inhibitory effects they have on bacterial toxins. In our study, the concentration of ammonia in the cecum was not recorded, but no difference was observed in the abundance of the Methanobrevibacter family, the main dominant phylotype of methanogenic bacteria in swine [35].

Our results demonstrate that TAN is as effective as additives containing ENR+ZnO and BUT in terms of zootechnical performance, showing similar effects on performance parameters. Although enramycin helps modulate intestinal bacteria against gram-positive bacteria and zinc oxide acts as an enzyme cofactor that aids in diarrhea prevention [36], these additives did not achieve higher performance indices than those obtained with TAN. Comparing the results of the group that received TAN with the group treated with BUT, a product widely used as an alternative to growth-promoting antibiotics, whose actions include improving performance and intestinal health and controlling diarrhea [37], a similar pattern of results was verified.

All the treatments that received additives (ENR+ZnO, BUT, and TAN) had a reduced incidence and severity of diarrhea (Table 3). The results observed for tannins were similar to those observed by Girard et al [13], who studied piglets that received an oral suspension of ETEC F4 and noted that the addition of 1% chestnut tannin extract reduced the mean faecal score, the percentage of piglets with diarrhea and the duration of diarrhea. However, it is not sufficient to reduce the shedding of E. coli. The authors also emphasize that increasing the dose of tannin extract may improve its efficiency in controlling diarrheal conditions, but attention should be given to the possible antinutritional effects on protein digestion or on changes in palatability of the feed due to the use of higher doses.

Condensed tannins, also known as proanthocyanidins, are flavonoid polymers, compounds known to have biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, anti-carcinogenic, antiviral and antibacterial activities; these effects are determined by the antioxidant properties of the molecules [38]. These qualities may explain the positive effects we observed on the control of diarrhea with the use of this molecule.

According to Ma et al [14], who used tannins from quebracho (Schinopsis lorentzii) for nursery pigs, supplementation with 0.3% of this commercial extract reduced the incidence of diarrhea among piglets weaned early, promoting increases in the jejunal villi height and crypt depth and a reduction in the colonic mucosa. The improvement in the diarrhea index was associated with low neutrophil levels, which are directly related to intestinal homeostasis and diseases, representing a key component of the innate response during an inflammatory reaction [39].

In the control of diarrhea, it should be noted that phenolic compounds not only have an antimicrobial action due to the structural or functional damage they confer to bacterial cell membranes [11], but also can affect the physicochemical properties of species by affecting the bacterial cell surface, mainly due to its hydrophobicity, in addition to altering the electron acceptors and polar and nonpolar components of bacteria [40]. Another antimicrobial effect of condensed tannins is achieved through competition with signalling molecules, such as acyl homoserine lactone, which bind to receptors on the bacterial membrane involved in quorum. This condition is currently of great importance, as this process (quorum sensing) does not determine bacterial resistance [12,41].

Regarding the metagenomic evaluation, the absence of differences in the alpha and beta diversities between the treatments shows that the additives did not results in a sufficient stimulus to modulate these traits. However, when analysing taxa with greater abundances, Coriobacteriaceae and Actinomyces were respectively the most abundant family and genus in the CONTR treatment (Figure 3), being the first an opportunistic pathogen related to post-infection conditions [42], and the second positively correlated with the concentration of putrescine [43], an amine related to intestinal disorders.

The abundances of the family Peptostreptococcaceae and the genus Methanobrevibacter were higher in the ENR+ZnO compared with CONTR and BUT, but it was similar to TAN (Figure 4A and 4B, respectively). The Peptostreptococcaceae family is associated with weight gain in pigs [44] and is observed in greater abundance in animals with better intestinal health [45], even in cases with lower feed intake. However, this action was not observed to the TAN treatment.

In turn, the abundance of the Methanobrevibacter family was similar between treatments, not exerting any favors regarding the modulation of ammonia production. These findings are different from Min et al [46], who observed a proportional increase in this family according to the concentration of tannins in the diet. It can be attributed that the diversity of the tannin source and the concentration used in our work did not favor the greater abundance of Methanobrevibacter.

Regarding the TAN treatment, it influenced specific modulations, notably increasing the abundance of the genus Brevibacillus spp. as shown in Figure 5A, compared to the other treatments. However, the abundance of Enterococcus spp. in the TAN group did not differ from the BUT and CONTR groups, as illustrated in Figure 5B. The genus Brevibacillus has the ability to biotransform tannins of plant origin [48] in addition to having a probiotic effect [47], observed especially in some species of the genus (B. laterosporus and B. brevis) [48], as well as a recognized inhibitory effect against L. monocytogenes [49]. Additionally, B. brevis is closely related to improved feed conversion and performance of nursery piglets [50].

The genus Enterococcus was also more abundant in the TAN treatment. In this context, within some species, such as E. cecorum and E. durans, Enterococcus has been highlighted for the advantages it has in the control of diarrheal conditions in animals [51]. Additionally, the species E. faecium has a particular probiotic effect that is related to the production of organic acids [52].

In contrast, tannins from Brazil nut (Castanea sativa mill) showed a positive effect, determined by the tendency to increase viable lactobacilli in the jejunum; however, there was no influence on caecal lactobacilli [15]. At the same time, the caecal coliform count showed a tendency to increase, while clostridia and enterococci were not affected by supplementation [15].

Tannins are a group of water-soluble polyphenols, categorized as hydrolyzable and non-hydrolyzable (condensed), each possessing distinct antibacterial activities [53]. Their effects also depend on their composition, which is influenced by the plant of origin and the extraction method of the substance [54]. For these reasons, the modulation of lactic acid bacteria, especially lactobacilli, may vary between studies, leading to inconsistent responses across different research. The modulation of the intestinal microbiota is a function of condensed tannins, resulting from a set of properties that directly or indirectly determine the condition, highlighting the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities they possess [10].

Condensed tannin (A. mearnsii) did not affect the ATTD of dry matter, crude protein, mineral matter and gross energy of the diets, behaving similarly to the other treatments (Table 4). The notion that tannins are anti-nutritional substances due to their ability to precipitate proteins, inhibit digestive enzymes, and reduce nutrient utilization was not supported by this evaluation [55]. It confirms that the dietary concentration and molecular characteristics of tannins must be considered. Consistent with this, Girard et al [13] reported no performance detriment or antinutritional effects from using tannins as an additive in piglet diets. However, the observed enhancement in mineral digestibility for the ENR+ZnO diet compared to the CONTR and BUT diets aligns with findings by Mille et al [56]. In their study using pharmacological levels of zinc for weaned piglets, Mille et al [56] did not observe improvements in the digestibility of other nutrients, yet they noted enhanced rates of mineral retention. This improvement can be attributed to the role of zinc oxide in enhancing digestion by stimulating pancreatic and intestinal enzymatic activities [57], as well as by improving the morphology of the small intestine [58]. Furthermore, the addition of enramycin to zinc oxide appears to enhance this digestive benefit, contributing to the activity of digestive enzymes and reducing damage to the intestinal mucosa structure [59].

The use of tannin as an additive has not compromised the digestibility of amino acids and proteins, as evidenced by other studies [60,61]. This supports the notion that tannin's ability to bind to proteins does not necessarily exert negative effects. Instead, the formation of tannin-protein complexes may protect proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids from oxidative damage during digestion [62]. These results confirm the suitability of using condensed tannins from black wattle (A. mearnsii) at the dose applied as a performance-enhancing additive without risk of negatively influencing the digestibility of dietary nutrients.

CONCLUSION

The condensed tannin from the extract of black wattle (A. mearnsii), as an additive for piglets in the nursery phase, was effective in controlling diarrheal conditions, did not affect the digestibility of the nutrients in the diet and promoted specific modulations of the intestinal microbiota, with positive results on zootechnical performance. The results demonstrate that condensed black wattle tannin are an effective substitute for zinc oxide associated with enramycin and led to results similar to those achieved in diets that used sodium butyrate.

Notes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design of study: K.L.S.; A.F.; A.S.O.P.; M.A.C.; C.A.S.;

Acquisition of data: K.L.S.; M.A.C.;

Analysis and interpretation of data: K.L.S.; R.H.C.; C.P.D.; C.A.S.;

Drafting the manuscript: K.L.S.; A.F.; A.S.O.P.; R.H.C.; C.A.S.;

Critical review/revision: K.L.S.; R.H.C.; C.P.D.; C.A.S.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any organization regarding the materials discussed in the manuscript. Dias CP, Callegari MA, Carvalho RH are employees of Akei Animal Research, and Friderichs A, Paes AOS are employees of Tanac S.A.

FUNDING

The authors received no financial support for this article.

References

1. Huting AMS, Middelkoop A, Guan X, Molist F. Using nutritional strategies to shape the gastro-intestinal tracts of suckling and weaned piglets. Animals 2021;11:402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020402.

2. Heo JM, Opapeju FO, Pluske JR, Kim JC, Hampson DJ, Nyachoti CM. Gastrointestinal health and function in weaned pigs: a review of feeding strategies to control post-weaning diarrhoea without using in-feed antimicrobial compounds. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2013;97:207–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01284.x.

3. Lekagul A, Tangcharoensathien V, Yeung S. Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: a systematic review. Vet Anim Sci 2019;7:100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058.

4. Petrin S, Patuzzi I, Di Cesare A, et al. Evaluation and quantification of antimicrobial residues and antimicrobial resistance genes in two Italian swine farms. Environ Pollut 2019;255:113183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113183.

5. Szuba-Trznadel A, Rząsa A, Hikawczuk T, Fuchs B. Effect of zinc source and level on growth performance and zinc status of weaned piglets. Animals 2021;11:72030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072030.

6. Carlson MS, Boren CA, Wu C, Huntington CE, Bollinger DW, Veum TL. Evaluation of various inclusion rates of organic zinc either as polysaccharide or proteinate complex on the growth performance, plasma, and excretion of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 2004;82:1359–66. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8251359x.

7. Gupta A, Pandey AK. Antibacterial lead compounds and their targets for drug development. In : Egbuna C, Kumar S, Ifemeje JC, Ezzat SM, Kaliyaperumal S, eds. Phytochemicals as lead compounds for new drug development Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier; 2020. p. 275–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817890-4.00018-4.

8. Sato F, Matsui K. Engineering the biosynthesis of low molecular weight metabolites for quality traits (essential nutrients, health-promoting phytochemicals, volatiles, and aroma compounds). In : Altman A, Hasegawa PM, eds. Plant biotechnology and agriculture Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2012. p. 443–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381466-1.00028-6.

9. Sherry SP. The black wattle (Acacia mearnsii de Wild.) Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of Natal Press; 1971.

10. Caprarulo V, Hejna M, Giromini C, et al. Evaluation of dietary administration of chestnut and quebracho tannins on growth, serum metabolites and fecal parameters of weaned piglets. Animals 2020;10:1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111945.

11. Silva V, Igrejas G, Falco V, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of phenolic compounds extracted from wine industry by-products. Food Control 2018;92:516–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.05.031.

12. Quecán BXV, Rivera MLC, Pinto UM. Bioactive phytochemicals targeting microbial activities mediated by quorum sensing. In : Kalia VC, ed. Biotechnological applications of quorum sensing inhibitors Singapore: Springere; 2018. p. 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9026-4_19.

13. Girard M, Thanner S, Pradervand N, Hu D, Ollagnier C, Bee H. Hydrolysable chestnut tannins for reduction of postweaning diarrhea: efficacy on an experimental ETEC F4 model. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0197878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197878.

14. Ma M, Chambers JK, Uchida K, et al. Effects of supplementation with a quebracho tannin product as an alternative to antibiotics on growth performance, diarrhea, and overall health in early-weaned piglets. Animals 2021;11:3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113316.

15. Biagi G, Cipollini I, Paulicks BR, Roth FX. Effect of tannins on growth performance and intestinal ecosystem in weaned piglets. Arch Anim Nutr 2010;64:121–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390903461584.

16. da Silva CA, Dias CP, Callegari MA, et al. Phytogenics and encapsulated sodium butyrate can replace antibiotics as growth promoters for lightly weaned piglets. PLoS ONE 2022;17:e0279197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279197.

17. Ortiz Sanjuán JM, Manzanilla EG, Cabrera-Rubio R, et al. Fine-tuning of post-weaning pig microbiome structure and functionality by in-feed zinc oxide and antibiotics use. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024;14:1354449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1354449.

18. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, et al. Brazilian tables for pigs and poultry In : Rostagno HS, ed. 4th edth ed. Viçosa, Brazil: UFV Departamento de Zootecnia; 2017.

19. Liu P, Piao XS, Thacker PA, et al. Chito-oligosaccharide reduces diarrhea incidence and attenuates the immune response of weaned pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K88. J Anim Sci 2010;88:3871–9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2771.

20. Degnan PH, Ochman H. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity. ISME J 2012;6:183–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.74.

21. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(Suppl 1):4516–22. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000080107.

22. Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA and “all-species living tree project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D643–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1209.

23. Tang X, Xiong K, Fang R, Li M. Weaning stress and intestinal health of piglets: a review. Front Immunol 2022;13:1042778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1042778.

24. Jang YD, Lindemann MD, Agudelo-Trujillo JH, et al. Comparison of direct and indirect estimates of apparent total tract digestibility in swine with effort to reduce variation by pooling of multiple day fecal samples. J Anim Sci 2014;92:4566–76. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6570.

25. Choi H, Kim BG. A low-fiber diet requires a longer adaptation period before collecting feces of pigs compared with a high-fiber diet in digestibility experiments using the inert marker method. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2019;256:114254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114254.

26. Latimer GW. AOAC International Official methods of analysis of AOAC international 18th edth ed. Gaithersburgs, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2006.

27. Clawson AJ, Reid JT, Sheffy BE, Willman JP. Use of chromium oxide in digestion studies with swine. J Anim Sci 1955;14:700–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/14.3.700.

28. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil PA, Hugenholtz P. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D785–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab776.

29. Carega MFC, Dantas A. Methane and ruminal tannins use as condensed mitigation strategy. Nucleus Animalium 2017;9:51–64. https://doi.org/10.3738/21751463.1831.

30. Soares S, Brandão E, Guerreiro C, Soares S, Mateus N, de Freitas V. Tannins in food: insights into the molecular perception of astringency and bitter taste. Molecules 2020;25:2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112590.

31. Nuamah E, Poaty Ditengou JIC, Hirwa F, Cheon I, Chae B, Chou NJ. Dietary supplementation of tannins: effect on growth performance, serum antioxidant capacity, and immunoglobins of weaned piglets—a systematic review with meta-analysis. Antioxidants 2024;13:236. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13020236.

32. Pimentel PRS, Pellegrini CB, Lanna DPD, et al. Effects of Acacia mearnsii extract as a condensed-tannin source on animal performance, carcass yield and meat quality in goats. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2021;271:114733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114733.

33. McArthur C, Sanson GD, Beal AM. Salivary proline-rich proteins in mammals: roles in oral homeostasis and counteracting dietary tannin. J Chem Ecol 1995;21:663–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033455.

34. Wang M, Huang H, Wang L, et al. Tannic acid attenuates intestinal oxidative damage by improving antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier in weaned piglets and IPEC-J2 cells. Front Nutr 2022;9:1012207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1012207.

35. Su Y, Bian G, Zhu Z, Smidt H, Zhu W. Early methanogenic colonisation in the faeces of Meishan and Yorkshire piglets as determined by pyrosequencing analysis. Archaea 2014;2014:547908. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/547908.

36. Wei X, Tsai T, Knapp J, et al. ZnO modulates swine gut microbiota and improves growth performance of nursery pigs when combined with peptide cocktail. Microorganisms 2020;8:146. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020146.

37. Denck FM, Hilgemberg JO, Lehnen CR. Acidifiers in diets for weanling and nursery piglets. Arch Zootec 2017;66:629–38. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v66i256.2782.

38. Romier B, Schneider YJ, Larondelle Y, During A. Dietary polyphenols can modulate the intestinal inflammatory response. Nutr Rev 2009;67:363–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00210.x.

39. Fournier BM, Parkos CA. The role of neutrophils during intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2012;5:354–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2012.24.

40. Borges A, Ferreira C, Saavedra MJ, Simões M. Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microb Drug Resist 2013;19:256–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2012.0244.

41. Santos CA, Almeida FA, Quecán BXV, et al. Bioactive properties of Syzygium cumini (L.) skeels pulp and seed phenolic extracts. Front Microbiol 2020;11:990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00990.

42. Shi Y, Cao Q, Sun J, et al. The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa exploits bacterial biotin synthesis pathway to benefit its infectivity. PLoS Pathog 2023;19:e1011110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011110.

43. Yu Y, Zhou W, Liang X, Zhou K, Lin X. Increased bound putrescine accumulation contributes to the maintenance of antioxidant enzymes and higher aluminum tolerance in wheat. Environ Pollut 2019;252:941–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.045.

44. De Rodas B, Youmans BP, Danzeisen JL, Tran H, Johnson TJ. Microbiome profiling of commercial pigs from farrow to finish. J Anim Sci 2018;96:1778–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky109.

45. Leng Y, Yi M, Fan J, Bai Y, Ge O, Yao G. Effects of acute intra-abdominal hypertension on multiple intestinal barrier functions in rats. Sci Rep 2016;6:22814. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22814.

46. Min BR, Solaiman S, Shange R, Eun JS. Gastrointestinal bacterial and methanogenic archaea diversity dynamics associated with condensed tannin-containing pine bark diet in goats using 16S rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing. Int J Microbiol 2014;2014:141909. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/141909.

47. Ruiu L. Brevibacillus laterosporus, a pathogen of invertebrates and a broad-spectrum antimicrobial species. Insects 2013;4:476–92. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects4030476.

48. Liao SF, Nyachoti M. Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Anim Nutr 2017;3:331–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.007.

49. Zwirzitz B, Wetzels SU, Dixon ED, et al. Co-occurrence of Listeria spp. and spoilage associated microbiota during meat processing due to cross-contamination events. Front Microbiol 2021;12:632935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.632935.

50. Cao X, Tang L, Zeng Z, et al. Effects of probiotics BaSC06 on intestinal digestion and absorption, antioxidant capacity, microbiota composition, and macrophage polarization in pigs for fattening. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:570593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.570593.

51. Sun J, Du L, Li X, et al. Identification of the core bacteria in rectums of diarrheic and non-diarrheic piglets. Sci Rep 2019;9:18675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55328-y.

52. Giang HH, Viet TQ, Ogle B, Lindberg JE. Growth performance, digestibility, gut environment and health status in weaned piglets fed a diet supplemented with potentially probiotic complexes of lactic acid bacteria. Livest Sci 2010;129:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.01.010.

53. Akiyama H, Fujii K, Yamasaki O, Oono T, Iwatsuki K. Antibacterial action of several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;48:487–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.4.487.

54. Puupponen-Pimiä R, Nohynek L, Alakomi HL, Oksman-Caldentey KM. The action of berry phenolics against human intestinal pathogens. BioFactors 2005;23:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5520230410.

55. Amarowicz R. Tannins: the new natural antioxidants? Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2007;109:549–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200700145.

56. De Mille CM, Burrough ER, Kerr BJ, Schweer WP, Gabler NK. Dietary pharmacological zinc and copper enhances voluntary feed intake of nursery pigs. Front Anim Sci 2022;3:874284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.874284.

57. Hu C, Song J, You Z, Luan Z, Li W. Zinc oxide–montmorillonite hybrid influences diarrhea, intestinal mucosal integrity, and digestive enzyme activity in weaned pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res 2012;149:190–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9422-9.

58. Furbeyre H, van Milgen J, Mener T, Gloaguen M, Labussière E. Effects of dietary supplementation with freshwater microalgae on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and gut health in weaned piglets. Animal 2017;11:183–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001543.

59. Luo Y, Zou C, Chen H, Yu B, Chen D. Effects of supplementing and withdrawing enramycin on growth and digestion absorption function of weanling piglets. Chin J Anim Nutr 2010;22:139–44.

60. Antongiovanni M, Minieri S, Petacchi F. Effect of tannin supplementation on nitrogen digestibility and retention in growing pigs. Ital J Anim Sci 2007;6:245–7. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.245.

61. Galassi G, Mason F, Rapetti L, Crovetto GM, Spanghero M. Digestibility and metabolic utilisation of diets containing chestnut tannins and their effects on growth and slaughter traits of heavy pigs. Ital J Anim Sci 2019;18:746–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1570361.

62. Cappai MG, Wolf P, Pinna W, Kamphues J. Pigs use endogenous proline to cope with acorn (Quercus pubescens Willd.) combined diets high in hydrolysable tannins. Livest Sci 2013;155:316–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.05.003.

Article information Continued

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Items	Phases

	Pre-initial I	Pre-initial II	Initial I	Initial II
Ingredients (%)
Corn grain	44.503	42.045	51.775	60.630
Soybean meal	13.161	22.048	26.352	30.838
Pregelatinized corn flour	10.000	10.000	5.000	0.000
Whey powder	14.000	12.000	7.000	0.000
Milk powder	10.000	5.000	2.500	0.000
Blood plasma	5.000	4.000	2.500	0.000
Soybean oil	0.208	1.075	1.519	4.199
Dicalcium phosphate	1.110	1.073	1.452	1.833
Limestone	0.280	0.506	0.547	0.765
L-lysine	0.543	0.316	0.365	0.397
L-threonine	0.256	0.121	0.150	0.157
DL-methonine	0.360	0.214	0.185	0.156
L-valine	0.039	0.000	0.000	0.033
L-tryptophan	0.051	0.012	0.012	0.024
Adsorvent	0.150	0.150	0.150	0.150
Salt	0.032	0.132	0.233	0.568
Choline chloride	0.047	0.047	0.000	0.000
Antioxidant	0.010	0.010	0.010	0.010
Vitamin premix¹⁾	0.150	0.150	0.150	0.150
Mineral premix²⁾	0.100	0.100	0.100	0.100
Total	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
Nutrients
Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)	3,500	3,400	3,350	3,350
Crude protein (%)	18.500	20.045	20.000	19.450
Crude fat (%)	4.837	4.383	4.461	6.640
Crude fibre (%)	1.801	2.355	2.682	3.053
Calcium (%)	0.640	0.697	0.750	0.872
Available phosphorus (%)	0.440	0.401	0.420	0.431
SID lysine (%)	1.440	1.334	1.300	1.206
SID methionine + cysteine (%)	0.927	0.814	0.770	0.687
SID threonine (%)	0.940	0.855	0.840	0.784
SID tryptophan (%)	0.250	0.240	0.230	0.229
SID valine (%)	0.857	0.892	0.813	0.832
SID isoleucine (%)	0.696	0.775	0.778	0.749
Sodium (%)	0.320	0.300	0.250	0.250
Chlorine (%)	0.380	0.346	0.337	0.366

Items	Treatments¹⁾				SEM	p-value

	CONTR	ENR+ZnO	BUT	TAN
Pre-Initial I (d 22–29)
IBW (kg)	6.0	6.0	6.0	6.0	0.14	0.995
ADFI (g/d)	164	163	163	160.0	4.60	0.988
ADG (g/d)	119	133	121	114	5.05	0.630
G:F	0.727	0.806	0.728	0.711	0.018	0.292
FBW (kg)	6.8	6.9	6.8	6.7	0.14	0.618
Pre-Initial II (d 29–43)
ADFI (g/d)	389^b	452^a	449^a	445^a	9.14	0.041
ADG (g/d)	253^b	304^a	296^ab	330^a	8.35	0.006
G:F	0.640^b	0.673^ab	0.659^b	0.746^a	0.011	0.007
FBW (kg)	10.4^b	11.2^a	11.0^ab	11.4^a	0.19	0.036
Initial I (d 43–50)
ADFI (g/d)	593^b	625^ab	682^a	670^ab	12.06	0.082
ADG (g/d)	349	350	405	395	10.44	0.220
G:F	0.532	0.626	0.599	0.635	0.019	0.658
FBW (kg)	12.8^b	13.7^ab	13.8^ab	14.2^a	0.26	0.067
Initial II (d 50–64)
ADFI (g/d)	898	873	946	951	14.64	0.159
ADG (g/d)	595	548	588	599	10.48	0.328
G:F	0.665	0.627	0.622	0.630	0.007	0.256
FBW (kg)	21.1^b	21.3^ab	22.1^ab	22.6^a	0.33	0.085
Total (d 22–64)
ADFI (g/d)	555	573	606	603	9.51	0.197
ADG (g/d)	360^b	365^ab	382^ab	394^a	8.35	0.067
G:F	0.650	0.637	0.632	0.654	0.004	0.324

Items	Treatments¹⁾				p-value

	CONTR	ENR+ZnO	BUT	TAN
Score 2 (n)	6	1	1	5	0.077
Score 3 (n)	42^b	18^a	29^a	21^a	<0.001
Total (n)	48^b	19^a	30^a	26^a	<0.001
Diarrhea severity index²⁾	0.022	0.009	0.014	0.012	-

Items	Treatments¹⁾				SEM	p-value

	CONTR	ENR+ZnO	BUT	TAN
DM	78.80	75.72	77.16	77.54	0.66	0.352
CP	70.34	65.65	66.34	67.69	1.00	0.422
MM	39.13^b	49.89^a	37.97^b	42.31^ab	1.49	0.011
GE	78.00	73.82	74.09	76.31	0.82	0.220