Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 38(3); 2025 > Article
Lou, Zhang, Yang, Li, Cao, Zhang, and Ling: Transcriptome analysis revealed the mechanism of skeletal muscle growth and development in different hybrid sheep

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the molecular mechanism of heterosis in East Friesian sheep×Hu sheep (EH) hybrid sheep and Suffolk×EH (SHE) hybrid sheep (Ovis aries).

Methods

In this research, the growth performance data of Hu sheep (H), EH and SHE from birth to 8 months of age were analyzed. Three 8-month-old sheep of each of the three strains (9 sheep in total) were chosen and their longissimus dorsi muscles were collected for transcriptome sequencing. We verified the expression of seven differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Results

The results showed: (1) body weight and chest circumference of EH were significantly greater than H (p<0.05), except at 4 months of age. Body weight and chest circumference of SHE was significantly higher than EH (p<0.05), except at 6 months of age. (2) 310 DEGs were screened in the EH and H, gene ontology and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes showed DEGs were mainly concentrate on the categories of actin cytoskeleton, calcium binding, cGMP-PKG and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, which correlating the development of skeletal muscle and energy metabolism. 329 DEGs were screened in the SHE and EH. DEGs were mainly enriched in extracellular matrix-receptor interactions and cell adhesion molecules. (3) Protein–protein interaction screening yielded five (MYL2, TNNI1, TNNI3, MYH11, TNNC1) and three (SOX10, COL2A1, MPZ) pivotal DEGs regulating muscle development in EH and SHE. (4) RT-qPCR test results were consistent with transcriptome sequencing.

Conclusion

This study provides candidate genes for improving sheep growth traits. It provides a theoretical basis for analyzing the mechanism of muscle development in crossbred sheep.

INTRODUCTION

Sheep meat is widely loved by consumers for its high protein content, low fat content and tender meat [1,2]. In recent years, mutton has become one of the main meats consumed by Chinese consumers, but the growing need for high-quality mutton has not been met [3]. Therefore, improving the production traits and meat quality of sheep is an issue we need to address.
Compared with pure breeding sheep, hybrid sheep showed the advantages of faster growth rate, less fat and cholesterol content, leaner meat and fresh er tenderness in production [4]. A study compared the meat quality and slaughter traits of Tibetan sheep and Tibetan sheep×Suffolk, found that the meat production traits of Sa-Tibetan hybrid sheep was greater than Tibetan sheep [5]. Zhu et al [6] found the growth, reproduction and slaughter performance of Wuhu hybrid sheep with Wugu sheep as male parent and Hu sheep (H) as female parent were significantly better than those of pure H. Moreover, studies have shown that three breeds hybridized sheep can significantly improve meat quality and increase the levels of crude protein and amino acids in skeletal muscle, which has the potential to cultivate and produce high-quality mutton [7]. Song et al [8] used Romney rams to cross with Small Tail Han sheep (STH), and selected hybrid F1 ewes with good traits to cross with Poll Dorset rams. The results displayed the growth traits and slaughter performance of the ternary hybrid offspring were significantly greater than those of the binary hybrid sheep. Du et al [9] crossed the Dorper sheep (DP) rams with the Hantan binary hybrid ewes, and found that the ternary hybridization showed significant heterosis.
With the advantages of four-season estrus and heat and humidity resistance, the H has become the preferred mother of choice for the development of the meat sheep industry in the southern region of China and even the whole country [10]. East Friesian sheep (E) is well-known breed of dairy sheep, with outstanding performance in milk production, reproduction and meat production, and has been widely used in various countries as a sire to enhance the milk-producing performance of local breeds [11]. To improve the lactation performance and meat production performance of H, in the early stage of this experiment, H was used as the female parent, and E was introduced for crossbreeding. After analyzing the data related to reproductive performance and lactation performance of E×H (EH), we found that EH still retained the excellent performance of one fetus and multiple lambs. The lambing rate was 229.51%, and the weaning survival rate was 92.14%, which was 88.29% higher than that of H. The total milk production of EH within 5 to 45 days was significantly higher than that of H (p<0.01), the lactation performance was significantly improved [12]. Studies have shown that compared with binary crosses, ternary crosses can give fuller play to the advantages of hybrid ewes and effectively utilize the hybrid advantages of individual ternary hybrids, so that the advantages of the three parental breeds are reflected in the offspring of ternary crosses. Therefore, based on the EH, this experiment introduced the world-famous mutton sheep variety Suffolk ram to crossbreed with EH, which was expected to further enhance the meat productivity and reproductive performance of the hybrid sheep [13].
However, the exploration of heterosis and the mechanism of heterosis in EH binary hybrids and Suffolk sheep (S)×EH (SHE) ternary hybrids has not been reported. In this paper, we analyzed the data related to the production performance of five stages of H, H×E and SHE from birth to 8 months of age. The bioinformatics analysis of the longissimus dorsi muscle was carried out by RNA-Seq, to provide reference for exploring the key genes and functional pathways regulating the meat productivity of binary hybrid sheep and ternary hybrid sheep.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal feeding and sample collection

In this research, purebred H, E×H and S×EH were used as the research objects (Figure 1). All sheep were raised under similar management conditions. The body weight, body height, body length, chest circumference and cannon circumference of sheep at 2 days, 2, 4, 6 and 8 months of age were measured under fasting condition.
Animal protocols were approved by the Review Committee for the Use of Animal Subjects of Anhui Agricultural University (No. AHAU20101025). Three 8-month-old sheep of each of the three strains (9 sheep in total) were randomly selected, fasted for 12 h and watered for 3 h before slaughter, euthanized after intravenous injection of barbituric acid (30 mg/kg), carcass weight, meat weight, carcass fat content (GR) value, and eye muscle area were measured. The longissimus dorsi muscle was collected as a test sample, rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline) containing 1× penicillin and streptomycin, and then the samples were immediately placed in a liquid nitrogen tank (East Asia Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., Leshan, China). Frozen and transferred to a refrigerator at −80°C until RNA extraction.

Total RNA extraction, library construction and sequencing

The longissimus dorsi muscle samples were ground into powder and added to Trizol (Adderall Biologicals, Beijing, China) to extract total RNA. RNA contamination and degradation were examined by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The purity and concentration of RNA were determined by Nanodrop One Micro UV-visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, integrity and total amount of RNA were accurately determined by Agilent2100 biometric analyzer.
The 5 μg of RNA from each sample was used to build the library. mRNA with polyA tail was enriched using Oligo (dT) magnetic beads. Double-stranded cDNAs were synthesized from dNTPs, and the purified cDNAs were subjected to end repair and addition of polyA junctions, respectively. The cDNAs around 250 to 300 bp were screened for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification to construct cDNA libraries. The library construction and sequencing (NovaSeq 6000; Illumina, San Diego, CA , USA) were done by Beijing Novogene.

Quality control and transcript assembly

The raw data were filtered using fastp (version 0.19.7) software as follows: adaptor reads; unknown base information reads; and reads for which the number of bases with Qphred ≤20 accounted for more than 50% of the entire read length. Finally, we calculated and analyzed the Q20, Q30, and guanine-cytosine content of the cleaning data.
The reference genome and gene annotation file (GCF_ 016772045.1) for sheep (Ovis aries) was downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Indexes of reference genomes were constructed using HISAT2 (v2.0.5) and compared. The transcripts were then assembled using StringTie (1.3.3b).

Screening of differentially expressed genes and functional annotation

Expression levels of genes are expressed as transcript fragments per kilobase per million mapped read values (FPKM). DESeq2 (1.20.0) was used to analyzed for differences. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) screening criteria were as follows: p-value <0.05 and |log2 Fold Change|≥1.
The clusterProfiler (3.8.1) software was used to perform gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis on the DEGs. p-value <0.05 was set as significant enrichment, p-value <0.01 indicates extremely significant enrichment.

Protein–protein interaction interaction analysis

The interactions between differential genes were identified in the STRING (11.5) database by blastx comparison, and the resulting interactions were imported into Cytoscape software for visualization of the interactions.

Real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to verify the accuracy of the RNA-Seq

Total RNA was extracted from tissues using Trizol (Beijing Adelaide Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase and oligo-dT primers according to the instructions of the manufacturer MonScript RTIII All-in-One Mix with dsDNase (Monad Biotech Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Primer pairs were designed using NCBI Primer-BLAST and synthesized by TsingKe Biotechnology (TsingKe, Nanjing, China). The GAPDH internal reference gene was used as a control (Table 1). Real-time reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using CFX Connect RT PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Reaction system (20 μL): 10 μL of 2×Q3 SYBR qPCR Premix (TOLOBIO, Shanghai, China), 8.2 μL of sterilized water, 1 μL of DNA template (cDNA solution) and 0.4 μL of RT-qPCR forward primer (10 μmol/L). Amplification conditions were as follows: pre denaturation at 95°C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis was conducted at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 34 s, and 95°C for 15 s.

Statistical analysis

The mRNA expression levels were calculated by 2−ΔΔCt. All data were expressed as the means±standard deviation and were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics v23.0. Statistical significance was assessed using T-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Figures were generated by GraphPad Prism 8.0. p<0.05 indicates significant difference.

RESULTS

Comparison of growth and slaughtering performance of H, EH and SHE

The production performance and slaughter performance of H, EH and SHE at 2 days, 2, 4, 6 and 8 months of age were measured. The results indicate in terms of growth performance, body weight and chest circumference were significantly (p<0.05) greater in EH than in H, except at 4 months of age. Body weight and chest circumference were significantly higher in the SHE than in the EH, except at 6 months of age (Table 2). The results showed EH had higher pre-slaughter live weight, carcass weight, net meat weight, eye muscle area and slaughter rate than H, and lower GR than H; SHE had higher pre-slaughter live weight, carcass weight, net meat weight, eye muscle area and slaughter rate and lower GR than EH. However, there was no significant difference in any of the slaughter performance indexes, it may be caused by too few samples (Figure 2). The study found the shear force and drip loss of EH were the lowest among the three sheep populations, indicating that the meat quality of EH was greater than H and SHE. In summary, the EH was superior to the H in terms of production performance, while the ternary crossbred SHE population was superior to the EH in terms of growth performance.

Quality analysis of RNA-Seq data

After transcriptome sequencing, an average of 43.7 million, 46.06 million and 45.29 million raw reads were obtained for H, EH and SHE, respectively, which were screened to obtain 41.71 million, 43.29 million and 43.39 million reads, respectively. Among the three groups of sheep, the sequencing comparison rates were 96.36%, 96.42% and 96.30%, respectively. The overall sequencing error rates of the data were all below 0.03%, with Q20>96.54% and Q30>90.61%, indicating that the sequencing data were valid (Table 3).

Screening for differentially expressed genes

310 DEGs (145 up- and 165 down-regulated) were identified in the EH and the H (Figure 3A), and the differential genes included MYL2, TNNC1, TNNI1, TNNI3, MYH11, etc. Muscle contraction is mediated by troponin, myosin, actin, calcium and adenosine triphosphate. MYL2 and TNNC1 are essential components of myosin and troponin, respectively [14]. Troponin I (TnI) is encoded by three homologous genes (TNNI1, TNNI2 and TNNI3). Indispensable in the regulation of contraction and relaxation by calcium ions. MYH11 participated in myoblast cell development, myotube differentiation and other regulatory processes in skeletal muscle development [15]. 329 DEGs (191 up- and 138 down-regulated) were identified in the SHE and the EH (Figure 3B), involving SOX10, COL2A1, MPZ, and MYL3, which are related to skeletal muscle development.

Enrichment analysis of gene ontology and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

To better understand the functions of these differential genes, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of DEGs were performed in this experiment. GO annotation showed that the DEGs of EH and H were significantly enriched in 42 functional pathways, and many differential genes (such as TNNI3, TNNI1, MYL2, MYH7B, TNNC1) were enriched in actin cytoskeleton (p-value = 1.56E-07), organelle part (p-value = 0.012) and calcium ion binding (p-value = 0.031) related to skeletal muscle development (Figure 4A). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were significantly involved in 58 pathways, such as cGMP-PKG signaling pathway (p-value = 3.51E-04), MAPK signaling pathway (p-value = 2.88E-03), Wnt signaling pathway (p-value = 5.43E-03), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling pathway (p-value = 6.74E-03) and other pathways related to skeletal muscle energy metabolism (Figure 4B).
Enrichment analysis of DEGs between SHE and EH was carried out. GO annotation showed that 12 pathways were enriched in cellular components, molecular functions, biological processes, etc. Among them, collagen trimer (p-value = 0.012) and extracellular matrix (ECM) structural components (p-value = 0.017) were related to muscle development (Figure 4C). KEGG enrichment analysis showed the DEGs was significantly involved in 13 pathways, including cell adhesion molecules (p-value = 7.96E-03), ECM-receptor interactions (p-value = 0.012) and other pathways (Figure 4D), Cao et al [16] found that these two pathways were the two most enriched pathways in the development stages of Pekin and Hanzhong ducks and were closely related to muscle development.

Protein–protein interaction interaction analysis

To further narrow down the candidate genes, protein–protein interaction (PPI) interaction analysis was performed on the DEGs. 68 genes were involved in PPI interaction in EH and H. Combined with functional enrichment analysis and literature reports, five hub genes closely related to skeletal muscle development were screened, including MYL2 (node = 8), TNNI1 (node = 6), TNNI3 (node = 6), MYH11 (node = 5) and TNNC1 (node = 4) (Figure 5A). A total of 35 genes were involved in the PPI interaction between ternary hybrid sheep and binary hybrid sheep. Among them, SOX10 (n = 7) was in the center of the PPI interaction network (Figure 5B). Studies have shown that SOX10 has a role in regulating muscle development [17].

Validation of transcriptome sequencing results by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Seven DEGs were randomly selected to verify the accuracy of RNA-Seq data by RT-qPCR (Figure 6). Expression trends of DEGs were equal with RNA-Seq results, indicating RNA-Seq data are reliable.

DISCUSSION

Crossbreeding has become an effective tool to improve the growth rate, meat quality and production performance of sheep breeds [18]. Analyzing the mechanism of heterosis from a genetic perspective is essential for optimizing the production performance and meat quality traits of sheep [19]. In recent years, RNA-Seq has been applied to explore the mechanism of heterosis in hybrid sheep. Transcriptome analysis of the longissimus dorsi muscle of DP×STH and Mongolia (MG)×STH showed the meat quality of DP×STH sheep was better than that of MG×STH. And 13 key candidate genes affecting meat quality traits in sheep were identified [20]. Song et al [21] used RNA-Seq to screen out four candidate genes (MSTR, IFRD1, PPARD, MYL2) related to growth and meat quality of STH and the F1 generation of STH×S. In this study, we used transcriptome sequencing technology to bioinformatically analyze the longissimus dorsi muscle of 8-month-old H, EH and SHE, and to excavate the key genes and functional pathways regulating the improvement of production performance of hybrid sheep.
310 DEGs were screened in EH and H. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that most of the DEGs were significantly enriched in pathways closely related to muscle development and energy metabolism, such as actin cytoskeleton, calcium binding, MAPK signaling pathway and cAMP signaling pathway. PPI analysis showed that MYL2, TNNI1, TNNI3, MYH11 and TNNC1 genes were located at the core of the interaction network and were closely related to other genes.
Muscle fiber is an important part of skeletal muscle, which determines the ability of skeletal muscle contraction and metabolism, and is a key factor affecting muscle development and meat quality [22]. According to the method of energy metabolism, muscle fibers can be divided into oxidized and enzymatic, oxidized muscle fibers showed higher endurance and oxidative metabolic enzyme activity, belonging to slow muscle fibers, enzymatic muscle fibers contract quickly but have a short duration and are fast muscle fibers [23]. The quality of mutton will be seriously affected when many enzymatic muscle fibers increase in muscle [24]. MYL2 is a myosin regulatory light chain that acts as a molecular motor to provide energy for muscle contraction. It has the function of regulating muscle fiber activity and movement, and is a typical slow muscle fiber molecule [25]. TNNI1 is present in the sarcomere filaments of the striated muscle, playing an important regulator of striated muscle contraction. It regulates muscle contraction under the change of calcium concentration [26]. Previous studies have shown overexpression of MYL2 and TNNI1 genes promotes the expression of genes associated with muscle development [27,28]. TNNC1 is the core regulatory protein of striated muscle contraction and the core component of slow muscle fibers, which has a positive effect on skeletal muscle myogenesis [25,29]. TNNC1 and TNNI1 are involved in actin-binding and glycolysis/glycogenesis pathways and play a central regulatory role in muscle fiber types [30]. MYH11 is a myosin, affecting muscle fiber composition and muscle fat content [15]. The cytoskeleton is a cellular scaffold responsible for determining the shape and length of myofibers and transmitting forces generated by actin-myosin interactions to the extracellular fiber skeleton [31]. Ca2+ mediates excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle, stimulates energy production in skeletal muscle mitochondria, and plays a crucial role in regulating slow muscle fiber formation in skeletal muscle [32]. Our bioinformatics analysis showed that MYL2, TNNI1, and MYH11 were enriched in the actin cytoskeletal signaling pathway, and TNNC1 was enriched in the calcium signaling pathway, all of them were up-regulated in EH, indicating that these genes are the key genes regulating the muscle development process of EH.
329 DEGs were screened in the SHE and EH. These DEGs were enriched into 12 GO functional pathways and 13 KEGG signaling pathways, including ECM-receptor interactions and cell adhesion molecules closely related to muscle development. PPI analysis showed that the SOX10 gene is located at the core of the PPI network and closely interacts with COL2A1 and MPZ genes.
SOX10 belongs to the SOX family of transcription factors involved in embryogenesis, cell differentiation, and bone formation. It is an essential transcription factor for the development of neural crest cells (NCC) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) [33]. During the development of the body, NCC and skeletal muscle lines are established simultaneously, which provides a basis for the establishment of functional interaction between skeletal muscle cells and PNS in the later stage [34]. PNS and motor neurons play a role in regulating muscle development during late developmental neuromuscular junctions and muscle spindle formation [35]. Studies have shown SOX10 deficiency resulted in a significant reduction in the number of Pax7+ muscle progenitor cells and MyoD+ differentiated myoblasts, severely interfering with myogenesis [18]. Muscle development is regulated by ECM-receptor interactions and cell adhesion molecule [20]. Myogenesis involves a series of complex processes such as proliferation of muscle progenitor cells, differentiation of myoblasts and formation of multinucleated myotubes [36]. Among them, cell adhesion molecules are involved in the normal processes of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis as cell-surface receptors, and are indispensable in the interaction of cells, tissues and extracellular matrix [37]. MPZ is a structural protein in the myelin sheath of the PNS that contributes to the transmission of nerve impulses and has also been shown to be involved in myocyte contraction, metabolism and cell repair [38]. In this experiment, MPZ was enriched in the cell adhesion molecule signaling pathway and involved in cell adhesion in this assay, consistent with previous findings. Reduced COL2A1 protein expression may inhibit ECM-receptor interactions and ECM degradation [39]. Our bioinformatics analysis showed COL2A1 was enriched in the ECM-receptor interaction pathway and was up-regulated in SHE, suggesting that COL2A1 may regulate muscle development through ECM-receptor interaction pathway.

CONCLUSION

In this experiment, we integrative analysis PPI networks and enrichment pathways, four (MYL2, TNNI1, MYH11, TNNC1) and three (SOX10, COL2A1, MPZ) pivotal DEGs regulating the growth performance of EH and SHE, respectively. The heterosis of crossbred sheep over purebred sheep for muscle and growth performance enhancement may be driven by these genes. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of skeletal muscle formation, provide candidate genes for improved growth traits, and help improve growth and developmental traits in sheep through molecular breeding.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Cao H, Zhang Z, Ling Y.

Data curation: Lou M, Yang W.

Formal analysis: Lou M, Zhang S.

Methodology: Lou M, Ling Y.

Software: Lou M, Zhang S.

Validation: Lou M.

Investigation: Lou M, Yang W.

Writing - original draft: Lou M.

Writing - review & editing : Lou M, Zhang S, Yang W, Li S, Cao H, Zhang Z, Ling Y.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32372832), the Anhui Key Research and Development Program (2023z04020003) and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-38).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author. If the article is accepted for publication, the data availability statement will be published as part of the accepted article.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Animal protocols were approved by the Review Committee for the Use of Animal Subjects of Anhui Agricultural University (No. AHAU20101025).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Not applicable.

Figure 1
Schematic diagram of hybridization method. GO, gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; PPI, protein–protein interaction.
ab-24-0269f1.jpg
Figure 2
Slaughtering performance and meat quality of H, EH and SHE at 8 months of age. (A) Slaughter performance of H, EH and SHE. (B) Meat quality of H, EH and SHE. The green color indicates Hu sheep (H); the yellow color indicates East Friesian×Hu sheep (EH); the gray color indicates Suffolk sheep (S)×EH (SHE).
ab-24-0269f2.jpg
Figure 3
Volcano map of DEGs. (A) DEGs in H and EH. (B) DEGs in EH and SHE. The DEGs screening criteria were as follows: p-value <0.05 and |log2 Fold Change|≥1.The red indicates up-regulated DEGs; the green indicates down-regulated DEGs; the bule indicates no difference. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; H, Hu sheep; EH, East Friesian×H ; SHE, Suffolk sheep×EH.
ab-24-0269f3.jpg
Figure 4
Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs. (A) Top 20 GO enrichment pathway of H and EH. (B) Top 20 KEGG pathways of H and EH. (C) All GO enrichment pathways of EH and SHE. (D) All KEGG pathways of EH and SHE. KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; GO, gene ontology; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; H, Hu sheep; EH, East Friesian×H ; SHE, Suffolk sheep×EH.
ab-24-0269f4.jpg
Figure 5
PPI interaction network diagram. (A) PPI interaction analysis of H and EH. (B) PPI interaction analysis of EH and SHE. Nodes represent proteins. Edges represent protein-protein associations. The relationship between the two proteins is expressed through the thickness of the line; the thicker the line, the closer the relationship. PPI, protein–protein interaction; H, Hu sheep; EH, East Friesian×H; SHE, Suffolk sheep×EH.
ab-24-0269f5.jpg
Figure 6
Comparison of RT-qPCR and RNA-Seq results of differentially expressed genes. The blue, line graph indicates RNA-Seq; the orange, bar graph indicates RT-qPCR. RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; M8_H, 8-month-old Hu sheep; M8_EH, 8-month-old East Friesian×H; M8_SHE, 8-month-old Suffolk sheep×EH.
ab-24-0269f6.jpg
Table 1
Primer information
Primer Primer sequences (5′~3′) Annealing (°C) Product length (bp)
GAPDH F: CCACGCCATCACTGCCACCC 62.5 249
R: CAGCCTTGGCAGCGCCAGTA
CREG2 F: AAGCCATGTTTTCAAGACACCCA 57.5 120
R: TGTCGGCTACTCCCCCATAC
GCNT1 F: CTGCCCAGTTGGAGACTCAT 58 101
R: CATTCTGTGCCCATGAAGAGTG
NFATC4 F: CCAATCAGAGACAGACCGGGAC 59 168
R: GGTGGGGCGTCTTCTGAGTC
LPL F: CTTCAACCACAGCAGCAAAA 55 211
R: AAACTTGGCCACATCCTGTC
FABP5 F: CTCACCTGTCACGCTTGTCC 61 126
R: AGCCATCCCCACTCCTACTT
EYA1 F: TGGAATCTCCTCCTATGGCATC 57 135
R: ATCTGGTAGCTGTACGGTGC
NUDT16 F: ATGCGTAGGCTTGAGCTGG 60 145
R: CAAAGCGCATCTGCATCAGC

bp, base pair; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; CREG2, cellular repressor of E1A stimulated genes 2; GCNT1, glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 1; NFATC4, nuclear factor of activated T cells 4; LPL, lipoprotein lipase ; FABP5, fatty acid binding protein 5; EYA1, EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1; NUDT16, nudix hydrolase 16.

Table 2
Differences in production performance among H, EH and SHE sheep populations
Age Variety Body weight (kg) Body height (cm) Body length (cm) Chest circumference (cm) Cannon circumference (cm)
2 days H 3.13±0.43c 37.58±1.84 27.39±1.49b 34.49±1.74c 5.41±0.42b
EH 3.37±0.73b 37.29±2.58 27.3±2.46b 35.25±2.6b 5.56±0.53b
SHE 4.06±0.84a 38.08±2.6 28.2±2.12a 37.3±2.54a 6.02±0.52a
2 months H 16.18±2.14c 53.46±2.54b 54.64±2.47c 57.64±2.58c 7.87±7.96a
EH 18.31±3.4b 55.32±3.21a 56.05±3.69b 59.23±4.26b 6.98±0.47b
SHE 21.54±3.5a 56.02±2.96a 57.6±2.89a 63.65±3.6a 7.45±0.49a
4 months H 25.02±4.23b 59.41±2.72 61.71±3.79ab 65.14±4.38b 6.76±0.5b
EH 24.25±4.29b 58.36±3.72 60.22±3.06b 66.73±4.62b 6.74±0.52b
SHE 30.22±3.84a 58.29±2.89 62.52±3.18a 71.21±4.91a 7.4±0.59a
6 months H 29.27±3.78b 63.09±2.05b 66.11±2.91b 70.88±3.49b 7.17±0.38b
EH 34.85±5.07a 65.59±2.42a 68.73±2.74a 79.78±4.13a 7.42±0.54ab
SHE 37.55±3.41a 65.44±1.98a 68.57±2.26a 80.22±2.56a 7.69±0.39a
8 months H 40.21±2.49c 67.07±2.21 70.93±2.47 80.41±3c 7.96±0.4b
EH 43.32±3.99b 68.1±1.87 71.59±2.05 83.79±3.91b 8.4±0.46a
SHE 46.27±3.73a 67.78±1.38 72.24±2.51 85.9±2.41a 8.62±0.38a

H, Hu sheep; EH, East Friesian×H; SHE, Suffolk sheep (S)×EH.

a–c Shoulder labels within the same age with different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

The same or no letters indicate non-significant differences (p>0.05).

Table 3
Comparison of sequenced transcriptome sequences with reference sequences
Sample Raw reads Clean reads Error rate (%) Q20 (%) Q30 (%) GC content (%) Total map (%)
M8_H_1 44434682 42528134 0.03 96.54 90.61 49.99 96.08
M8_H_2 42283360 40151204 0.03 97.8 93.7 48.82 96.37
M8_H_3 44388700 42448198 0.03 97.86 93.96 52.15 96.63
M8_EH_1 46805968 44017458 0.03 97.86 93.47 50.55 96.17
M8_EH_2 45300712 42033122 0.03 97.85 93.81 49.13 96.5
M8_EH_3 46078322 43830296 0.03 97.88 93.97 51.75 96.59
M8_SHE_1 45587106 43441966 0.03 97.83 93.77 48.17 96.45
M8_SHE_2 44886924 42725478 0.03 97.62 93.49 53.86 95.78
M8_SHE_3 45410674 43989632 0.03 97.7 93.57 52.12 96.68
Average 45019605 42796165 0.03 97.66 93.37 50.73 96.36

GC, guanine-cytosine; M8_H, 8-month-old Hu sheep; M8_EH, 8-month-old East Friesian×Hu sheep; M8_SHE, 8-month-old Suffolk sheep×EH.

REFERENCES

1. Wang D, Zhao L, Su R, Jin Y. Effects of different starter culture combinations on microbial counts and physico-chemical properties in dry fermented mutton sausages. Food Sci Nutr 2019;7:1957–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.989
crossref pmid pmc
2. Wang F, Gao Y, Wang H, et al. Analysis of volatile compounds and flavor fingerprint in Jingyuan lamb of different ages using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Meat Sci 2021;175:108449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108449
crossref pmid
3. Zhang C, Wang G, Wang J, Ji Z, Dong F, Chao T. Analysis of differential gene expression and novel transcript units of ovine muscle transcriptomes. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e89817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089817
crossref pmid pmc
4. Chen B, Yue Y, Li J, et al. Global DNA methylation, miRNA, and mRNA profiles in sheep skeletal muscle promoted by hybridization. J Agric Food Chem 2023;71:15398–406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02173
crossref pmid
5. Liu MJ, zong Zhaxiyang, Nizhen , et al. Comparison of meat quality of valley-type Tibetan sheep and its hybrid progeny with Suffolk sheep under natural grazing condition. Chin J Anim Nutr 2022;34:3077–95. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.05.036
crossref
6. Zhu AW, Liu HX, Wang BZ, Zhang B, Yang YX. Comparative analysis of growth, reproduction and slaughter performance between Wuhu hybrid sheep and Hu sheep. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med 2021;9:60–3. https://doi.org/10.13881/j.cnki.hljxmsy.2020.05.0383
crossref
7. Wang H, Zhan S, Gu Y, et al. Comparative study on meat quality characteristics of three-way hybrid sheep charolais × duper × hu and charolais × australian white× hu and hu sheep. Acta Vet Zootech Sin 2024;55:110–9. https://doi.org/10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2024.01.012
crossref
8. Song CB, Gao TY, Ji JQ. Crossbreeding models of sheep. J Domest Anim Ecol 2009;30:25–7.

9. Du WG, Li XC, Wu X, Liang P. Study on fattening effect of Dorper sheep and “hantan” ternary hybrid lambs. China Herbiv 2016;36:67–8.

10. Chao Z, Ren YW, Sun RP, et al. Comparative analysis of transcriptome in subcutaneous fat between Hainan black goat and Nubian × Hainan black hybrid goat. Anim Husb Vet Med 2023;55:1–7.

11. Allison AJ. Importing a sheep which offers more-the East Friesian. In : Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production; 55:The New Zealand Society of Animal Production; 1995. p. 321–3.
pmid
12. Wang PF. Determination of production performance and correlation analysis between GDF9 gene and reproductive performance of Donghu hybrid sheep. Anhui Agricultural University; 2022.

13. Yang H, Yang YL, Li GQ, Yu Q, Yang J. Identifications of immune-responsive genes for adaptative traits by comparative transcriptome analysis of spleen tissue from Kazakh and Suffolk sheep. Sci Rep 2021;11:3157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82878-x
crossref pmid pmc
14. Squire JM, Paul DM, Morris EP. Myosin and actin filaments in muscle: structures and interactions. Subcell Biochem 2017;82:319–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49674-0_11
crossref pmid
15. Yue C, Wang J, Shen Y, et al. Whole-genome DNA methylation profiling reveals epigenetic signatures in developing muscle in Tan and Hu sheep and their offspring. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1186040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1186040
crossref pmid pmc
16. Cao C, Cai Y, Li Y, et al. Characterization and comparative transcriptomic analysis of skeletal muscle in female Pekin duck and Hanzhong Ma duck during different growth stages using RNA-seq. Poult Sci 2023;102:103122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103122
crossref pmid pmc
17. Van Ho AT, Hayashi S, Bröhl D, Auradé F, Rattenbach R, Relaix F. Neural crest cell lineage restricts skeletal muscle progenitor cell differentiation through Neuregulin1-ErbB3 signaling. Dev Cell 2011;21:273–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.019
crossref pmid
18. Ilişiu E, Dărăban S, Gabi-Neaşcu M, Ilişiu VC, Rahman G. Improvement of lamb production in Romania by crossbreeding of local Tsigai breed with high performance breeds. Agric For Res 2010;60:259–66.

19. Cheng S, Wang X, Zhang Q, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis identifying the different molecular genetic markers related to production performance and meat quality in longissimus dorsi tissues of MG × STH and STH sheep. Genes 2020;11:183. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020183
crossref pmid pmc
20. Shi J, Wang X, Song Y, Liu T, Cheng S, Zhang Q. Excavation of genes related to the mining of growth, development, and meat quality of two crossbred sheep populations based on comparative transcriptomes. Animals 2021;11:1492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061492
crossref pmid pmc
21. Song Y, Zhang Q, Shi J, Fu L, Cheng S. Screening of genes related to growth, development and meat quality of sahan crossbred F1 sheep based on RNA-seq technology. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:831519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.831519
crossref pmid pmc
22. Bai X, Yin F, Ru A, et al. Muscle fiber composition affects the postmortem redox characteristics of yak beef. Food Chem 2022;397:133797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022. 133797
crossref pmid
23. Su L, Zhao C, Sun B, et al. Effects of exercise on muscle fiber conversion, muscle development and meat quality of Sunit sheep. Meat Sci 2024;211:109440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109440
crossref pmid
24. Picard B, Gagaoua M. Muscle fiber properties in cattle and their relationships with meat qualities: an overview. J Agric Food Chem 2020;68:6021–39. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02086
crossref pmid
25. Ciecierska A, Motyl T, Sadkowski T. Transcriptomic profile of primary culture of skeletal muscle cells isolated from semitendinosus muscle of beef and dairy bulls. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:4794. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134794
crossref pmid pmc
26. Huang C, Zhang D, Wang Z, et al. Validation of protein biological markers of lamb meat quality characteristics based on the different muscle types. Food Chem 2023;427:136739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136739
crossref pmid
27. Pan P, Qin Z, Xie W, Chen B, Guan Z, Xie B. Identification of differentially expressed genes in the longissimus dorsi muscle of Luchuan and duroc pigs by transcriptome sequencing. Genes 2023;14:132. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010132
crossref pmid pmc
28. Li Y, Zhou T, Zhuang J, et al. Effects of feeding restriction on skeletal muscle development and functional analysis of TNNI1 in New Zealand white rabbits. Anim Biotechnol 2023;34:4435–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2155662
crossref pmid
29. Liu Y, Fu Y, Yang Y, et al. Integration of multi-omics data reveals cis-regulatory variants that are associated with phenotypic differentiation of eastern from western pigs. Genet Sel Evol 2022;54:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00754-2
crossref pmid pmc
30. Li Y, Ma Q, Shi X, Yuan W, Liu G, Wang C. Comparative transcriptome analysis of slow-twitch and fast-twitch muscles in dezhou donkeys. Genes 2022;13:1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091610
crossref pmid pmc
31. Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 2011;91:1447–531. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2010
crossref pmid
32. Qu Z, Liu A, Liu C, et al. Theaflavin promotes mitochondrial abundance and glucose absorption in myotubes by activating the CaMKK2-AMPK signal axis via calcium-ion influx. J Agric Food Chem 2021;69:8144–59. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02892
crossref pmid
33. Pingault V, Zerad L, Bertani-Torres W, Bondurand N. SOX10: 20 years of phenotypic plurality and current understanding of its developmental function. J Med Genet 2022;59:105–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108105
crossref pmid pmc
34. Gammill LS, Roffers-Agarwal J. Division of labor during trunk neural crest development. Dev Biol 2010;344:555–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.04.009
crossref pmid pmc
35. Escher P, Lacazette E, Courtet M, et al. Synapses form in skeletal muscles lacking neuregulin receptors. Science 2005;308:1920–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108258
crossref pmid
36. Ma X, Tang Z, Wang N, et al. Identification of extracellular matrix and cell adhesion molecule genes associated with muscle development in pigs. DNA Cell Biol 2011;30:469–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2011.1218
crossref pmid
37. Buck CA, Horwitz AF. Cell surface receptors for extracellular matrix molecules. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1987;3:179–205. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cb.03.110187.001143
crossref pmid
38. Abid MSR, Bredahl EC, Clifton AD, Qiu H, Andrews MT, Checco JW. Proteomic identification of seasonally expressed proteins contributing to heart function and the avoidance of skeletal muscle disuse atrophy in a hibernating mammal. J Proteome Res 2024;23:215–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00540
crossref pmid pmc
39. Wu L, Zhang S, Li X, et al. Integrative transcriptomics and proteomic analysis of extraocular muscles from patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Exp Eye Res 2020;193:107962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.107962
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 1 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 790 View
  • 62 Download
Related articles


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2025 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next