Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 38(4); 2025 Special Issue > Article
Sumiati, Fadilah, Darmawan, and Nadia: Challenges and constraints to the sustainability of poultry farming in Indonesia

Abstract

Although the demand for poultry products in Indonesia, one of the most significant poultry-producing countries in Southeast Asia, continues to increase, the poultry farming sector continues to face various challenges. This paper provides an overview of the prospects for and challenges faced by the poultry farming sector in Indonesia. Broilers comprise the largest portion of Indonesia’s poultry population, with other commodities contributing less than 10% of the total. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the consumption of chicken meat and eggs increased. The declining national economy led people to consume affordable food for their daily meals, favoring chicken and eggs because their retail prices were four times cheaper than that of beef. In terms of imports to Indonesia, compared with other agricultural commodities, poultry and eggs account for only approximately 1.26% and 0.41%, respectively. Meanwhile, some feed ingredients, such as soybean meal and corn, continue to be imported into Indonesia. According to data from the United States Department of Agriculture, Indonesia imported 4.4 million tons of soybean meal to meet the needs of its poultry industry. In recent years, feed mill companies have rapidly been developing in Indonesia, with an estimated average production of 572,000 metric tons. In terms of scale, poultry farming in Indonesia comprises 60% large-scale farming and 40% small- and medium-scale farming. Many small-scale farms have yet to implement strict biosecurity measures, making climate change a significant challenge for poultry farming in Indonesia. After implementing the ban on antibiotic growth promoters, Indonesia’s poultry farming sector began to stabilize and look for alternative methods to maintain productivity. The use of technology, improved regulations, and the enhancement of farmers’ capacity to manage challenges are key toward sustaining and increasing poultry farming productivity in Indonesia in the future.

INTRODUCTION

Poultry farming is a crucial sector of the Indonesian economy, particularly as a source of animal protein. Chicken meat and eggs are Indonesia’s most consumed poultry products, primarily due to their relatively affordable prices compared with other protein sources, such as beef [1]. As Indonesia’s population grows and its purchasing power increases, demand for chicken meat and eggs continues to rise [2]. However, various challenges could hinder the sustainability of Indonesia’s poultry farming sector.
One challenge facing the industry is the fluctuating price of feed, the largest component of poultry production costs. Most feedstuffs, such as corn and soybean meal (SBM), continue to be imported in Indonesia, making feed prices highly dependent on international market dynamics [3,4]. This dependency results in considerable fluctuations in feed prices, significantly affecting production costs and market prices. Meanwhile, climate change represents a significant external challenge to the sustainability of poultry farming in Indonesia [5]. Higher temperatures due to global warming and unpredictable weather patterns can result in heat stress, which can reduce productivity, lessen growth, and increase mortality rates [6]. This impact is more pronounced for smallholder farmers who cannot afford climate control technology. In terms of regulations, the government’s ban on antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) has created new challenges for farmers. Although this policy aims to reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance in humans, many farmers have faced difficulty in maintaining poultry health without using AGPs [7]. Therefore, many farmers have sought alternatives such as probiotics and natural feed additives; however, the effectiveness of these alternatives in maintaining productivity is not always optimal and often constrained by high costs and availability [8]. The situation is further exacerbated by the low implementation of biosecurity measures at some farms, especially small-scale farms, which increases the risk of disease spread [9]. This paper presents a brief overview of the poultry industry in Indonesia, including future prospects, opportunities, challenges, and solutions to support the sustainability of the poultry industry in Indonesia.

CURRENT SITUATIONS

Poultry population in Indonesia

Indonesia’s poultry industry plays a vital role in the country’s agricultural sector, supplying crucial protein to millions of people through products such as chicken meat and eggs. In recent years, the industry has experienced significant growth, driven by rising domestic demand due to population growth, urbanization, and increased incomes [10]. Indonesia is one of the largest poultry producers in Southeast Asia, featuring a diverse array of farms, from large-scale commercial operations to small backyard setups.
In 2022, Indonesia had a population of 3.11 billion broiler chickens, 0.37 billion laying hens, 0.3 billion native chickens, and 56 million ducks (including Muscovy ducks). The broiler population has increased nearly every year, except for a decrease of 7.8% from 2019 to 2020. Figure 1 presents the populations of broiler chickens, laying hens, and native chickens in Indonesia. Broilers account for the largest share of the poultry population at 80%. Several broiler chicken strains can be found in Indonesia, including Cobb, Ross, Indian River, Hubbard [11], Lohmann, and Hybro. Meanwhile, layer and native chickens constitute less than 10% of the population, whereas other commodities, such as ducks and quails, constitute less than 2% to the total poultry population [2]. Figure 2 presents the poultry population (in percentages) by type.

Consumption, supply, and demand of broiler chicken meat

Poultry meat consumption, especially broiler meat, has increased from year to year in line with the country’s growing population. In 2019, broiler meat consumption was 5.7 kg per capita per year and consistently increased to 7.46 kg per capita per year in 2023 (Figure 3). However, this consumption is only household consumption, excluding stalls, restaurants, and hotels. Figure 4 illustrates the supply and demand trends for broiler chicken meat in Indonesia from 2020 to 2023. Throughout this period, the supply is generally able to meet the demand for broiler chicken meat. In 2020, the supply was almost 3.5 million tons, while demand 3.4 million tons [12]. However, in 2021, both supply and demand declined 1.66% and 7.08%, respectively [13]. By 2022, supply increased but the demand was almost same as the previous year [14]. From 2020 to 2022, broiler meats indicated a slight surplus. In 2023, the demand exceeded the supply, with values at 4 million tons and 3.5 million tons, respectively [2].
In addition to the needs of the community, several factors affect the availability of broiler chicken meat:
  • a. Domestic production: chicken production in Indonesia is influenced by farm capacity, technology adoption, feed quality, and animal health conditions.

  • b. Technology and infrastructure: modern technologies such as closed-house systems can improve production efficiency and chicken meat quality.

  • c. Government policies: subsidies, technical support, and veterinary health regulations play a role in improving production.

  • d. Weather and climate: these factors can affect poultry production, especially in areas with open-house systems.

  • e. Imports: the availability of imported chicken can increase domestic supply, especially when local production is insufficient.

Egg consumption, supply, and demand

Eggs remain the first choice of most people in fulfilling their protein needs because of egg’s affordable price. Between 2019 and 2023, egg consumption in Indonesia showed a significant upward trend, reflecting a change in consumption habits. In 2019, egg consumption was approximately 6.74 kg per capita per year (Figure 5). In the following years, this figure has continued to increase due to several factors, such as increased awareness of the nutritional value of eggs, population growth, and economic development. By 2022, egg consumption had increased to approximately 7.37 kg per capita per year, highlighting a significant shift in consumption habits over five years. In particular, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic greatly influenced the increase in egg consumption. In addition, efforts made by the Indonesian government and various other organizations to promote poultry farming and egg production across the country also contributed to this increase. Meanwhile, improvements in infrastructure, such as better distribution networks and the increased availability of feed, have contributed to enhance egg distribution. Campaigns highlighting the nutritional value of eggs, including their protein content and affordability, have further boosted their popularity among Indonesian consumers. As such, the rising egg consumption trend is expected to continue, supported by ongoing efforts to enhance production and distribution capabilities.
Figure 6 shows the supply and demand for laying hen eggs in Indonesia from 2020 to 2023. In this period, the supply consistently exceeded the demand. In 2020, the supply was 5 million tons, while demand reached 4.9 million tons [12]. Both supply and demand increased slightly in 2021 [13]. In 2022, there was a more significant rose in supply, for 14.9%, while demand increased for 4.81% [14]. By 2023, demand showed notable growth, surpassing 6 million ton, while supply also increased to 5.8 million tons. This trend highlights a steady rise in both the supply and demand for laying hen eggs, with demand growing at a slightly faster rate.

Poultry commodity trading

According to the Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health of the Ministry of Agriculture [15], Indonesia must import grandparent stock (GPS) chickens in the form of day-old chicks (DOCs) every year to meet local demand for broilers and layers. The need to import GPS chickens is based on the technical calculations in the national production plan for National Stock Replacement mandated by Minister of Agriculture Regulation No. 32/2017 [15].
In 2021–2023, GPS DOC imports fluctuated, decreasing from 649,000 birds in 2021 to 641,000 birds in 2022 before increasing to 691,000 birds in 2023 (Table 1). The number of GPS broilers was determined for each farmer in 2021, based on the decree of the Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health on Standard Operating Procedures, including ownership and/or control of poultry slaughterhouses and cold chain facilities, the performance of GPS/PS poultry farms, and the export of poultry chicks and products.
Meanwhile, the volume of poultry imports and exports in Indonesia decreased in 2021 and then increased in 2022 (Table 2). Indonesia exported a considerable amount of chicken meat, with an increase in 2021, whereas imports of chicken meat declined from 2020 to 2022 in response to increased domestic chicken meat production. Indonesia exported a significant amount of poultry meat to several countries, including Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Egypt, Turkey, and Croatia [16]. However, annual egg imports continue to increase to meet demand, and egg exports were expected to decline from 2020 to 2022 [2].
Indonesia’s poultry industry continues to depend on imported feed raw materials, particularly SBM and corn. The main suppliers of SBM to Indonesia are Argentina, Brazil, and the United States. According to data from the Central Bureau of Statistics [17], soybean imports to Indonesia increased compared with 2021 in 2022 and 2023. The volume of soybean imports in 2021 was 722,000 tons, which increased to 724,000 tons in 2022 and 2023 (Table 3). Moreover, according to data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Indonesia imported about 4.4 million tons of SBM in 2022. This dependency is due to insufficient domestic soybean production in Indonesia, making imports essential to meet the needs of the country’s growing poultry sector.
Indonesia has three primary corn-producing areas, namely, Java (40%), Sulawesi (24%), and Nusa Tenggara (10%) [18]. Domestic production, however, often proves insufficient to meet high demand for poultry feed. Consequently, Indonesia imports corn and other essential ingredients for poultry feed. A report from the USDA [18] indicates that Indonesia’s corn imports remain considerable, particularly from Brazil and Argentina, and complement local production, despite ongoing initiatives by the government to enhance domestic corn cultivation and reduce the reliance on imports.

OPPORTUNITIES

Poultry farming in Indonesia has a number of opportunities driven by various socioeconomic and policy factors. With the large and growing population, demand for affordable protein sources like chicken meat and eggs is consistently high, as these products remain inexpensive compared with other protein options. Meanwhile, growth in the Indonesian poultry sector is characterized by differences in productivity between large-scale farms smallholder farms. Government policies to support the poultry sector, such as through subsidies, biosecurity implementation, and infrastructure development, offer promising prospects for growth and improved efficiency. Finally, the integration of modern technology and better supply chain management along with government intervention provides significant opportunities to increase productivity and meet growing demand in domestic and export markets.

The growing Indonesia population

Population data can be the main reference for the government in planning and evaluating development based on assumptions about components of the population growth rate, such as births, deaths, and migration [19]. Indonesia’s rapid population growth provides excellent opportunities for the growth of poultry farming.
Indonesia’s population in 2024 is around 281.6 million, and it ranks fourth globally [19]. The Central Bureau of Statistics has made several Indonesia population projection to plan and make policy in developing program. The formulation of population projection 2015–2045 uses assumption with two scenarios, which are scenario A is based on assumptions relatef to policy and scenario B is based on trend [19]. Scenario A estimates a population growth of 1.00% from 2015 to 2025, whereas scenario B envisages a growth of 0.99% (Figure 7) [19]. In scenario A, Indonesia’s population in 2030 and 2045 would be 294.1 and 318.9 million people, respectively. Indonesia’s increasing population has a significant impact on poultry farming. In particular, the growing population has resulted in an increased demand for affordable and accessible protein sources, especially from chicken meat and eggs. Poultry farming is predicted to grow to meet the increased demand, potentially increasing economic growth and creating jobs in rural areas.

The high price of non-poultry animal product

In addition to population and economic improvement, cultural preferences are positively correlated with consumption of poultry products. The cultural preference for poultry products as traditional dishes and growing awareness about their nutritional benefits have contributed to this positive trend. In Indonesia, the total consumption of protein sources such as beef, chicken, eggs, and tofu has increased significantly due to price differences and cultural preferences. Chicken meat is the most commonly consumed source of protein due to its affordability and wide availability [20]. Broiler meat, eggs, and beef per kilogram cost approximately US$2, US$1.77, and US$8, respectively [21]. As beef is priced at four times the cost of broiler meat, it is a less affordable option for daily meals (Table 4). In particular, during the COVID-19 pandemic, people were looking for affordable, nutritious options; further, the majority of the Muslim population in Indonesia preferred eggs and chicken over pork.

Feed mills in Indonesia

Feed mill companies have rapidly developed in Indonesia, corresponding to the increased demand for poultry feed. In 2023, Indonesia had 107 feed mill factories, at both large and small scales, with an average production capacity of 702,000 metric tons (MT) and an estimated average production of 572,000 MT (Table 5) [22].

Poultry farming scale in Indonesia

Large- and small-scale poultry farmers in Indonesia are significantly different in terms of business scale, adoption of technology, access to capital, and distribution networks [23]. Large poultry farmers have advantages in production efficiency and market penetration; meanwhile, small poultry farmers play an important role in meeting local needs and supporting the rural economy [9]. Small farms are usually managed by families or individuals with simpler management and represent small-scale operations with relatively few livestock [24]. Meanwhile, large breeders are professionally managed by staff with special skills and have a wide distribution network that can even reach foreign countries.
According to data from the Poultry Farmers Association, around 200 to 300 large poultry farmers control most poultry production in Indonesia. These farmers are typically affiliated with large integrated companies such as PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia and PT Japfa Comfeed Indonesia, and other multinational companies. Meanwhile, based on data from the Ministry of Agriculture, the number of small poultry farmers in Indonesia is estimated to exceed 1 million. They are spread across various regions, particularly rural areas, and represent the backbone of the country’s poultry production. It is estimated that 60% of poultry production comes from industrialized farms (closed-house systems) while 40% remains in the hands of small and medium players (open-house system) [25].

Technology

One poultry farming technology in Indonesia is the closed-house system. Housing is a crucial aspect of poultry farming. Some farms in Indonesia have started to use closed-house systems, mostly operated through corporate partnerships [26]. These collaborations reduce construction and maintenance costs. Closed-house systems offer numerous benefits, such as the ability to maintain an optimal environment by regulating heat, moisture, and harmful gases (CO, CO2, and NH3) [27]. Moreover, closed-house systems can provide better feed conversion ratios, lower mortality rate, greater profitability, and improved performance compared with open-house systems [9,23].

CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS

Indonesia’s poultry farming industry faces various challenges, such as climate change, which affects the health and productivity of poultry, and poor biosecurity, increasing the risk of disease transmission. The ban on AGPs also presents an obstacle, as farmers must find alternatives to maintain their poultry’s growth and health. In addition, outbreaks of diseases such as avian influenza and Newcastle disease often lead to significant economic losses. Overcoming these obstacles requires improved strict biosecurity practices, the adoption of environmentally friendly technologies, and the use of safe and effective alternative feed materials. Efforts to increase vaccination and strict disease monitoring must also be enhanced to prevent and control disease outbreaks in poultry.

Climate changes in Indonesia

Indonesia is a tropical country with only two seasons, the rainy and dry seasons. Extreme changes in temperature and humidity can adversely affect various sectors, especially the livestock sector. Since the industrial revolution, greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) have increased in the atmosphere and led to climate change. CH4 and CO2 levels in the air cause increased temperatures on the Earth’s surface, and the livestock sector is considered to be the largest global contributor of CH4 and nitrous oxide at around 10% to 12% of anthropogenic emissions [28]. Therefore, climate change greatly affects poultry production, especially in tropical countries including Indonesia.
Layer and broiler chickens are quite sensitive to the climatic environment and maintain their internal temperatures through physiological and behavioral thermoregulation. Through physiological thermoregulation, chickens alter their metabolism to control their body temperature [29]. Ambient temperatures above 30°C generally have a negative impact on chickens and lead to reduced feed consumption and body weight and increased mortality. Moreover, heat stress can also affect the quality of poultry meat, such as a significantly worsened appearance, texture, and flavor [30].
Heat stress not only reduces feed consumption and body weight but also disrupts egg production by laying hens [31]. Heat stress in laying hens can disrupt egg-producing hormones such as luteinizing hormone, reduce ovulation function, and result in poor egg quality. An increase in ambient temperature can cause hens to increase their respiratory rate to 151 times per minute [32], which can reduce the availability of blood bicarbonate for eggshell mineralization and ultimately affect egg production negatively [33].
Temperature fluctuations in Indonesia contribute to failures in optimal poultry production. For instance, the minimum temperature is around 22°C, but the maximum temperature can reach 36°C in the western and eastern parts of the country (Figure 8). The heat stress index can exceed 160 in certain months (Table 6). This condition is uncomfortable for birds and leads to decreased production. Closed- or semiclosed-house systems can be a solution to climate change in Indonesia. Alternative solutions that can be implemented by large-scale farmers are using solar energy for lighting and temperature regulation, improving waste management by processing it into fertilizer [34], and government support for sustainable practices, such as tax incentives for renewable energy adoption or subsidies for climate-resilient infrastructure.

Poor implementation of biosecurity

Based on the how strictly they implement biosecurity measures, poultry farms in Indonesia are categorized into four sectors [35]. The modern farms in Sector 1 are run by large multinational companies that have implemented very strict biosecurity measures. Meanwhile, the commercial farms in Sector 2 have implemented medium to high biosecurity, where chickens are kept in closed areas to prevent contact with wild animals. Sector 3 comprises commercial farms, often found in Indonesia, that feature simple biosecurity measures with open-house systems that allow chickens to remain in contact with wild animals. Finally, farms in Sector 4 continue to use traditional systems without implementing biosecurity measures and are dominated by small-scale farms that often lack the resources and knowledge to implement effective protocols. These farms may not have appropriate facilities for quarantine, disinfection, or controlled access, increasing the risk of disease transmission. Furthermore, inadequate vaccination coverage and improper handling of sick or dead birds exacerbate the problem. Consequently, even farms with stringent biosecurity measures are at risk of potential contamination from neighboring operations with lower standards. According to Ilham [36], one of the causes of the weak biosecurity in Sectors 3 and 4 is limited funds, due to which farmers are unable to implement efficient and effective biosecurity. However, the government has begun to address this issue through activities including forming farmer groups and providing coaching to ensure biosecurity through village-based disinfectants by involving all levels of animal health stakeholders [37].

Prohibition of antibiotic growth promoters

Before the ban on AGPs, officially implemented in January 2018, the poultry industry in Indonesia relied heavily on AGPs to enhance growth rates and feed efficiency. AGPs were routinely added to feed to prevent disease and promote faster growth, and they were economically beneficial for farmers. However, this practice raised significant concerns about the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which could carry severe implications for animal and human health. As resistant bacteria could be transferred to humans by consuming poultry products or through direct contact with animals, the use of AGPs undermined the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating human infections [38].
Following the decision to ban AGPs, the transition period was marked by significant challenges. Farmers had to quickly adapt to new regulations while looking for alternative methods to maintain productivity and prevent disease. This period saw a notable decline in growth rates and feed efficiency, as many farms struggled to achieve the same level of performance without AGPs. Moreover, the industry faced increased costs due to the need for more comprehensive biosecurity measures, vaccination programs, and alternative growth promoters such as probiotics, prebiotics, and organic acids. In addition, the transition required substantial investments in infrastructure and farmer education, increasing the financial burden on poultry producers.
Following the AGP ban, the Indonesian poultry industry began to stabilize and adapt to the new regulatory landscape. The use of alternative growth promoters became widespread, and improvements in biosecurity practices were evident at many farms. The AGP alternatives researched and employed in Indonesia are presented in Table 7. The poultry industry has shifted toward using natural growth promoters such as probiotics, prebiotics, phytobiotics, and organic acids to maintain gut health and improve feed efficiency. Organic acids have also been used to reduce gut pH and inhibit pathogenic bacteria, contributing to better overall flock health. Probiotics such as Lactobacillus and Bacillus have effectively improved digestion and nutrient absorption [39]. Prebiotics support the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, whereas phytobiotics and organic acids act as natural antimicrobials and growth enhancers. These alternatives, while initially costly and challenging to implement, have gradually proved effective in maintaining productivity levels.

Avian influenza and Newcastle disease virus outbreak

Avian influenza, Newcastle disease, and coccidiosis develop rapidly under low biosecurity conditions and pose a significant risk to the poultry population and farming productivity. The increasing prevalence of these diseases requires strict implementation of biosecurity measures and possibly greater use of veterinary drugs, which would further increase production costs. Indeed, the HPAI H5N1 virus has remained endemic in Indonesian poultry since 2003, causing significant economic losses to commercial and small-scale poultry operations. In areas with high infection rates, the virus has been found in 32 of 34 provinces, leading to the death of millions of birds and the closure of many farms [40].
According to the standard naming convention for the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of the HPAI H5N1 virus, HA evolved from clade 2.1 into several subclades as the virus circulated among poultry in Indonesia from 2003 to 2010 [41]. Since the detection of the first highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in Indonesia in 2003, the disease has caused the death of millions of birds and disrupted the livelihoods of many people who depend on poultry-keeping. Notably, in 2015, there was a significant decline in avian influenza cases in Indonesia, with only 76 cases (Figure 9). The number of avian influenza virus cases has continued to decline, and most recently, cases have been reported in only three provinces.
The first reported outbreak of Newcastle disease occurred on Java Island in 1926. To this day, disease remains endemic to Indonesia, with ongoing outbreaks affecting free-range and commercial poultry farms [42]. According to data from the Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture [43], Newcastle disease continues to affect poultry populations across various provinces in Indonesia. There were 8,060 cases of Newcastle disease reported in 2020, but this number declined in 2021 and 2022 to 7,413 and 530 infected birds, respectively (Figure 10), which decreased by 92.85%.
The implementation of strict biosecurity measures and mandatory vaccines can be a solution for preventing diseases, especially avian influenza and Newcastle disease. Several factors should be taken when selecting the most effective and practical vaccination program, such as required level of protection, the immune status of the poultry, the pathogenicity strains, correlation with other poultry diseases, the method of vaccine application, and monitoring the immune response [43]. Newcastle disease and avian influenza can occur simultaneously in poultry, causing significant losses for poultry farmers. Chicken vaccination can be carried out using live vaccines, inactivated vaccines, or a combination of both. Vaccine manufacturers have developed combination vaccines as an effort to control newcastle disease and avian influenza in Indonesia [44]. Research from Kencana et al [44], stated that the combination vaccine also has several advantages, including the ability to be given at the same time to birds, thereby reducing the stress levels that may arise after vaccination. The cost of poultry farming can also be reduced by using the inactivated newcastle disease-avian influenza combination vaccine. In broiler chickens, a single vaccination with the inactivated vaccine is sufficient, whereas in layer chickens, revaccination is required before the laying period to trigger a protective secondary immune response, safeguarding the chickens against newcastle disease amd avian influenza cases in the field.

CONCLUSION

Poultry farming in Indonesia plays a crucial role in providing affordable animal protein sources for the community; however, its sustainability faces several challenges. Fluctuations in feed prices, which continue to rely heavily on imports, the impact of climate change, and regulations related to antibiotic use are the main issues affecting the sector’s efficiency and productivity. The current situation demonstrates that the poultry industry is still struggling to balance supply and demand, especially with limited access to technology and wider markets for smallholder farmers. Therefore, achieving sustainability for poultry farming in Indonesia, collaborations among the government, academia, and the private sector are needed. Moreover, applying appropriate technology, improving regulations, and increasing the capacity of farmers to manage external challenges are key for maintaining and increasing the productivity of this sector in the future.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Sumiati.

Data curation: Sumiati, Fadilah R, Darmawan A, Nadia R.

Formal analysis: Sumiati, Darmawan A, Nadia R.

Methodology: Sumiati, Nadia R.

Software: Nadia R.

Validation: Sumiati.

Investigation: Sumiati, Fadilah R, Darmawan A, Nadia R.

Writing - original draft: Sumiati, Fadilah R, Darmawan A, Nadia R.

Writing - review & editing: Sumiati, Fadilah R, Darmawan A, Nadia R.

FUNDING

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors appreciated Prof. Jong K. Ha, the Editor-in-Chief of Animal Bioscience, and team for the invitation to the Animal Bioscience Forum 2024.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

During the preparation of this work, ChatGPT and Scispace was used. ChatGPT was used in order to plan and translate some words. Scispace was used in order to find articles relevant to what will be written. After using this tool, the manuscript was reviewed and edited as needed, with full responsibility by authors for the publication.

Figure 1
Population of broiler chickens, laying hens, and native chicken (billion heads) in Indonesia (2016–2022). Data from Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan [2].
ab-24-0678f1.jpg
Figure 2
Percentage of poultry population by type in 2022. Data from Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan [2].
ab-24-0678f2.jpg
Figure 3
Broiler meat consumption in Indonesia (kg per capita per year), 2019–2023. Data from Ministry of Agriculture [21].
ab-24-0678f3.jpg
Figure 4
Supply and demand for chicken meat (tons) in 2020–2023. Data from Indrawan et al [9], Fukase and Martin [10], Rofii et al [11], and Subdirectorate of Livestock Statistics [12].
ab-24-0678f4.jpg
Figure 5
Egg consumption in Indonesia (kg per capita per year), 2019–2023. Data from Ministry of Agriculture [21].
ab-24-0678f5.jpg
Figure 6
Supply and demand of laying hen eggs (tons) in 2020–2023. Data from Indrawan et al [9], Fukase and Martin [10], Rofii et al [11], and Subdirectorate of Livestock Statistics [12].
ab-24-0678f6.jpg
Figure 7
Indonesia population projections, 2015–2045. Adapted from BPS-Statistics Indonesia [19] with permission of author.
ab-24-0678f7.jpg
Figure 8
Minimum and maximum temperature (°C) in Indonesia in 2023. Data from Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Pelalawan [46] and Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bogor [47].
ab-24-0678f8.jpg
Figure 9
Distribution of avian influenza cases in poultry in Indonesia (affected poultry). Data from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation [57].
ab-24-0678f9.jpg
Figure 10
Distribution of Newcastle disease in affected poultry in Indonesia, 2017–2022. Adapted from Dharmayanti et al [43] with permission of CC-BY-NC.
ab-24-0678f10.jpg
Table 1
Import of day-old-chick broiler grandparent stock (birds) in 2021–20231)
Month 2021 2022 2023
January - - -
February 47,120 59,930 47,000
March 68,226 48,950 39,503
April 60,780 59,303 50,485
May 81,726 59,463 94,735
June 85,250 113,748 71,882
July 24,049 41,975 81,586
August 77,604 74,134 26,391
September 58,769 48,023 111,846
October 38,591 76,059 52,173
November 69,038 57,616 59,546
December 38,592 2,217 56,136
Total 649,745 641,418 691,283

1) Data from Association of Poultry Breeding Companies [45].

Table 2
Import and export volumes of poultry commodities (tons) in 2020–20221)
Commodity Year

2020 2021 2022
Import volume
 Chicken 66.16 58.81 64.11
 Chicken meat 419.47 277.67 34.56
 Turkey meat - - 0.08
 Egg 2,027.55 1,999.30 2,036.40
Export volume
 Chicken 22.32 17.48 23.60
 Chicken meat 594.53 652.56 477.78
 Turkey meat 26 21.17 3.23
 Egg 78 52.11 51.04

1) Data from Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan [2].

Table 3
Soybean import data for Indonesia by country of origin in 2017–20231)
Country of origin (kg) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
United States 2,637,125 2,520,253 2,513,311 2,238,480 2,152,633 1,928,076 1,949,365
Canada 12,103.98 54,531.27 128,911 229,644 232,009 287,991 271,280
Argentina 5,000.00 - - 633.02 89,951.00 60,823.00 23,127.00
Brazil 500.88 - 18,900.00 0.00 9,238.30 41,735.00 24,220.00
Malaysia 9,505.47 10,413.11 8,683.48 6,363.13 5,547.50 5,208.30 6,331.70
France - 126.81 230.95 120.74 212.40 - 40.00
India 0.00 - - 0.00 76.50 - 5.50
Others 7,678.74 484.72 48.77 45.83 22.50 895.80 58.20
Total 765,604.82 814,363.36 750,070.72 606,730.27 722,711.90 724,746.40 724,746.40

1) Data from Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan [2].

Table 4
Food prices of protein sources in Indonesia1)
Comodity Price (Indonesian Rupiah, $)2)

2021 2022 2023 2024
Beef (per kg) 106,087 ($6.59) 120,688 ($7.50) 126,398 ($7.85) 123,578 ($7.68)
Milk (per litre) 15,005 ($0.93) 13,880 ($0.86) 14,521 ($0.90) 15,058 ($0.94)
Pork (per kg) 105,179 ($6.53) 139,261 ($8.65) 109,872 ($6.83) 109,098 ($6.78)
Chicken meat (per kg) 30,690 ($1.90) 31,630 ($1.97) 32,226 ($2.00) 33,180 ($2.06)
Egg (per kg) 24,530 ($1.52) 26,260 ($1.63) 26,430 ($1.64) 28,410 ($1.77)

1) Data from Ministry of Agriculture [21].

2) As per exchange rate on August 7, 2024.

Table 5
Data recap of feed mills In Indonesia, 20231)
No. Company group Number of feedmills Capacity (MT per year) Production estimate (MT per year)
1 CPI Group 16 8,780,000 7,600,000
2 JCI Group 18 5,700,000 4,140,000
3 NHI Group 9 1,700,000 1,550,000
4 CJ Group 6 1,530,000 856,500
5 Malindo Group 7 1,380,000 1,380,000
6 De Heus Group 5 1,320,000 1,170,000
7 Others 46 7,705,200 6,217,560

1) Data from Association of Animal Feed Companies [22].

CPI, Charoen Pokphand Indonesia; JCI, Japfa Comfeed Indonesia; NHI, New Hope Indonesia; CJ, Cheil Jedang.

Table 6
Heat stress index (HSI)1) in Indonesia, 2023
Month West Indonesia East Indonesia

Minimal heat stress index Maximal heat stress index Average heat stress index Minimal heat stress index Maximal heat stress index Average heat stress index
January 142.00 185.84 163.08 121.20 195.00 164.40
February 142.44 184.14 163.72 127.40 193.20 166.40
March 148.36 186.76 164.44 125.20 191.20 166.40
April 141.88 182.56 163.24 114.80 193.20 163.40
May 145.78 184.64 163.60 116.60 193.20 158.80
June 146.24 187.84 163.52 109.80 187.60 155.80
July 139.08 182.12 159.34 105.20 184.60 150.00
August 139.54 177.74 155.52 101.20 186.40 151.00
September 145.36 187.20 162.80 110.80 186.20 155.40
October 135.88 180.80 155.86 107.60 192.00 159.20
November 149.96 187.10 165.42 128.40 193.80 161.20
December 134.00 185.72 161.96 118.40 195.00 163.40

1) HSI is calculated based on formula according to Palupi [48].

Table 7
Research about AGP alternatives in Indonesia
Natural growth promoters Dosage Research topic Animal Result Source
a. Acid PAK
b. Probalac L
c. OGC Soluble
a. 1 L/6,000 birds
b. 25 mL/1,000 birds
c. 100 g/1,000 birds
Evaluation of the effect of probiotics and organic acid supplementation on drinking water Layer chicken Probiotics can control pathogenic bacteria and maintain the immune system while organic acids can lower the pH of the digestive tract to suppress microbial growth Varhan [49]
Lactococcus and Bacillus spesies probiotics 108 cell/g Influence of Lactococcus and Bacillus species probiotics Broiler chicken The feed efficiency of broiler chickens increased Lena et al [39]
B. coagulans D3372 105 cfu/g Effects of dietary B. coagulans D3372 supplemention as probiotics on broiler Lohmann broiler chicken Increasing body weight, performance, and income over feed and chicken cost Zainuddin et al [50]
Curcuma xanthorrhiza and garlic 2% of feed Effects of herbal formulation on the productivity of stunted broilers Stunted broiler (narrative review) Improved growth and performance of the broiler Lestari et al [51]
Acidified turmeric or black pepper powder 1% of feed Effect of acidified turmeric or black pepper on the growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens Lohmann broiler Reduced abdominal fat content and improved meat characteristics of the broiler Sugiharto et al [52]
Natural feed additives
  • Curcumin

  • Gingerol

  • Epigoitrin

  • Andrographis paniculata

  • Tyramine

  • Cianidanol

  • Cyranoside

0.25%–1% of feed Exploring the potential of natural feed additives from herbs as an alternative for AGPs Mojosari layer duck Natural feed additives as natural growth promoter did not impact enzyme performance, regulate insulin levels in ducks, enhancing egg quality and production Djunaidi et al [53]
Binahong (Anredera cordifolia) leaf extract 100–250 mg/kg body weight Effect of Anredera cordifolia extract in water on the performance of the broiler Broiler strain MB 202 The extract had no impact on growth performance Hasiib et al [54]
Blends of Zingiber officinale, Curcuma domestica, Kaempferia galanga, Curcuma xanthorrhiza and probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus megaturium, Lactobacillus plantharum and Lactobacilus sullivarius 1.5 mL/L of water Effect of the probiotic and herb mix on the performance, carcass, and physical quality of broilers Broiler Improved feed conversion ratio and carcass traits of broilers Sukmaningsih and Rahardjo [55]
Phaleria macrocarpa leaf extract More than 20% of drinking water Supplementation with Phaleria macrocarpa leaf extract significantly reduces E. coli infection in broiler Broiler Reduced E. coli counts in the intestine of broilers Diyantoro and Rochmi [56]

AGP, antibiotic growth promoter; B. coagulans, Bacillus coagulans; E. coli, Escherichia coli.

REFERENCES

1. Novra A, Fatati F, Mulawarman M. The comparative study of geographically and demographically of the animal protein consumption from livestock source. Aceh J Anim Sci 2019;4:27–41. https://doi.org/10.13170/ajas.4.1.13549
crossref
2. Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan. Peternakan dalam angka 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik 2023.

3. Ariyanto YN, Mubarokah , Hendrarini H. Analysis of corn supply in Indonesia. J Econom Fin Manag Stud 2023;6:3399–408. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i7-45
crossref
4. Sibuea FA, Sibuea MB, Safitri SA. Indonesian soybean import in international trade. J Manaj Agribisnis 2024;21:122–31. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.21.1.122
crossref
5. Sirajuddin SN, Lestari VS, Saleh IM, Sara U, Kasim J. Effect of climate change on laying hen farms. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res 2017;32:206–14.

6. Apalowo OO, Ekunseitan DA, Fasina YO. Impact of heat stress on broiler chicken production. Poultry 2024;3:107–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry3020010
crossref
7. Coyne L, Patrick I, Arief R, et al. The costs, benefits and human behaviours for antimicrobial use in small commercial broiler chicken systems in Indonesia. Antibiotics 2020;9:154. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040154
crossref pmid pmc
8. Candinegara T. Challenges of using feed additives in Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2020;4492:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012001
crossref
9. Indrawan D, Cahyadi Ruddy E, Daryanto A, Hogeveen H. The role of farm business type on biosecurity practices in West Java broiler farms. Prev Vet Med 2020;176:104910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104910
crossref pmid
10. Fukase E, Martin M. Economic growth, convergence, and world food demand and supply. World Dev 2020;132:104954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104954
crossref
11. Rofii , Ulfah M, Darwati S, Muladno . Performance of four strains of broiler chicken grandparent stock flock in Indonesia. J Anim Sci Univ Padjadjaran 2023;23:178–87. https://doi.org/10.24198/jit.v23i2.47564
crossref
12. Subdirectorate of Livestock Statistics. Livestock in numbers 2020. Subdirectorate of Livestock Statistics 2020.

13. Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan. Peternakan dalam angka 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik 2021.

14. Direktorat Statistik Peternakan, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan. Peternakan dalam angka 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik 2022.

15. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan, Kementerian Pertanian. Kementan: alokasi impor GPS sudah sesuai kalkulasi [Internet]. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan, Kementerian Pertanian; 2021. [cited 2024 Sep 30]. Available from: https://ditjenpkh.pertanian.go.id/berita/1295-kementan-alokasi-impor-gps-sudah-sesuai-kalkulasi

16. Ministry of Agriculture. Macro statistics for agricultural sector 2023. Ministry of Agriculture; 2023.

17. Badan pusat statistik. Impor kedelai menurut negara asal utama 2017–2023 [Internet]. Badan Pusat Statistik; 2023. [cited 2024 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/1/MjAxNSMx/impor-kedelai-menurut-negara-asal-utama-2017-2023.html

18. Formiga Marcela. Grain and feed annual [Internet]. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agriculture Service; 2023. [cited 2024 Sep 4]. Available from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=GrainandFeedAnnual_Brasilia_Brazil_BR2023-0008.pdf

19. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. Indonesia population projection 2015–2045 result of SUPAS 2015 (revised edition). BPS-Statistics Indonesia; 2018.

20. Soriano-Santos J. Chemical composition and nutritional content of raw poultry meat. Handb Poult Sci Techn 2010;1:467–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470504451.ch25
crossref
21. Ministry of Agriculture. Livestock and Animal health statistics 2023. Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health Ministry of Agriculture RI; 2023.

22. Association of Animal Feed Companies. Data recap of feed mills in Indonesia in 2023. Association of Animal Feed Companies; 2023.

23. Indrawan D, Rich KM, van Horne P, Daryanto A, Hogeveen H. Linking supply chain governance and biosecurity in the context of HPAI control in Western Java: a value chain perspective. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00094
crossref pmid pmc
24. Fahrunningsih R, Septiningrum R. Analisis usaha peternakan ayam broiler: studi kasus peternak mandiri di kelurahan Maklalut. J Trop Anim Res 2021;2:1–7.

25. Ferlito C, Respatiadi H. Policy reforms on poultry industry in indonesia [Internet]. Center for Indonesian Policy Studies (CIPS); 2018. [cited 2024 Sep 4]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep62588

26. Mastuti S, Hidayat NN, Widiyanti R, et al. Elasticity analysis of production cost against income of broiler business with open-house and closed-house system in Banyumas regency. Anim Prod 2023;25:51–9. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2023.25.1.200
crossref
27. Hariono , Afnan R, Sumiati , Fadilah R. The effecf of wind chill in closed house on broiler performance. J Ilmu Prod Teknol Has Peternak 2023;11:34–40. https://doi.org/10.29244/jipthp.11.1.34-40
crossref
28. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, et al. Agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU). Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, editorsClimate change 2014: mitigation of climate change Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 811–922.

29. Mutaf S, Seber Kahraman N, Firat MZ. Intermittent partial surface wetting and its effect on body-surface temperatures and egg production of white and brown domestic laying hens in Antalya (Turkey). Br Poult Sci 2009;50:33–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802592399
crossref pmid
30. Feng J, Zhang M, Zheng S, Xie P, Ma A. Effects of high temperature on multiple parameters of broilers in vitro and in vivo. Poult Sci 2008;87:2133–9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00358
crossref pmid
31. Abidin Z, Khatoon A. Heat stress in poultry and the beneficial effects of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) supplementation during periods of heat stress. Worlds Poult Sci J 2013;69:135–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000123
crossref
32. Nascimento ST, da Silva IJO, Mourão GB, de Castro AC. Bands of respiratory rate and cloacal temperature for different broiler chicken strains. Rev Bras Zootec 2012;41:1318–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000500033
crossref
33. Nyoni N, Grab S, Archer E. Heat stress and chickens: climate risk effects on rural poultry farming in low-income countries. Clim Dev 2019;11:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1442792
crossref
34. Yuzaria D, Fitrimawati F, Ikhsan Rias M. Analysis system dynamic of chicken egg production system: case in West Sumatra Indonesia. BIO Web of Conferences 2023;81:00030.
crossref
35. Pramuwidyatama MG, Hogeveen H, Saatkamp HW. A systematic evaluation of measures against highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in Indonesia. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00033
crossref pmid pmc
36. Ilham N. Kebijakan pemerintah terhadap usaha unggas skala kecil dan kesehatan lingkungan di Indonesia. Wartazoa 2015;25:95–105. https://doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v25i2.1146
crossref
37. Thaha AH, Bagenda I. Strategi pengendalian dan pencegahan penyebaran virus highly pathogenic avian influenza pada sektor III dan IV di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar, Sulawesi Barat. J Ilmu Ind Peternak 2019;4:74–83. https://doi.org/10.24252/jiip.v4i1.9810
crossref
38. Hedman HD, Vasco KA, Zhang L. A review of antimicrobial resistance in poultry farming within low-resource settings. Animals 2020;10:1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081264
crossref pmid pmc
39. Lena M, Syahramadani DF, Gustya AN, et al. The influence of Lactococcus and Bacillus species probiotics on performance, energy utilization, intestinal ecosystem of broiler chickens. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2022;10:651–8. https://doi.org/10.17582/JOURNAL.AAVS/2022/10.3.651.658
crossref
40. Karo-karo D, Bodewes R, Wibawa H, et al. Reassortments among avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses circulating in Indonesia, 2015–2016. Emerg Infect Dis 2019;25:465–72. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2503.180167
crossref pmid pmc
41. Smith GJD, Donis RO. World Health Organization/World Organisation for Animal Health/Food and Agriculture Organization (WHO/OIE/FAO) H5 Evolution Working Group. Nomenclature updates resulting from the evolution of avian influenza A(H5) virus clades 2.1.3.2a, 2.2.1, and 2.3.4 during 2013–2014. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2015;9:271–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12324
crossref pmid pmc
42. Dharmayanti NLPI, Hartawan R, Hewajuli DA, Indriani R. Phylogenetic analysis of genotype VII of new castle disease virus in Indonesia. Afr J Microbiol Res 2014;8:1368–74. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmr2014.6601
crossref
43. Dharmayanti NLPI, Nurjanah D, Nuradji H, Suyatno T, Indriani R. Newcastle disease virus: the past and current situation in Indonesia. J Vet Sci 2024;25:e3. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.23022
crossref pmid
44. Kencana GAY, Suartha IN, Paramita NMAS, Handayani AN. Combined newcastle disease (ND) and avian influenza (AI) vaccines induce protective immune response in commercial layer against ND and AI. J Vet 2016;17:257–64. https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2016.17.2.257
crossref
45. Association of Poultry Breeding Companies. Import of day-old-chick broiler grandparent stock (birds) in 2021–2023. Association of Poultry Breeding Companies; 2024.

46. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Pelalawan. Rata-rata suhu menurut bulan ((°C)), 2020–2023 [Internet]. Badan Pusat Statistik; 2024. [cited 2024 Sept 4]. Available from: https://pelalawankab.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTQzIzI=/rata-rata-suhu-udara-menurut-bulan.html

47. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bogor. Rata-rata suhu menurut bulan di Kabupaten Bogor (°C), 2022–2023 [Internet]. Central Bureau of Statistics; 2024. [cited 2024 Sep 4]. Available from: https://bogorkab.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NzQjMg==/rata-rata-suhu-udara-menurut-bulan-di-kabupaten-bogor.html

48. Palupi R. Manajemen mengatasi heat stress pada ayam broiler yang dipelihara dilahan kering. In : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal 2015; 2015 Oct 8–9; Palembang, Indonesia. Unsri Press; p. 275–83.

49. Varhan HZ, Sumiati , Astuti DA. Evaluation of probiotic and organic acid supplementation on drinking water for laying hens at mega farm sukabumi. Nutr Feed Technol J 2022;20:83–8. https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.20.2.83-88
crossref
50. Zainuddin , Darmawan A, Sumiati , Wiryawan KG, Nahrowi . Effects of dietary Bacillus coagulans D3372 supplementation as probiotics on broiler performance, ileal microflora, meat quality, nutrient retention, and metabolizable energy. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2020;8:115–23. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.1.115.123
crossref
51. Lestari R, Fatinah D, Istifani D, Rinawidiastuti R. Pengaruh pemberian ramuan herbal guna meningkatkan produktivitas broiler (Gallus domesticus) stunting. Surya Agritama 2020;9:163–9. https://doi.org/10.37729/suryaagritama.v9i2.722
crossref
52. Sugiharto S, Pratama AR, Yudiarti T, Wahyuni HI, Widiastuti E, Sartono TA. Effect of acidified turmeric and/or black pepper on growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. Int J Vet Sci Med 2020;8:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/23144599.2020.1830691
crossref pmid pmc
53. Djunaidi IH, Damayanti CA, Wibowo S, Sjofjan O. Exploring the potential of natural feed additives from herbs as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters for Mojosari layer duck (Anas javanica) farming: in-silico and in-vivo studies. J Indones Trop Anim Agric 2023;48:243–57. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.48.4
crossref
54. Hasiib EA, Riyanti , Hartono M. Pengaruh pemberian ekstrak daun binahong (Anredera cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis) dalam air minum terhadap performa broiler. J Ilm Peternak Terpadu 2015;3:14–22.

55. Sukmaningsih T, Rahardjo AHD. Pengaruh pemberian campuran probiotik dan herbal terhadap penampilan, karkas, dan kualitas fisik ayam broiler. J Nukl Peternak 2019;6:88–95.

56. Diyantoro , Rochmi SE. Supplementation of Phaleria macrocarpa leaf extract significantly reduced E.coli infection in broiler. Indian Vet J 2019;96:12–4.

57. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation (FAO). ECTAD Indonesia [Internet]. FAO; c2025. [cited 2024 Sep 5]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/indonesia/programmes-and-projects/ectad-indonesia/en/



Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2025 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next