Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 38(7); 2025 > Article
Fu, Ge, Qu, Ouyang, and Qiu: Effects of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone supplementation on growth performance, serum antioxidant capacity, rumen fermentation characteristics, rumen bacterial quorum sensing, and microbial community in Hu sheep

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effects of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on growth performance, serum antioxidant capacity, rumen fermentation characteristics, rumen microbial LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing, and community composition in Hu sheep.

Methods

Twenty-two male Hu sheep with similar body weights (19.97±0.41 kg) and ages (66.75±2.11 days) were evenly divided into two groups: the control group, receiving a basal diet (n = 11, CON), and the treatment group, receiving the basal diet supplemented with an additional 1.0 g/d of HDMF (n = 11, HDMF).

Results

The results showed no significant differences in average daily gain, average daily dry matter intake, and feed conversion ratio between the HDMF and CON groups (p>0.05), but numerical improvements of 11.12%, 4.55%, and 7.56% were observed, respectively. Compared to the CON group, the HDMF group exhibited elevated levels of serum glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase, and decreased levels of malondialdehyde and reactive oxygen species, as well as a reduced oxidative stress index (p<0.05). Dietary HDMF supplementation did not affect rumen fermentation characteristics, except for the proportion of valerate (p<0.05). HDMF supplementation increased the AI-2 signaling molecules concentration and biofilm formation in the rumen fluid (p<0.05). No substantial differences were seen in the richness and evenness of rumen microbes between the HDMF and CON groups. Principal coordinates analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling analyses revealed an obvious overlap between the two groups, and analysis of similarities also indicated no significant differences (R = 0.0116, p = 0.303). Subsequent species annotation and biomarker analysis revealed that the HDMF group reduced the abundances of Shuttleworthia, Eubacterium eligens group, and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG 002, and increased the abundances of Riknellaceae RC9 gut group, Prevotellaceae UCG 003, Desulfobulbus, Methanobrevibacter, and Selenomonas ruminantium.

Conclusion

This study indicates that HDMF supplementation enhances the body’s antioxidant capacity and increases the abundances of certain disease-resistant bacteria by promoting AI-2 signaling molecules and biofilm formation, thereby ultimately contributing to the enhanced growth performance of Hu sheep.

INTRODUCTION

Feed additives are pivotal in boosting the productivity and health of ruminants. They enhance rumen fermentation, optimize nutrient absorption, and bolster overall animal health, which in turn leads to improved growth, reproductive success, and superior quality of products [1]. Integral to the digestive process, rumen microorganisms adeptly convert complex plant fibers into absorbable nutrients [2]. They are critical in transforming feed into meat, milk, and other products, thereby significantly influencing the efficiency and sustainability of ruminant agriculture [3]. Strategically manipulating these microbes via targeted feed additives presents a promising path to increase nutrient utilization and production yields, while also potentially mitigating environmental impacts [4]. Therefore, the development of feed additives designed to regulate rumen microbiota is a viable and promising approach to boost ruminant productivity and promote sustainability.
Quorum sensing (QS) is a communication mechanism used by bacteria to assess their population density and synchronize their behavior based on the presence of autoinducers [5]. This sophisticated system is crucial for the adaptation and survival of bacterial communities within their environments [5]. The LuxS/autoinducer-2 (AI-2) system is a predominant form of QS in rumen microbial communities, with the enzyme LuxS producing AI-2, a signaling molecule that facilitates interspecies communication [6,7]. The presence of AI-2 synthase and receptor genes in many rumen microbial genomes indicates that LuxS/AI-2 QS plays a significant role in the rumen ecosystem, potentially influencing feed degradation and nutrient conversion efficiency. Liu et al [8] found that AI-2 mediated QS can induce biofilm formation, and under the action of these biofilms, rumen microorganisms can effectively degrade fibrous materials in feed. Huws et al [9] also observed that a distinct biofilm forms in the rumen within the first 5 minutes of digesting roughage. During the primary colonization stage, the expression of the luxS gene increased among rumen microbes, while it decreased during the secondary colonization stage. Metagenomic studies have revealed that dairy cows with low feed efficiency had a richer QS metabolic pathway in the rumen [10]. Furthermore, Atlanderova et al [11] reported that QS inhibitors increased the levels of volatile fatty acids (VFA), ammonia nitrogen, and total nitrogen within the rumen fluid of beef cattle, while decreasing the levels of non-protein nitrogen, thus enhancing nitrogen utilization efficiency. These studies suggest that QS modulators may serve as potential feed additives for improving ruminant production performance and enhancing animal health.
4-Hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) is recognized as a common modulator in the LuxS/AI-2 QS system among bacteria [12]. It is a naturally occurring flavor compound found in various fruits and heat-processed foods, such as beef broth, roasted almonds, and coffee [13]. Martinelli et al [14] found that synthetic furanones could mimic the activity of N-acylhomoserine lactones, thereby inducing the formation of violacein. However, HDMF has also been reported to act as an inhibitor of QS in certain bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Trueperella pyogenes, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic agent for combating bacterial infections [15,16]. Moreover, HDMF also has the ability to suppress the expression of virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including biofilm formation, motility, and the QS system [15]. This indicates that HDMF could diminish the virulence of certain bacteria, potentially resulting in a reduced prevalence of diseases in ruminant animals. The findings from these reports demonstrate that the precise impact of HDMF may vary depending on the specific bacterial species involved. Considering the diverse array of species within the rumen, the overall influence of HDMF on the performance and health of ruminants remains to be fully elucidated.
Therefore, a 75-day animal feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of HDMF on various aspects of ruminant health and productivity. The trial aimed to assess the impact of HDMF on growth performance, serum antioxidant capacity, rumen fermentation characteristics, rumen microbial diversity, QS and community composition. The goal was to evaluate the feasibility and underlying mechanisms of HDMF as a feed additive to enhance ruminant production. The study hypothesized that HDMF may promote the growth of sheep by enhancing serum antioxidant capacity and modifying rumen microbial communities and QS. As the first research to explore the application of HDMF in animal production, it aims to pave the way for new insights into the use of QS modulators to advance animal production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal care

In compliance with the highest standards of animal care and welfare, the study was conducted under the strict supervision and authorization of the Committee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals at Jiangxi Agricultural University, as per protocol number JXAULL-2021036.

Animals, diets, and experimental design

A total of twenty-two healthy male Hu sheep, with similar body weight (19.97±0.41 kg) and age (66.75±2.11 days), were divided evenly into two groups. One group was fed a basal diet (n = 11, CON), while the other group received an additional 1.0 g per day of HDMF on top of the basal diet (n = 11, HDMF). The ratio of concentrate to forage in the basal diet was 70:30, with the specific ingredient composition and chemical components as shown in Table 1. HDMF was purchased from Hubei Yongkuo Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianmen, China), with a purity of 99.5%. The entire trial lasted for 75 days, including a 15-day adaptation period and a 60-day experimental period. The sheep were housed individually, with free access to feed and a clean supply of drinking water throughout the trial. Given the requirement to monitor growth performance in this trial, and taking into account that each group comprised 11 biological replicates, we opted not to employ a crossover design.

Sample collection

During the trial, the dry matter intake was recorded daily. The body weights were measured on two consecutive days at the beginning and end of the trial. Two days before the trail’s end, blood was collected from the jugular vein into blood collection tubes and centrifuged at 2,012×g for 15 minutes to obtain serum samples. Before morning feeding, rumen contents were collected using the oral intubation method as described by Paz et al [17], and the the first 50 mL was discarded to reduce saliva contamination. The collected rumen contents included both liquid and solid phases. After passing through four layers of gauze and being divided into centrifuge tubes, they were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then transferred to a laboratory freezer at −80°C for storage.

Parameter determination

The rumen pH value is measured immediately after the rumen fluid is obtained using a portable pH meter (Testo 206, Testo AG, Schwarzwald, Germany). The ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was determined following the protocol established by Broderick and Kang [18], utilizing the phenol-hypochlorite colorimetric method. The concentration of microbial crude protein (MCP) was measured using the Folin phenol method, which is an adaptation of Lowry’s assay, as delineated in the work of Makkar et al [19]. In this study, the VFA assessed included acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, isovalerate, and valerate, with the collective sum of isobutyrate, isovalerate, and valerate categorized as branched-chain VFA (BCVFA). Each VFA component was identified by its relative retention time and quantified against a standard curve, both established under identical operational conditions. The analysis was conducted on a gas chromatograph (GC-2014, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), following the scheduled procedures and parameter settings outlined in Qiu et al [20].
Serum parameters included cortisol and antioxidant indicators, which are used to assess stress status and antioxidant capacity, respectively. In this study, the antioxidant indicators measured included total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and reactive oxygen species (ROS). All assays were conducted strictly according to the instructions provided with the corresponding assay kits from the Beijing Sinouk Institute of Biological Technology (Beijing, China). The oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated by dividing ROS by T-AOC, serving as a comprehensive measure of antioxidant capability.

DNA extraction, sequencing and data analysis

Genomic DNA from rumen fluid samples was extracted utilizing a Bacterial DNA Kit (OMEGA, Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA), employing a two-step protocol that included bead-beating for initial lysis [17]. The integrity and concentration of the DNA were assessed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), respectively. A total of 22 samples, each exhibiting high purity and quality, were forwarded to Allwegene Gene Technology Co., LTD (Nanjing, China) for further amplification and sequencing. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were targeted for amplification to characterize bacterial diversity and community structure, utilizing barcoded primers as reported by Wei et al [21]: 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3′). The amplification protocol and reaction conditions were in accordance with those detailed by Qiu et al [20]. Polymerase chain reaction amplicons were inspected on a 1% agarose gel, purified using Agencourt AMPure XP Kits (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and subsequently used to construct libraries for microbial diversity sequencing. High-throughput sequencing was conducted on an Illumina NextSeq 2000 PE300 platform, generating paired-end reads. The raw sequencing data have been archived in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA1158230.
The sequencing data were subjected to analysis using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME 2) [22]. The paired-end reads were merged using Fast Length Adjustment of Short reads (FLASH, version 1.2.11) [23], with a maximum mismatch rate of 0.10 and a minimum overlap of 10 base pairs. Sequences were filtered out if they did not meet the following criteria: length between 200 and 500 bp, quality score of at least 20, absence of ambiguous bases or chimeric sequences, and match to primer sequences and barcode tags. The sequences that passed the quality control were denoised into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) utilizing the Deblur algorithm within QIIME 2. ASVs from all samples were rarefied to a common depth of 31,113 reads, yielding an average of 265 ASVs per sample. Taxonomic classification of each ASV was conducted using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier at a 70% confidence threshold, aligning with the bacterial SILVA 138 database.

Statistical analysis

The normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. As all data, except for the microbiome data, met the assumptions of normality, an independent samples t-test was performed using SPSS software (version 20; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) to compare the mean differences between the CON and HDMF groups. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05, with a trend was noted p-values between 0.05 to 0.10 (0.05≤p<0.10). For the microbiome data, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the differences between the CON and HDMF groups. QIIME 2 was employed to calculate five alpha diversity indices—Chao 1, observed species, phylogenetic diversity (PD) whole tree, Shannon index, and Simpson index—to characterize the richness and evenness of the rumen bacterial community. To elucidate the differences and similarities between the CON and HDMF groups, principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were performed using R software (version 4.0.2), based on Bray-Curtis distances. An analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) was also conducted to explore the community structure similarities between the CON and HDMF groups, utilizing the vegan package within R software. Furthermore, an Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis was introduced to identify biomarkers within each group. This analysis was carried out using LEfSe software, with an LDA score threshold set at 3.0 [24]. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) was utilized to predict the metagenomic contributions of the detected communities, thereby elucidating the intrinsic ruminal functions of the bacterial microbiota.

RESULTS

Growth performance

Table 2 presents the effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on growth performance of Hu sheep. Compared to the CON group, dietary supplementation with HDMF did not result in significant differences in final body weight (FBW), average daily weight gain (ADG), average daily dry matter intake (DMI), or feed to gain ratio (F/G) (p>0.05). However, there was a numerical increase of 4.72% in FBW, 11.12% in ADG, and 4.55% in DMI. Additionally, there was a 7.56% decrease in the F/G.

Serum antioxidant capacity

The effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on serum antioxidant capacity of Hu sheep is listed in Table 3. Dietary supplementation with HDMF significantly increased the levels of GSH-Px and SOD, reduced the levels of MDA and ROS, and ultimately lowered the OSI (p<0.05). Additionally, there was a trend suggesting that HDMF supplementation might decrease cortisol levels (p = 0.055).

Rumen fermentation characteristics

The effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics of Hu sheep is shown in Table 4. Dietary HDMF supplementation had no significant impact on ruminal pH value, concentrations of MCP, NH3-N, total VFA or individual VFA (p>0.05). In contrast, valerate concentration tended to decrease in the HDMF group (p = 0.096), while the proportion of valerate was significantly lower in the HDMF group compared to the CON group (p<0.05).

Quorum sensing molecules and biofilm formation

As shown in Figure 1, the AI-2 concentration and the level of biofilm formation were higher in the HDMF group compared to the CON group (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in microbial density (p>0.05).

Rumen bacterial diversity and community composition

HDMF supplementation did not alter rumen bacterial richness or evenness, as indicated by the Chao1, observed species, PD whole tree, Shannon index, and Simpson index (p>0.05, Table 5). A total of eleven phyla were observed with relative abundances greater than 0.1%. Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria occupied the top three positions, accounting for 40.18%, 37.86%, and 19.23%, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed between the CON and HDMF groups for any of these phyla (p>0.05, Table 6). Twenty-four genera were observed with relative abundances greater than 0.5%, with Prevotella and Succinivibrio occupying the top two positions, accounting for 32.75% and 13.45%, respectively. The relative abundance of Eubacterium eligens group was significantly lower in the HDMF group compared to the CON group (p<0.05, Table 7).

Beta-diversity of rumen bacteria

As shown in Figure 2, both PCoA (Figure 2A) and NMDS (Figure 2B) plots clearly reveal overlaps between the HDMF and CON groups. Additionally, ANOSIM found no significant differences in the microbial composition between the HDMF and CON groups (R = 0.0116, p = 0.303).

Biomarker analysis

The LDA distribution bar graph (Figure 3A) indicates that a total of twenty-one species were observed with an LDA score greater than 3.0 and a significance level of p<0.05. In the CON group, the biomarkers with significant discriminative power were Bacilli, Erysipeloclostridiaceae, Shuttleworthia, Eubacterium eligens group, and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG 002. In the HDMF group, they were Euryarchaeota, Desulfobulbia, Methanobacteria, Desulfobulbales, Methanobacteriales, Desulfobulbaceae, Rikenellaceae, Methanobacteriaceae, Riknellaceae RC9 gut group, Prevotellaceae UCG 003, Desulfobulbus, Methanobrevibacter, and Selenomonas ruminantium. Cladogram (Figure 3B) derived from the LEfSe analysis revealed the similar biomarkers with LDA distribution bar graph.

Predicted functions of ruminal bacterial microbiota

This study identified 29 gene families in the rumen fluid samples, 23 of which had relative abundances greater than 0.1% (Table 8). Gene families related to the metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, carbohydrate metabolism, and amino acid metabolism were predominant in the rumen microbiome of both HDMF and CON groups. However, no significant differences were observed among these three gene families or any other gene families examined in this study (p>0.05).

DISCUSSION

Effect of dietary supplement of HDMF on growth performance and serum antioxidant capacity of Hu sheep

HDMF exhibits antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties in the biopharmaceutical field [25,26], making it a promising candidate for animal production. HDMF has a sweet caramel-like odor and is one of the major compounds generated by the Maillard reaction [27]. However, no increase in DMI was observed in this study, suggesting that this caramel-like flavor may not a taste preferred by the Hu sheep. While the numerical enhancements in ADG and feed conversion ratio were observed with dietary HDMF supplementation, they did not reach statistical significance. The brevity of the feeding period may have obscured these differences. Echoing this, Li et al [28] reported that there was only a mere numerical increase in growth performance within the initial 60 days of glutamate supplementation, with growth significantly accelerating after 90 days of feeding Hu sheep. A longer feeding period is required to confirm the growth-promoting effects of dietary HDMF supplementation, as the current short-term feeding has already shown numerical improvements.
Serum hormone levels and antioxidant capacity provided a good explanation for the numerical improvements in growth performance. Cortisol is a crucial glucocorticoid in animals, playing a pivotal role in stress response, metabolism, immune modulation, and cognitive function [29]. It helps animals adapt to various challenges by regulating energy availability and maintaining homeostasis [30]. However, high cortisol levels signify a state of physiological arousal, preparing the animal to cope with perceived threats [30]. Dietary supplementation with HDMF tended to decrease the level of cortisol, implying that HDMF can alleviate chronic stress in animals. GSH-Px and SOD are integral components of the antioxidant defense system in animals [31,32]. GSH-Px uses glutathione to reduce hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides, thereby preventing oxidative damage to cellular components [31]. On the other hand, SOD catalyzes the conversion of superoxide radicals into molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, which GSH-Px then further metabolizes [31]. The coordinated action of these enzymes is essential for maintaining cellular redox balance and mitigating the harmful effects of ROS. Higher levels of GSH-Px and SOD were observed in the HDMF group, likely due to the inherent antioxidant properties of HDMF itself. MDA, a byproduct of lipid peroxidation, serves as a biomarker for oxidative stress in animals [33]. The lower levels of MDA in the HDMF group indicate that the addition of HDMF alleviated stress, which corresponds to the trend of decreased cortisol levels. ROS, naturally produced in cells, play a dual role in physiological processes and pathogenesis [34]. Essential for cell signaling and homeostasis, ROS are also implicated in various diseases when present in excessive levels, leading to oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA [34]. The HDMF group exhibited lower levels of ROS, indicating that dietary supplementation with HDMF mitigated oxidative damage in the body. This reduction in overall oxidative stress is further supported by a decreased OSI. The data suggest that HDMF supplementation in the diet can enhance the antioxidant capacity and reduce oxidative stress in Hu sheep, potentially improving their growth performance.

Effect of dietary supplement of HDMF on rumen fermentation characteristics

Rumen fermentation is a critical biological process in ruminants, pivotal for the efficient degradation of fibrous plant material [35]. The complex microbial activity within the rumen transforms cellulose into VFA, which are essential for providing the primary energy substrates for the ruminants [36]. Furthermore, these rumen microorganisms are crucial in nitrogen metabolism, as they convert dietary protein into NH3-N and amino acids. These nitrogenous compounds are then utilized for the synthesis of MCP, which is vital for the protein nutrition of ruminants [37]. In this study, dietary supplementation with HDMF did not alter most of the rumen fermentation characteristics, except for the concentration and proportion of valerate. Valerate is principally produced through the microbial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates and branched-chain amino acids [36]. However, propionibacteria also convert lactic acid into propionic and valeric acids via the propionic acid metabolic pathway [38]. Both the concentration and proportion of valerate decreased after dietary supplementation with HDMF, possibly due to the antimicrobial effect of HDMF leading to a reduction in the activity of propionibacteria. This reduction can also be indirectly corroborated by the decrease in the numerical values of propionate concentration and proportion. These results suggest that the dietary addition of HDMF may inhibit the activity of some VFA-producing microorganisms, thereby reducing the production of valerate. However, the specific mechanisms remain to be elucidated through further investigation.

Effect of dietary supplement of HDMF on rumen bacterial quorum sensing and community structure

In the rumen, the LuxS/AI-2 QS system, identified as the dominant QS mechanism through metagenomic and metatranscriptomic studies, is crucial for interspecies communication among rumen bacteria [6,8]. AI-2, the central and distinctive signaling molecule of the LuxS/AI-2 QS system, allows bacteria to sense its concentration and synchronize their collective actions, such as adjusting cell density and initiating biofilm formation [9,39]. The study revealed that dietary addition of HDMF led to a marked enhancement in AI-2 levels and biofilm formation. These findings suggest that HDMF stimulates rather than suppresses QS among rumen microbial communities, contradicting earlier literature [12]. The discrepancy in outcomes might stem from the fact that previous studies identifying HDMF as an inhibitor of LuxS/AI-2 QS focused on specific bacterial strains in vitro, whereas the rumen houses a diverse microbial community, which could respond differently to HDMF. Furthermore, the complex structure of biofilms not only bolsters bacteria’s resilience against external environmental challenges but also facilitates the adhesion of rumen microorganisms to feed particles [39]. This promotes the efficient breakdown of feed, thereby enhancing feed conversion efficiency [9,39]. The notable increase in biofilm formation observed in the HDMF group sheds light on the numerical upgrades in feed conversion rates and the concurrent increase in serum antioxidant activity following the dietary addition of HDMF.
Alpha diversity metrics quantify the richness and evenness of species within a specific sample or a single ecological community [40]. Alpha diversity plays a pivotal role in preserving the stability and functionality of the rumen ecosystem, significantly impacting the efficiency of feed digestion and nutrient absorption in ruminant animals [41]. There were no significant differences in either species richness or evenness between the CON and HDMF groups, suggesting that dietary supplementation with HDMF did not impact the alpha diversity of the rumen microbial community. Taxonomic annotation offers a more holistic perspective on microbial community structure across various levels. At the phylum level, no significant differences were detected between the CON and HDMF groups. At the genus level, the relative abundance of the Eubacterium eligens group in the HDMF group was significantly lower than that in the CON group. The Eubacterium eligens group is recognized for its pivotal role in producing short-chain fatty acids and its ability to utilize pectin, a complex carbohydrate found in plant cell walls [42]. This pectin-degrading ability is especially crucial in the rumen of ruminant animals, facilitating the fermentation process and bolstering the host’s energy yield. The relative abundance of the Eubacterium eligens group corresponded with the VFA production within the rumen fermentation characteristics, implying that the supplementation with HDMF might not be favorable for the efficiency of nutrient utilization. Nevertheless, this inference necessitates substantiation through further digestive experimentation.
The biomarker analysis revealed a higher discriminatory power at various taxonomic levels, spanning from phylum to species. Bacilli participate in the breakdown of hemicellulose and the utilization of polysaccharides [43], a function analogous to that of the Eubacterium eligens group previously discussed. This similarity further suggests that the dietary inclusion of HDMF could potentially exert adverse effects on nutrient utilization. The presence of Erysipeloclostridiaceae, Shuttleworthia, and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG 002 has been correlated with inflammation or pathological conditions within the body [44,45]. Following the supplementation of HDMF, a notable reduction in their relative abundances was observed, which is indicative of an amelioration in the animal’s health. This observation aligns with the reduced cortisol levels and enhanced antioxidant capabilities reported earlier, pointing towards a positive shift in the physiological balance. The class of Desulfobulbia, along with its affiliated Desulfobulbales, Desulfobulbaceae, and Desulfobulbus, are sulphate-reducing bacteria involved in biofilm formation [46]. Within the HDMF group, the elevated relative abundance of these bacteria coincides with an increased level of biofilm formation, substantiating the notion that HDMF supplementation can bolster the animal’s resilience against external stressors. Members of the Methanobacteria, Methanobacteriales, Methanobacteriaceae, and Methanobrevibacter, which are part of the Euryarchaeota, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions by producing methane through the metabolism of organic compounds in anaerobic environments [47]. The activity of Selenomonas ruminantium plays a vital role in the rumen’s hydrogen gas recycling process, as they contribute to sustaining the low partial pressure of hydrogen, a condition that is essential for the functioning of methanogenic archaea [48]. Methane production signifies an extent of energy loss, as this energy could have otherwise been harnessed for growth and productivity [49]. The elevated relative abundance of these bacteria in the HDMF group implies a higher degree of energy loss, which is reflected in the comparatively reduced levels of VFA production within this group. The Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group stands out as a significant component of the Rikenellaceae family. It exhibits a positive correlation with the uptake and metabolic processing of VFA, thereby indirectly influencing the immune capabilities of the host [50]. Research also indicates a link between the Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and the generation of metabolic byproducts by rumen microorganisms [51]. Predominantly, these byproducts are concentrated in metabolic pathways that include galactose metabolism, the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, and the breakdown of fatty acids, all of which are intricately connected to the host’s energy metabolism [51]. The studies suggest that the Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group is capable of bolstering the host’s resistance to diseases and the efficacy of VFA absorption. This could partially account for the observed improvement in the growth performance of sheep with the dietary addition of HDMF, despite no observed increase in VFA output. A wealth of research indicates that an increase in the ruminant’s antioxidant defenses and immune function is correlated with a higher relative abundance of Prevotellaceae UCG-003 [5254]. In addition, studies have revealed a significant positive correlation between Prevotellaceae UCG-003 and feed efficiency [54,55]. The elevated relative abundance of Prevotellaceae UCG-003 in the HDMF group provides a microbial rationale for the observed enhancement in immune function and improved feed efficiency resulting from dietary HDMF supplementation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, dietary HDMF supplementation increased the serum levels of GSH-Px and SOD, while simultaneously reducing levels of MDA, ROS, and OSI. This supplementation has a subtle impact on rumen fermentation characteristics, particularly by reducing the proportion of valerate. Additionally, HDMF supplementation enhanced the levels of AI-2 signaling molecules and biofilm formation in the rumen fluid. HDMF supplementation did not affect the alpha diversity of the ruminal microbiota but influenced certain bacterial genera. Specifically, it reduced the relative abundances of Shuttleworthia, Eubacterium eligens group, and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG 002, and increased the relative abundances of Riknellaceae RC9 gut group, Prevotellaceae UCG 003, Desulfobulbus, Methanobrevibacter, and Selenomonas ruminantium. This study suggests that HDMF, acting as a LuxS/AI-2 QS regulator, bolsters antioxidant defenses, nutrient assimilation efficiency, and overall growth performance through the augmentation of AI-2 and biofilm formation. As the first study to investigate the effects of HDMF on ruminant growth performance from the perspective of rumen microbial QS, it provides innovative insights and new directions for research aimed at the optimization of production strategies in ruminant animals.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Qiu Q.

Formal analysis: Fu C, Ge J.

Methodology: Qu M, Ouyang K.

Investigation: Fu C, Ge J, Qiu Q.

Writing - original draft: Fu C, Qiu Q.

Writing - review & editing: Fu C, Ge J, Qu M, Ouyang K, Qiu Q.

FUNDING

This study was supported by Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20232BAB215051), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260861), and China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-37).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

In compliance with the highest standards of animal care and welfare, the study was conducted under the strict supervision and authorization of the Committee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals at Jiangxi Agricultural University, as per protocol number JXAULL-2021036.

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

No AI tools were used in this article.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Not applicable.

Figure 1
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on the concentration of rumen quorum sensing signaling molecule and biofilm formation in Hu sheep. HDMF, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone.
ab-24-0683f1.jpg
Figure 2
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on beta-diversity of the rumen bacteria in Hu sheep. (A) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA); (B) non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). HDMF, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone.
ab-24-0683f2.jpg
Figure 3
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on the discriminative bacterial communities at different taxonomic levels. (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA); (B) Cladogram. HDMF, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone.
ab-24-0683f3.jpg
Table 1
Ingredients composition and nutritional components of basal diet
Ingredient Proportion (%) Nutritional components Value
Corn 45.04 Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg) 11.18
Soybean meal 18.72 Crude protein (g/kg) 150.81
Wheat bran 3.49 Neutral detergent fiber (g/kg) 313.93
Wheat straw 30.00 Acid detergent fiber (g/kg) 178.69
Calcium hydrogen phosphate 0.75
Limestone 0.50
Salt 0.50
Premix1) 1.00

1) Premix provided the following per kg of DM: 1400 mg of Fe, 1200 mg of Zn, 250 mg of Cu, 900 mg of Mn, 100,000 IU of vitamin A, 27,000 IU of vitamin D3, and 800 IU of vitamin E.

Table 2
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on growth performance of Hu sheep
Item CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
Initial body weight (kg) 19.99 19.94 0.582 0.952
Final body weight (kg) 35.57 37.25 0.934 0.227
Average daily gain (g/d) 259.57 288.43 15.323 0.244
Average daily dry matter intake (g/d) 1,041.00 1,088.39 33.757 0.297
Feed to gain ratio3) 4.10 3.79 0.243 0.416

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

3) Feed to gain ratio was calculated by dividing the average daily dry matter intake by the average daily gain.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 3
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on serum antioxidant capacity of Hu sheep
Item CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
Cortisol (ng/mL) 42.14 38.37 1.315 0.055
Total antioxidant capacity (U/mL) 35.35 37.53 1.266 0.278
Glutathione peroxidase (U/mL) 328.31b 349.20a 6.358 0.031
Superoxide dismutase (U/mL) 82.43b 88.08a 1.758 0.040
Malondialdehyde (nmol/mL) 3.51a 3.15b 0.094 0.023
Reactive oxygen species (EU/mL) 147.73a 123.79b 7.656 0.039
Oxidative stress index 4.18a 3.23b 0.246 0.014

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

a,b In the same row, values with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 4
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on rumen fermentation characteristics of Hu sheep
Item CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
pH value 6.67 6.73 0.080 0.611
Microbial crude protein (mg/L) 1,415.91 1,650.22 135.69 0.255
Ammonia nitrogen (mg/dL) 4.85 4.47 0.74 0.716
Total volatile fatty acids (mmol/L) 36.91 33.78 3.079 0.480
Concentration (mmol/L)
 Acetate 21.80 20.57 1.886 0.649
 Propionate 10.27 8.51 1.059 0.255
 Isobutyrate 0.30 0.30 0.016 0.843
 Butyrate 3.48 3.49 0.441 0.982
 Isovalerate 0.42 0.40 0.050 0.739
 Valerate 0.63 0.51 0.050 0.096
 Branched-chain volatile fatty acids 1.36 1.20 0.091 0.243
Proportion (%)
 Acetate 59.38 60.88 1.282 0.421
 Propionate 27.65 25.04 1.665 0.289
 Acetate/propionate 2.23 2.63 0.199 0.189
 Isobutyrate 0.88 0.94 0.070 0.570
 Butyrate 9.18 10.45 0.751 0.264
 Isovalerate 1.15 1.20 0.103 0.745
 Valerate 1.76a 1.50b 0.086 0.041
 Branched-chain volatile fatty acids 3.79 3.63 0.155 0.468

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

a,b In the same row, values with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 5
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on rumen bacterial alpha-diversity metrics of Hu sheep
Item CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
Chao1 269.96 272.16 17.32 0.930
Observed species 269.00 271.45 17.19 0.921
PD whole tree 32.44 28.96 2.09 0.255
Shannon index 5.94 5.99 0.16 0.834
Simpson index 0.955 0.965 0.006 0.332

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

SEM, standard error of the mean; PD, phylogenetic diversity.

Table 6
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on the rumen bacterial composition (phylum, >0.10%) of Hu sheep
Phylum name CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
Bacteroidota 37.87 42.48 3.695 0.389
Firmicutes 37.32 38.40 3.421 0.827
Proteobacteria 22.34 16.11 4.350 0.340
Actinobacteriota 0.82 0.82 0.243 0.995
Spirochaetota 0.21 0.72 0.202 0.150
Cyanobacteria 0.56 0.26 0.205 0.361
Fibrobacterota 0.20 0.28 0.129 0.663
Euryarchaeota 0.19 0.25 0.134 0.815
Patescibacteria 0.17 0.23 0.078 0.620
Desulfobacterota 0.21 0.17 0.047 0.598
Verrucomicrobiota 0.01 0.23 0.108 0.325

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 7
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on the rumen bacterial composition (genus, >0.50%) of Hu sheep
Genus name CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
Prevotella 32.04 33.46 2.906 0.734
Succinivibrio 15.72 11.18 3.522 0.398
Succinivibrionaceae UCG-001 6.30 4.57 2.050 0.561
Clostridia UCG-014 4.80 5.26 1.345 0.811
Roseburia 3.08 4.62 1.329 0.441
Oribacterium 3.90 2.66 0.978 0.388
Selenomonas 0.97 4.52 2.040 0.324
Dialister 1.46 3.28 0.844 0.188
Succiniclasticum 2.25 2.33 0.682 0.933
Ruminococcus 1.75 1.76 0.659 0.995
Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group 0.96 2.35 0.678 0.175
Muribaculaceae 0.99 1.69 0.497 0.381
Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group 1.68 0.96 0.324 0.159
Prevotellaceae UCG-001 0.66 1.90 0.432 0.110
Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group 0.82 1.30 0.443 0.511
Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002 2.04 0.08 0.630 0.144
Lachnospira 1.26 0.84 0.269 0.294
Olsenella 0.77 0.76 0.242 0.957
Eubacterium eligens group 1.08a 0.37b 0.187 0.017
Syntrophococcus 0.89 0.47 0.182 0.152
Candidatus Amoebophilus 1.25 0.02 0.621 0.341
RF39 0.78 0.43 0.130 0.093
Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-009 0.39 0.79 0.320 0.418
Ruminococcus gauvreauii group 0.60 0.41 0.201 0.536

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

a,b In the same row, values with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 8
Effect of dietary HDMF supplementation on predicted metabolic pathways of ruminal bacterial microbiome of Hu sheep
Item CON1) HDMF2) SEM p-value
Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins 14.10 14.46 0.167 0.151
Carbohydrate metabolism 14.09 14.05 0.140 0.856
Amino acid metabolism 13.12 13.19 0.071 0.485
Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides 9.20 8.95 0.137 0.211
Replication and repair 6.68 6.68 0.062 0.984
Metabolism of other amino acids 6.57 6.60 0.077 0.774
Energy metabolism 5.84 5.70 0.069 0.173
Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism 5.02 5.33 0.126 0.117
Lipid metabolism 4.25 4.09 0.084 0.200
Translation 3.70 3.69 0.030 0.949
Folding, sorting and degradation 3.25 3.23 0.056 0.870
Cell motility 3.13 2.77 0.189 0.197
Nucleotide metabolism 2.22 2.24 0.020 0.493
Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites 2.17 2.26 0.115 0.573
Cell growth and death 1.74 1.76 0.013 0.199
Membrane transport 1.67 1.60 0.048 0.325
Transcription 1.18 1.22 0.033 0.369
Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism 0.38 0.49 0.168 0.637
Cellular community - prokaryotes 0.35 0.32 0.030 0.418
Signal transduction 0.33 0.31 0.012 0.323
Environmental adaptation 0.28 0.26 0.010 0.202
Transport and catabolism 0.25 0.26 0.007 0.128
Infectious disease: bacterial 0.18 0.18 0.003 0.666

1) CON indicates the control group, which was fed a basal diet.

2) HDMF represents the treatment group, which was received an additional 1.0 g per day of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (HDMF) on top of the basal diet.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

REFERENCES

1. Singh AK, Ojha L, Kumari P, Choubey M, Chaudhary SK. Phytochemicals as natural feed additives for ruminants. Mahesh MS, Yata VK, editorsFeed additives and supplements for ruminants. Springer; 2024. p. 167–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0794-2_8
crossref
2. Newbold CJ, Ramos-Morales E. Review: ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host. Animal 2020;14:S78–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003252
crossref pmid
3. Monteiro HF, Zhou Z, Gomes MS, et al. Rumen and lower gut microbiomes relationship with feed efficiency and production traits throughout the lactation of Holstein dairy cows. Sci Rep 2022;12:4904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08761-5
crossref pmid pmc
4. Zhu M, Singer SD, Guan LL, Chen G. Emerging microalgal feed additives for ruminant production and sustainability. Adv Biotechnol 2024;2:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44307-024-00024-w
crossref pmid pmc
5. Mukherjee S, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019;17:371–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5
crossref pmid pmc
6. Won MY, Oyama LB, Courtney SJ, Creevey CJ, Huws SA. Can rumen bacteria communicate to each other? Microbiome 2020;8:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00796-y
crossref pmid pmc
7. Lawther K, Santos FG, Oyama LB, Huws SA. Chemical signalling within the rumen microbiome. Anim Biosci 2024;37:337–45. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0374
crossref pmid pmc
8. Liu X, Liu Q, Sun S, et al. Exploring AI-2-mediated interspecies communications within rumen microbial communities. Microbiome 2022;10:167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01367-z
crossref pmid pmc
9. Huws SA, Edwards JE, Lin W, et al. Microbiomes attached to fresh perennial ryegrass are temporally resilient and adapt to changing ecological niches. Microbiome 2021;9:143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01087-w
crossref pmid pmc
10. Xie Y, Sun H, Xue M, Liu J. Metagenomics reveals differences in microbial composition and metabolic functions in the rumen of dairy cows with different residual feed intake. Anim Microbiome 2022;4:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00170-3
crossref pmid pmc
11. Atlanderova KN, Makaeva AM, Kurilkina MY, Kholodilina TN, Duskaev GK. Technology for increasing the bioavailability of feed using quorum sensing inhibitors. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;624:012159. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/624/1/012159
crossref
12. Zhang Y, Zhong H, Zheng Y, Wang Y, He Y, Gu Y. Use of whole-genome analysis to study the effect of various quorum-sensing inhibitors on the biofilm formation of Lactobacillus fermentum. LWT 2023;173:114378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114378
crossref
13. Schwab W. Natural 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone (Furaneol®). Molecules 2013;18:6936–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18066936
crossref pmid pmc
14. Martinelli D, Grossmann G, Séquin U, Brandl H, Bachofen R. Effects of natural and chemically synthesized furanones on quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum. BMC Microbiol 2004;4:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-4-25
crossref pmid pmc
15. Chen Q, Zhao K, Li H, et al. Antibacterial and anti-virulence effects of furazolidone on Trueperella pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Vet Res 2022;18:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03216-5
crossref pmid pmc
16. Proctor CR, McCarron PA, Ternan NG. Furanone quorum-sensing inhibitors with potential as novel therapeutics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 2020;69:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001144
crossref pmid
17. Paz HA, Anderson CL, Muller MJ, Kononoff PJ, Fernando SC. Rumen bacterial community composition in Holstein and Jersey cows is different under same dietary condition and is not affected by sampling method. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01206
crossref pmid pmc
18. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 1980;63:64–75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
crossref pmid
19. Makkar HPS, Sharma OP, Dawra RK, Negi SS. Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor. J Dairy Sci 1982;65:2170–3. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82477-6
crossref pmid
20. Qiu Q, Gao C, Aziz ur Rahman M, Cao B, Su H. Digestive ability, physiological characteristics, and rumen bacterial community of Holstein finishing steers in response to three nutrient density diets as fattening phases advanced. Microorganisms 2020;8:335. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030335
crossref pmid pmc
21. Wei X, Long T, Li Y, Ouyang K, Qiu Q. Diet shift may trigger LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing in rumen bacteria. Bioengineering 2022;9:379. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080379
crossref pmid pmc
22. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37:852–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
crossref pmid pmc
23. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2957–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507
crossref pmid pmc
24. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 2011;12:R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60
crossref pmid pmc
25. Husain A, Khan SA, Iram F, Iqbal MA, Asif M. Insights into the chemistry and therapeutic potential of furanones: a versatile pharmacophore. Eur J Med Chem 2019;171:66–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.03.021
crossref pmid
26. Sung WS, Jung HJ, Park K, Kim HS, Lee IS, Lee DG. 2,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone (DMHF); antimicrobial compound with cell cycle arrest in nosocomial pathogens. Life Sci 2007;80:586–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2006.10.008
crossref pmid
27. Yokoyama I, Ohata M, Komiya Y, Nagasao J, Arihara K. Comparison of 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone, a volatile odor compound generated by the Maillard reaction, in cooked meat of various animal species and parts. Anim Sci J 2023;94:e13813. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13813
crossref pmid
28. Li C, Zhang J, Li Y, et al. Glutamate supplementation improves growth performance, rumen fermentation, and serum metabolites in heat-stressed Hu sheep. Front Nutr 2022;9:851386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.851386
crossref pmid pmc
29. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 2000;21:55–89. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389
crossref pmid
30. Hart KA. The use of cortisol for the objective assessment of stress in animals: pros and cons. Vet J 2012;192:137–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.016
crossref pmid
31. Panday S, Talreja R, Kavdia M. The role of glutathione and glutathione peroxidase in regulating cellular level of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Microvasc Res 2020;131:104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2020.104010
crossref pmid
32. Fridovich I. Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem 1995;64:97–112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000525
crossref pmid
33. Aktas MS, Kandemir FM, Kirbas A, Hanedan B, Aydin MA. Evaluation of oxidative stress in sheep infected with Psoroptes ovis using total antioxidant capacity, total oxidant status, and malondialdehyde level. J Vet Res 2017;61:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2017-0025
crossref pmid pmc
34. Bhattacharya S. Reactive oxygen species and cellular defense system. Rani V, Yadav U, editorsFree radicals in human health and disease. Springer; 2015. p. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2035-0_2
crossref
35. Russell JB, Rychlik JL. Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 2001;292:1119–22. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058830
crossref pmid
36. Dijkstra J. Production and absorption of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. Livest Prod Sci 1994;39:61–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(94)90154-6
crossref
37. Firkins JL, Yu Z, Morrison M. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:E1–16. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-518
crossref pmid
38. Lin M, Feng L, Cheng Z, Wang K. Effect of ethanol or lactic acid on volatile fatty acid profile and microbial community in short-term sequentially transfers by ruminal fermented with wheat straw in vitro. Process Biochem 2021;102:369–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.12.018
crossref
39. Ghali I, Shinkai T, Mitsumori M. Mining of luxS genes from rumen microbial consortia by metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches. Anim Sci J 2016;87:666–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12476
crossref pmid
40. Tucker CM, Cadotte MW, Carvalho SB, et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol Rev 2017;92:698–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12252
crossref pmid pmc
41. Zhou M, Chen Y, Guan LL. Rumen bacteria. Puniya AK, Singh R, Kamra DN, editorsRumen microbiology: from evolution to revolution. Springer; 2015. p. 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_6
crossref
42. Kim CC, Healey GR, Kelly WJ, et al. Genomic insights from Monoglobus pectinilyticus: a pectin-degrading specialist bacterium in the human colon. ISME J 2019;13:1437–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0363-6
crossref pmid pmc
43. Williams AG, Withers SE. Bacillus spp. in the rumen ecosystem. Hemicellulose depolymerases and glycoside hydrolases of Bacillus spp. and rumen isolates grown under anaerobic conditions. J Appl Bacteriol 1983;55:283–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb01325.x
crossref
44. Kaakoush NO. Insights into the role of Erysipelotrichaceae in the human host. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2015;5:84. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2015.00084
crossref pmid pmc
45. Wang M, Yan LY, Qiao CY, et al. Ecological shifts of salivary microbiota associated with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023;13:1131255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1131255
crossref pmid pmc
46. Van Landuyt J, Kundu K, Van Haelst S, et al. 80 Years later: marine sediments still influenced by an old war ship. Front Mar Sci 2022;9:1017136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1017136
crossref
47. Tapio I, Snelling TJ, Strozzi F, Wallace RJ. The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017;8:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0141-0
crossref pmid pmc
48. Iwamoto M, Asanuma N, Hino T. Ability of Selenomonas ruminantium, Veillonella parvula, and Wolinella succinogenes to reduce nitrate and nitrite with special reference to the suppression of ruminal methanogenesis. Anaerobe 2002;8:209–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.2002.0428
crossref
49. Lan W, Yang C. Ruminal methane production: associated microorganisms and the potential of applying hydrogen-utilizing bacteria for mitigation. Sci Total Environ 2019;654:1270–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.180
crossref pmid
50. Nishihara K, van Niekerk J, Innes D, et al. Transcriptome profiling revealed that key rumen epithelium functions change in relation to short-chain fatty acids and rumen epithelium-attached microbiota during the weaning transition. Genomics 2023;115:110664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110664
crossref pmid
51. Sha Y, Liu X, He Y, et al. Multi-omics revealed rumen microbiota metabolism and host immune regulation in Tibetan sheep of different ages. Front Microbiol 2024;15:1339889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1339889
crossref pmid pmc
52. Zhao XH, Chen ZD, Zhou S, et al. Effects of daidzein on performance, serum metabolites, nutrient digestibility, and fecal bacterial community in bull calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017;225:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.014
crossref
53. Hou P, Li B, Wang Y, et al. The effect of dietary supplementation with zinc amino acids on immunity, antioxidant capacity, and gut microbiota composition in calves. Animals 2023;13:1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091570
crossref pmid pmc
54. Jiang X, Liu X, Liu S, Li Y, Zhao HB, Zhang YG. Growth, rumen fermentation and plasma metabolites of Holstein male calves fed fermented corn gluten meal during the postweaning stage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2019;249:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.01.012
crossref
55. Qiu X, Qin X, Chen L, et al. Serum biochemical parameters, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacterial communities are partly driven by the breed and sex of cattle when fed high-grain diet. Microorganisms 2022;10:323. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020323
crossref pmid pmc


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2026 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next