Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 38(8); 2025 > Article
Firdaus, Panjaitan, Makmur, Atmoko, Adinata, Krishna, and Widiyawati: Spirulina supplementation effects on small ruminants performance and product attributes: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

The research aims to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the nutritional benefits of Spirulina supplementation on growth performance, rumen function, antioxidant status, blood biochemistry, fatty acid profile, meat quality, and eating quality in small ruminant, specifically goats and sheep.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the impact of Spirulina supplementation on various aspects of small ruminant performance and product attributes. Electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar) were searched for relevant studies published between 2012 and 2023. From the 350 identified studies, 24 matched the inclusion criteria of original research. A meta-analysis was performed using OpenMEE software. Publication bias was assessed using the precision-effect test (PET)-precision-effect estimate with standard errors method and Rosenthal’s fail-safe N analysis, visualised through PET regression plots in JASP software. Standardised mean differences between Spirulina-supplemented and control groups were calculated to determine the effect magnitude.

Results

Meta-analysis show that Spirulina supplementation significantly enhances growth performance, meat quality, and antioxidant status in small ruminants compared to controls. Supplementation increases average daily gain and reduces feed conversion ratio. Additionally, Spirulina supplementation elevates antioxidant enzyme activities, including catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione, and superoxide dismutase. Meat quality parameters, such as fat melting point, intramuscular fat percentage, and pH, are also positively affected. Blood biochemistry markers, including alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, cholesterol, haemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein, total protein, urea, and white blood cell counts, remain within normal physiological ranges. Moreover, Spirulina supplementation favorably alters fatty acid composition, increasing the proportion of eicosapentaenoic acid and decreasing the proportion of palmitic acid. Supplementation duration ranged from 14 to 182 days, with doses between 0.014 to 2.14 g/kg body weight/day.

Conclusion

Spirulina supplementation has potential effects on small ruminant productivity, especially growth performance, health and meat quality. Spirulina can be a valuable dietary addition for small ruminant. Further research is warranted to optimise supplementation strategies and understand underlying mechanisms.

INTRODUCTION

The global population is rapidly expanding, driving a surge in demand for animal protein. Meat consumption has increased significantly, fuelled by rising living standards and urbanisation [1,2]. As a critical source of essential nutrients (such as protein, zinc, iron, selenium, calcium, and vitamin B12), meat plays a vital role in human diets. Small ruminants, particularly sheep and goats, offer a promising option to meet this growing demand. With a global population of 2.18 billion head, representing 56% of the world’s ruminant population, these animals contribute substantially to meat production [3]. Their adaptability to diverse environments and efficient feed conversion makes them valuable assets for many farming systems, especially in the face of climate change. Developing small ruminant livestock to produce healthy, sustainable, and high-nutritional-value meat is essential.
Recent research indicates that incorporating phytonutrients into livestock diets can improve animal health, resulting in improved meat quality and increased nutritional value for consumers [4]. Identifying novel feed sources with high nutritional efficiency is crucial for sustainable livestock production. Spirulina (Arthrospira sp.) is filamentous cyanobacteria widely used as a dietary supplement [5]. Spirulina offers potential benefits for small ruminants by improving their growth, health, and product quality [6]. Spirulina’s mechanism of action involves activating cellular antioxidant enzymes, inhibiting lipid peroxidation, and counteracting free radicals, thereby enhancing overall health and vitality of the animals [7]. Importantly, Spirulina increase feed intake in small ruminants fed low-quality diets, consequently boosting their protein intake and overall feed consumption [810].
Numerous studies have investigated the effects of Spirulina supplementation on small ruminant performance, reporting positive impacts on growth performance, rumen function, fatty acid profiles, antioxidant status, and meat quality [1115]. However, inconsistencies in study designs, sample sizes, and outcomes hinder definitive conclusions about the overall impact of Spirulina supplementation. A meta-analysis is essential to synthesise the available evidence and identify consistent patterns in the effects of Spirulina on small ruminant production. By combining and analysing multiple studies [1618], a meta-analysis can provide a more robust understanding of Spirulina’s benefits and inform evidence-based recommendations for its use in small ruminant farming.
It is hypothesised that Spirulina supplementation enhances overall small ruminant performance. This study aims to evaluate the impact of Spirulina supplementation on growth, rumen function, fatty acid profiles, antioxidant status, meat quality, and eating quality. The findings will contribute to understanding Spirulina’s potential as a sustainable and effective feed supplement for small ruminant production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Paper searching

A systematic and comprehensive literature review was conducted between January and May 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines [19], with paper numbers outlined in Figure 1. Published papers were retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. Keyword searches were conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework [20], with the following terms: population (goat and sheep), intervention (Spirulina), comparison (control), and outcomes (growth performance, rumen function, antioxidant status, blood biochemistry, fatty acid profile, meat quality, and eating quality). Recent studies conducted over the past 10 years, published between 2012 and 2023, were included. Inclusion criteria, adapted from Trevi et al [21], were: 1) original research on sheep or goats, 2) published in English, 3) Spirulina as a feed supplement, and 4) reporting mean values, standard deviation or standard error, and sample size for relevant variables.

Data extraction

Data for meta-analysis were extracted from selected papers (Table 1) and then compiled and analysed. The following data were collected: (1) First author and publication year; (2) Mean value of the treatment group and control groups; (3) standard deviation of the mean values for treatment groups and control groups; (4) number of livestock in the treatment group and control groups (Nc); (5) livestock species (sheep, goat); (6) Spirulina usage dosage; and (7) study location.

Analysis of data

A meta-analysis was conducted using Open Meta-Analyst for Ecology and Evolution software, a statistical tool designed for analysing ecological and evolutionary data [22]. The effect sizes were calculated as standardised mean differences using Hedges’ g, comparing Spirulina-supplemented diets to control diets. Cohen’s d effect size interpretation guidelines were used to interpret the magnitude of the overall effect: 0.2 representing a small effect, 0.5 a medium effect, and 0.8 a large effect [23]. After data inspection, a random effects model was employed to determine the overall effect, as a fixed effects model was not deemed appropriate.
The applied mathematical models for data analysis are as follows:
(1)
Yi=μ+τi+ɛi
(2)
Q=(wiESi2)-((wiESi2))2wi
(3)
τ2=Q-dfC
(4)
I2=(Q-(k-1))Q×100
where yi is the diversity of effect size, μ is the mean true effect, τi is the diversity of true effect size and ɛi is error sampling [16]. There are three measures used to measure the level of heterogeneity between studies, namely Cochran’s Q, index I2 (with thresholds of <25%, 25% to 75%, and >75% for low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively), and tau-squared (τ2), calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Where wi is the weight of each study, ES is the effect size value of each study, k is the number of studies analysed, df is the degrees of freedom and C is the overall estimation value. Publication bias was examined for the 4 items with the largest sample sizes using the precision-effect test-precision-effect estimate with standard error squared (PET-PEESE) method [24] and Rosenthal fail-safe N analysis [25], and visualised trough PET regression plots in Just Another Statistics Package (JASP) software (version 0.18.3).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Study characteristic

A flowchart illustrating the study selection process is presented in Figure 1. An initial search of electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar) yielded 350 potential articles. After removing duplicates, 170 unique articles were screened, resulting in 80 relevant studies. Subsequent abstract screening based on data availability, sample size, and variable alignment eliminated 25 articles, leaving 55 for full-text review. Further screening for standard deviation or standard error of each independent variable resulted in the exclusion of 31 articles. Ultimately, 24 studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis (Table 1 [12,14,15,2645]).
The included studies, published between 2012 and 2023, originated from nine countries: Russia, Oman, Australia, Bangladesh, China, Kuwait, Egypt, the USA, and Indonesia. Most studies reported Spirulina supplementation duration ranging from 14 to 182 days, with dosages varying from 0.014 to 2.14 g/kg body weight (BW)/day. Administration methods included feed mixing, drinking water and drench peroral supplementation, as reported by Mansour and Zeitoun [13], Malau-Aduli and Holman [28], Holman et al [29], Malau-Aduli and Kashani [32], Kashani et al [36], Holman et al [42], and Flakemore [44].

Chemical composition and nutritive value of Spirulina

Spirulina (Arthrospira sp.) a filamentous cyanobacterium with a spiral shape, is a rich source of nutrients [5]. As noted by Jung et al [46], Spirulina is remarkably adaptable and can thrive in harsh conditions, including saline environments. Renowned for its high protein content, Spirulina provides a complete amino acid profile and is abundant in vitamins and minerals (Table 2 [12,27,28,31,42,4751]). Its protein content is notably twice that of soybeans, and it is a significant source of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as omega-6 [52].

The benefits Spirulina on growth and body conformation

The benefits of Spirulina supplementation on growth performance and body conformation of small ruminants are presented in Table 3. The table includes the cumulative effect size and 95% confidence interval (CI) for various levels of Spirulina supplementation. Meta-analysis results indicate that Spirulina supplementation significantly improved the growth performance of small ruminants. Specifically, average daily gain (ADG) increased significantly (d = 1.2±0.4, large effect size) compared to control groups. Conversely, feed conversion ratio (FCR) decreased significantly (d = −1.64±0.42, large effect size) after Spirulina supplementation.
While a few studies reported non-significant increases in body weight gain with Spirulina supplementation, most studies found significant improvements in body weight gain of small ruminants. For example, El-Sabagh et al [40] reported that lambs fed a formulated basal diet to meet nutrient requirements according to NRC [53] and supplemented with Spirulina platensis powder (0.11 g/kg BW/d) experienced an increase in body weight gain from 0.127 kg/d in the control diet to 0.236 kg/d in the Spirulina platensis powder diet and a decrease in FCR from 13.20 to 7.35. The discrepancies in results may be attributed to factors such as the quantity and quality of feed provided as basal diets and Spirulina as supplement, as well as the animals’ previous health and nutrition status. Although Spirulina improved growth and feed efficiency, it did not significantly affect body condition score (BCS) or body dimensions (body length, heart girth, and wither height). However, it is important to note that BCS is a subjective measurement and may exhibit variability between assessments.
Spirulina’s potential growth-promoting effects may be related to its rich nutrient profile (Table 2), which includes a substantial protein content (53% to 75%), essential fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals that can supplement common diets [12,27,28,29,31,36]. In addition to its nutritional value, Spirulina’s interaction with gut microbiota in the rumen stimulates extracellular enzyme secretion [54], which enhances rumen feed absorption and promotes gut microbiota colonisation, ultimately leading to improved FCR.

The benefits of Spirulina for rumen function

Meta-analysis results (Table 4), have revealed no significant impact of Spirulina supplementation on pH, acetate, butyrate, isobutyrate, propionate, or total volatile fatty acids (VFA) based on cumulative effect size. These findings are consistent with most studies, including Fomichev et al [26], who observed no significant effects of Spirulina on sheep rumen pH and VFA. However, Rabee et al [43], reported that Spirulina supplementation decreased VFA, acetate, and butyrate, with a concomitant increase in propionate and isobutyrate but no change in pH. Additionally, Plascencia et al [55] found that low-level Spirulina supplementation (up to 1% of diet) did not appreciably affect nutrient digestion, ruminal fermentation, or VFA in feedlot cattle fed a high-energy diet.
These studies generally indicate a minimal effect of Spirulina on rumen fermentation parameters in animals fed medium to high-quality diets with low level of Spirulina supplementation. Recent studies have shown that Spirulina can modulate rumen fermentation. Wang et al [12] found that Spirulina supplementation (3% of the diet) in a high-fat diet improved rumen development and fermentation in lambs, effectively improving rumen microbial health. This supplementation reduced daily feed intake while increasing acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total VFA production. These findings are consistent with those of Meteab et al [56], who observed that Spirulina supplementation (2 g/kg feed) enhanced the feed quality of Panicum maximum and alfalfa straw, optimising degradability and rumen fermentation parameters.
Additionally, Christodoulou et al [57] reported that high-level Spirulina supplementation (0.28 g/kg BW/day) in ewes slightly modulated rumen microbe composition with an increase in cellulolytic bacteria such as Eubacterium ruminantium, Fibrobacter succinogenes, and Ruminococcus albus. These bacteria may potentially improve the ability to degrade high-fibre diets in the rumen, leading to increased VFA production. Panjaitan et al [58] reported positive effects on rumen digestion in steers fed low-quality forage-based diets. Spirulina supplementation in these cases increased the concentration of branched-chain fatty acids, microbial protein production, feed intake, and decreased digesta retention time in the rumen. Costa et al [9] concluded that Spirulina can be considered a supplemental option to improve rumen function for grazing ruminants.

The benefits of Spirulina on blood antioxidant status

The benefits of Spirulina on blood plasma or serum antioxidant parameters in small ruminants supplemented with various levels of Spirulina (cumulative effect size with 95% CI), are shown in Table 5. The results revealed significant effects of Spirulina supplementation on catalase (CAT) (1.26±0.20), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (1.69±0.29), glutathione (GSH) (1.35±0.21), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (3.05±0.46), vitamin A (vit-A) (3.08±1.21), and malondialdehyde (MDA) (−0.51±0.15), all with large effect sizes except for MDA, which showed a medium effect size. Levels of CAT, GPx, GSH, SOD, and vit-A in serum or plasma increased significantly compared to the control group, while MDA levels decreased after Spirulina supplementation.
These findings suggest that Spirulina supplementation can enhance the antioxidant status of small ruminants. Enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity and reduced MDA levels indicate a reduction in oxidative stress, which may have positive implications for animal health and productivity. El-Sabagh et al [40] reported a significant increase in GSH and Vitamin A, along with a decrease in MDA, which were associated with a significant increase in ADG of fattening lambs fed common basal diets supplemented with Spirulina. Spirulina supplementation seems to effectively improve the antioxidant status of small ruminants, potentially benefiting their health and productivity.

The benefits of Spirulina on blood biochemical profiles

The benefits of Spirulina on several blood biochemical parameters in small ruminants supplemented with various levels of Spirulina (cumulative effect size with 95% CI) are shown in Table 6. The results revealed significant effects of Spirulina supplementation on several blood biochemical parameters in small ruminants. Notably, levels of haemoglobin (2.11±0.53), total protein (0.79±0.20), urea (1.44±0.49), and white blood cells (0.94±0.27) increased, suggesting improvements in oxygen-carrying capacity, protein synthesis, kidney function, and immune response, respectively. All these parameters showed large effect sizes. Conversely, levels of alanine transaminase (ALT; −2.67±0.51), aspartate transaminase (AST; −3.04±0.46), cholesterol (−0.58±0.27), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL −0.76±0.27) decreased, indicating an improved lipid profile. ALT and AST showed large effect sizes, while cholesterol and LDL showed medium effect sizes. Healthy animals typically exhibit low levels of ALT and AST in their blood. Elevated ALT and AST often signal liver damage [59]. The meta-analysis demonstrated that small ruminants supplemented with Spirulina had lower ALT and AST levels than the control group. While the exact mechanism underlying these changes in ALT and AST concentrations remains unclear, Spirulina supplementation, as reported by El-Sabagh et al [40], was associated with an increase in feed intake, liveweight gain in fattening lambs, and a significant elevation in blood haemoglobin concentration, globulin concentration, white blood cells, and blood urea concentration. These findings suggest that Spirulina supplementation positively influenced blood biochemical profiles, likely due to its high protein and phytochemicals content, which may contribute to the overall health and productivity of small ruminants.

The benefits of Spirulina on specific fatty acid profiles

Spirulina is known to be rich in fatty acids, and feeding it as a supplement to animals may modify the fatty acid composition of meat. The benefits of Spirulina on specific fatty acid profiles in small ruminants supplemented with various levels of Spirulina (cumulative effect size with 95% CI) are shown in Table 7. Spirulina supplementation altered the fatty acid profile of the longissimus dorsi muscle, increasing the proportion of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5ω3, an unsaturated fatty acid) and decreasing the proportion of palmitic acid (16:0, a saturated fatty acid). No significant effects were observed on other fatty acid profiles.
Overall, this study did not reveal significant effects of Spirulina supplementation on the majority of body fatty acid composition. However, Kashani et al [36] reported that polyunsaturated fatty acids such as EPA, which constitutes 1.95% of Spirulina’s total fatty acid content, were increased in subcutaneous adipose, muscle, and liver tissues of lambs grazing ryegrass pasture when Spirulina was supplemented at medium (0.33 g/kg BW/d) and high (0.66 g/kg BW/d) compared to the control group. Interestingly, while Spirulina was high in saturated palmitic acid (24.8% of total fatty acid), a main contributor to blood plasma cholesterol and LDL, its concentration did not increase in all examined tissues and was even lower than the control in heart and muscle tissue. These findings indicate that the effect of Spirulina on fatty acid profiles is variable and contentious.

The benefits of Spirulina for meat and eating quality

Meta-analysis results (Table 8) revealed significant effects of Spirulina supplementation on key meat quality attributes in small ruminants (cumulative effect size with 95% CI). Meat pH increased (0.67±0.31) with a medium effect size compared to controls, while fat melting point (FMP) decreased (−1.94± 0.75) with a large effect size. Intramuscular fat percentage and tenderness also decreased significantly (−2.85±0.93 and −1.72±0.57, respectively) with large effect sizes. Although the meta-analysis showed an increase in meat pH with Spirulina supplementation, this change is biologically small and may not significantly impact actual meat quality. Al-Yahyaey et al [45] suggested that an increase in longissimus dorsi pH from (5.19±0.09) in the control diet to (5.84±0.17) in the treatment (T1) diet had no effect on other meat quality parameters. This aligns with Alghonaim et al [60], who reported no effect of Spirulina supplementation on meat pH but observed increased body wall fat, back fat thickness, and meat fat content, along with decreased muscle shear force. Consistent with this, Holman et al [29] demonstrated that elevated Spirulina supplementation in sheep was associated with a decreased FMP.
Interestingly, the meta-analysis results showed that the decrease in FMP was not directly proportional to IMF percentage. These findings suggest that Spirulina supplementation has mixed results on meat quality parameters. However, the meat industry prioritises increasing omega-3 and polyunsaturated fatty acids while concurrently reducing FMP to enhance meat tenderness [61]. Typically, lamb exhibits a fat melting point within the range of 38°C–55°C [62]. However, no significant effects were observed on sensory attributes such as appearance, aroma, juiciness, and taste.

Bias analysis

A publication bias analysis was conducted for the four variables with the largest number of studies: ADG, cholesterol, MDA, and total protein. Neither PET-PEESE analysis nor sensitivity analysis using Rosenthal’s fail-safe N (Table 9) detected evidence of publication bias (p>0.05). Consequently, it was concluded that the analysed effect sizes were not subject to publication bias. These findings were visually corroborated by PET regression plots (Figure 2A–2D).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis revealed that Spirulina supplementation improved feed intake, FCR, and ADG, along with meat quality, which was characterized by increased EPA and decreased shear force and FMP. These findings suggest that Spirulina has the potential to be a valuable dietary supplement, enhancing the economic viability of small ruminant production systems. However, these findings may be limited by the inclusion criteria and heterogeneity of the included studies. Future studies should investigate the optimal Spirulina dosage for various basal diets, its interactions with other dietary components, and its long-term effects on animal health and productivity. The nutritional composition of Spirulina suggests a strong potential for improving the performance of small ruminants fed low-quality diets, a common practice globally. Additionally, exploring the underlying mechanisms of Spirulina’s beneficial effects would provide further insights into its potential applications for sustainable livestock production.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS.

Data curation: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS, Makmur M, Atmoko BA.

Formal analysis: Firdaus F, Makmur M.

Methodology: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS, Makmur M, Atmoko BA.

Software: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS, Makmur M.

Validation: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS, Makmur M, Atmoko BA, Adinata Y, Krishna NH, Widiyawati R.

Investigation: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS, Makmur M, Atmoko BA, Adinata Y.

Writing - original draft: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS.

Writing - review & editing: Firdaus F, Panjaitan TS, Makmur M, Atmoko BA, Adinata Y, Krishna NH, Widiyawati R.

FUNDING

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Organization Research for Agricultural and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia, for facilitating the “Rumah Program Bibit Unggul.” Special thanks go to Professor Dennis Poppi, Emeritus Professor at the University of Queensland, for generously dedicating his time to proofreading this paper and providing invaluable insights, comments, and suggestions that significantly enhanced its quality.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

The authors used Gemini (Google) to assist with English language checks and to improve grammatical clarity during the preparation of this manuscript. No generative AI was used to create scientific content or data. The authors have reviewed, edited, and proofread all text to ensure quality and take full responsibility for the content and integrity of this publication.

Figure 1
A PRISMA flow diagram visually represents the literature search and selection process employed in this meta-analysis. Initially, 350 papers were identified as potentially relevant to Spirulina. Adapted from Haddaway et al with CC-BY [19].
ab-24-0835f1.jpg
Figure 2
PET regression plot. (a) ADG, (b) cholesterol, (c) MDA, and (d) total protein. PET, precision-effect test; ADG, average daily gain; MDA, malondialdehyde.
ab-24-0835f2.jpg
Table 1
Description of studies included in the meta-analysis of Spirulina supplementation on small ruminant performance and product attributes
References Duration (days) Dose (g/kg BW/day) Species Country
Fomichev et al [26] 14 0.02–0.03 Sheep Russia
Al-Yahyae et al [27] 70 0.08–0.25 Goat Oman
Malau-Aduli and Holman [28] 42 0.50–1.00 Sheep Australia
Holman et al [29] 63 0.25–1.00 Sheep Australia
Ghosh et al [30] 105 0.04–0.18 Goat Bangladesh
Liang et al [31] 74 0.30–0.90 Sheep China
Malau-Aduli and Kashani [32] 63 0.67–1.33 Sheep Australia
Burezq and Khalil [33] 182 2.14 Sheep Kuwait
Assar et al [15] 150 0.09–0.45 Sheep Egypt
Hanafy [14] 42 0.10 Sheep USA
Eldaim et al [34] 45–60 0.10 Sheep Egypt
Khalifa et al [35] 90 0.01 Goat Egypt
Mansour and Zeitoun [13] 168 0.23–0.46 Sheep Egypt
Kashani et al [36] 63 0.17–0.67 Sheep Australia
Sarvinda et al [37] 60 0.45–0.50 Sheep Indonesia
Baliarti et al [38] 30 0.58 Sheep Indonesia
Holman et al [39] 60 0.26–0.53 Sheep Australia
El-Sabagh et al [40] 35 0.10 Sheep Egypt
Wang et al [12] 74 0.90 Sheep China
El-Deeb et al [41] 150 0.05 Goat Egypt
Holman et al [42] 63 0.25–1.00 Sheep Australia
Rabee et al [43] 42 0.13 Sheep Egypt
Flakemore [44] 60 0.33–0.67 Sheep Australia
Al-Yahyaey et al [45] 70 0.12–0.24 Goat Oman
Table 2
Chemical composition and nutritional profile of Spirulina from various sources included in the meta-analysis
Nutrient composition in dry matter basis Amount Unit
Dry matter 78–96 %
Ash 6–12 %
Crude protein 53–75 %
Crude fibre 3–6 %
Crude lipid 7 %
Ether extract (EE) 1–5 %
Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) 2–38 %
Acid detergent fibre (ADF) 2–18 %
Metabolisable energy 11–17 MJ/kg
Fatty acid
 16:0 palmitic 24.8–44.9 %FA
 18:0 stearic 1.7–6.3 %FA
 20:0 arachidic 6.2 %FA
 18:1 cis 9 (oleic) 9.8–16.6 %FA
 18:1 trans 9 (elaidic) 2.8 %FA
 16:1 palmitoleic 2.3–3.8 %FA
 18:2 cis 9,12 (linoleic) 11.1–12.2 %FA
 18:3 cis9,12,15 α-Linolenic 4.3 %FA
 18:3 cis6,9,12 ϒ-Linolenic 24.4 %FA
 20:4 cis5,8,11,14 (eicosatetraenoic) 13.9 %FA
 Saturated fatty acids (SFA) 48.8–52.1 %FA
 Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) 5.1–10.4 %FA
 Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) 37.5–46.0 %FA
Amino acids
 Phenylalanine 3.2 mg/kg
 Valine 4.3 mg/kg
 Threonine 4.7 mg/kg
 Tryptophan 0.4 mg/kg
 Methionine 1.0 mg/kg
 Leucine 5.7 mg/kg
 Isoleucine 3.9 mg/kg
 Lysine 3.6 mg/kg
 Histidine 5.1 mg/kg
 Arginine 3.6 mg/kg
Minerals
 Calcium 2,070–2,700 mg/kg
 Phosphorus 7,280–9,700 mg/kg
 Zinc 1.9–17.6 mg/kg
 Magnesium 3,200–4,860 mg/kg
 Potassium 16,750–17,000 mg/kg
 Iron 539–162 mg/kg
 Manganese 10–24 mg/kg
Vitamins
 Riboflavin (B2) 55–81 mg/kg
 Folic acid 8 mg/kg
 Niacin (B3) 150–555 mg/kg
 Pantothenic acid 179 mg/kg
 Ascorbic acid 1,150 mg/kg

Data from Al-Yahyaey [27], Malau-Aduli and Holman [28], Liang et al [31], Wang et al [12], Holman et al [42], Kashani et al [36], Rahim et al [47], Raji et al [48], Raczyk et al [49], Ramírez-Rodrigues et al [50], Liestianty et al [51].

Table 3
Meta-analysis of growth performance and body conformation in small ruminants supplemented with various level of spirulina with 95% confidence intervals (CI)
Categories Ns (n) Xc Xe Standardized mean difference (continuous random-effects model)

Model results Heterogeneity


Estimate Standard error p-value Tau2 Q Het. p-value I2
ADG (g/d) 30 110.72 135.44 1.20 0.40 0.003 3.31 268.92 <0.001 91.08
DMI (kg/d) 6 1.07 1.10 −0.52 0.51 0.305 1.38 49.10 <0.001 89.82
FCR (g/kg) 11 0.01 0.01 −1.64 0.42 <0.001 1.53 65.49 <0.001 84.73
BCS (1–5) 10 2.31 2.33 0.19 0.20 0.354 0.24 23.14 0.006 61.11
BL (cm) 13 54.30 54.11 0.50 0.26 0.058 0.64 48.44 <0.001 75.23
HG (cm) 14 65.38 64.66 −0.17 0.32 0.602 1.16 97.46 <0.001 86.66
WH (cm) 13 53.98 52.51 −0.34 0.27 0.204 0.64 50.60 <0.001 76.28

Ns, number of studies; Xc, mean value of the control group; Xe, mean value of the treatment group; ADG, average daily gain; DMI, dry matter intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio; BCS, body condition score (0–5); BL, body length; HG, heart girth; WH, wither height.

Table 4
Meta-analysis of the effects of Spirulina supplementation on rumen fermentation parameters (pH, acetate, butyrate, isobutyrate, propionate, and total VFA’s) in small ruminants (95% CI)
Items Unit Ns Xc Xe Standardized mean difference (continuous random-effects model)

Model results Heterogeneity


Estimate Standard error p-value Tau2 Q Het. p-value I2
Rumen profile
 pH - 4 6.63 6.78 0.80 0.64 0.213 1.22 17.72 <0.001 83.07
 Acetate mmol/L 3 34.02 27.55 −0.80 0.53 0.132 0.54 7.27 0.026 72.50
 Butyrate mmol/L 3 5.03 4.36 −0.29 0.24 0.239 0.01 2.15 0.341 7.14
 Isobutyrate mmol/L 3 0.60 1.05 0.82 0.54 0.129 0.58 7.61 0.022 73.73
 Propionate mmol/L 3 12.62 16.71 0.13 0.86 0.877 1.81 18.05 <0.001 88.92
 VFA mmol/L 4 19.11 20.12 −0.9 1.12 0.407 4.58 49.08 <0.001 93.89

VFA, volatile fatty acid; CI, confidence interval; Ns, number of studies; Xc, Mean value of the control group; Xe, mean value of the treatment group.

Table 5
Meta-analysis of the effects of Spirulina on blood plasma or serum antioxidant parameters in small ruminants (95% CI)
Item Ns Xc Xe Unit Standardized mean difference (continuous random-effects model)

Model results Heterogeneity


Estimate Standard error p-value Tau2 Q Het. p-value I2
CAT 16 445.52 496.89 U/mL 1.26 0.20 <0.001 0.27 25.41 0.045 40.97
GPx 16 84.50 101.07 U/mL 1.69 0.29 <0.001 0.81 42.74 <0.001 64.90
GSH 21 16.58 25.21 U/mL 1.35 0.21 <0.001 0.57 59.23 <0.001 66.23
MDA 33 7.88 4.78 U/mL −0.51 0.15 <0.001 0.39 76.55 <0.001 58.19
SOD 26 70.74 88.10 U/mL 3.05 0.46 <0.001 4.66 281.92 <0.001 91.13
Vit-A 4 52.65 64.23 μg/dL 3.08 1.21 0.011 4.75 19.85 0.001 84.89

CI, confidence interval; Ns, number of studies; Xc, Mean value of the control group; Xe, mean value of the treatment group; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; MDA, malonaldehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Vit-A, vitamin A.

Table 6
Meta-analysis of the effects of Spirulina on blood biochemistry parameters in small ruminants (95% CI)
Item Unit Ns Xc Xe Standardized mean difference (continuous random-effects model)

Model results Heterogeneity


Estimate Standard error p-value Tau2 Q Het. p-value I2
Total protein g/dl 30 14.75 17.28 0.79 0.20 <0.001 0.85 119.91 <0.001 75.82
Albumin g/dl 9 2.57 2.49 −0.37 0.61 0.543 2.87 61.74 <0.001 87.04
Globulin g/dl 9 2.95 3.28 1.36 0.70 0.052 3.80 71.08 <0.001 88.75
ALT IU/mL 22 37.44 24.19 −2.67 0.51 <0.001 5.00 264.03 <0.001 92.05
AST IU/mL 26 68.82 51.97 −3.04 0.46 <0.001 4.68 292.15 <0.001 91.44
HDL mg/dl 6 25.04 24.54 −0.85 0.47 0.073 0.96 18.32 0.003 72.70
LDL mg/dl 6 22.22 15.73 −0.76 0.27 0.005 0.12 7.01 0.220 28.67
Cholesterol mg/dl 27 65.21 61.11 −0.58 0.27 0.034 1.59 160.61 <0.001 83.81
Glucose mg/dl 21 57.29 57.18 0.14 0.22 0.532 0.75 84.55 <0.001 76.35
Haemoglobin g/L 9 122.29 131.98 2.11 0.53 <0.001 1.93 36.97 <0.001 78.36
TG mg/dl 20 65.52 66.68 −0.43 0.35 0.218 2.25 313.43 <0.001 93.94
Urea mg/dl 11 51.99 54.59 1.44 0.49 0.003 2.18 74.18 <0.001 86.52
WBC 103/μL 10 9.24 10.95 0.94 0.27 <0.001 0.34 16.92 0.050 46.79

CI, confidence interval; Ns, number of studies; Xc, Mean value of the control group; Xe, mean value of the treatment group; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; TG, triacylglycerol; WBC, white blood cells.

Table 7
Meta-analysis of fatty acid composition in longissimus dorsi muscle of small ruminants supplemented with Spirulina (95% CI)
Item1) Ns Xc Xe Unit Standardized mean difference (continuous random-effects model)

Model results Heterogeneity


Estimate Standard error p-value Tau2 Q Het. p-value I2
16:0 3 23.80 22.27 %FA −4.42 1.37 0.001 4.95 19.39 <0.001 89.69
17:0 3 1.40 1.40 %FA 0.19 0.59 0.744 0.51 3.92 0.048 74.51
18:0 3 20.10 19.93 %FA −0.08 0.24 0.747 0.00 0.69 0.710 0.00
18:1ω9 3 35.50 36.13 %FA 0.18 0.24 0.440 0.00 0.33 0.848 0.00
18:2ω6 3 4.50 3.87 %FA −0.34 0.24 0.156 0.00 0.19 0.910 0.00
18:3ω3 3 2.00 1.90 %FA −0.17 0.29 0.466 0.00 1.10 0.577 0.00
20:4ω6 3 0.70 0.63 %FA −0.13 0.24 0.583 0.00 0.61 0.736 0.00
20:5ω3 3 0.10 0.40 %FA 0.81 0.28 0.004 0.06 2.62 0.270 23.65
22:5ω3 3 0.20 0.30 %FA 0.27 0.24 0.249 0.00 0.91 0.636 0.00
SFA 3 46.60 46.93 %FA 0.08 0.24 0.740 0.00 1.010 0.603 0.00
MUFA 3 44.80 45.40 %FA 0.17 0.24 0.486 0.00 0.721 0.697 0.00
PUFA 3 8.60 7.70 %FA −0.27 0.24 0.253 0.00 0.562 0.755 0.00
ω-3 3 2.90 2.70 %FA −0.21 0.32 0.505 0.14 3.59 0.116 44.25
ω-6 3 5.50 4.73 %FA −0.31 0.24 0.186 0.00 0.128 0.938 0.00

1) 16:0, palmitic acid; 17:0, margaric acid; 18:0, stearic acid; 18:1ω9, oleic acid; 18:2ω6, linoleic acid; 18:3ω3, α-Linolenic acid; 20:4ω6, eicosatetraenoic acid; 20:5ω3, eicosapentaenoic acid; 22:5ω3, docosapentaenoic acid-3; ω-3, omega-3; ω-6, omega 6.

CI, confidence interval; Ns, number of studies; Xc, Mean value of the control group; Xe, mean value of the treatment group; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.

Table 8
Meat quality, and eating quality of small ruminants supplemented with Spirulina
Item Ns Xc Xe Unit Standardized mean difference (continuous random-effects model)

Model results Heterogeneity


Estimate Standard error p-value Tau2 Q Het. p-value I2
Meat quality
 FMP 11 44.15 43.27 ºC −1.94 0.75 0.010 5.31 94.93 <0.001 89.47
 IFP 5 2.80 2.10 % −2.85 0.93 0.002 3.61 29.66 <0.001 86.51
 pH 9 5.92 6.06 0.67 0.31 0.028 0.45 17.51 0.025 54.32
Eating quality
 Appearance 6 7.43 7.17 1–10 −0.97 0.91 0.287 4.41 46.07 <0.001 89.15
 Aroma 6 7.27 6.81 1–10 −1.13 1.07 0.292 6.25 56.75 <0.001 91.19
 Juiciness 6 7.39 6.99 1–10 −0.83 0.52 0.112 1.20 19.65 0.001 74.56
 Taste 6 7.52 7.05 1–10 −1.03 1.13 0.362 7.02 60.47 <0.001 91.73
 Tenderness 6 7.96 7.19 1–10 −1.72 0.57 0.003 1.41 19.47 0.002 74.32

Ns, number of studies; Xc, Mean value of the control group; Xe, mean value of the treatment group; FMP, fat melting point; IFP, intramuscular fat percentage.

Table 9
File drawer analysis1)
Item Ns Fail-safe N value Significance of bias
ADG 30 994 Not significant
Cholesterol 27 842 Not significant
MDA 33 835 Not significant
Total protein 30 1,796 Not significant

1) Data from Rosenthal [25].

REFERENCES

1. Henchion M, Moloney AP, Hyland J, Zimmermann J, McCarthy S. Review: trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins. Animal 2021;15:100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100287
crossref pmid
2. Mazinani M, Rude B. Population, world production and quality of sheep and goat products. Am J Anim Vet Sci 2020;15:291–9. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2020.291.299
crossref
3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT: statistics database. FAO; 2018.

4. van Vliet S, Provenza FD, Kronberg SL. Health-promoting phytonutrients are higher in grass-fed meat and milk. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021;4:555426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.555426
crossref
5. Holman BWB, Malau-Aduli AEO. Spirulina as a livestock supplement and animal feed. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2013;97:615–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01328.x
crossref
6. Waheed DM, El-Diasty M, Gabr EM. Spirulina as an animal feed and its effect on animal health and productivity. J Adv Vet Res 2024;14:342–4.

7. Wu Q, Liu L, Miron A, Klímová B, Wan D, Kuča K. The antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory activities of spirulina: an overview. Arch Toxicol 2016;90:1817–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1744-5
crossref pmid
8. Altmann BA, Rosenau S. Spirulina as animal feed: opportunities and challenges. Foods 2022;11:965. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070965
crossref pmid pmc
9. Costa DFA, Quigley SP, Isherwood P, McLennan SR, Poppi DP. Supplementation of cattle fed tropical grasses with microalgae increases microbial protein production and average daily gain. J Anim Sci 2016;94:2047–58. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0292
crossref pmid
10. Prasetya DR, Baliarti E, Yusiati LM, Dewayanto N, Budiman A. Potential of spirulina platensis as a feed protein supplement for sheep ration. AIP Conf Proc 2023;2628:060001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0144209
crossref
11. de Medeiros VPB, Pimentel TC, Sant’Ana AS, Magnani M. Microalgae in the meat processing chain: feed for animal production or source of techno-functional ingredients. Curr Opin Food Sci 2021;37:125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.014
crossref
12. Wang Z, Liang Y, Lu J, et al. Dietary spirulina supplementation modifies rumen development, fermentation and bacteria composition in Hu sheep when consuming high-fat dietary. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1001621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1001621
crossref pmid pmc
13. Mansour MM, Zeitoun MM. Influence of spirulina supplementation on growth performance, puberty traits, blood metabolites, testosterone concentrations, and semen quality in Barki male lambs. Open Vet J 2023;13:772–81. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i6.12
crossref pmid pmc
14. Hanafy A. Enhancing fattening lamb performance with spirulina platensis: insights into growth, blood metabolism and antioxidant status. J Appl Life Sci Int 2023;26:31–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/jalsi/2023/v26i1597
crossref
15. Assar DH, Al-Wakeel RA, Elbialy ZI, et al. Spirulina platensis algae enhances endogenous antioxidant status, modulates hemato-biochemical parameters, and improves semen quality of growing ram lambs. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2023;11:595–605. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2023/11.4.595.605
crossref
16. Retnawati H, Apino E, Kartianom , Djidu H, Anazifa DR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Parama Publishing; 2018.

17. Macaskill P, Takwoingi Y, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C. Understanding meta-analysis. Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM, Takwoingi Y, editorsCochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Wiley Blackwell; 2023. p. 203–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119756194.ch9
crossref
18. Hernandez AV, Marti KM, Roman YM. Meta-analysis. Chest 2020;158:S97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.003
crossref pmid
19. Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev 2022;18:e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
crossref pmid pmc
20. Nishikawa-Pacher A. Research questions with PICO: a universal mnemonic. Publications 2022;10:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030021
crossref
21. Trevi S, Uren Webster T, Consuegra S, Garcia de Leaniz C. Benefits of the microalgae Spirulina and Schizochytrium in fish nutrition: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023;13:2208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29183-x
crossref pmid pmc
22. Wallace BC, Lajeunesse MJ, Dietz G, et al. OpenMEE: intuitive, open-source software for meta-analysis in ecology and evolutionary biology. Methods Ecol Evol 2017;8:941–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12708
crossref
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edRoutledge; 1988.

24. Bartoš F, Maier M, Quintana DS, Wagenmakers EJ. Adjusting for publication bias in JASP and R: selection models, PET-PEESE, and robust Bayesian meta-analysis. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci 2022;5:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221109259
crossref
25. Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979;86:638–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
crossref
26. Fomichev YP, Bogolyubova NV, Romanov VN, Kolodina EN. Comparative assessment of natural feed additives for functional effects on the digestive processes in the rumen of sheep (Ovis aries). Agric Biol 2020;55:770–83. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2020.4.770eng
crossref
27. Al-Yahyaey F, Shaat I, Hall E, Bush RD. Effect of Spirulina platensis supplementation on growth, performance and body conformation of two Omani goat breeds. Anim Prod Sci 2022;63:133–41. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21483
crossref
28. Malau-Aduli AEO, Holman BWB. Effect of spirulina supplementation on plasma metabolites in crossbred and purebred Australian Merino lambs. Int J Vet Sci Med 2015;3:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2015.08.001
crossref
29. Holman BWB, Flakemore AR, Kashani A, Malau-Aduli AEO. Spirulina supplementation, sire breed, sex and basal diet effects on lamb intramuscular fat percentage and fat melting points. Int J Vet Med Res Rep 2014;2014:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5171/2014.263951
crossref
30. Ghosh A, Awal A, Khan AHNA, Alam GS, Islam S, Bari ASM. Effects of spirulina in arsenic poisoning in the Black Bengal goat. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2014;38:63–72. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1305-10
crossref
31. Liang Y, Bao Y, Gao X, et al. Effects of spirulina supplementation on lipid metabolism disorder, oxidative stress caused by high-energy dietary in Hu sheep. Meat Sci 2020;164:108094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108094
crossref pmid
32. Malau-Aduli AEO, Kashani A. Molecular genetics-nutrition interactions in the expression of AANAT, ADRB3, BTG2 and FASN genes in the heart, kidney and liver of Australian lambs supplemented with spirulina (Arthrospira platensis). Genes Genomics 2015;37:633–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-015-0294-1
crossref
33. Burezq H, Khalil F. Multifarious feed additives on lamb performance on Kuwait farms. Vet World 2022;15:2785–94. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.2785-2794
crossref pmid pmc
34. Eldaim MA, Ramadan S, Elsabagh M, Mahboub H. Impact of spirulina platensis algae and vitamin A supplementation to late pregnant ewes on their lamb’s survivability and performance. Assiut Vet Med J 2018;64:144–53. https://doi.org/10.21608/AVMJ.2018.169034
crossref
35. Khalifa EI, Hassanien HAM, Mohamed AH, Hussein AM, Abd-Elaal AAM. Influence of addition spirulina platensis algae powder on reproductive and productive performance of dairy Zaraibi goats. Egypt J Nutr Feeds 2016;19:211–25. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJNF.2016.74901
crossref
36. Kashani A, Holman BWB, Nichols PD, Malau-Aduli AEO. Effect of level of spirulina supplementation on the fatty acid compositions of adipose, muscle, heart, kidney and liver tissues in Australian dual-purpose lambs. Ann Anim Sci 2015;15:945–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0037
crossref
37. Sarvinda DT, Bintara S, Budisatria IGS, Kustantinah K, Baliarti E. The effect of flushing premating with spirulina platensis supplementation on ewes postpartum estrus. Bul Peternakan 2022;46:31–5. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i1.67523
crossref
38. Baliarti E, Raka YT, Yusiati LM, Budisatria IGS, Al Anas M. Effect of protein supplementation from Spirulina platensis on Javanese thin-tailed sheep weight gain. In : Proceedings of the International Conference on Improving Tropical Animal Production for Food Security (ITAPS 2021); 2021 Nov 20–21; Kendari, Indonesia: Atlantis Press; 2022. p. 32–5.
crossref
39. Holman BWB, Kashani A, Malau-Aduli AEO. Growth and body conformation responses of genetically divergent Australian sheep to spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) supplementation. J Exp Agric Int 2012;2:160–73. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2012/992
crossref
40. EL-Sabagh M, Abd Eldaim M, Mahboub D, Abdel-Daim M. Effects of spirulina platensis algae on growth performance, antioxidative status and blood metabolites in fattening lambs. J Agric Sci 2014;6:92–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n3p92
crossref
41. El-Deeb MM, Abdel-Gawad AM, Desoky ALI, Aboul-Omran MA, Ahmed ME, Eissa MM. Spirulina platensis influence on the productivity of Zaraibi does. Eur J Biol Sci 2022;14:49–57. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ejbs.2022.49.57
crossref
42. Holman BWB, Kashani A, Malau-Aduli AEO. Effects of spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) supplementation level and basal diet on liveweight, body conformation and growth traits in genetically divergent Australian dual-purpose lambs during simulated drought and typical pasture grazing. Small Rumin Res 2014;120:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.04.014
crossref
43. Rabee AE, Younan BR, Kewan KZ, Sabra EA, Lamara M. Modulation of rumen bacterial community and feed utilization in camel and sheep using combined supplementation of live yeast and microalgae. Sci Rep 2022;12:12990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16988-5
crossref pmid pmc
44. Flakemore AR. Influence of spirulina supplementation on intramuscular fat content, fat melting point and meat eating quality in crossbred and purebred prime lambs [bachelor’s thesis]. University of Tasmania; 2012.

45. Al-Yahyaey F, Al-Marzooqi W, Shaat I, et al. Effect of spirulina platensis supplementation on carcass characteristics, fatty acid profile, and meat quality of Omani goats. Animals 2023;13:2976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182976
crossref pmid pmc
46. Jung F, Krüger-Genge A, Waldeck P, Küpper JH. Spirulina platensis, a super food? J Cell Biotechnol 2019;5:43–54. https://doi.org/10.3233/JCB-189012
crossref
47. Rahim A, Çakir C, Ozturk M, et al. Chemical characterization and nutritional value of spirulina platensis cultivated in natural conditions of Chichaoua region (Morocco). S Afr J Bot 2021;141:235–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.05.006
crossref
48. Raji AA, Jimoh WA, Bakar NHA, et al. Dietary use of spirulina (Arthrospira) and chlorella instead of fish meal on growth and digestibility of nutrients, amino acids and fatty acids by African catfish. J Appl Phycol 2020;32:1763–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02070-y
crossref
49. Raczyk M, Polanowska K, Kruszewski B, Grygier A, Michałowska D. Effect of spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) supplementation on physical and chemical properties of semolina (Triticum durum) based fresh pasta. Molecules 2022;27:355. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020355
crossref pmid pmc
50. Ramírez-Rodrigues MM, Estrada-Beristain C, Metri-Ojeda J, Pérez-Alva A, Baigts-Allende DK. Spirulina platensis protein as sustainable ingredient for nutritional food products development. Sustainability 2021;13:6849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126849
crossref
51. Liestianty D, Rodianawati I, Arfah RA, et al. Nutritional analysis of Spirulina sp to promote as superfood candidate. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2019;509:012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/509/1/012031
crossref
52. Bensehaila S, Doumandji A, Boutekrabt L, et al. The nutritional quality of spirulina platensis of Tamenrasset, Algeria. Afr J Biotechnol 2015;14:1649–54. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.14414
crossref
53. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirement of sheep. 6th edNational Academies Press; 1985.

54. Al-Yahyaey F, Said FM. Effect of spirulina on productive and reproductive traits as well as hematological parameters and the meat quality characteristics in local Omani goats [dissertation]. The University of Sydney; 2024.

55. Plascencia A, Martínez-Alvarez IG, Montano M, et al. Effects of spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) as feed additive of steers consuming high energy diets: growth performance and nutrient digestion. J Hell Vet Med Soc 2022;73:4015–22. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.26069
crossref
56. Meteab MI, Khorshed MM, El-Essawy AMAE, Nassar MSM, El-Bordeny NESYM. In vitro gas production and rumen fermentation for rations containing increasing levels of Panicum maximum cv. Mombasa with or without spirulina. Trop Anim Health Prod 2025;57:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04262-x
crossref pmid pmc
57. Christodoulou C, Mavrommatis A, Loukovitis D, et al. Effect of spirulina dietary supplementation in modifying the rumen microbiota of ewes. Animals 2023;13:740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040740
crossref pmid pmc
58. Panjaitan T, Quigley SP, McLennan SR, Swain AJ, Poppi DP. Spirulina (spirulina platensis) algae supplementation increases microbial protein production and feed intake and decreases retention time of digesta in the rumen of cattle. Anim Prod Sci 2015;55:535–43. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13146
crossref
59. Değer Y, Ertekin A, Değer S, Mert H. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant potential of sheep liver infected naturally with distomatosis. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2008;32:23–6.
pmid
60. Alghonaim AA, Alqahtani MF, Al-Garadi MA, et al. Effects of different levels of spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) supplementation on productive performance, nutrient digestibility, blood metabolites, and meat quality of growing Najdi lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod 2022;54:124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03115-9
crossref pmid
61. Otto JR, Mwangi FW, Pewan SB, Adegboye OA, Malau-Aduli AEO. Muscle biopsy long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid compositions, IMF and FMP in Australian pasture-based Bowen Genetics Forest Pastoral Angus, Hereford, and Wagyu Beef Cattle. BMC Vet Res 2024;20:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-03906-2
crossref pmid pmc
62. Gagloev AG, Negreeva AN, Sugareva TE. Qualitative composition of purebred and crossbred lamb fat. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;845:012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/845/1/012087
crossref


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2025 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next