Exploitation of pig by-product: physicochemical properties and flavor of Dachang Tang: effect of cooking time

Article information

Anim Biosci. 2025;38(10):2266-2279
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 April 28
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0894
1College of Food and Bioengineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
2Henan Province Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Products Processing Equipment, Luoyang, China
3Henan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Agricultural Product Drying Equipment, Luoyang, China
4College of Life Science, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang, China
5Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Malaysia Campus, University of Nottingham, Semenyih, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author: Tongxiang Yang, Tel: +86-18338817162, E-mail: txyamy@163.com. Guangyue Ren, Tel: +86-13303885754, E-mail: guangyueyao@163.com
Received 2024 December 18; Revised 2025 March 6; Accepted 2025 April 28.

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the optimal cooking time for Dachang Tang in order to promote Chinese cuisine culture and to improve the utilization of pig large intestines, thereby reducing resource waste.

Methods

The raw pig large intestines were cleaned with water and flour, then boiled with selected spices for 40 mins to reduce off-odors. Subsequently, the large intestines were stir-fried with oil, garlic, and Zanthoxylum bungeanum for a specified duration, before being added to the original broth. The pig large intestines were then cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins, and 60 mins, respectively. Samples were collected at each cooking times to analyze their basic nutritional components (moisture, protein, fat), texture, color, water state, fatty acids, volatile compounds, microstructure, and sensory characteristics.

Results

With the increase in cooking time, the moisture and fat content decreased significantly, and the ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids increased (p<0.05). At 20 mins, pig large intestines exhibited optimal chewiness, color, surface integrity and sensory scores. Meanwhile, volatile flavor compounds mainly derived from spices, such as 4-methoxybenzaldehyde, benzaldehyde, 3-ethyltoluene, estragole, and ethyl decanoate effectively masking the off-flavor caused by p-cresol and indole in pig large intestines, and provided fruity, spicy, fennel and citrus aromas to Dachang Tang.

Conclusion

A comprehensive analysis concluded that 20 mins was the optimal cooking time.

INTRODUCTION

Pork accounts for 33% of global meat consumption, with Asia contributing 56% of global pork production and China alone responsible for 48% [1]. The production of pig by-products during slaughter and processing leads to substantial resource waste because of low utilization, even though pork consumption is considerable. The pig large intestine (PLI) is one of the pork by-products, containing protein, fat content, as well as rich vitamins (especially B vitamins) and minerals (such as manganese, calcium, selenium, etc.) [2]. It’s also have been reported to be a valuable source of collagen, renowned for their cosmetic benefits, including maintaining skin elasticity [3]. Even so, the PLI still suffers from high production but low utilization rates. By converting PLI into a range of cuisines, this issue can be partially resolved. Developing PLI products can not only remove or reduce its odor but also make it a more widely accepted ingredient. This not only helps increase the market value of PLI but also reduces resource waste, promoting its efficient utilization.

There are many cuisines about PLI in China, such as “marinated large intestines”, “fried pork intestines”, the famous Shandong dish “red braised intestines”, and Anyang’s “fried blood intestines” from Henan. Dachang Tang (DCT) is an intangible cultural heritage delicacy from Henan Province, China, with PLI as the main ingredient, complemented by tofu and blood, and cooked with aromatic spices. It is highly popular among consumers. Cooking time is a key processing step during the cooking process [4,5]. Related studies have shown that increased cooking time reduces key odor-causing compounds, thereby mitigating unpleasant odors. However, cooking too long can also deteriorate the texture of the large intestines [3,6]. Li et al [6] found that continuously boiling PLI for 10 to 20 mins significantly reduces key odor-causing substances such as cresol and indole. Kim et al [3] identified 120 mins as the optimal cooking duration for odor removal, minimizing cooking loss, and achieving optimal shear force in PLI. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the cooking time during the processing of DCT.

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different cooking times on the fundamental nutritional components, color, texture, and microstructure of gourmet DCT and to explore the changes in its flavor by solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (SPME-GC-MS). Through a comprehensive analysis, the study seeks to determine the optimal cooking time and provide theoretical insights for enhancing the texture and flavor of PLI. The findings aim to promote the utilization of pig by-products and support the industrial development of the DCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

In this study, PLI, seasonings and spices were purchased from Luoyang Dazhang Supermarket, with the PLI stored at −25°C in the refrigerator for later use.

Preparation of sample

Raw Pig Large Intestine

PLI were removed from the refrigerator to thaw and washed with flour and tap water for further analysis.

Figure 1 shows the processing of DCT. Pre-treated PLI (0 min): The cleaned thoroughly RL was blanched in boiling water. Then 4,000 g water and 200 g PLI were added to the pan with measured quantitative spices (scallion, ginger, star anise, cinnamon, angelica, and cooking wine), and were cooked at 900 W for 40 mins to reduce the off-odor of the PLIs. The pre-treated PLI and original soup were stored separately for further processing.

Figure 1

Processing diagram of Dachang Tang.

Cooked large intestine group (10–60 mins)

The pre-treated PLI was added to the pan with the garlic and Zanthoxylum bungeanum. Then, 1,600 g of the original soup was added to the pan, along with measured amounts of seasonings and spices (star anise, myrcia, cloves, cinnamon, and chili oil). When the soup began to simmer cooked at 900 W for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins, and 60 mins, respectively. Samples of PLI were cut into different sizes to measure various indicators.

Moisture, fat and protein analysis

The moisture, protein, and fat content were analyzed according to the method of AOAC (2006) and were followed precisely during analysis. The moisture content was determined using AOAC 950.46, which involved drying in an oven at 105°C. Fat content was determined using a fat analyzer (SOX500; Shandong Haineng Scientific Instrument, Dezhou, China), referring to AOAC method 991.36; Protein content was determined using a Kjeldahl nitrogen determinator (K1305A; Shanghai Shengsheng Automated Analytical Instrument, Shanghai, China) to determine the nitrogen content, which was converted to protein content by the formula N×6.25 (where N is the nitrogen content from the sample and 6.25 is the conversion factor), as described in AOAC 928.08. Analyses were performed in triplicate.

Texture profile analysis

PLI was cut into unfolded lengths of about 120 mm×120 mm. The texture of the PLI was measured according to the method of Li et al [7] with slightly modified, by using a texture analyzer (TA. XT EXPRESS; SMS, Glasgow, UK). The measured parameters were as follows: strain, 70%; pretest speed, 1.0 mm/s; test speed, 2.0 mm/s; posttest speed, 5.0 mm/s; trigger force, 5.0 g; and time, 5.0 s. The hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, and chewiness were determined. Each sample was repeated five times to obtain an average value.

Color analysis

PLI was cut into approximately 120 mm×120 mm lengths when unfolded. The colorimeter (Color i5; X-Rite, Grand Rapids, MI, USA) was used to measure the color of the samples. The color values were expressed as L* (lightness), a* (red-green value), and b* (yellow-blue value). Each sample was repeated three times to obtain an average value.

Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance measurements

Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) relaxation was determined using a LF-NMR analyzer (NMI20-015V-I; Shanghai Neumay Electronic Technology, Shanghai, China). According to Wang et al [8] with slight modifications on the methodology. Approximately 1 g of the sample was placed into a cylindrical glass tube and inserted into the center of the magnetic field. The Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) multiple-pulse echo sequence was used to collect the transverse relaxation time (T2). The relevant parameters were as follows: the time waiting = 4,000 ms, the time echo = 0.25 ms, the number of echoes = 3,000, and the number of scans = 4. Each sample was repeated three times to obtain an average value.

Fatty acid analysis

Fatty acid (FAA) was extracted following the method of Folch et al [9]. 5 g of the sample was added to a mixture of 100 mL dichloromethane-methanol (2:1, V/V). The mixture was subjected to ultrasonication for 10 mins and 2 mL of saturated sodium chloride solution to facilitate phase separation. The lower layer was collected as the chloroform-methanol extract. Water was removed using anhydrous cupric sulfate, and the lipid sample was obtained by evaporating the solvent using the rotary evaporator at 50°C under vacuum.

FAA methyl esterification concerned Indrasti [10] and brief descriptions were as follows: 50 mg of extracted fat was placed in a test tube, 2 mL of benzene-petroleum ether mixture (1:1, V/V) was added, and mixed well, then 2 mL of 0.4 mol/mL KOH-CH3OH was added and mixed well. After leaving to stratify, saturated NaCl solution was added along the wall of the test tube to raise the organic phase layer. After clarification, the supernatant was taken and passed through a 0.22 μm filter membrane. The filtrate was loaded into a sample bottle for testing.

The composition of FAAs was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The SP-5 2560 capillary column was used, the inlet temperature was 250°C, He was used as carrier gas, and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 1 μL and the split ratio was 24: 1. Temperature programming: The initial temperature of the oven was set to 140°C for 2 mins, increased to 200°C at 6 °C/min for 6 mins, then increased to 230°C at 2°C/min for 2 mins, and finally reached to 250°C at 4°C/min for 2 mins. Conditional parameters: The transmission line temperature of the mass spectrometer was 250°C, and the temperature of the ion source was 230°C. The masses were scanned over a range of 40−400 m/z and a solvent delay of 10 mins. The qualitative analysis of FAAs was conducted using mass spectrometry library matching, while the quantification was performed using peak area normalization.

Volatile substance analysis

Solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometer analysis

The detection of volatile flavor substances by GC-MS. HS-SPME condition: The SPME fiber was aged at 250°C for 5 mins. 2.0 g of PLI and 2.0 mL of saturated sodium chloride solution were added to a 20 mL headspace vial. 1 μL of 0.816 g/mL 2-methyl-3-heptanone solution as an internal standard was added to the headspace vial. SPME fiber was inserted into the extraction needle and allowed to adsorb at 60°C for 30 mins, followed by desorption at 250°C for 5 mins.

GC condition

Chromatographic column HP-5 (30 m×0.32 mm, 0.25 μm); carrier gas was He with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection port temperature was set to 250°C. The initial column temperature was 50°C, held for 2 mins, then increased at a rate of 5°C/min to 180°C, held for 5 mins, followed by a ramp of 10°C/min to 250°C, held for 5 mins. The injection was performed in splitless mode.

MS condition

The ion source used 70 eV electron impact ionization at 230°C. The scanning mass range was 35–500 m/z with a quadrupole temperature of 150°C and a transmission line temperature of 280°C. The peak areas of each volatile compound were compared with the peak area of the internal standard, and the calculations were according to formula (1) [11].

(1) C=Ax×C0×V×1,000A0×m

Where: C is the concentration of the volatile compound (mg/kg); C0 is the concentration of the internal standard (mg/mL); Ax is the peak area of the volatile compound; A0 is the peak area of the internal standard; V is the volume of the internal standard added; m is the mass of the sample (kg).

Odor activity value analysis

odor activity value (OAV) is typically used to assess the impact of individual volatile compounds on the overall aroma. According to the method by Zhang et al [12], the OAV was calculated using formula (2):

(2) OAV=CT

Where: C is the concentration of the volatile compound (mg/kg); T is the sensory threshold of the substance in water (mg/kg).

Scanning electron microscopy analysis

The PLI was cut into unfolded lengths of about 5 mm×5 mm for scanning electron microscope (S4800; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) analysis. Dry the samples using a vacuum freeze dryer for 24 hours. Once dried, coated the samples with a thin layer of gold using a sputter coater, and transferred into an scanning electron microscopy (SEM) chamber for observation.

Sensory analysis

The sensory panel consists of 15 females and 15 males, volunteers from college of food and bioengineering aged between 22 and 30 years old, who conducted sensory evaluations on the appearance, spice flavor, large intestine flavor, tenderness, and taste of the DCT. Each member rated each attribute of the sample on a scale of 1 to 20. The sensory scores table is shown in Table 1. The study was reviewed and approved by the Henan University of Science and Technology and informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to their participation in this study.

Sensory scoring sheet of cooked PLI

Statistical analysis

The volatile compounds were processed using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST - 11) standard substance mass spectrometry database, as well as the retention times of C7 and C40 n-alkane standards. Data were processed using Excel software, with three parallel experiments conducted, and results were represented as the mean value± standard deviation. Graphs were plotted using Origin 2024 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Significance analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), where p<0.05 indicates significant differences. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using SIMIA 14.1.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The effect of cooking time on protein, fat, and moisture content

The results of the changes in the basic composition of the PLI under different cooking times are shown in Figure 2. During the cooking, the moisture content of PLI first decreased and then increased. It reached a minimum value of 50.75% at 10 mins, down from an initial value of 67.43%. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increased temperature in the center of the PLI during cooking, which induces protein denaturation and contraction, leading to a reduction in the water-holding capacity of the muscle fibers. This finding aligns with the study by Wang et al [13], which explored the impact of frying on pork tenderloin quality. Their study found that prolonged frying time at a constant temperature resulted in a reduction in the moisture content of the meat. The moisture content increased from 10 mins to 60 mins, reaching a peak value of 56.86% at 60 mins. This increase can be attributed to the extended cooking time, which facilitates the hydrolysis of collagen and myofibrillar proteins in PLI [14] thereby enhancing the penetration and absorption of water into the DCT. The RL exhibited the lowest protein content, which significantly increased after cooking. This increase may be attributed to the influence of nitrogen-containing substances present in the added spices.

Figure 2

The effect of different cooking time on the water, fat, and protein content of RL and cooked PLI. Each values represents the mean±SD, n = 3. RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. a–d Different letters indicate significant differences between mean values for different cooking (p<0.05). PLI, pig large intestine; SD, standard deviation.

Compared with RL, the fat content of PLI decreased significantly at 0 min (p<0.05), which was due to the formation of small molecules by the thermal reaction of fat during heating. These small molecules were dissolved in free water and flowed into the soup [15]. As the cooking time was extended, the fat content initially increased before subsequently decreasing. The fat content was highest during the 10−40 mins period, as this was when edible oil and chili oil were added during cooking. However, there was no significant difference in fat content between 60 mins and 0 min (p<0.05), indicating that the fat content in the large intestine was actually decreased during the cooking process. This reduction in fat content was primarily attributed to pre-frying, a finding that is in agreement with the changes in fat content observed after pre-frying and stewing of pork belly, as discussed by Li et al [16]. The mechanism needs further discussion. Comprehensive analysis indicated that at 20 mins, the moisture, fat, and protein content of PLI were all closest to those at 0 min.

Changes in the texture during cooking

The RL exhibits the highest hardness and springiness (Table 2). Compared with RL, the hardness (g), springiness (mm), and chewiness (g·mm) of the large intestine decreased at 0 min, mainly because a large amount of collagen in PLI was degraded into gelatin, which tenderized the connective tissue. The results were consistent with the results of Li et al [6] exploring the effect of boiled time on the quality of PLI. From 0 to 60 mins, the hardness and springiness values initially increased and then decreased (p<0.05). At 20 mins, the hardness, springiness, and chewiness reached their maximum values. This was due to the cooking process, where the PLI underwent frying and boiling, causing an increase in the center temperature, loss of moisture, and denaturation of structural proteins. As a result, the surface of the large intestine shrank, forming a hard outer layer, which led to an increase in hardness [17,18]. 20–60 mins, collagen was converted into gelatin, which softened the connective tissue. This transformation was accompanied by a continuous decrease in myofibrillar protein content, along with the atrophy and breakage of muscle fibers, resulting in reduced hardness, elasticity, and chewiness. At 20 mins and 40 mins, the PLI exhibited higher springiness and chewiness, and which taste was better needed further sensory evaluation.

The effect of different cooking time on the texture of RL and cooked PLI

Cooking could cause muscle fibers to aggregate, leading to the stretching and dissociation of myofibrillar protein molecules [19]. This process accelerated the formation of disulfide bonds, resulting in moisture loss, increased toughness, and greater shear force in the meat. Conversely, boiling caused collagen dissolution, softened meat and reduced shear force [6,20]. Therefore, the shear force of meat during cooking depended on which of these two processes — aggregation of muscle fibers or gelatinization of collagen — was dominant.

The influence of cooking time on the color

Color results are shown in Table 3. As cooking time increased, moisture gradually migrated from the interior to the surface in droplet form [21], leading to a significant decrease in L* (brightness) (p<0.05). Both a* (redness) and b* (yellowness) initially increased and then decreased, reaching their maximum values at 20 mins. This change was attributed to high-temperature stir-frying and stewing, which induced Maillard reactions and fat oxidation, as well as the addition of seasonings, resulting in a deepening of color.

The effect of different cooking time on the color of RL and cooked PLI

Moisture status at different cooking times

A shorter relaxation time indicated a tighter bond between water and the substrate, reflecting lower water mobility, whereas a longer relaxation time signified higher water mobility [22]. 0−10 mins, the relaxation time significantly shortened (p<0.05), the relative content of immobile water (P21) decreased, and the content of free water (P22) increased (Table 4). The high heating rate during stir-frying caused muscle fibers to contract, expelling water from within the fibers into the extracellular space and converting the interstitial water into free water [23]. From 10 to 60 mins, the relaxation time was extended, and the P21 significantly increased (p<0.05). This was due to the conversion of collagen into gelatin in the PLI, which absorbed free water and compensated for the water loss in the muscle. Simultaneously, free water permeated the surface of the PLI and was lost.

The effect of different cooking time on the moisture status of RL and cooked PLI

Effect of cooking time on fatty acids

The FAA results are shown in Table 5. The relative percentage content of FAAs reflects the composition ratio of each FAA at the same sampling point. Due to the continuous decrease in fat content during the cooking, the actual content of each FAA in PLI also decreased (Figure 2), in proportion to the reduction in fat content.

The effect of different cooking time on the fatty acid content of RL and cooked PLI

The FAAs in PLI included saturated fatty acid (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). C22:0 was identified in cooked PLI, but was not detected in either RL or pre-treated PLI. It may have originated from the spices, cooking oil, or chili oil added during the cooking process. Among the SFAs, C16:0 and C18:0 are the primary FAAs. As the cooking time increased from 10 to 60 mins, the content of SFAs significantly decreased (p< 0.05), falling from 51.56% to 44.29%, with the lowest value at 60 mins. The decrease in SFA content can be attributed to two main factors: the degradation of SFAs into low molecular weight compounds and polymers, and the transfer of SFAs from the meat into the broth. C18:1n9c was the primary MUFA and had a significant impact on the changes in MUFA content, with its relative content reaching the lowest at 60 mins. C18:2n6c was the primary PUFA, its trend was consistent with that of UFAs, showing a significant increase in relative content with longer cooking times (p<0.05), peaking at 60 mins. The increase in UFA was attributed to the generation of highly active antioxidants, including melanoidin-related compounds, which can eliminate hydroxyl radicals, superoxide radicals, and peroxides. These components inhibited the auto-oxidation of UFA, thereby preventing their oxidation and degradation during prolonged cooking. Within a certain range, a higher ratio UFA/SFA in food was beneficial, as UFAs helped prevent conditions such as arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases, as well as contributed to the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Analysis of flavor compounds

A total of 56 substances were detected, broadly classified into 10 categories, including 10 ketones, 8 aldehydes, 9 alcohols, 2 phenols, 4 ethers, 9 esters, 1 acid, 4 hydrocarbons, 4 aromatics, and 5 other compounds (Supplement 1). There were 23 flavor compounds in RL, and the number and content of volatile compounds in PLI increased after cooking, and reaching a maximum at 20 mins. At this time, the number of compounds increased from 23 to 32, and the content increased from 111.54±5.21 to 194.73±18.84 mg/kg. The main volatile compounds in RL were ketones, and aldehydes and ethers increased significantly after cooking. This may be due to the oxidation and degradation of fats and proteins in PLI during processes like frying and boiling [24], as well as the addition of spices, which enriched the variety and content of flavor compounds. Some compounds mainly derived from spices such as (Z)-cinnamaldehyde, 4-methoxybenzaldehyde, eugenol, etc. reached a maximum value at 20 mins of cooking. At this time, substances representing the fecal odor of PLI, such as p-cresol, indole, and 3-methylindole, were not detected. It showed that cooking can not only enrich the flavor of DCT but also cover up or eliminate the unpleasant flavor. Interestingly, no fecal odor substances were detected at 20 mins and 60 mins, and a small amount of fecal odor substances were detected at 40 mins. The mechanism needs to be further explored.

During the cooking process, ketones were the most abundant volatile compounds in PLI, primarily produced through fat oxidation, Maillard reactions, and amino acid degradation [25]. Key volatile compounds in PLI included 3-heptanone, 2, 4-dimethyl-3-heptanone, and 4’-methylacetophenone, which contributed floral, fruity, and green aromas. Butyrophenone, with its camphor-like odor, may be a source of off-flavor in PLI and warrants further investigation. The absence of 2-pentadecanone in RL, suggests it might be derived from the added spices, contributing floral and fatty aromas.

Aldehydes were not found in RL. After cooking, their content was second only to that of ketones, increased from 27.61± 2.13 mg/kg to 55.46±5.28 mg/kg, indicating that aldehydes mainly originated from fat oxidation and the added spices. For example, benzaldehyde and nonanal, which derived from fat oxidation, primarily contribute to almond and fatty aromas [26,27]. (Z)-Cinnamaldehyde, 2-methoxybenzaldehyde, and 4-methoxybenzaldehyde primarily originated from star anise and cinnamon, imparting spicy, cinnamon, anise, and hawthorn flavors. Notably, (Z)-cinnamaldehyde, the most abundant aldehyde, served as a key characteristic flavor compound. Aldehydes typically have low odor thresholds, meaning they can impart distinctive aromas even in small amounts [28].

In RL, the main alcohols detected were 2,3-dimethylpentane-2-ol and phenylethanol, and the content decreased significantly after processing, reaching the lowest at 60 mins. It indicated that both compounds may have originated from RL. Eucalyptol, linalool, 4-terpineol, α-terpineol, and cinnamyl alcohol were only found in cooked intestines, mainly primarily came from spices such as oil, ginger, and star anise used during cooking [29,30], imparting herbal, spicy, woody, cinnamon, citrus, and rose odors to the DCT, suggesting that alcohols are a major contributor to flavor in spices.

p-Cresol, indole, and 3-methylindole were the primary compounds responsible for the off-flavors in PLI [6], originating mainly from the degradation of tryptophan and tyrosine [31]. These compounds were correlated with fecal and horsey odors commonly found in fermentation foods [6]. After cooking, the concentration of these off-odor compounds significantly decreased or disappeared, indicating that boiling can reduce or mask unpleasant flavors to some extent. Eugenol, present in small amounts in RL, mainly came from added spices such as cloves and peppers, providing clove and spicy flavors. Anethole, the most abundant flavor compound, offered licorice and anise-like aromas and was present in small amounts in RL, primarily derived from added spices such as star anise.

Esters, typically formed through the esterification of acids and alcohols, are characterized by sweet and fruity flavors [32]. As cooking time increased, the content rose from 2.09± 0.49 mg/kg to 10.80±2.41 mg/kg, reaching a peak at 60 mins. Hydrocarbons and aromatic compounds, due to their low content and high threshold values, played a minor role in the overall flavor.

Odor activity value analysis

The perception of flavor ultimately depended on both the concentration and threshold value of the compounds. Typically, OAV of 1 or greater was considered to have a significant impact on flavor; the larger the OAV, the greater the contribution to the overall flavor [33]. The results further confirmed that the primary sources of off-flavors in RL were p-cresol, indole, and 3-methylindole (OAV>50) (Table 6), and these off-odor substances were not detected at 20 mins of cooking. 3-Heptanone and 5-nonanone were the primary compounds providing fatty and floral aromas in RL and the main contributors to the persistent fatty aroma throughout the cooking process. As the cooking time extended (10–60 mins), the flavor compounds from the spices increased and gradually reached equilibrium. At 20 mins, the volatile compounds were abundant, with some reaching their maximum flavor contribution, including 5-nonanone, benzaldehyde, 4-methoxybenzaldehyde, estragole, ethyl decanoate, and phellandrene, which provide almond, cherry, anise, spicy, woody, and fruity flavors. However, some compounds have not yet fully volatilized at this stage. By 60 mins, substances with OAV values greater than 1 were as abundant as at 20 mins, but the flavor compounds were different. The flavor compounds included eucalyptol, linalool, eugenol, and anethole, which provide anise, herbal, floral, citrus, rose, spicy, and licorice flavors. These compounds effectively mask the fecal odors of PLI and enhance the overall aroma of the cooked PLI.

The effect of different cooking time on the odor activity values of RL and cooked PLI

Partial least squares discriminant analysis

Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) is a supervised PCA method that performs dimensionality reduction while incorporating group information. This multivariate statistical technique models regression on multiple independent variables and accurately identifies the most important variables influencing the grouping. Therefore, PLS-DA is effective for further screening of the most crucial flavor compounds [34]. The compounds with OAV values greater than 0.1 were used as independent variables, RL and PLI cooked at different times (0–60 mins) as dependent variables. Figure 3 showed the PLS-DA plot, where RL and pre-treated PLI were located on the positive axis of PC1, while cooked PLI were located on the negative axis of PC1. Cooked PLI at 20 mins and 60 mins were the furthest from RL, indicating the greatest difference. This distinction arises because, during the cooking process, the volatile compounds from spices and the flavor compounds formed from fat oxidation gradually reach a dynamic equilibrium. The PLS-DA prediction model, obtained through interaction residual variance analysis (Figure 4), has an explanatory variable R2X of 0.939, R2Y of 0.982, and a predictive ability Q2 of 0.948. These values indicated that the model is effective and not overfitted, suggesting that the results can be used for this sample analysis [35].

Figure 3

Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of volatile substances in RL and cooked PLI at different cooking time. RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLI, pig large intestine.

Figure 4

Permutation plot for PLS-DA model. R2, explained variance. Q2, predictive ability. PLS-DA, partial least squares discriminant analysis.

Loading scatter plot (Figure 5) from the PLS-DA analysis were used to assess the contribution of flavor substances to RL and various cooking durations. The figure revealed that the off-flavors in RL mainly originate from p-cresol, indole, and 3-methylindole. At 0 min, the main flavor compounds in PLI were nonanal, mesitylene, 5-decalactone, 4’-methylacetophenone, and methyl benzoate, which primarily providing fatty aroma. As the cooking time increased, aromatic compounds from the spices volatilized and became important flavor contributors. At 20 mins, the compounds with the greatest contribution were 4-methoxybenzaldehyde, benzaldehyde, 3-ethyltoluene, estragole, and ethyl decanoate, providing fruity, spicy, anise, and citrus flavors. At 60 mins, the characteristic flavor compounds were α-terpineol, linalyl acetate, (E, E)-2, 4-decadienal, α-terpineol acetate, and 4-terpineol. These compounds, primarily derived from alcohols and esters, imparting woody, citrus, herbal, spicy, and fatty flavors.

Figure 5

Loading scatter plot for PLS-DA model. RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLS-DA, partial least squares discriminant analysis.

Analysis of microscopic structure

The SEM results are shown in Figure 6. RL exhibited larger pores and a rough surface. During the pre-treatment, the heating caused the PLI to contract, which led to the absorption of moisture by the muscle cells, resulting in a smoother surface and a reduction in pore size. From 0 to 10 mins, the rapid increase in temperature due to frying and boiling led to the surface of the PLI to contract and a decrease in pore size. The main reason for this was the conversion of immobile water in PLI to free water and the loss of some of the free water (Table 5). The primary process during cooking involved the dynamic exchange of fat and moisture between PLI and the broth (Figure 2). The exchange of moisture involved the denaturation and contraction of proteins in PLI, reducing its water-holding capacity. Additionally, the hydrolysis of collagen and myofibrils facilitated the absorption of moisture from the broth. The adhesion of oil from the broth (such as added chili oil and cooking oil) to the PLI’s surface, combined with the breakdown and dissolution of fat cells into the broth, results in a dynamic exchange of fat. At 20 mins, the surface of PLI appears relatively smooth with clear pores. The texture results also indicated the highest levels of springiness and chewiness (Table 2). This may be the optimal cooking time and needs to be further verified by sensory evaluation.

Figure 6

The effect of different cooking times on the microstructure of RL and cooked PLI (bar = 300 μm). RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLI, pig large intestine.

Sensory analysis

The results of sensory analysis of cooked large intestines are shown in Figure 7. Cooked PLI showed no significant differences in appearance. The spice aroma score was lowest at 10 mins because the short cooking time did not allow for the complete volatilization of flavor compounds. 20–60 mins, as the cooking time extended, the flavor compounds gradually volatilize. Both spice aroma and PLI flavors scores were relatively high, resulting in a rich fragrance. The tenderness and taste of the intestines were optimal at 20 mins and 40 mins, when PLI had good elasticity, were easy to chew, and had a balanced salty and spicy flavor, providing the best mouthfeel. At 10 mins, the relatively short cooking time resulted in poor chewiness (Table 2) and incomplete penetration of the seasonings into the intestines, making the flavor somewhat bland. At 60 mins, the longer cooking time caused the intestines to become soft and mushy, with significantly reduced elasticity (Table 2). Prolonged cooking may also introduce a slight bitterness, impacting the mouthfeel negatively. This is likely because some compounds from the spices dissolve into the broth and adhere to the intestines, contributing to a bitter taste. The comprehensive sensory analysis indicated that PLI have the best sensory at 20 mins of cooking.

Figure 7

The sensory evaluation of cooked PLI at different cooking times. 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLI, pig large intestine.

CONCLUSION

This study determined the optimal cooking time for gourmet DCT by analyzing the technological characteristics of PLI. Due to the processing, which involved stir-frying followed by cooking, the moisture content in the intestines significantly decreased at 10 mins (p<0.05), with the immobile water converting into free water. As the cooking time extended, the hydrolysis of collagen and myofibrillar proteins promotes water penetration and absorption, leading to an increase in moisture content at 60 mins. Compared with RL, the fat content decreased significantly at 0 min (p<0.05), which was because the heating caused the fat cells to rupture and the fat flowed into the soup. 0–60 mins, the fat content decreased due to pre-stirring and stewing. The protein content showed no significant changes. At 20 mins, the moisture, fat, and protein content in PLI were closest to 0 min. The UFA/SUFA increased with prolonged cooking time. The main off-odor in RL was primarily attributed to cresol, indole, and 3-methylindole. The flavor compounds were most abundant when cooked for 20 mins, and no substances associated with the odor of the PLI were detected. The reason is that cooking and the addition of spices mask or eliminate unpleasant flavors. Scanning electron microscope results showed that at 20 mins, the surface of the intestines is smooth with clear pores and an intact structure, not completely destroyed. The chewiness, color, and sensory scores of PLI were optimal at 20 mins of cooking. The comprehensive analysis indicates that a cooking time of 20 mins is optimal.

The results of this study provide references for the development and utilization of pig by-products, and offer a theoretical basis for the key processing technologies and process parameters in the industrialization of DCT.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Yang T, Wei J.

Formal analysis: Yang T.

Investigation: Yang T.

Writing - original draft: Yang T, Wei J.

Writing - review & editing: Yang T, Wei J, Wu X, Wang Y, Wu K, Duan X, Liu W, Cao W, Li L, Law CL, Chen J, Ren GY.

FUNDING

We acknowledge the financial support from Key Science and Technology Program of Henan Province (No. 232102520011), Research and Development of Key Technology for Controlling Quality Degradation of Microwave Freeze-drying Starch-based Prepared Vegetables (No. 232102110161), Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education of Henan Province (Nos. 26A550009 and 26A610013), all of which enabled us to carry out this study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

No AI tools were used in this article.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary file is available from: https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0894

Supplement 1. The effect of different cooking time on volatile flavor compounds of RL and cooked PLI.

ab-24-0894-Supplementary-1.pdf

References

1. Lebret B, Čandek-Potokar M. Review: pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat. Animal 2022;16:100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100402.
2. Seong PN, Park KM, Cho SH, et al. Characterization of edible pork by-products by means of yield and nutritional composition. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 2014;34:297–306. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.3.297.
3. Kim SS, Lee YE, Kim CH, Min JS, Yim DG, Jo C. Determining the optimal cooking time for cooking loss, shear force, and off-odor reduction of pork large intestines. Food Sci Anim Resour 2022;42:332–40. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2022.e6.
4. Ma C, Tian X, Li Y, et al. Using high-temperature cooking for different times for bone soup: physicochemical properties, protein oxidation and nutritional value. J Food Compos Anal 2023;122:105467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105467.
5. Yu Y, Yuan X, Zhang Z, Zheng Y, He Y, Zhou Y. Effect of different cooking conditions on the quality characteristics of chicken claws. Food Sci Nutr 2024;12:5518–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4197.
6. Li X, Zang M, Li D, et al. Effect of boiled-water-cooking time on quality and characteristic of flavor components in pig large intestines. Int J Gastron Food Sci 2024;35:100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100899.
7. Li M, Huang J, Chen Y, Zu X, Xiong G, Li H. Correlations between texture profile analysis and sensory evaluation of cured largemouth bass meat (Micropterus salmoides). J Food Qual 2022;2022:1319744. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1319744.
8. Wang X, Yao Y, Yu J, et al. Evolution of lean meat tenderness stimulated by coordinated variation of water status, protein structure and tissue histology during cooking of braised pork. Food Res Int 2023;171:113081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113081.
9. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957;226:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5.
10. Indrasti D, Man YBC, Mustafa S, Hashim DM. Lard detection based on fatty acids profile using comprehensive gas chromatography hyphenated with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem 2010;122:1273–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.082.
11. Lai J, Wu R, Wang J, et al. Effect of cooking modes on quality and flavor characteristic in Clitocybe squamulose chicken soup. Front Nutr 2022;9:1048352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1048352.
12. Zhang L, Qin Z, Zhang L, Jiang Y, Zhu J. Dynamic changes of quality and flavor characterization of Zhejiang rosy vinegar during fermentation and aging based on untargeted metabolomics. Food Chem 2023;404:134702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134702.
13. Wang Z, Nie T, Zhang H, et al. Correlation analysis between volatile compounds and quality attributes in pork tenderloin in response to different stir-frying processes. Foods 2023;12:4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12234299.
14. Qi J, Li X, Zhang W, Wang H, Zhou G, Xu X. Influence of stewing time on the texture, ultrastructure and in vitro digestibility of meat from the yellow-feathered chicken breed. Anim Sci J 2018;89:474–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12929.
15. Xiong T, Mei X, Wu Y, et al. Insights into nutrition, flavor and edible quality changes of golden pomfret (Trachinotus ovatus) fillets prepared by different cooking methods. Front Nutr 2023;10:1227928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1227928.
16. Li Y, Li C, Zhao F, Lin X, Bai Y, Zhou G. The effects of long-duration stewing combined with different cooking and heating methods on the quality of pork belly. J Food Process Preserv 2016;40:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12587.
17. Das R, Pawar DP, Modi VK. Quality characteristics of battered and fried chicken: comparison of pressure frying and conventional frying. J Food Sci Technol 2013;50:284–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0350-z.
18. Lalam S, Sandhu JS, Takhar PS, Thompson LD, Alvarado C. Experimental study on transport mechanisms during deep fat frying of chicken nuggets. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2013;50:110–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.06.014.
19. Zhou CY, Pan DD, Sun YY, et al. The effect of cooking temperature on the aggregation and digestion rate of myofibrillar proteins in Jinhua ham. J Sci Food Agric 2018;98:3563–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8872.
20. Bahwan M, Baba WN, Adiamo O, et al. Exploring the impact of various cooking techniques on the physicochemical and quality characteristics of camel meat product. Anim Biosci 2023;36:1747–56. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0238.
21. Wang S, Lin R, Cheng S, Tan M. Water dynamics changes and protein denaturation in surf clam evaluated by two-dimensional LF-NMR T1-T2 relaxation technique during heating process. Food Chem 2020;320:126622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126622.
22. Wu Z, Liu J, Ruan J, Xu M, Wang Z, Zhang D. Formation mechanism of texture characteristics of pork belly during stewing: focusing on the effects of myofibrillar protein modification. Int J Food Sci Technol 2023;59:2013–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16570.
23. Xu Y, Wei W, Lin H, et al. Mechanism underlying the tenderness evolution of stir-fried pork slices with heating rate revealed by infrared thermal imaging assistance. Meat Sci 2024;213:109478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109478.
24. Gómez M, Lorenzo JM. Effect of fat level on physicochemical, volatile compounds and sensory characteristics of dry-ripened "chorizo" from Celta pig breed. Meat Sci 2013;95:658–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.005.
25. Zhang L, Hu Y, Wang Y, Kong B, Chen Q. Evaluation of the flavour properties of cooked chicken drumsticks as affected by sugar smoking times using an electronic nose, electronic tongue, and HS-SPME/GC-MS. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2021;140:110764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110764.
26. Xiang C, Li S, Liu H, et al. Impact of chilling rate on the evolution of volatile and non-volatile compounds in raw lamb meat during refrigeration. Foods 2021;10:2792. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112792.
27. Wang H, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Wang X, Shi W. Volatile components present in different parts of grass carp. J Food Biochem 2018;42:e12668. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12668.
28. Zhang J, Cao J, Pei Z, et al. Volatile flavour components and the mechanisms underlying their production in golden pompano (Trachinotus blochii) fillets subjected to different drying methods: a comparative study using an electronic nose, an electronic tongue and SDE-GC-MS. Food Res Int 2019;123:217–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.069.
29. Shi J, Nian Y, Da D, et al. Characterization of flavor volatile compounds in sauce spareribs by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and electronic nose. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2020;124:109182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109182.
30. Sales A, Felipe LO, Bicas JL. Production, properties, and applications of α-terpineol. Food Bioprocess Technol 2020;13:1261–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-020-02461-6.
31. Saito Y, Sato T, Nomoto K, Tsuji H. Corrigendum: identification of phenol- and p-cresol-producing intestinal bacteria by using media supplemented with tyrosine and its metabolites. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2019. 95fiy206. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy206.
32. Zhao J, Wang M, Xie J, et al. Volatile flavor constituents in the pork broth of black-pig. Food Chem 2017;226:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.011.
33. Zhu Y, Chen J, Chen X, Chen D, Deng S. Use of relative odor activity value (ROAV) to link aroma profiles to volatile compounds: application to fresh and dried eel (Muraenesox cinereus). Int J Food Prop 2020;23:2257–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1856133.
34. Mais E, Alolga RN, Wang SL, Linus LO, Yin X, Qi LW. A comparative UPLC-Q/TOF-MS-based metabolomics approach for distinguishing Zingiber officinale Roscoe of two geographical origins. Food Chem 2018;240:239–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.106.
35. Yun J, Cui C, Zhang S, et al. Use of headspace GC/MS combined with chemometric analysis to identify the geographic origins of black tea. Food Chem 2021;360:130033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130033.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Processing diagram of Dachang Tang.

Figure 2

The effect of different cooking time on the water, fat, and protein content of RL and cooked PLI. Each values represents the mean±SD, n = 3. RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. a–d Different letters indicate significant differences between mean values for different cooking (p<0.05). PLI, pig large intestine; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 3

Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of volatile substances in RL and cooked PLI at different cooking time. RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLI, pig large intestine.

Figure 4

Permutation plot for PLS-DA model. R2, explained variance. Q2, predictive ability. PLS-DA, partial least squares discriminant analysis.

Figure 5

Loading scatter plot for PLS-DA model. RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLS-DA, partial least squares discriminant analysis.

Figure 6

The effect of different cooking times on the microstructure of RL and cooked PLI (bar = 300 μm). RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLI, pig large intestine.

Figure 7

The sensory evaluation of cooked PLI at different cooking times. 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins. PLI, pig large intestine.

Table 1

Sensory scoring sheet of cooked PLI

Scoring item Description Score
Appearances (20) Good color, uniform, able to stimulate appetite 14–20
Average color, slightly dull 7–13
Poor color, lack of uniformity, does not stimulate appetite 0–6
Spice flavor (20) Moderate aroma of spices, rich aroma 14–20
Slightly light on spices, slightly bitter 7–13
The weak aroma of spices, lacking in aroma 0–6
Large intestine flavor (20) Moderate aroma of intestines, rich fat aroma 14–20
Slight intestinal fishy odor, weak aroma of intestinal fat 7–13
Strong intestinal fishy odor 0–6
Tenderness (20) Has elasticity, good chewiness 14–20
Moderate firmness, some chewiness 7–13
Intestines are soft and mushy, with poor chewiness 0–6
Taste (20) Refreshing taste, moderately salty and spicy, rich meaty aroma 14–20
Average taste, slightly salty or slightly bland, with a faint meaty aroma 7–13
Poor taste, too salty or too bland, lacks meaty aroma 0–6

PLI, pig large intestine.

Table 2

The effect of different cooking time on the texture of RL and cooked PLI

Sample1) Hardness (g) Springiness (mm) Cohesiveness Chewiness (g·mm)
RL 176.46±15.31a 1.05±0.03a 0.67±0.03ab 123.05±0.81a
0 86.36±2.59d 0.97±0.04bc 0.73±0.06a 61.16±5.09d
10 162.06±6.19b 0.93±0.01c 0.51±0.01c 76.48±3.12c
20 175.92±8.28a 1.02±0.05ab 0.60±0.03b 108.64±5.56b
40 150.59±7.86b 0.97±0.04bc 0.71±0.05a 104.78±15.60b
60 130.24±1.83c 0.79±0.02d 0.59±0.03b 60.81±1.42d
1)

RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins.

a–d

Different letters on the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

PLI, pig large intestine.

Table 3

The effect of different cooking time on the color of RL and cooked PLI

Sample1) L* a* b*
RL 80.71±1.08a −1.56±0.07e 16.14±0.54c
0 74.11±1.61b 0.79±0.31d 19.50±0.57b
10 64.45±0.30c 4.96±0.09c 24.04±0.47a
20 53.75±0.59d 6.78±0.37a 22.76±1.21a
40 44.90±2.18e 5.71±0.35b 15.90±2.52c
60 44.52±1.17e 6.08±0.06b 15.77±0.62c
1)

RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins.

a–e

Different letters on the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

PLI, pig large intestine.

Table 4

The effect of different cooking time on the moisture status of RL and cooked PLI

Sample1) T2b (ms) T21 (ms) T22 (ms) P2b (%) P21 (%) P22 (%)
RL 0.61±0.25cd 79.42±6.54a 1000±0.00a 4.25±0.05ab 94.76±0.14b 0.99±0.10b
0 1.15±0.00a 53.50±5.27b 921.87±15.18b 4.03±0.28ab 94.88±0.33b 0.88±0.04b
10 0.49±0.12d 3.37±1.43e 53.50±4.30f 3.44±1.29b 2.46±0.93c 94.11±1.24a
20 0.86±0.18b 52.25±3.73b 623.8±30.63d 4.71±0.43a 94.58±0.33b 0.71±0.20b
40 0.78±0.08bc 46.53±3.55c 730.31±123.03c 4.98±0.48a 94.58±0.50b 0.44±0.17b
60 0.63±0.13cd 37.64±0.00d 370.28±46.23e 3.75±0.35b 95.71±0.33a 0.53±0.11b
1)

RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins.

a–e

Different letters on the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

PLI, pig large intestine; T2b, the relaxation time of bound water; T21, the relaxation time of immobilized water; T22, the relaxation time of free water; P2b, The relative content of bound water; P21, the relative content of immobilized water; P22, the relative content of free water.

Table 5

The effect of different cooking time on the fatty acid content of RL and cooked PLI

Compound RL 0 10 20 40 60
C10:0 0.19±0.01a 0.12±0.01b 0.12±0.01b 0.13±0.00b 0.12±0.00b 0.10±0.00c
C12:0 0.31±0.01a 0.12±0.00b 0.13±0.01b 0.13±0.00b 0.12±0.00b 0.10±0.00c
C14:0 3.23±0.09a 1.85±0.04b 1.81±0.10b 1.86±0.02b 1.81±0.01b 1.55±0.01c
C15:0 0.19±0.02b 0.21±0.01a 0.15±0.02c 0.15±0.00c 0.15±0.00c 0.16±0.00c
C16:0 22.44±1.63ab 23.61±0.37a 22.50±0.67ab 21.66±0.17b 21.59±0.23b 19.80±0.07c
C17:0 0.90±0.04d 1.73±0.00a 1.29±0.11b 1.12±0.01c 1.16±0.00c 1.10±0.02c
C18:0 22.75±0.73c 25.92±0.23a 24.69±0.64b 21.35±0.12d 22.00±0.30cd 19.74±0.28e
C20:0 0.36±0.01c 0.38±0.02bc 0.44±0.04bc 0.45±0.02b 0.46±0.01b 0.63±0.11a
C22:0 ND ND 0.43±0.04d 0.75±0.04b 0.62±0.06c 1.10±0.01a
C16:1 2.81±0.48a 1.98±0.01b 1.57±0.09c 2.21±0.02b 1.59±0.00b 1.49±0.02c
C20:1 1.59±0.09a 1.42±0.05bc 1.37±0.09bc 1.46±0.03b 1.58±0.00a 1.31±0.05c
C18:1n9c 28.78±3.79c 35.37±0.27a 34.21±0.59ab 36.17±0.45a 35.50±0.16a 32.40±0.01b
C18:2n6c 14.55±0.85b 5.27±0.03e 9.49±0.10d 10.08±0.08cd 10.39±0.04c 16.71±0.23a
C18:3n3 0.99±0.09b 0.23±0.05c 0.88±0.12b 1.37±0.60b 1.44±0.59b 2.28±0.10a
C20:3n6 0.22±0.00c 0.24±0.00b 0.21±0.00c 0.18±0.01d 0.16±0.00e 0.30±0.01a
C20:4n6 0.70±0.04d 1.56±0.03a 0.70±0.07d 0.95±0.13c 0.94±0.05c 1.21±0.04b
SFA 50.37±2.43b 53.94±0.33a 51.56±0.28b 47.58±0.17c 48.04±0.50c 44.29±0.26d
MUFA 33.18±3.25d 38.77±0.24ab 37.16±0.41bc 39.84±0.45a 39.04±0.16ab 35.21±0.06cd
PUFA 16.45±0.84b 7.30±0.10e 11.28±0.16d 12.57±0.59c 12.93±0.66c 20.49±0.30a
UFA 49.63±2.43c 46.06±0.33d 48.44±0.28c 52.42±0.17b 51.96±0.50b 55.71±0.26a
UFA/SFA 0.99±0.09c 0.85±0.01d 0.94±0.10c 1.10±0.01b 1.08±0.02b 1.26±0.01a
a–e

Different letters on the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins.

ND indicates that the substance was not detected.

PLI, pig large intestine; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids.

Table 6

The effect of different cooking time on the odor activity values of RL and cooked PLI

No. Compound Threshold (mg/kg) RL 0 10 20 40 60
1 3-Heptanone 0.08 139.75 185.38 76.75 163.63 116.00 132.63
3 5-Nonanone 0.0082 1,401.22 1,759.76 754.88 2,131.71 1,530.49 1,336.59
4 4’-Methylacetophenone 2.1 1.44 1.45 0.76 1.12 0.89 0.65
8 6-Undecanone 0.085 ND ND ND ND 9.88 31.18
11 Benzaldehyde 0.75089 ND ND 2,627.27 4,527.27 ND ND
12 Nonanal 0.0011 ND 1,236.36 ND ND ND ND
15 4-Methoxybenzaldehyde 0.047 ND 160.43 297.02 329.79 220.00 190.64
16 2,4-decadienal 0.0003 ND ND 3,300.00 ND ND ND
17 (E, E)-2,4-decadienal 0.00008 ND ND ND ND 10,375.0 25,375.0
19 2,3-dimethylpentan-2-ol 1.6 11.49 5.51 2.77 7.51 6.63 6.85
20 Eucalyptol 0.0011 ND ND 1,427.27 2,527.27 ND 3,954.55
21 Linalool 0.00022 ND ND 19,090.91 29,500.00 16,909.09 40,454.55
22 Phenylethanol 0.56423 3.35 3.19 2.13 2.46 2.00 1.45
23 4-Terpinenol 1.2 ND ND 0.62 0.81 0.00 1.49
24 α-Terpineol 1.2 ND ND 1.07 0.67 1.59 1.04
26 Cinnamyl Alcohol 0.077 ND ND 87.92 ND ND ND
28 p-Cresol 0.01 1,087.00 ND 315.00 ND ND ND
29 Eugenol 0.0025 128.00 304.00 984.00 2,348.00 1,436.00 2,600.00
32 Anethole 0.015 274.67 1,996.00 1,603.33 2,720.67 2,244.00 4,419.33
33 Estragole 0.016 ND 87.50 36.88 346.25 ND 46.88
34 Methyl benzoate 0.073 23.97 21.23 0.00 13.01 10.00 0.00
35 Linalyl acetate 1 ND ND ND ND 2.43 8.25
36 α-Terpineol acetate 2.5 ND ND 0.31 0.35 0.20 0.46
37 Ethyl decanoate 0.005 66.00 268.00 0.00 478.00 106.00 88.00
39 Methyl palmitate 2 ND 0.20 0.00 0.28 0.17 0.00
41 5-Decalactone 0.066 ND 9.70 ND ND ND ND
45 Phellandrene 0.04 ND ND ND 9.75 ND 44.75
48 Mesitylene 0.7 4.33 27.07 2.47 6.01 7.49 4.21
49 3-Ethyltoluene 0.8 ND ND ND 1.66 ND ND
52 Indole 0.04 196.25 106.25 64.75 ND 82.25 ND
55 3-Methylindole 0.00041 4,414.63 ND ND ND 3829.27 ND

RL, raw pig large intestine; 0, pre-treated pig large intestine; 10, 20, 40 and 60 represent pre-treated pig large intestine cooked for 10 mins, 20 mins, 40 mins and 60 mins.

ND indicates that the substance was not detected.

PLI, pig large intestine.