Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 38(11); 2025 > Article
Li and Yang: Morphological and transcriptional insights into the role of histone phosphorylation-related genes in early development of the chicken duodenum

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the morphological transitions and the role of histone phosphorylation-related genes during the first week of duodenal development in broilers.

Methods

At hatch (D0) and 7 days post-hatch (D7), five broiler chickens were humanely euthanized and duodenal samples were collected to assess the histomorphology, specifically the duodenal villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD), and the VH/CD ratio. The gene expression data of duodenum of broilers at D0 and D7 obtained from the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) analyses were conducted using GEO2R. In addition, histone phosphorylation-related genes were obtained from the GeneCards database. Function enrichment for DEGs was conducted using the DAVID and PANTHER databases. Hub genes were identified using the CytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape, employing four different methods: MCON, DNMC, EPC, and MNC. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics.

Results

We identified striking developmental transformations: VH surged by 63.02% (p<0.05) and VH/CD ratio doubled (100.68% increase, p<0.05), accompanied by 17.81% CD reduction (p<0.05). Transcriptomic profiling revealed 449 histone phosphorylation-related DEGs, comprising 163 up-regulated and 286 down-regulated candidates. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that these genes participated in phosphorylation, intracellular protein phosphorylation, protein dephosphorylation, immune response, as well as MAPK, PPAR, ErbB, and adipocytokine pathways. Importantly, we identified eight hub genes orchestrating duodenal maturation, including LGALS3, ITGB2, IRF7, SOCS3, and CSF1R, KIF23, SMC2, and DLGAP5.

Conclusion

These findings establish a novel paradigm wherein histone phosphorylation coordinates intestinal morphogenesis, providing mechanistic insights for optimizing poultry intestinal health and nutritional strategies.

INTRODUCTION

Early duodenum development plays a vital role in the overall health and performance of chickens [1]. As the primary site for nutrient absorption, the duodenum significantly influences feed efficiency, immune response, and production performance [2]. A well-developed duodenum is crucial for optimizing the utilization of feed, which directly impacts growth rates and feed conversion ratios [3]. Proper nutrient absorption in the duodenum ensures that essential proteins, carbohydrates, and fats are adequately assimilated, leading to improved growth rates and enhanced meat quality. Additionally, the development of the duodenum is intricately linked to the establishment of a robust immune system in broilers. The intestinal mucosa acts as a critical barrier against pathogens, while the microbiota plays a role in immune development [4]. Research has shown that the morphological characteristics of the duodenum, including villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD), are indicative of its health and functionality [5]. Enhancements in these parameters correlate with improved nutrient absorption capabilities and overall health status. Furthermore, a well-developed duodenum can facilitate the rapid healing of the intestinal lining, which is essential following challenges such as viral infections or antibiotic treatments [6]. Stressors affecting the duodenum, such as the quality of feed and environmental conditions, can lead to poor development and subsequent health issues in broilers, including enteritis and dysbiosis. These health challenges ultimately translate to decreased feed efficiency, increased medication costs, and reduced production yields. Thus, understanding the developmental biology of the duodenum in broilers is essential for optimizing production practices and improving the health and welfare of poultry.
Histone phosphorylation is a significant epigenetic modification that influences chromatin structure and gene expression in various biological processes, including intestinal development [7]. This post-translational modification serves as a regulatory mechanism for transcriptional activation or repression, thus playing crucial roles in cellular differentiation, proliferation, and response to environmental stimuli. In the context of intestinal development, histone phosphorylation can modulate key developmental genes involved in epithelial cell differentiation and function. For example, specific phosphorylated histones have been shown to correlate with the expression of genes involved in intestinal barrier function, goblet cell differentiation, and enterocyte maturation, thereby critically influencing the overall architecture and function of the intestinal epithelium [8]. Additionally, histone phosphorylation enhances cellular defense mechanisms against pathogens by regulating the expression of immune-related genes [9]. The intestinal epithelium acts as a frontline defense, and its ability to respond to infections relies on the dynamic regulation of gene expression mediated by histone modifications [10]. Histone phosphorylation is particularly important for the activation of inflammatory responses and production of antimicrobial peptides, which protect the intestinal mucosa from bacterial infections [11]. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that alterations in histone phosphorylation patterns can lead to abnormal intestinal development and increased susceptibility to diseases, emphasizing the significance of this epigenetic modification in maintaining intestinal health [12]. Given the diverse roles of histone phosphorylation in regulating gene expression during intestinal development, understanding these processes can provide insights into the mechanisms that govern gut health and disease resistance in livestock.
Despite the known significance of histone phosphorylation in various biological contexts, its specific role in the development of the broiler duodenum remains largely unexplored. This gap in knowledge calls for a systematic examination of the phosphorylation events associated with critical genes during duodenal development in broilers. The primary objective of this study is to screen for key genes associated with histone phosphorylation in the early development of the broiler duodenum. By employing transcriptomic and morphological analyses, we aim to uncover histone phosphorylation-associated genes and its effects on intestinal development. This research will provide a foundational understanding of how histone modifications contribute to the health and growth of broilers, ultimately offering valuable insights for improving broiler welfare and production practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal and diet

Ten healthy Ross broilers at hatch, purchased from the Bengbu Dacheng Food. breeder farm, were selected at hatch and reared in a controlled environment optimized for growth and welfare. During the first week, the temperature was maintained between 32°C–34°C, with gradual reductions of 2°C per week until a stable temperature of 24°C was reached by week three. Humidity levels were kept at approximately 60%–70% to prevent respiratory stress and ensure optimal feed and water consumption. Lighting was managed on a 24-hour cycle, with 18 hours of light and 6 hours of darkness in the initial week to facilitate feed intake and reduce stress. This light regimen was gradually adjusted to a standard 23:1 light-to-dark cycle by the end of the first week, promoting healthy development. Clean, fresh water was provided ad libitum throughout the rearing period. The specialized broiler diet used in this study was sourced from Anhui Baixin Feed and formulated according to the Nutrient Requirements of Poultry [13], as detailed in Table 1. This nutritionally complete diet met the broilers’ requirements for energy, protein, amino acids, and essential minerals. Standard vaccination protocols were strictly implemented throughout the rearing period, and daily monitoring of water intake and feed consumption was conducted to ensure compliance with welfare guidelines.

Duodenal collection and morphological analysis

At hatch (D0) and 7 days post-hatch (D7), five animals per period were humanely euthanized using 150 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital via intraperitoneal injection, in accordance with the Guidelines for Euthanasia of Laboratory Animals of China (GB/T 39760-2021), respectively. Duodenal samples were then collected for morphological analysis. The samples were fixed in 10% formalin and processed for histological examination. After dehydration and embedding in paraffin, 5 μm thick sections were cut using a microtome. These sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to visualize the tissue architecture. Morphometric measurements were conducted to assess duodenal morphology, specifically the duodenal VH, CD, and the VH/CD ratio. Measurements were performed using a calibrated micrometer under a light microscope. The VH was defined as the distance from the tip of the villus to the base of the crypt, while the CD was measured from the base of the crypt to the muscularis mucosae. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22; IBM). Morphometric differences in duodenal VH, CD, and VH/CD ratio between the D7 and D0 groups were evaluated using an independent samples t-test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05 (two-tailed). Normality and homogeneity of variances were confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively, prior to performing parametric analyses.

RNA isolation and microarray quality control procedures

Total RNA was extracted from duodenal tissue using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. To ensure representative sampling of total duodenal RNA, 12–15 biological replicates from two time points (D0 and D7) were pooled to create three biological composite samples for each time point, each comprising 4–5 individual RNA specimens. RNA quality was confirmed by Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (RIN>8.0) and spectrophotometry (A260/A280 = 1.8–2.0). For microarray analysis, 2 μg RNA was reverse transcribed using T7-oligo (dT)24 primers (Invitrogen) with RNase H treatment. dsDNA was synthesized via DNA Polymerase I/Ligase and phenol-purified. Biotin-cRNA was produced using Affymetrix IVT Kit (≥20 μg yield), then fragmented (94°C, 35 min) in Tris-acetate/KOAc/MgOAc buffer (pH 8.1). Hybridization mixtures contained: 15 μg fragmented cRNA and MES-based buffer with spike-in controls (BioB/C/D, Cre). Arrays were hybridized (45°C, 16 h, 60 rpm), washed (stringent: 50°C/6×SSPE; non-stringent: 25°C), and stained with streptavidin-PE/anti-streptavidin. Signals were captured by GeneChip Scanner 3000 (570 nm, 3 μm). Data were processed using GCOS 1.1 (MAS 5.0 algorithm, median target = 500). All data (GSE15413) and platform details (GPL3213) are MIAME-compliant in NCBI GEO.

Transcriptional data collection

This study utilized the gene expression microarray dataset GSE15413, obtained from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). This dataset consists of six chicken duodenum samples: three from D0 (GSM386843-845) and three from D7 (GSM386846-848). In addition, histone phosphorylation-related genes were obtained from the GeneCards database (https://www.genecards.org/).

Histone phosphorylation-related differentially expressed genes

Differentially expressed genes (DEG) analyses were conducted using GEO2R (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r). This tool employs the Limma package, an R-based software specifically designed for microarray data analysis. The Limma package offers various methods for p-value adjustment, with the default being the Benjamini & Hochberg false discovery rate technique. Genes with |log2 fold change (FC)|≥1.00 and p<0.05 were classified as DEGs. Probes without Entrez gene annotations were excluded from the analysis. Subsequently, the common subset of total DEGs and histone phosphorylation-related genes was identified as histone phosphorylation-related DEGs.

Functional enrichment analysis and protein classification

To explore the functional roles of the DEGs, we conducted Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG, and Reactome enrichment analyses using the DAVID database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/summary.jsp). Additionally, functional enrichment analysis was performed with the PANTHER database (http://pantherdb.org/tools/compareToRefList.jsp). To identify proteins associated with the DEGs, we classified these proteins using the PANTHER database.

Protein-protein interaction networks, hub genes and their functions

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks based on the DEGs were constructed using STRING software (https://string-db.org/) and visualized with Cytoscape 3.8.0. Hub genes were identified using the CytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape, employing four different methods: MCON, DNMC, EPC, and MNC. The genes identified by these methods were designated as hub genes. Subsequently, the functions of these hub genes were summarized using information from existing literature, the NCBI database, and GeneCards.

RESULTS AND DISCUSION

Duodenal histomorphology in the early development

As shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, we observed significant changes in the histomorphology of duodenum during the first week after hatching in broilers. In brief, compared to D0, the VH increased significantly by 63.02% on D7, while the CD decreased by 17.81%. Additionally, the VH/CD ratio significantly increased by 100.68%.

Overview of genes expression in chicken duodenums

A total of 38,535 transcripts (Supplement 1), 4,088 differentially expressed transcripts (Supplement 2), and 12,633 genes (Supplement 3) were identified in chicken duodenum samples at D0 and D7. Additionally, 2,292 DEGs were obtained in chicken duodenum between D0 and D7, in which 1,052 and 1,240 genes were significantly up- and down-regulated in duodenum at D7 compared to D0, respectively (Supplement 4 and Supplement 5 [Table S1]). Supplement 5 (Tables S2, S3) presented the top 30 significantly up- and down-regulated genes in the duodenum at D7 compared to those D0. These upregulated genes included AVD, B2M, BF2, and CDO1, et al (Supplement 5 [Table S2]). Down-regulated genes included ATP12A, FET1, and ACSM5, et al (Supplement 5 [Table S3]).
Figures 2A–2F indicated gene expression box plots, UMAP, expression density, adjusted p-value counts, mean-variance trend, transcript expression, moderated T statistic. Figure 2G revealed the volcano plot for the DEGs in chicken duodenum between D7 and D0. Importantly, 449 histone phosphorylation-related DEGs were obtained, in which 163 and 286 genes were significantly up- and down-regulated in duodenum at D7 compared to D0, respectively (Supplement 5 [Table S4], Figure 2H, and Supplement 6). Supplement 5 (Tables S5, S6) illustrated the top 30 significantly up- and down-regulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs in the duodenum at D7 compared to those D0. These upregulated genes included P2RX7, IL1B, SORBS2, and SUCLG1, et al (Supplement 5 [Table S5]). Down-regulated genes included SCRIB, CIT, CBX7, and ELK4, et al (Supplement 5 [Table S6]).

GO enrichment

To understand the biological processes associated with differential histone phosphorylation-related genes, GO enrichment analysis was conducted using the DAVID database. Figure 3A and Supplement 7 illustrated the biological processes linked to the up-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes in chicken duodenum at D7. These processes included phosphorylation, protein phosphorylation, intracellular signal transduction, cell differentiation, protein dephosphorylation, inflammatory response, immune response, and cell migration. Furthermore, down-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes were associated with biological processes, including protein phosphorylation, chromatin remodeling, cell division, phosphorylation, mitotic cell cycle, mitotic cytokinesis, chromosome segregation, and cell cycle (Figure 3B and Supplement 8). Additionally, Figures 3C–3H illustrated the histone phosphorylation-related genes in the biological processes of protein phosphorylation, cell cycle, cell differentiation, cell division, protein dephosphorylation and cell migration, respectively.

KEGG enrichment

To understand the signaling pathways associated with differential histone phosphorylation-related genes, KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted using the DAVID database. Figure 4A and Supplement 9 illustrated the signaling pathways linked to the up-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes in chicken duodenum at D7. These signaling pathways included MAPK, ErbB, PPAR, apoptosis, C-type lectin receptor, NOD-like receptor, adipocytokine, necroptosis, Toll-like receptor, cytosolic DNA-sensing, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and RIG-I-like receptor. Furthermore, the down-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes in chicken duodenum at D7. These signaling pathways included p53, spliceosome, cell cycle, mismatch repair, base excision repair, homologous recombination, DNA replication, cellular senescence, and nucleotide excision repair (Figure 4B and Supplement 10). Additionally, Figures 4C–4J illustrated the histone phosphorylation-related genes in the signaling pathways of cell cycle, necroptosis, NOD-like receptor, apoptosis, MAPK, ErbB, and PPAR respectively.

Reactome pathway analysis

Figure 5A illustrated the signaling pathways linked to the up-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes in chicken duodenum at D7. The up-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes in chicken duodenum at D7 played an important role in CD28 dependent PI3K/Akt signaling, apoptotic factor-mediated response, mTORC1-mediated signaling, and pregnenolone biosynthesis, et al. Additionally, the down-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes at D7 involved in APC/C phosphorylation, mitotic metaphase/anaphase transition, polymerase switching, telomere maintenance, telomere C-strand, telomeres extension, DNA strand elongation, lagging strand synthesis, DNA replication initiation, and (Figure 5B).

Protein classification

To understand the proteins associated with differential histone phosphorylation-related genes, Protein classification analysis was conducted using the PANTHER database. The upregulated histone phosphorylation-related genes at D7 were associated with DNA ligase, interleukin superfamily, integrin, cytokine, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, ligase, and intercellular signal molecules, et al (Figure 6A). Additionally, the down-regulated histone phosphorylation-related genes in chicken duodenum at D7 were linked to RNA processing factor, cytoskeletal protein, chaperone, kinase activator, DNA helicase, HSP90 family chaperone, and DNA polymerase processivity factor, et al (Figure 6B).

Protein-protein interaction network, hub genes and their functions

To further identify key genes, we performed a PPI analysis of the DEGs using STRING. As depicted in Figure 7A, among the upregulated histone phosphorylation genes, many genes, including TLR4, LGALS3, CD44, ITGB2, CCL4, SOCS3, IL2, JAK1, IL15, CSF1R, and PPARG were implicated in the early development of the broiler duodenum. Additionally, within the downregulated histone phosphorylation genes, many genes such as CCND1, KIF23, DLGAP5, CCNE2, SMC2, BMP4, and CAV1 were also associated with the early development of the broiler duodenum (Figure 7B).
To further identify hub genes, we analyzed the PPI network using the CytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape, employing three algorithms: DMNC, MCC, and MNC. The common genes identified by these three algorithms were designated as hub genes. As illustrated in Figure 7C, among the upregulated histone phosphorylation genes, LGALS3, ITGB2, IRF7, SOCS3, and CSF1R were associated with the early development of the broiler duodenum. Additionally, in the downregulated histone phosphorylation genes, KIF23, SMC2, and DLGAP5 were found to be involved in the early development of the broiler duodenum (Figure 7D). In addition, hub gene functions were shown in Table 3.

DISCUSSION

Histone phosphorylation dynamically regulates gene expression through bidirectional mechanisms: 1) Activation occurs when phosphorylation neutralizes histone-DNA electrostatic interactions, destabilizing nucleosomes to permit transcriptional machinery access while simultaneously recruiting scaffold proteins that bridge activators to basal transcription factors, as demonstrated during immediate-early gene induction; 2) Repression arises when phosphorylated histones serve as docking sites for silencing complexes like trigger adjacent residue modifications (methylation/acetylation crosstalk), with the phosphorylated C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II further modulating elongation efficiency, creating a phosphorylation-dependent “histone code” that integrates cellular signaling with chromatin state transitions across mitosis, DNA repair, and stress responses [1417]. Prior studies have demonstrated that histone phosphorylation critically regulates gene expression and chromatin dynamics during early intestinal morphogenesis [18]. In the duodenum, this modification orchestrates epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival—processes fundamental to establishing gut integrity, nutrient absorption efficiency, and immune competency [19]. Broilers exhibit heightened dependence on early duodenal development, as these structural adaptations directly determine metabolic performance and productivity. Our findings reveal substantial morphological remodeling during this phase, including villus elongation (height increase) and optimized villus-to-crypt ratios—key adaptations for expanding absorptive surface area [20]. Notably, as broilers age (from D0 to D7), the intestinal VH increases accordingly, indicating a positive balance between intestinal cell proliferation and apoptosis (i.e., cell proliferation predominates over apoptosis). Through transcriptional network analysis, we identified eight histone phosphorylation-associated hub genes (LGALS3, ITGB2, IRF7, SOCS3, CSF1R, KIF23, SMC2, and DLGAP5) that mechanistically link epigenetic regulation to developmental programming.
LGALS3 (galectin-3) plays critical roles in macrophage chemotaxis, mucosal barrier maintenance, intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) apoptosis regulation, and inflammatory responses [2123]. Our study revealed a 6.59-fold increase in LGALS3 gene expression in the duodenum at D7 compared to D0 (Supplement 6), with functional analysis confirming its involvement in macrophage chemotaxis (Supplement 7). These findings align with Sun et al [21], who reported that LGALS3 silencing in necrotizing enterocolitis models inhibited the TLR4/NF-κB pathway, subsequently reducing IEC apoptosis and inflammation [21]. Emerging evidence further suggests LGALS3’s protective functions through ER stress modulation, autophagy regulation, and inflammasome control in intestinal Behçet’s disease [22], along with its capacity to upregulate key mucosal barrier components (MUC2, Occludin, and ZO-1) [23]. Collectively, these observations suggest LGALS3 promotes duodenal development through: 1) mucosal barrier reinforcement via tight junction protein upregulation, 2) inflammatory control through TLR4/NF-κB-mediated macrophage regulation, and 3) cellular homeostasis maintenance via ER stress/autophagy pathways.
ITGB2 (Integrin beta 2) plays a pivotal role in maintaining gut epithelial homeostasis through its involvement in cell adhesion, regulation of intestinal inflammation, modulation of permeability, and mediation of immune responses. In murine models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), elevated ITGB2 expression has been observed, while its suppression exacerbates disease pathology [24]. Recent findings by Wang et al [25] further elucidate ITGB2’s regulatory functions in immune response modulation and neuroinflammatory processes associated with intestinal disorders [26]. Complementing these observations, Zeng et al [26] established that ITGB2 is essential for maintaining cytoskeletal integrity and facilitating cell adhesion, with its activation stimulating cellular proliferation and conferring protection against LPS-induced apoptosis in intestinal cells [26]. Our experimental data revealed a 2.81-fold increase in ITGB2 gene expression in the duodenum between D0 and D7 (Supplement 6). Functional analysis identified ITGB2’s association with critical biological processes including cell migration, integrin-mediated signaling cascades, and integrin-dependent cell adhesion mechanisms (Supplement 7). Collectively, these findings support our hypothesis that ITGB2 serves as a key regulator in the early developmental stages of the broiler duodenum, orchestrating multiple physiological processes such as cellular adhesion, migratory behavior, inflammatory responses, barrier function maintenance, and immune system modulation.
IRF7 (Interferon regulatory factor 7) serves as a master transcriptional regulator orchestrating critical aspects of intestinal homeostasis, including inflammatory responses, immune surveillance, epithelial barrier integrity, and macrophage polarization dynamics. Our experimental data revealed a striking 3.98-fold upregulation of IRF7 gene expression in the duodenum between D0 and D7 (Supplement 6), suggesting its potential involvement in early intestinal development. Functional annotation further associated IRF7 with essential biological processes such as immune system regulation, hematopoietic development (Supplement 7), and Toll-like receptor signaling cascades (Supplement 9), corroborating previous findings by Qing et al [27]. The pivotal role of IRF7 in intestinal pathophysiology was substantiated by Qing et al [27], who documented significantly diminished IRF7 expression in ulcerative colitis patients [27]. Their mechanistic studies using IRF7-deficient murine models demonstrated exacerbated susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis, characterized by heightened systemic and colonic pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles. This pathological phenotype was mechanistically linked to disrupted intestinal barrier function, evidenced by dysregulated expression of critical junctional proteins (β-catenin, Occludin, E-cadherin) and the mucin barrier component MUC2, along with reduced interleukin-28A (IL-28A) levels. Importantly, their work established that IL-28A treatment could functionally rescue barrier defects by upregulating these key epithelial integrity markers [27].
Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) functions as a critical negative feedback regulator in cytokine signaling pathways, playing an indispensable role in maintaining immune homeostasis by preventing hyperactive cellular responses. Emerging evidence has implicated epigenetic modifications of SOCS3, particularly promoter methylation in colonic mucosa, as a molecular hallmark of the inflammatory pathology characteristic of Crohn’s Disease [28]. Beyond its regulatory functions, SOCS3 exhibits multifaceted protective roles in intestinal physiology: it promotes the polarization of M2 anti-inflammatory macrophages and confers protection against intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury [29]. At the molecular level, SOCS3 precisely modulates IL-22 responsiveness in colonic epithelial cells [30], while simultaneously orchestrating the upregulation of crucial junctional proteins (ZO-1, occludin, and E-cadherin) that constitute the intestinal epithelial barrier. These molecular mechanisms collectively underlie SOCS3’s demonstrated capacity to ameliorate inflammatory processes and restore epithelial integrity in experimental models of DSS-induced colitis [31].
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) emerges as a pivotal regulator in intestinal development and homeostasis, with our study revealing a 1.58-fold increase in its duodenal expression between D0 and D7 (Supplement 6). This developmental upregulation coincides with CSF1R’s involvement in critical signaling pathways, including protein phosphorylation (Supplement 7), MAPK cascade, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions (Supplement 9), suggesting its potential role in orchestrating intestinal maturation [32,33]. While best known for mediating oxidative stress-induced premature senescence and inflammatory responses, CSF1R exhibits dual functionality in gut physiology. On one hand, its inhibition attenuates Microcystin-LR-induced colorectal inflammation [34]; on the other, it participates in a pathological triad of chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and barrier dysfunction that disrupts gut microbiota equilibrium and metabolite profiles [35]. Importantly, CSF1R’s developmental expression pattern may reflect its balanced regulation of pro-inflammatory and tissue-repair mechanisms during intestinal morphogenesis. The observed temporal expression dynamics of CSF1R in developing duodenum, coupled with its established roles in mucosal immunity and barrier maintenance, position this receptor as a potential modulator of intestinal developmental programming. Its capacity to influence both inflammatory cascades and epithelial integrity suggests CSF1R may serve as a molecular switch coordinating immune maturation with structural development in the nascent gut.
Kinesin family member 23 (KIF23), a critical regulator of mitotic spindle midzone assembly [36], demonstrated significant developmental regulation in our study. We observed a 54% reduction in duodenal KIF23 expression at D7 compared to D0 (Supplement 6), paralleling its functional association with cell division machinery (Supplement 8). This developmental downregulation aligns with established evidence that KIF23 overexpression induces duodenal pathology, including crypt reduction [36], impaired cell cycle progression, and suppressed mitosis-related gene expression (ASPM, CCNB1, and BIRC5) [36]. Our findings suggest that controlled KIF23 suppression during intestinal development may optimize broiler epithelial proliferation and differentiation through mitotic regulation. Structural maintenance of chromosomes 2 (SMC2), essential for chromosomal cohesion and segregation, showed a 60.77% expression decrease in developing duodenum (Supplement 6). Its developmental regulation correlates with critical mitotic processes including chromosome condensation and segregation (Supplement 8) [37,38], reinforcing its role in maintaining genomic stability during rapid intestinal growth.
The coordinated developmental regulation of these mitotic regulators extends to DLGAP5, which exhibited a 62.37% expression reduction at D7 (Supplement 6). Like KIF23, SMC2, and DLGAP5 participates in chromosome segregation and kinetochore assembly (Supplement 8), with its dosage sensitivity influencing both intestinal homeostasis and pathology [3942]. The parallel downregulation of these three mitotic regulators (KIF23, SMC2, DLGAP5) suggests an evolutionarily conserved mechanism modulating cell division precision during intestinal morphogenesis.
While this study identified several hub genes associated with broiler duodenal development through integrated morphological and transcriptional analyses, the following limitations should be acknowledged: (1) Lack of experimental validation for hub gene expression patterns. Although bioinformatics tools and co-expression networks revealed key candidate genes, their spatial and temporal expression profiles in the duodenum remain unverified. Experimental approaches such as quantitative PCR, in situ hybridization, or immunohistochemistry are critical to confirm their localization and dynamic expression across developmental stages. Without such validation, the reliability of transcriptional data and their biological relevance to duodenal morphogenesis cannot be fully established. (2) Uncharacterized functional roles and mechanistic insights. The study primarily focused on gene identification and network analysis but did not explore the functional contributions of these hub genes to duodenal development. Future work should employ loss-of-function or gain-of-function experiments (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9 knockout, RNA interference, or overexpression models) to assess their impact on critical processes like cell proliferation, apoptosis, or stem cell maintenance. Additionally, the mechanistic links between histone phosphorylation and duodenal development require clarification. These unresolved questions highlight the need for multi-omics integration (e.g., ChIP-seq for histone modifications, proteomics) and in vivo functional assays to bridge the gap between gene expression patterns and biological mechanisms. Addressing these limitations will strengthen the translational relevance of the findings for poultry science and developmental biology.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates histone phosphorylation as an epigenetic orchestrator of duodenal maturation in broilers, driving villus expansion and crypt remodeling to enhance absorptive capacity. Transcriptomic analysis identified 449 phosphorylation-regulated DEGs enriched in MAPK/PPAR signaling and immune-cell cycle integration. Eight hub genes (LGALS3, ITGB2, IRF7, SOCS3, CSF1R, KIF23, SMC2, DLGAP5) collectively bridge mucosal specialization, metabolic adaptation, and mitotic precision, offering novel targets for optimizing poultry gut development through epigenetic modulation.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conceptualization: Yang B.

Data curation: Li X.

Formal analysis: Li X.

Methodology: Yang B.

Software: Yang B.

Validation: Li X.

Investigation: Yang B.

Writing - original draft: Li X, Yang B.

Writing - review & editing: Li X, Yang B.

FUNDING

The authors acknowledge their respective universities and institutes for their constant support and help. This study was supported by The Open Project of National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization (No. SKLTOF20230121), The Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding (No. 2024SKLAB6-10), The Open Project of Longyan University & Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Animal Infectious Diseases and Biotechnology (No. ZDSYS2023003), and The Open Project of Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Embryo Development and Reproductive Regulation (No. FSKFKT011).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

ETHICS APPROVAL

This study was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals from the National Institutes of Health, with approval from the Committee on the Ethics of Anhui Science and Technology University (EASTU-2022003).

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI

No AI tools were used in this article.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary file is available from: https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.25.0108
Supplement 1. All transcripts found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 3,224KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-1.xlsx
Supplement 2. Differentially expressed transcripts found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 384KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-2.xlsx
Supplement 3. All genes found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 1,218KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-3.xlsx
Supplement 4. DEGs found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 239KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-4.xlsx
Supplement 5. Supplementary Tables.
ab-25-0108-supplementary-5.pdf
Supplement 6. Histone phosphorylation-related DEGs found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 55KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-6.xlsx
Supplement 7. GO enrichment analysis for upregulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 20KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-7.xlsx
Supplement 8. GO enrichment analysis for downregulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 25KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-8.xlsx
Supplement 9. KEGG enrichment analysis for upregulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 11KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-9.xlsx
Supplement 10. KEGG enrichment analysis for downregulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs found in the duodenum of broilers (XLSX = 11KB).
ab-25-0108-Supplementary-10.xlsx

Figure 1
Histomorphological changes in the duodenum during early post-hatching development. (A) and (B) depict duodenal histomorphology at D0 and D7 post-hatching, respectively. On the day of hatch (D0) and 7 days post-hatch (D7), five broiler chickens per time point were humanely euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (150 mg/kg), following the Guidelines for Euthanasia of Laboratory Animals of China (GB/T 39760-2021). Duodenal segments were subsequently collected for morphological assessment. The tissue samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and processed for histological analysis. Following dehydration and paraffin embedding, serial sections of 5 μm thickness were prepared using a microtome. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for microscopic evaluation of tissue morphologyCompared with the D0, the D7 exhibited a 63.02% increase in VH and a 17.81% reduction in CD. Consequently, the VH/CD ratio demonstrated a 100.68% elevation, indicating enhanced intestinal absorptive efficiency. VH, villus height; CD, crypt depth.
ab-25-0108f1.jpg
Figure 2
Overview of genes expression in duodenum. (A) illustrate the distribution of gene expression through a box plot. (B) present UMAP analysis of the data. (C) illustrate the expression density. (D) display adjusted p-value counts. (E) illustrate the mean-variance trends. (F) show the moderated t statistics. (G) present volcano plots of DEGs. (H) display histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs identified in duodenum. DEG, differentially expressed genes.
ab-25-0108f2.jpg
Figure 3
Functional enrichment of histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs. (A) GO terms enriched for upregulated histone phosphorylation-linked DEGs in the duodenum at D7, including phosphorylation (e.g., protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation), intracellular signal transduction, and cell differentiation. (B) Enriched GO terms for downregulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs, predominantly involving chromatin remodeling, cell division, and phosphorylation-associated regulatory processes. (C–H) illustrate the histone phosphorylation-related genes in the biological processes of protein phosphorylation, cell cycle, cell differentiation, cell division, protein dephosphorylation and cell migration, respectively. DEG, differentially expressed genes.
ab-25-0108f3.jpg
Figure 4
Pathway enrichment analysis of histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs. (A) KEGG pathways enriched for upregulated histone phosphorylation-linked DEGs in the duodenum at D7, highlighting immune and metabolic regulation (e.g., MAPK, ErbB, PPAR, Toll-like receptor, and necroptosis pathways) alongside stress-responsive processes (C-type lectin receptor, NOD-like receptor, and adipocytokine signaling). (B) Pathways associated with downregulated histone phosphorylation-related DEGs, predominantly involving genomic stability mechanisms (p53 signaling, mismatch/base excision/nucleotide excision repair, homologous recombination) and cell cycle regulation (spliceosome, DNA replication, cellular senescence). (C–J) present the histone phosphorylation-related genes in the signaling pathways of cell cycle, necroptosis, NOD-like receptor, apoptosis, MAPK, ErbB, and PPAR respectively. DEG, differentially expressed genes.
ab-25-0108f4.jpg
Figure 5
Reactome pathway enrichment of histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs. (A) Upregulated histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs in D7 duodenum were enriched in metabolic regulation (pregnenolone biosynthesis), cell survival signaling (CD28-dependent PI3K/Akt, mTORC1), and apoptosis. (B) Downregulated histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs primarily involved DNA replication fidelity (polymerase switching, lagging strand synthesis, replication initiation), telomere dynamics (maintenance, C-strand extension), and mitotic control (APC/C phosphorylation, metaphase-anaphase transition). DEG, differentially expressed genes.
ab-25-0108f5.jpg
Figure 6
Functional classification of histone phosphorylation-associated DEGs. (A) Upregulated DEGs at D7 encoded proteins critical for immune signaling (interleukin superfamily, cytokines), molecular connectivity (integrins, intercellular signal molecules), and biosynthesis (aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, DNA ligases). (B) Downregulated DEGs functionally centered on genomic maintenance (DNA helicases, polymerase processivity factors), proteostasis (HSP90 chaperones, general chaperones), and RNA processing machinery. DEG, differentially expressed genes.
ab-25-0108f6.jpg
Figure 7
Protein interaction networks and hub genes regulating duodenal development. (A,B) PPI network analysis identified upregulated immune regulators (TLR4, IL2/15, CSF1R, PPARG) and cell adhesion mediators (CD44 and ITGB2) alongside downregulated cell cycle controllers (CCND1 and CCNE2) and chromosomal stability factors (SMC2 and KIF23) in duodenal development. (C,D) Hub gene prioritization refined key players: upregulated LGALS3 (glycan-mediated signaling), SOCS3 (inflammatory regulation), and IRF7 (innate immunity), contrasted with downregulated mitotic drivers (KIF23 and DLGAP5) and chromatin organizers (SMC2). PPI, protein-protein interaction.
ab-25-0108f7.jpg
Table 1
Dietary composition and nutrient level
Item Content, %
Ingredients
 Corn 41.5
 Rice polishing meal 8.8
 Soybean meal 23.6
 Wheat 8.0
 Rice bran 5.0
 Corn starch residue 3.0
 Spray-dried corn gluten feed 2.0
 Soybean meal 3.2
 Feather meal 1.0
 Limestone 1.8
 Dicalcium phosphate 0.5
 Montmorillonite 0.3
 Sodium chloride 0.3
 Lysine 0.49
 Methionine 0.24
 Threonine 0.02
 Choline chloride 0.1
 VTR Enzyme 818 0.03
 Phytase 0.02
 Sodium bicarbonate 0.1
 Total 100
Nutrients levels1)
 Metabolizable energy/Mcal·kg−1 2.90
 Moisture 9.74
 Crude protein 19.22
 Crude fat 3.07
 Crude fiber 5.38
 Crude ash 10.05
 Lysine 1.35
 Methionine 0.60
 Methionine+cystine 0.80
 Calcium 0.88
 Available phosphorus 0.40

1) Content of metabolizable energy, methionine, cystine, calcium, available phosphorus in diet was calculated values, while moisture, crude protein, fat, fiber, ash was measured values.

Table 2
Duodenal tissue morphology of broilers at D0 and D7
Items D0 D7
Villus heigh/μm 749.58±103.99b 1,221.84±68.93a
Crypt depth/μm 63.42±3.72a 52.12±6.55b
Villus height/crypt depth 11.81±1.43b 23.70±2.91a

a,b Values in the same row sharing the same lowercase letter superscript or no superscript indicate no significant difference (p>0.05), whereas distinct lowercase letter superscripts denote significant differences (p<0.05).

Table 3
Hub genes and their functions
Gene symbol Full name Functions
LGALS3 Galectin 3 LGALS3 encodes a member of the galectin family of carbohydrate binding proteins which play an important role in numerous cellular functions including apoptosis, innate immunity, cell adhesion and T-cell regulation. The protein exhibits antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi.
ITGB2 Integrin subunit beta 2 ITGB2 encodes an integrin beta chain, which plays an important role in immune response and defects in this gene cause leukocyte adhesion deficiency.
IRF7 Interferon regulatory factor 7 IRF7 encodes interferon regulatory factor 7, a member of the interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF) family. It plays a critical role in the innate immune response against DNA and RNA viruses and regulates the transcription of type I IFN genes and IFN-stimulated genes by binding to an interferon-stimulated response element in their promoters.
SOCS3 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 SOCS3 encodes a member of the STAT-induced STAT inhibitor (SSI), also known as suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS), family. SSI family members are cytokine-inducible negative regulators of cytokine signaling. The expression of this gene is induced by various cytokines, including IL6, IL10, and interferon (IFN)-gamma.
CSF1R Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor The protein encoded by CSF1R is a cytokine which controls the production, differentiation, and function of macrophages. This receptor mediates most if not all of the biological effects of this cytokine.
KIF23 Kinesin family member 23 The protein encoded by KIF23 is a member of kinesin-like protein family which include microtubule-dependent molecular motors that transport organelles within cells and move chromosomes during cell division.
SMC2 Structural maintenance of chromosomes 2 SMC2 is predicted to enable chromatin binding activity and involved in mitotic chromosome condensation and positive regulation of chromosome condensation.
DLGAP5 DLG Associated Protein 5 DLGAP5 is predicted enable microtubule binding activity and involved in several processes, including centrosome localization; kinetochore assembly; and mitotic spindle organization.

REFERENCES

1. Liu Z, Cheng S, Zhang X, et al. Characterization of the regulatory network and pathways in duodenum affecting chicken abdominal fat deposition. Poult Sci 2024;103:104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104463
crossref pmid pmc
2. Nessabian S, Zarei A, Chamani M, Sadeghi AA, Seidavi A. Effects of different levels of zinc-glycine and zinc hydroxide on the performance, carcass quality, immunity and duodenum morphometric of the broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci 2021;20:1791–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.1953408
crossref
3. Huang Q, Wen C, Yan W, et al. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of digestive organs in broiler chickens with different feed efficiencies. Poult Sci 2022;101:102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102184
crossref pmid pmc
4. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Hou W, Liu D, Miao Z. Research note: Poria cocos polysaccharide alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal inflammation and barrier damage in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2024;103:104126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104126
crossref pmid pmc
5. Yang L, Chen Y, Bai Q, et al. Protective effect of Bifidobacterium lactis JYBR-190 on intestinal mucosal damage in chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:879805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.879805
crossref pmid pmc
6. Wu QJ, Liu ZH, Jiao C, et al. Effects of glutamine on lymphocyte proliferation and intestinal mucosal immune response in heat-stressed broilers. Braz J Poult Sci. 2021. 23:eRBCA-2019-1207https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1207
crossref
7. Zhao B, Chen Y, Jiang N, et al. Znhit1 controls intestinal stem cell maintenance by regulating H2A.Z incorporation. Nat Commun 2019;10:1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09060-w
crossref pmid pmc
8. Yang J, Xiao Y, Zhao N, et al. PIM1–HDAC2 axis modulates intestinal homeostasis through epigenetic modification. Acta Pharm Sin B 2024;14:3049–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.017
crossref pmid pmc
9. Huang M, Wu Q, Jiang ZH. Epigenetic alterations under oxidative stress in stem cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022;2022:6439097. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6439097
crossref pmid pmc
10. Zhao B, Chen Y, Jiang N, et al. Znhit1 controls intestinal stem cell maintenance by regulating H2A.Z incorporation. Nat Commun 2019;10:1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09060-w
crossref pmid pmc
11. Dominguez M, Truemper V, Mota AC, et al. Impact of ATP-citrate lyase catalytic activity and serine 455 phosphorylation on histone acetylation and inflammatory responses in human monocytic THP-1 cells. Front Immunol 2022;13:906127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.906127
crossref pmid pmc
12. Ruiz Pedro A, Braune A, Hölzlwimmer G, et al. Quercetin inhibits TNF-induced NF-κB transcription factor recruitment to proinflammatory gene promoters in murine intestinal epithelial cells. J Nutr 2007;137:1208–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.5.1208
crossref pmid
13. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of poultry. 15th edNRC; 2014.
crossref
14. Saha A, Seward CH, Stubbs L, Mizzen CA. Site-specific phosphorylation of histone H1.4 is associated with transcription activation. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:8861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228861
crossref pmid pmc
15. Wang C, Ye Y, Zhao M, Chen Q, Liu B, Ren W. Asparagine transporter supports macrophage inflammation via histone phosphorylation. Sci Adv. 2025. 11:eads3506https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ads3506
crossref pmid pmc
16. Ghate NB, Kim S, Spiller E, et al. VprBP directs epigenetic gene silencing through histone H2A phosphorylation in colon cancer. Mol Oncol 2021;15:2801–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261
crossref pmid pmc
17. Minnebo N, Görnemann J, O’Connell N, et al. NIPP1 maintains EZH2 phosphorylation and promoter occupancy at proliferation-related target genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:842–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1255
crossref pmid
18. Liu L, Cao L, Gong B, Yu J. Novel biomarkers for the identification and targeted therapy of gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;9:1217–26. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2015.1072466
crossref pmid
19. Sinnett-Smith J, Ni Y, Wang J, Ming M, Young SH, Rozengurt E. Protein kinase D1 mediates class IIa histone deacetylase phosphorylation and nuclear extrusion in intestinal epithelial cells: role in mitogenic signaling. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2014;306:C961–71. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00048.2014
crossref pmid pmc
20. Bondar A, Slencu BG, Popovici I, Solcan C. Effect of turmeric (Curcuma longa) on duodenal structure in broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci 2023;25:001–008. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2022-1738
crossref
21. Sun L, Sun M, Ma K, Liu J. Let-7d-5p suppresses inflammatory response in neonatal rats with necrotizing enterocolitis via LGALS3-mediated TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2020;319:C967–79. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00571.2019
crossref pmid
22. Lee HJ, Kim JH, Hong S, et al. Proteomics-based functional studies reveal that galectin-3 plays a protective role in the pathogenesis of intestinal Behcet’s disease. Sci Rep 2019;9:11716. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48291-1
crossref pmid pmc
23. Chen J, Gu Y, Biao Y, et al. Isoorientin ameliorated ulcerative colitis by inhibiting the Galectin-3/NLRP3/IL-1β signaling pathway. J Funct Foods 2024;121:106394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2024.106394
crossref
24. Xu R, Du W, Yang Q, Du A. ITGB2 related to immune cell infiltration as a potential therapeutic target of inflammatory bowel disease using bioinformatics and functional research. J Cell Mol Med 2024;28:e18501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.18501
crossref pmid pmc
25. Wang Y, Xie D, Ma S, Shao N, Zhang X, Wang X. Exploring the common mechanism of vascular dementia and inflammatory bowel disease: a bioinformatics-based study. Front Immunol 2024;15:1347415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1347415
crossref pmid pmc
26. Zeng L, Tan B, Yin Y, et al. Gene expression profiles in porcine intestinal epithelial cells treated with arginine using a microarray technique. J Food Agric Environ 2012;10:834–9.
crossref
27. Qing F, Tian H, Wang B, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 7 alleviates the experimental colitis through enhancing IL-28A-mediated intestinal epithelial integrity. J Transl Med 2024;22:905. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05673-y
crossref pmid pmc
28. Sanati G, Jafari D, Noruzinia M, et al. Association of aberrant promoter methylation changes in the suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) gene with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 2022;14:165–9. https://doi.org/10.18502/ajmb.v14i2.8887
crossref pmid pmc
29. Elwany NE, Abdelhamid AM, Mohamed NM, Khalil SS, Orabi EEE, Abdelfattah AM. Vinpocetine alleviates intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury and enhances M2 macrophage polarization in rats: role of SIRT1/SOCS3/STAT3 signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol 2023;122:110654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110654
crossref pmid
30. Han H, Davidson LA, Fan YY, et al. Loss of aryl hydrocarbon receptor suppresses the response of colonic epithelial cells to IL22 signaling by upregulating SOCS3. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2022;322:G93–106. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00074.2021
crossref pmid
31. Cheng Z, Zhou Y, Xiong X, et al. Traditional herbal pair Portulacae herba and Granati pericarpium alleviates DSS-induced colitis in mice through IL-6/STAT3/SOCS3 pathway. Phytomedicine 2024;126:155283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155283
crossref pmid
32. Na YR, Jung D, Stakenborg M, et al. Prostaglandin E2 receptor PTGER4-expressing macrophages promote intestinal epithelial barrier regeneration upon inflammation. Gut 2021;70:2249–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322146
crossref pmid
33. Del Piano F, Lama A, Piccolo G, et al. Impact of polystyrene microplastic exposure on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758): differential inflammatory and immune response between anterior and posterior intestine. Sci Total Environ 2023;879:163201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163201
crossref pmid
34. Yang Y, Wen C, Zheng S, et al. Lactobacillus fermentum alleviates the colorectal inflammation induced by low-dose sub-chronic microcystin-LR exposure. Toxins 2023;15:579. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15090579
crossref pmid pmc
35. Yang Y, Wang H, Wang X, et al. Long-term environmental levels of microcystin-LR exposure induces colorectal chronic inflammation, fibrosis and barrier disruption via CSF1R/Rap1b signaling pathway. J Hazard Mater 2022;440:129793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129793
crossref pmid
36. Nakano E, Mushtaq S, Heath PR, et al. Riboflavin depletion impairs cell proliferation in adult human duodenum: identification of potential effectors. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:1007–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1374-3
crossref pmid
37. Dávalos V, Súarez-López L, Castaño J, et al. Human SMC2 protein, a core subunit of human condensin complex, is a novel transcriptional target of the WNT signaling pathway and a new therapeutic target. J Biol Chem 2012;287:43472–81. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.428466
crossref pmid pmc
38. Kobayashi G, Ichikawa T, Okamura T, et al. A study of small intestinal epigenomic changes induced by Royal Jelly. Cells 2024;13:1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13171419
crossref pmid pmc
39. Lei X, Jing J, Zhang M, Guan B, Dong Z, Wang C. Bioinformatic identification of hub genes and analysis of prognostic values in colorectal cancer. Nutr Cancer 2021;73:2568–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2020.1841249
crossref pmid
40. Yu Y, Ma S, Zhou J. Identification of hub genes for psoriasis and cancer by bioinformatic analysis. Biomed Res Int 2024;2024:5058607. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5058607
crossref pmid pmc
41. Zhang Y, Tan L, Yang Q, Li C, Liou YC. The microtubule-associated protein HURP recruits the centrosomal protein TACC3 to regulate K-fiber formation and support chromosome congression. J Biol Chem 2018;293:15733–47. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.003676
crossref pmid pmc
42. Tedeschi A, Ciciarello M, Mangiacasale R, Roscioli E, Rensen WM, Lavia P. RANBP1 localizes a subset of mitotic regulatory factors on spindle microtubules and regulates chromosome segregation in human cells. J Cell Sci 2007;120:3748–61. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.009308
crossref pmid


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2026 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next