INTRODUCTION
Advancements in genetically engineered pigs have ushered in new possibilities for xenotransplantation. However, potential transmission of animal-derived pathogens remains a significant challenge in transplantation [
1]. Xenotransplantation can enable pathogenic microorganisms to cause unexpected infections in new hosts, posing health risks to recipients and the society as a whole. Therefore, monitoring and managing animal pathogens is crucial for the safe and effective implementation of xenotransplantation [
2]. Direct contact between body secretions and blood is the primary route of infection in pigs. Common zoonotic pathogens include Salmonella,
Escherichia coli, Streptococcus, the hepatitis E virus, the Japanese encephalitis virus, and the Nipah virus. Strict biosecurity measures, such as vaccination, antiviral administration, and rearing in specific pathogen-free facilities, have been implemented to prevent the transmission of exogenous pathogens [
2]. However, unlike exogenous pathogens, endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are integrated into the host genome and inherited across generations because of which their elimination through external management strategies is impossible [
3].
Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are classified within the Retroviridae family, Orthoretrovirinae subfamily, Gammaretrovirus genus, and Porcine type-C oncovirus species. These viruses are estimated to have been existing for approximately 7–8 million years [
4]. The PERV genome consists of a single-stranded RNA, with both coding and noncoding sequences. The coding region includes three essential genes:
gag, which encodes viral structural proteins;
pol, which encodes enzymes required for viral replication; and
env, which encodes envelope proteins responsible for receptor binding and infection of host cells [
5]. The
env gene plays a critical role in PERV infectivity and is used for subtype classification [
6]. Among the identified PERV subtypes, only PERV-A, PERV-B, and PERV-C are replication-competent. PERV-A and PERV-B can infect both pig and human cells, whereas PERV-C is restricted to pig cells [
7]. Additionally, recombinant PERV-A/C (PERV-CA) increases the infectivity in human cells, raising concerns about potential cross-species transmission during xenotransplantation [
8].
Substantial progress has been made in xenotransplantation research. In September 2021, Cooper [
9] transplanted a gene-edited pig kidney into a brain-dead human, achieving normal renal function for 54 h without hyperacute rejection. Later, Porrett et al [
10] implanted a kidney from a pig with 10 gene edits, including deletion of GGTA1, CMAH, and β4GALNT2. The donor pig carried PERV-A and PERV-B but lacked PERV-C. The graft remained structurally intact and free of hyperacute rejection for 74 h; however, the recipient succumbed to systemic organ failure [
9,
10]. In January 2022, Griffith et al [
11] transplanted a genetically edited pig heart into a patient with end-stage heart failure; the graft worked for seven weeks, but porcine cytomegalovirus detected on day 43 contributed to the patient’s death on day 60. In March 2023, surgeons from Massachusetts General Hospital implanted a kidney from a PERV-inactivated, gene-edited pig [
12]; though the renal function remained stable, the recipient died of unrelated causes approximately 60 days post transplant. Although no human xenotransplant recipient has shown direct PERV infection, brief survival times limit long-term surveillance. The clarification on PERV safety thus remains uncertain. Comprehensive inactivation of all PERV loci in donor pigs via multiplex gene editing is therefore viewed as a pivotal step toward safer, more feasible xenotransplantation.
Among the various animal models, Jeju native pigs (JNPs) represent a valuable genetic resource owing to their unique traits and potential biomedical applications. However, similar to other pig breeds, JNPs harbor ERVs that are integrated into their genome and inherited via germline transmission. Unlike exogenous pathogens, which can be controlled through strict biosecurity measures, ERVs cannot be completely eliminated through external interventions [
3]. This poses a challenge for xenotransplantation because PERVs can potentially infect human cells, leading to concerns regarding cross-species transmission.
This study was aimed at analyzing the presence, distribution, and genetic characteristics of PERVs in JNPs. By examining the genomic composition and expression of PERVs in JNPs, we aimed to provide insights into their potential impact on xenotransplantation and to contribute to the development of safer and more effective transplantation practices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Whole-genome sequencing
This study’s protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Jeju National University (No. 2024-0079). Genomic DNA was extracted from hair samples collected from three JNPs (J-17, J-23, and J-24), three Duroc pigs (D-41, D-42, and D-45), and three Landrace pigs (L-9, L-21, and L-34) using the DirEx Fast Hair Kit (GeneAll), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The hair sample was placed in a DirEx Fast-Hair tube and was subjected to thermal processing in a thermal cycler; it was incubated at 65°C for 5 min and subsequently at 95°C for 5 min to enhance DNA release. After extraction, the supernatant (excluding hair remnants) was transferred to a sterile centrifuge tube and DNA purity and concentration were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA integrity was confirmed via electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. The final DNA concentration ranged from 20 to 50 ng/μL, with an average purity ratio (A260/A280) of 1.8–2.0, indicating high-quality DNA suitable for sequencing.
Whole-genome resequencing (WGR) was performed at Macrogen using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. A sequencing library was constructed using the TruSeq Nano DNA Kit (Illumina), targeting a 350 bp insert size. Paired-end sequencing (2×150 bp) was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, generating an average raw sequencing depth of 30× per sample. The total sequencing output across the nine samples yielded approximately 900 Gb of raw data, ensuring comprehensive genome coverage for subsequent analysis.
Analysis of porcine endogenous retrovirus integration in genetically distinct pig breeds
The raw NGS data for each specimen were processed using DNASTAR Lasergene v17.0 for quality control and downstream analysis. Initial data quality assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies (QUAST v5.2.0) and Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO v5.4.3), with completeness scores exceeding 95% across samples, ensuring high-quality sequencing reads. The reference genome, Sus scrofa 11.1 (GCF_ 000003025.6), was obtained from the NCBI database. Raw sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome using Bowtie2 v2.4.5, achieving an average mapping rate of 98.6% per sample. The resulting SAM files were converted to the BAM format using SAMtools v1.15, and the genome coordinates were indexed to identify specific genomic regions of interest. For variant annotation, ANNOVAR and Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK v4.2.6.1) were used with stringent filtering criteria, such as phred quality score (≥30), read depth (≥10), and minor allele frequency (≤0.05).
The reference sequences for PERV subtypes A (AY099323), B (AY099324), C (KC116221), and recombinant A/C (AY953542) were used for subtype identification. To refine the subtype classification, approximately 3 kb of flanking sequences around the candidate PERV loci were retrieved and aligned to the respective PERV reference sequences. The homology-rich gag-pol region (>90% sequence similarity) was aligned to each individual genome using SnapGene v6.1, enabling detection of the number and genomic positions of PERV insertions. To refine the subtype classification, approximately 3 kb of flanking sequences surrounding each candidate PERV locus were retrieved and aligned against the respective PERV reference sequences. Subtype identification and full-length sequence verification were conducted by comparing homology within the env-3′ long terminal repeat region, ensuring subtype accuracy. Finally, amino acid sequences corresponding to the gag, pol, and env regions of the identified PERVs were translated and aligned using benchling. Sequence homology within key functional domains was analyzed to assess potential differences in infectivity among the JNP, Duroc, and Landrace breeds.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis and sequencing
Ear tissue samples (20–30 mg) were collected from three JNPs, three Landrace pigs, and three Duroc pigs under sterile conditions. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Exgene Tissue SV Plus kit (GeneAll) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and only samples with an A260/A280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were selected for further analysis to ensure that the high-quality DNA was suitable for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. PCR amplification was performed using Han Taq DNA Polymerase (HanLAB) with PERV subtype-specific primers targeting the
gag, pol, and
env regions. Primer sequences were designed based on previously reported conserved regions for PERV subtypes A (AY099323), B (AY099324), C (KC116221), and recombinant A/C (AY953542) (
Table 1).
The amplicon sizes for PERV-A, -B, -C, and -A/C were approximately 650, 720, 550, and 800 bp, respectively. Each 25 μL PCR mixture contained 50 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 200 μM dNTPs (Takara), 1× PCR buffer (Mg2+ included, HanLAB), and 0.25 U Han Taq DNA polymerase. Both conventional PCR and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were performed using an iCycler Thermal Cycler (Agilent Technologies) at the Bio-Health Materials Core Facility of Jeju National University. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95ºC for 5 min, followed by 36 cycles of amplification consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. For qRT-PCR, SYBR Green-based detection (Takara Bio) was used with fluorescence acquisition at each cycle, and melt curve analysis was performed to confirm amplicon specificity. The PCR products were resolved via electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer at 100 V for 45 min and visualized under UV light using a GelDocXR+ imaging system (Bio-Rad) after staining the gel with GelRed (Biotium). Amplicons of the expected size were excised, purified using the Expin PCR SV kit (GeneAll), and subjected to Sanger sequencing at Macrogen, Inc. Sequencing was performed in both the forward and reverse directions with the same primer sets that were used for PCR amplification. The obtained sequences were analyzed using SnapGene (Insightful Science) for alignment with the reference sequences, and sequence homology was confirmed using BLAST (NCBI). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA X (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software) with the neighbor-joining method, and bootstrap resampling was performed with 1,000 replicates to assess phylogenetic confidence.
DISCUSSION
PERV infection in human cell lines prompted significant efforts to characterize their genetic structure and suppress infectivity [
13,
14]. Subsequent
in vivo investigations in immunodeficient mice revealed the ability of PERVs to integrate into the host genome, which led to attempts at mitigating the risks associated with the use of antiretroviral drugs, neutralizing antibodies, and RNA interference [
15–
18]. Moreover, the discovery of PERV recombination events has raised concerns regarding their evolutionary adaptability and implications for human infections [
19]. In Korea, foundational studies on the distribution of PERVs in domestic pigs was initiated in 2004 with the analysis of the
pol gene sequence. Subsequent studies have focused on cloning and characterizing PERV-A and PERV-B
env genes from gnotobiotic pigs [
20], molecular characterization of the
gag gene of ERVs in domestic pigs [
21], and phylogenetic analysis of ERV envelope genes in Korean pig populations [
22]. These studies provided insights into the molecular and phylogenetic characteristics of PERVs, which are critical for enhancing the safety of porcine tissues in xenotransplantation models. Furthermore, the regulation of recombinant PERV-A/C infectivity via the C-terminal outer membrane glycoprotein of the PERV-C subtype [
23] has been explored and genomic insertion sites between Asian and European pigs have been compared [
24]. PERV subtypes have been classified using PCR [
25] and RNA interference has been employed to suppress PERV expression, further increasing the safety of pig tissues for xenotransplantation. However, research on JNPs remains limited, as most studies have focused on foreign breeds, such as Large White, Landrace, and Duroc, raised in Korea [
26,
27].
Unlike conventional genes, PERVs exhibit breed-specific variations in their insertion sites, copy number, and chromosomal integration patterns. Differences in PERV insertion sites have been reported among European, Asian, and wild pig populations [
28,
29]. In this study, we employed WGR to analyze PERV insertion sites and copy number in JNPs, Duroc, and Landrace breeds. We identified 24 PERVs in JNPs, 18 in Duroc pigs, and 15 in Landrace pigs. The distribution of PERV subtypes indicated that PERV-B and PERV CA were prevalent across the three breeds, whereas PERV-A was present at a low frequency, and PERV C was undetectable. Because PERV-C does not infect human-derived cell lines, pigs harboring PERV-C may offer advantages as xenotransplantation models. However, the low frequency of PERV-C and potential recombination risks with other PERV subtypes necessitate additional inactivation strategies for safe xenotransplantation.
Comparative analysis of amino acid sequences inferred from WGR revealed significant variations in the PERV subtypes across pig breeds. The majority of PERVs display diverse mutations in the pol region, indicating that only a subset of PERVs remains functionally active. Moreover, differences were observed in amino acid sequences for the gag and env regions, even among PERVs predicted to be active, indicating potential breed- and individual-specific differences in viral structure and infectivity.
The increased prevalence of PERV insertions in JNPs may be attributable to their distinct evolutionary history, characterized by prolonged isolation and reduced selective breeding compared with that of commercial breeds. The genomic retention of PERV elements suggests possible adaptive advantages, such as immune modulation or resistance to viral infections, which warrant further investigation. Given that PERV-C is associated with recombination risks and increased zoonotic transmission potential, its absence in JNPs, Duroc, and Landrace pigs may be advantageous for xenotransplantation. This aligns with the findings of previous studies, indicating that PERV-C-containing genomes are more prone to generating replication-competent recombinant viruses, reinforcing the selection of genetically safer pig breeds for biomedical applications. WGR is a powerful tool for identifying genetic variations among individuals. However, it is subject to limitations, such as improper mapping and insufficient coverage of repetitive sequences or structurally complex regions. To address these challenges, we performed PCR validation for each PERV subtype. Our PCR results for PERV-A, B, and CA were consistent with WGR findings, while PERV-C was detected in some Western breeds and all three JNPs analyzed. The sequencing of amplified PERV-C PCR products confirmed alignment with the
env region of PERV C. Previous studies have demonstrated discrepancies between NGS- and PCR-based detection due to sequencing biases, complex mutations, or low coverage in certain genomic regions [
30].
The gag gene encodes essential structural proteins, including the matrix, capsid, and nucleocapsid proteins, which play critical roles in virion assembly and genome packaging. The pol region encodes enzymes, such as reverse transcriptase, integrase, and RNase H, which are vital for viral replication and host genome integration. In this study, PERV-B insertion in chromosome 3 exhibited high homology across the gag, pol, and env regions, suggestive of a conserved and potentially functional form of PERV-B that may contribute to viral persistence. However, whereas PERV-B insertion in chromosome 4 displayed conserved gag and pol regions across breeds, the env region in JNPs exhibited substantial divergence compared with the Western breeds. Given the role of env in viral entry, these sequence variations may influence receptor-binding affinity, host tropism, and infectivity. This suggests that PERV-B elements in JNPs undergo distinct evolutionary modifications that potentially affect their interactions with host cells. Further analysis of PERV-B insertions in chromosome 16 revealed high pol homology in JNPs, whereas Duroc and Landrace pigs exhibited reduced homology, implying a possible functional loss in the Western breeds. This suggests that JNPs may retain a more active replication capacity, reinforcing the notion that interbreed differences play a crucial role in the evolution of PERV and host–virus interactions. PERV-CA insertions in chromosomes 3 and 5 in JNPs exhibited high homology across gag, pol, and env regions, indicating functional integrity. However, variations in chromosomal locations imply potential differences in infectivity. The breed-specific differences in PERV-CA distribution underscore the complexity of retroviral evolution and their implications for cross-species transmission risks. The SNPs indicated potential sequence variations among individuals, suggesting genetic divergence in PERV-C among pig breeds. Validation of PERV subtypes via PCR and sequencing provides crucial evidence supporting the genomic characterization of PERV elements in different pig breeds. The detection of SNPs within the PERV-C env region highlights possible functional implications, warranting further investigation of their impact on viral infectivity, host specificity, and potential cross-species transmission.