Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 39(5); 2026 > Article
Moon, Heo, Park, Kim, and Lee: Nitrogen balance and yolk corticosterone levels of laying hens fed low-protein diets from 33 to 64 weeks of age

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to investigate the effects of varying dietary crude protein levels on laying performance, nitrogen balance, odor emission, and yolk corticosterone in laying hens from 33 to 64 weeks.

Methods

Two hundred and forty laying hens (Hy-Line Brown) were randomly assigned to one of four varying protein diets from 18.5% to 12.5% at 33–45 weeks, from 18.0% to 12.0% at 46 to 55 weeks, and from 17.0% to 11.0% at 56 to 64 weeks.

Results

Laying performance (i.e., egg weight, egg production, and egg mass, p<0.05) was linearly declined with decreasing dietary crude protein levels. Eggshell thickness decreased (quadratic effect, p = 0.033) at 44 weeks of age, while increased (linear effect, p<0.001) at 52 weeks of age as dietary protein levels lowered. Decreasing dietary protein levels linearly increased (p<0.05) Haugh unit at 52 and 64 weeks. Apparent digestibility of dry matter and crude protein increased at 45 and 55 weeks of age as dietary protein levels decreased. Lowering dietary protein levels increased the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (linear effect, p = 0.012) but decreased (linear effect, p = 0.021) uric acid levels in serum samples at 64 weeks of age. Nitrogen excretion linearly declined as dietary protein levels decreased at all ages. Among the odors analyzed, fecal volatile fatty acids increased at 55 weeks of age with decreasing dietary protein levels. Finally, yolk corticosterone was not altered by dietary protein levels during the laying cycle.

Conclusion

It is concluded that decreasing dietary protein levels fortified with limiting amino acids can be applied to mitigate nitrogen excretion without affecting nutrition-mediated stress in laying hens.

INTRODUCTION

Excess dietary crude protein (CP) constitutes a major source of nitrogen excretion leading to environmental pollution in poultry industry [1,2]. Thus, low-protein diets fortified with limiting amino acids have been commonly employed as a nutritional strategy to mitigate nitrogen excretion [3]. However, excessive reductions in dietary protein levels could compromise laying performance and egg qualities [46], gut health (i.e., microbiota and intestinal morphology) [7,8], and immune responses [9] in laying hens. Indeed, Torki et al [10] reported that decreasing protein levels from 16.5% to 10.5% in the diets of laying hens from 52 to 60 weeks decreased egg production and egg mass, but increased serum triglyceride levels. Moreover, Bunchasak et al [11] reported that lowering dietary protein from 18% to 14% decreased protein conversion ratio and serum globulin including beta and gamma-globulin in laying hens. On the other hand, marginal reduction of protein levels by 1.4 percentage point in the diets of laying hens did not affect laying performance, egg qualities, and gut health indicators including concentrations of short-chain fatty acids in cecal digesta, mRNA expression of genes associated with gut barrier proteins (e.g., claudin-1, zonula occludens-1, and mucin-2 genes) in laying hens [12].
It is well documented that low CP diets play an important role in promoting sustainable poultry production by decreasing emissions of nitrogen, ammonia, nitrous oxide, and potentially methane and carbon dioxide from poultry feces [1315]. In previous studies, low-protein diets lowered nitrogen excretion [16] and odor emission [14] in laying hens.
It is also well documented that nutrient deficiencies could alter physiological responses via disruption in gut health [17], antioxidant systems [18,19], or immune balance [20,21]. Recently, Park et al [22] reported that decreasing dietary phosphorus levels induced stress responses manifested by elevated concentrations of yolk corticosterone in laying hens. On the other hand, Heo et al [23] reported that low protein levels reduced yolk corticosterone in laying hens at 22 weeks of age, but the low protein-mediated reduction in yolk corticosterone was not seen at 26 and 32 weeks of age. These studies [22,23] suggest that yolk corticosterone levels, an indicator of stress responses in laying hens, could be influenced by different nutrient composition in early phases of laying production. It is however not known whether lowering protein levels in the diets of laying hens could affect stress response in mid- or late-stages of laying production. Thus, the present study was designed to test the effect of lowering protein levels on nitrogen balance, odor emission and yolk corticosterone in laying hens from 33 to 64 weeks of age. It is anticipated that the information obtained would be useful in assessing the long-term feeding of low-protein diets and unraveling nutrition-mediated alterations of stress response in laying hens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design, diets and birds

A total of 240 Hy-Line Brown laying hens aged 33 weeks of age were randomly subjected into one of four experimental diets with varying CP levels during three feeding phases (phase I from 33 to 45 weeks, phase II from 46 to 55 weeks, and phase III from 56 to 64 weeks). Four experimental diets were formulated to contain the graded CP levels at 2% intervals (Supplement 1) from 18.5% to 12.5% (phase I), from 18.0% to 12.0% (phase II), and from 17.0% to 11.0% (phase III). All experimental diets, in a powdered form, were ensured to have equal levels of metabolizable energy, limiting amino acids (lysine, methionine, threonine, and valine) and calcium. The hens were housed in three-tiered cages (45×45×45 cm per cage) equipped with a plastic trough feeder and nipple waterer. Each cage housed two hens, and three adjacent cages (six hens per replicate) were considered a replicate. Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the experiment. The experimental lighting schedule consisted of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness (16L:8D).
Body weights were individually recorded at the beginning and end of the experiment and feed intake per replicate was measured at four-week intervals. Eggs laid were daily collected, weighed per replicate and used to calculate egg weight, egg production, and egg mass. The percentage of soft and broken eggs per replicate was calculated as total number of soft and broken eggs divided by total number of eggs multiplied by 100.

Sample collection

At 64 weeks, one bird per replicate was randomly selected and euthanized with excess carbon dioxide. Blood was collected by heart puncture and serum was obtained by centrifugation (200×g for 15 min) and stored at −20°C until further analysis. Immediately after blood sampling, internal organs including abdominal fat, liver, spleen, bursa of Fabricius, ovary, oviduct, large yellow follicles, small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum) and right leg were excised. A 1-cm-long mid-ileal segment was fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for histological evaluation. Tibiae from the right leg were prepared by removing attached muscles and cartilage.
On the last three consecutive days at 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64 weeks, 6 intact eggs per replicate were collected to quantify yolk corticosterone and eggs collected at 44, 56, and 64 weeks were used to measure egg qualities.

Egg quality determination

Eggs collected at 44, 52, and 64 weeks were subjected to egg quality analysis (i.e., eggshell thickness, eggshell strength, Haugh unit, and yolk color score) using a digital egg tester (DET6000; Nabel). Eggshell color was measured by a shell color reflectometer (TSS QCR; Technical Services and Supplies).

Organ weights, ileal morphology, and tibia characteristics

At 64 weeks, internal organs (i.e., abdominal fat, liver, kidney, spleen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, bursa of Fabricius, ovary, and oviduct) collected were weighed and relatively expressed per body weight. Large yellow follicles over 0.5 cm per bird were counted and recorded. Villus height and crypt depth were measured in seven well-oriented villi at 40× magnification using a digital microscope (BX 43; Olympus), and images were captured with a digital camera (eXcope T500; Olympus). The width and length of the tibia were measured using a vernier caliper. Tibia breaking strength was measured using an Instron (Instron Universal Testing Machine Mo. 3342; Instron) with a 50-kg load range at a crossed speed of 50 mm/min with tibia supported on a 3.35 cm span.

Nutrients digestibility and nitrogen balance

At 45, 55, and 64 weeks, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance were determined using the total fecal collection method. Each treatment consisted of 7 replicates with 2 birds per replicate. Birds were provided with free access to feed and water throughout the metabolism trial. Feed intake was recorded, and fecal samples were quantitatively collected twice daily for three consecutive days. Excreta from each replicate were pooled and stored at −20°C until further processing. Samples were subsequently dried in a forced-air oven at 65°C for 72 h and ground for chemical analyses. Feed and excreta samples were analyzed for [24] dry matter (method 930.15), CP (method 990.03), ether extract (method 920.39), and crude ash (method 942.05). Nitrogen balance including intake, excretion, and retention (difference between the intake and the excretion) was calculated according to the method described [22,23].

Determination of odors in fecal samples

At 45, 55, and 64 weeks, odor emission was measured using the modified flux chamber method [25]. In short, approximately 150 g of freshly voided excreta were placed in a 6 L plastic container. To equilibrate odorant concentrations, nitrogen gas (99.99%) was introduced at a rate of 1 L/min for 10 min. Odor emissions were then analyzed with a Gastec detector (GV-100S; Gastec) equipped with detector tubes for CO2, NH3, H2S, and trimethylamine. In addition, the concentrations of total volatile fatty acids in fresh excreta samples were assayed using gas chromatography (6890 Series GC System; Hewlett Packard) per the method described elsewhere [26].

Serum biochemical parameters

At 64 weeks, serum samples were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, glutamic pyruvic transaminase, albumin, total protein, and uric acid using an automated blood chemistry analyzer (Film DRI CHEM 7000i; Fuji Film).

Determinations of corticosterone in yolk samples

Eggs collected at 4-week intervals from 36 to 64 weeks were used to quantify yolk corticosterone levels as described elsewhere [27]. In brief, the separated yolks were pooled (3 yolks/replicate) were mixed with ethanol and the mixture was extracted at 37°C for 1 h in the incubator and then centrifuged. The supernatants were analyzed using a commercially available CORT ELISA kit (ADI-901-097; Enzo Life Science) per the manufacturer’s recommendation.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the GLM procedure of the SAS (SAS Institute). The model included dietary treatment as a fixed variable. The least square means were calculated for each treatment. Due to the lack of differences among four treatments, yolk corticosterone levels measured at 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64 weeks were combined for statistical analysis. Preplanned polynomial contrasts were employed to determine linear and quadratic effects of dietary protein levels. An alpha level of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

Final body weight of laying hens at 64 weeks of age was lowered (quadratic effect, p = 0.049) with decreasing protein levels (Table 1). However, body weight change and feed intake were not affected by dietary protein levels. Egg weight linearly declined with decreasing protein levels (p<0.001). Lowering dietary protein levels decreased (linear and quadratic effects, p<0.05) egg production and egg mass, but increased (linear and quadratic effects, p<0.05) feed conversion ratio. The percentages of soft and broken eggs tended to be reduced (quadratic effect, p = 0.055) as dietary protein level lowered, the values being higher in laying hens fed diets containing high and very low protein levels.
Decreasing dietary protein levels increased (quadratic effect, p = 0.033) eggs with thin eggshells at 44 weeks, but improved (linear effect, p<0.001) eggshell thickness at 52 weeks (Table 2). Eggshell strength was unaffected by dietary CP levels. Eggshell color was increased (linear effect, p = 0.015) at 52 weeks as dietary protein levels decreased. Lowering dietary protein levels increased Haugh unit, but decreased yolk color at all ages.
Relative weights of abdominal fat and internal organs (i.e., kidney, spleen, small intestine, and bursa of Fabricius) were not affected by dietary protein levels (Table 3). Decreasing dietary protein levels increased (quadratic effect, p = 0.059) liver weight but lowered the relative weights of ovary (quadratic effect, p = 0.037) and oviduct (linear effect, p = 0.047). Although dietary protein levels affected reproductive organs, number of large yellow follicles was not altered. Tibia characteristics (i.e., length, width, and breaking strength) in laying hens at 64 weeks were not affected by dietary protein levels.
Lowering dietary protein levels did not affect ileal villus height, but decreased (linear effect, p = 0.045) ileal crypt depth, leading to increased villus height:crypt depth (linear effect, p = 0.093; Table 4).
Decreasing dietary protein levels linearly increased the digestibility of dry matter at 45 and 55 weeks (p<0.05), and that of CP at 45 (p<0.001) and 55 (p = 0.053) weeks (Table 5). Laying hens fed diets containing lowered dietary protein levels exhibited decreased digestibility of ether extract and crude ash at 45 weeks (linear effect, p<0.05), but increased digestibility of ether extract at 64 weeks (linear effect, p = 0.068) and crude ash at 55 weeks (linear effect, p = 0.018).
Lowering dietary protein levels increased the concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (linear and quadratic effects, p<0.05), but lowered (linear effect, p = 0.021) that of uric acid in serum samples at 64 weeks (Table 6). The concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride, glutamic oxaloacetatic transaminase, glutamic pyruvic transaminase, and total protein in serum samples were not altered by dietary protein levels.
Fresh excreta weight ranged from 83.75 to 95.03 g/d/hen at 45 weeks, from 72.20 to 82.24 g/d/hen at 55 weeks, and from 73.86 to 83.90 g/d/hen at 64 weeks (Table 7). Lowering dietary protein levels decreased (linear effect, p<0.001) nitrogen consumed, excreted, and retained at all ages. Linear regression analysis clearly showed the reduction of nitrogen excretion (Y) by each 2% reduction in dietary protein levels (x) at 45 weeks (Y = −0.242x+2.21, r2 = 0.988), 55 weeks (Y = −0.192x+ 1.61, r2 = 0.997), and 64 weeks (Y = −0.131x+1.30, r2 = 0.988). Odor gas emissions (i.e., carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and trimethylamine) were not affected by dietary protein levels (Table 8). However, decreasing dietary protein levels linearly increased total volatile fatty acids in fecal digesta and this effect was only noted at 55 weeks (linear effect, p = 0.003).
To determine whether dietary protein levels could affect stress responses in laying hens, we analyzed yolk corticosterone at 4-week intervals from 33 to 64 weeks. No differences in yolk corticosterone by dietary protein levels were found at all ages. Thus, all analyzed values for yolk corticosterone were pooled and presented (Figure 1).

DISCUSSION

The present study aimed to investigate the long-term feeding effect of low-protein diets on laying performance, egg quality, nitrogen balance, odor emission, and yolk corticosterone in laying hens. Our results demonstrated that although body weight change was unaffected by dietary protein levels, laying hens performed less coupled with decreased reproductive organs with lowering dietary protein levels. However, low-protein diets improved ileal morphology, an indicator of gut health, and apparent total tract nutrient digestibility (e.g., dry matter or CP). Finally, low-protein diets did not affect yolk corticosterone but lowered nitrogen excretion. Taken together, these data suggest that low-protein diets fortified with limiting amino acids can be considered as an effective option to mitigate nitrogen emission during the laying cycle.
The findings of this study indicate that lowering dietary protein levels did not negatively affect body weight of laying hens, which is consistent with previous studies [11,28,29]. This can be attributed to the fact that all experimental diets were supplemented with limiting amino acids including lysine, methionine, and threonine which could have prevented the negative effect of low-protein diets, if any, on body weight. In addition, the observation that feed intake was not altered by dietary treatments indicates that nitrogen levels in low-protein diets might be sufficient to meet the requirements of laying hens for maintaining body composition or weight. However, lowering dietary protein levels decreased laying performance including egg weight, egg production, egg mass, and feed conversion ratio. This finding corroborates earlier studies showing that lowering dietary protein levels decreased laying performance including egg weight and production [30]. It is generally understood that nutritional factors including protein or energy levels could affect laying performance [31,32]. Thus, although all experimental diets had equal concentrations of limiting amino acids (i.e., lysine, methionine, threonine, and valine) and metabolizable energy, it is likely that suboptimal levels of nitrogen required for maintaining optimal laying performance could have led to decreased laying performance. In addition, impaired feed efficiency by dietary protein levels noted in this study indicates that feed consumed, especially diets with low and very low protein levels, was not efficiently utilized to lay eggs due to the lack of nitrogen for egg production. Our findings align with earlier studies [33,34] that low-protein diets decreased egg production and egg mass but increased feed conversion ratio in laying hens. In addition, our finding that lowering dietary protein levels lowered the relative weights of productive organs (i.e., ovary and oviduct) could also support the reduction in laying performance (i.e., egg weight, egg production, and egg mass).
Egg quality plays a crucial role in the commercial egg industry [35]. It is clear from this study that lowering dietary protein levels did not impair eggshell qualities. Instead, it is tempting to conclude that low-protein diets improved Haugh unit, an indicator of freshness, without impairing eggshell qualities. It is documented that eggshell quality is influenced by genetics, age, environment, and nutrition including calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, trace minerals, and amino acids [35]. Thus, our study indicates that all nutrients (e.g., calcium, amino acids) needed to synthesize eggshell and albumen are adequately provided in laying hens fed suboptimal low-protein diets. In line with our findings, low-protein diets did not affect eggshell qualities in laying hens [11]. Of interest, lowering dietary protein levels produced pale brown eggs at 52 weeks of age. It is known that endogenously synthesized pigments (i.e., biliverdin and protoporphyrin) are deposited into eggshell at the final stage of egg formation [36]. Thus, it might be likely that low protein levels may affect pigment deposition process via reproductive organs rather than inhibiting the process of pigment synthesis. However, it should be kept in mind that eggshell color values in this study are all within the acceptable range [37]. Finally, we found that pale egg yolks were consistently produced in low-protein diet-fed laying hens. This is secondary to the concomitant decrease of corn gluten meals, rich in xanthophyll [38], in low-protein diets.
Gut morphology is considered an indicator of gut health in laying hens [39]. In this study, lowering dietary protein levels lowered crypt depth but tended to increase villus height:crypt depth in laying hens, indicating improved gut health. It has been documented that an increase in undigested proteins flowing into the distal intestine may cause the increase of harmful bacteria leading to impaired gut health [8,40]. Thus, it is likely that low protein levels in the diets of laying hens can lower undigested proteins in the distal intestine favoring a beneficial environment for gut microbiota.
We attempted to investigate whether dietary protein levels could affect apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients in laying hens. It is noted that the digestibility of dry matter and CP increased with decreasing dietary protein levels. This may be attributed to the enhanced digestibility of crystalline amino acids which were increased with decreasing dietary protein levels. In line with our findings, lowering dietary protein levels fortified with limiting amino acids improved the digestibility of protein and amino acids in laying hens [12,15,23]. In this study, we found that the digestibility of ether extracts and crude ash exhibited similar patterns. Lowering dietary protein levels decreased the digestibility of ether extracts and crude ash at 45 weeks but increased the digestibility at 55 or 64 weeks. It is known that fatty acids can form insoluble soaps with calcium rendering unavailable to the host, thus leading to reductions in the digestibility of ether extracts and calcium [41]. However, we noted that eggshell thickness and strength, as influenced by calcium availability, were not altered by dietary protein levels. Thus, a clear explanation on the contradictory results on the digestibility of ether extracts and crude ash at different ages is not readily available that needs to be addressed.
Serum parameters can reflect physiological and metabolic changes and are used as indicators for the nutritional status in chickens [42]. In this study, lowering dietary protein levels increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol but decreased uric acid in serum samples. It is well documented that high-density lipoprotein cholesterol has been considered as beneficial cholesterol [43], indicating the health-promoting role of low-protein diets in cholesterol metabolism. Uric acid levels directly reflect protein and amino acid metabolism, and it is the main end product of nitrogen metabolism in poultry [44]. Therefore, the observed decrease in uric acid levels by low-protein diets noted in this study can be explained as enhanced nitrogen efficiency with low nitrogen intake. Our results align with an earlier study [45] showing that serum uric acid levels (from 3.02 mg/dL to 1.68 mg/dL) and nitrogen intake (from 2.93 g/bird/day to 2.23 g/bird/day) were declined with lowering dietary protein levels (from 17% to 14%) in laying hen. The effect of low-protein diets on serum uric acid levels was also reported elsewhere [46,47].
Nitrogen excretion influences environmental pollution and represents the efficiency of diet-origin protein utilization [1,3]. As expected, low-CP diets lowered nitrogen intake and nitrogen excretion, leading to a decrease in nitrogen retention. Our study corroborates with earlier studies in laying hens [23] and broiler chickens [48], suggesting that lowering protein levels in the diets of laying hens is the best nutritional strategy to lower nitrogen excretion. Indeed, linear regression analysis indicates that each 2% protein reduction in the diets of laying hens led to lowering the excreted nitrogen by 0.24 g/d/hen at 45 weeks, 0.19 g/d/hen at 55 weeks, and 0.13 g/d/hen at 64 weeks.
Odors and volatile fatty acids in fecal droppings are produced by the incomplete anaerobic digestion of nutrients like carbohydrates or proteins in manure [49,50]. Although low-protein diets clearly lowered nitrogen excretion in this study, they did not affect odor emissions (i.e., carbon dioxide, ammonia, H2S, and trimethylamine) but increased total volatile fatty acid production in fecal droppings. Low protein-mediated increase in total volatile fatty acids was only noted at 55 weeks of age. Our finding agrees with a study by Heo et al [23] who found that lowering dietary protein levels did not affect odor emissions in 33-week-old laying hens but disagrees with earlier studies those [14,15] which reported that odor emissions were lowered in laying hens fed low-protein diets. Our study differs from the earlier study [23] showing that low-protein diets did not affect total volatile fatty acids in pullets and laying hens. It is thus tempting to conclude that decreasing dietary protein levels may shift the compositions of distal gut microflora favoring the production of total volatile fatty acids on undigested nutrients in distal intestine.
Corticosterone is secreted in responses of hens to nutritional stressors such as dietary phosphorus levels, feed restriction and feed density [22,51,52]. Thus, we quantified yolk corticosterone as a noninvasive biomarker for assessing stress levels in laying hens. In this study, the concentration of yolk corticosterone was not affected by dietary protein levels. However, Heo et al [23] reported that low-protein diets-fed laying hens at 22 weeks of age, but not at 26 and 32 weeks of age, had decreased concentrations of yolk corticosterone. This suggests that low protein per se may not act as a nutritional stressor in laying hens. On the other hand, Park et al [22] showed that laying hens fed low vs. adequate phosphorus diets laid eggs with elevated yolk corticosterone. Thus, it is likely that stress responses of laying hens to low-nutrition diets are dependent on the nutrients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, low-protein diets lowered laying performance and reproductive organs but did not affect eggshell qualities. Reducing dietary protein levels improved the digestibility of nutrients including CP and effectively decreased nitrogen excretion. Lowering dietary protein levels did not affect odor emissions but increased concentrations of total volatile fatty acids. Our study shows that lowering dietary protein levels fortified with limiting amino acids is the best nutritional approaches to mitigate nitrogen excretion. It is, however, needed to find nutritional solutions (e.g., exogenous enzymes) to lower odor emissions and to improve laying performance in laying hens fed low-protein diets.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Formal analysis: Heo YJ, Park J.

Validation: Kim DH.

Investigation: Moon S, Heo YJ.

Writing - original draft: Moon S, Heo YJ.

Writing - review & editing: Moon S, Heo YJ, Park J, Kim DH, Lee KW.

FUNDING

This work was supported by Korean Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Livestock Industrialization Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (321080-03-3-HD020).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

ETHICS APPROVAL

All protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Konkuk University (KU21081).

No AI tools were used in this article.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary file is available from: https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.250814
Supplement 1. Ingredients and calculated chemical composition of experimental diets fed to laying hens from 33 to 64 weeks of age.
ab-250814-Supplement-1.pdf

DATA AVAILABILITY

Upon request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Figure 1
Effect of dietary protein levels on yolk corticosterone in laying hens. Data was obtained by pooling yolk corticosterone quantified in eggs collected at 4-week intervals from 33 to 64 week. Each box plot indicates the interquartile range with the median represented by the horizontal line within the box, while whiskers extend to show the full range of the data (represented by symbol X).
ab-250814f1.jpg
Table 1
Effect of dietary protein levels on laying performance in laying hens at 33 to 64 wk
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
Initial BW (kg/hen) 1.92 1.97 1.97 2.01 0.05 0.268 0.976
Final BW (kg/hen) 1.88 1.97 1.96 1.85 0.05 0.647 0.049
BW change (kg/hen) −0.04 0.01 −0.01 −0.16 0.07 0.251 0.155
ADFI (g/hen/d) 121.75 121.71 121.76 121.68 0.18 0.848 0.921
Egg weight (g) 62.98 62.92 61.93 60.88 0.40 <0.001 0.224
Egg production (%) 91.06 92.16 90.56 84.33 1.03 <0.001 0.001
Egg mass (g/d) 56.10 57.79 53.67 48.69 1.12 <0.001 0.004
FCR (g/g) 2.21 2.11 2.30 2.56 0.06 <0.001 0.003
Soft and broken egg (%) 0.311 0.192 0.226 0.486 0.096 0.200 0.055

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diet containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean; BW, body weight; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

Table 2
Effects of dietary protein levels on egg quality in laying hens
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
Eggshell thickness (mm)
 44 wk 0.41 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.876 0.033
 52 wk 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.41 0.01 <0.001 0.452
 64 wk 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.01 0.957 0.478
Eggshell strength (kgf)
 44 wk 5.52 5.46 5.47 5.60 0.11 0.612 0.418
 52 wk 4.86 4.76 4.58 4.87 0.13 0.433 0.674
 64 wk 4.30 4.09 4.33 4.65 0.18 0.118 0.145
Eggshell color (unit)
 44 wk 25.3 24.8 24.8 25.3 0.8 0.965 0.496
 52 wk 22.2 24.4 25.1 25.0 0.8 0.015 0.179
 64 wk 23.8 24.1 24.0 23.5 0.7 0.707 0.558
Haugh unit
 44 wk 93.7 92.9 94.1 95.3 0.7 0.092 0.228
 52 wk 86.3 87.7 87.0 90.2 1.2 0.044 0.459
 64 wk 83.2 84.2 84.4 86.3 0.9 0.024 0.625
Yolk color
 44 wk 8.63 8.58 8.31 8.42 0.09 0.028 0.364
 52 wk 8.59 8.24 7.42 6.96 0.09 <0.001 0.573
 64 wk 7.44 7.08 6.08 5.62 0.13 <0.001 0.686

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diets containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 3
Effect of dietary protein levels on relative organ weight (g/100 g of BW) and tibia characteristics in laying hens (64 wk)
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very Low Linear Quadratic
Organ weight
 Abdominal fat 2.91 3.08 3.64 3.81 0.44 0.112 0.998
 Liver 1.79 2.00 2.13 1.95 0.10 0.185 0.059
 Kidney 0.8 0.76 0.78 0.78 0.02 0.795 0.402
 Spleen 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.461 0.653
 Duodenum 0.37 0.34 0.42 0.41 0.03 0.179 0.807
 Jejunum 0.48 0.50 0.55 0.51 0.05 0.493 0.585
 Ileum 0.43 0.42 0.46 0.36 0.06 0.486 0.466
 Bursa of Fabricius 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.641 0.762
 Ovary 0.32 0.26 0.24 0.30 0.03 0.412 0.037
 Oviduct 3.71 3.52 3.23 3.16 0.21 0.047 0.776
 Number of large of yellow follicles 4.71 4.57 4.71 4.00 0.27 0.115 0.307
Tibia characteristics
 Fresh weight 0.71 0.67 0.64 0.67 0.02 0.196 0.150
 Length (cm) 12.19 12.10 12.26 12.23 0.12 0.907 0.998
 Width (cm) 0.76 0.75 0.74 0.73 0.01 0.213 0.948
 Strength (kgf) 14.5 16.8 13.2 16.8 1.2 0.548 0.566

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diets containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 4
Effect of dietary protein levels on ileal morphology in laying hens (64 wk)
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
Villus height (VH) (μm) 865 876 902 879 25 0.552 0.495
Crypt depth (CD) (μm) 89.1 89.1 85.2 85.3 1.6 0.045 0.945
VH:CD 9.72 9.86 10.6 10.3 0.3 0.093 0.495

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diets containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 5
Effects of dietary protein levels on apparent total tract digestibility in laying hens
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
Dry matter (%)
 45 wk 71.1 71.2 73.6 73.1 0.7 0.016 0.658
 55 wk 73.3 74.5 74.8 77.6 0.7 <0.001 0.247
 64 wk 75.2 76.3 76.9 77.7 1.7 0.357 0.937
Crude protein (%)
 45 wk 32.9 35.6 41.1 42.1 1.7 <0.001 0.686
 55 wk 45.8 44.5 46.9 50.3 0.7 0.053 0.192
 64 wk 50.5 52.3 53.5 54.4 3.6 0.483 0.904
Ether extract (%)
 45 wk 89.8 89.4 89.6 85.6 0.9 0.008 0.085
 55 wk 87.3 87.0 85.6 87.1 1.0 0.667 0.366
 64 wk 87.6 88.0 88.0 93.5 1.2 0.068 0.013
Crude ash (%)
 45 wk 32.2 29.4 27.3 21.4 2.0 0.001 0.431
 55 wk 37.4 41.8 40.8 46.7 2.4 0.018 0.744
 64 wk 44.2 45.9 50.3 51.5 5.1 0.315 0.961

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diets containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 6
Effect of dietary protein levels on serum parameters in laying hens (64 wk)
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
TCHO (mg/dL) 63.1 60.4 65.0 68.0 5.8 0.475 0.655
HDLC (mg/dL) 18.6 16.3 19.6 23.4 1.5 0.012 0.047
TG (mg/dL) 422 343 357 307 78 0.369 0.109
GOT (U/L) 203 356 226 144 64 0.296 0.797
GPT (U/L) 29.7 28.7 26.9 26.7 1.6 0.137 0.963
Total protein (g/dL) 4.07 3.90 3.73 3.63 0.26 0.209 0.891
Uric acid (mg/dL) 2.61 2.56 1.96 1.10 0.47 0.021 0.398

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diets containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean; TCHO, total cholesterol; HDLC, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT, glutamic pyruvic transaminase.

Table 7
Effects of dietary protein levels on nitrogen (N) balance (expressed as g/hen/d) in laying hens
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
Fresh excreta
 45 wk 83.91 83.75 95.03 85.63 5.83 0.534 0.436
 55 wk 77.99 72.20 76.45 82.24 4.67 0.424 0.227
 64 wk 79.65 73.86 78.11 83.90 4.67 0.424 0.227
Nitrogen intake
 45 wk 2.695 2.412 2.071 1.810 0.010 <0.001 0.149
 55 wk 2.589 2.180 1.954 1.679 0.057 <0.001 0.246
 64 wk 2.449 2.138 1.931 1.563 0.054 <0.001 0.604
Nitrogen excretion
 45 wk 1.977 1.727 1.432 1.268 0.060 <0.001 0.441
 55 wk 1.405 1.241 1.038 0.832 0.049 <0.001 0.677
 64 wk 1.189 1.020 0.898 0.792 0.077 0.001 0.681
Nitrogen retention
 45 wk 0.718 0.685 0.639 0.541 0.060 0.037 0.590
 55 wk 1.184 0.939 0.916 0.848 0.049 <0.001 0.081
 64 wk 1.259 1.118 1.033 0.770 0.087 0.001 0.492

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diets containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 8
Effects of dietary protein levels on odor emission in laying hens
Items Protein levels (%)1) SEM p-value


High Medium Low Very low Linear Quadratic
Carbon dioxide (ppm)
 45 wk 266 289 318 289 18 0.251 0.177
 55 wk 686 501 544 527 66 0.158 0.218
 64 wk 850 720 700 785 69 0.499 0.145
Ammonia (ppm)
 45 wk 3.20 3.00 2.67 2.00 0.53 0.155 0.717
 55 wk 8.75 7.00 8.20 5.50 2.93 0.639 0.901
 64 wk 11.6 12.0 10.0 4.00 4.30 0.299 0.570
Hydrogen sulfide (ppm)
 45 wk 0.15 0.20 0.22 0.16 0.04 0.670 0.355
 55 wk 0.68 1.33 1.00 0.76 0.28 0.958 0.163
 64 wk 1.30 2.04 1.30 1.80 0.42 0.688 0.776
Trimethylamine (ppm)
 45 wk 0.70 0.50 0.65 0.20 0.16 0.134 0.541
 55 wk 9.80 6.25 9.00 5.67 2.73 0.502 0.972
 64 wk 10.00 7.67 8.00 8.00 0.84 0.235 0.264
Total VFA (μM)
 45 wk 18.08 18.55 19.55 20.48 1.10 0.107 0.837
 55 wk 10.85 14.37 17.56 20.62 2.23 0.003 0.920
 64 wk 18.10 16.33 19.66 17.66 2.59 0.864 0.963

1) High protein diet containing 18.5%, 18.0%, 17.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; medium protein diet containing 16.5%, 16.0%, 15.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; low-protein diets 14.5%, 14.0%, 13.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III; very low-protein diet containing 12.5%, 12.0%, 11.0% in feeding phases I, II, and III.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

REFERENCES

1. Summers JD. Reducing nitrogen excretion of the laying hen by feeding lower crude protein diets. Poult Sci 1993;72:1473–8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721473
crossref pmid
2. Wang J, Yue H, Wu S, Zhang H, Qi G. Nutritional modulation of health, egg quality and environmental pollution of the layers. Anim Nutr 2017;3:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.03.001
crossref pmid pmc
3. Iio W, Shimada R, Ogino A, Nonaka I. Egg production performance, nitrogen excretion, and environmental gas emissions from manure composting of laying hens fed low-protein diets supplemented with essential amino acids. Jpn Agric Res Q 2025;59:235–44. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.24s04
crossref
4. Xin Q, Ma N, Jiao H, et al. Dietary energy and protein levels during the prelay period on production performance, egg quality, expression of genes in hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis, and bone parameters in aged laying hens. Front Physiol 2022;13:887381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.887381
crossref pmid pmc
5. Azzam MMM, Dong XY, Zou XT. Effect of dietary threonine on laying performance and intestinal immunity of laying hens fed low-crude-protein diets during the peak production period. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2017;101:e55–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12559
crossref
6. Mousavi SN, Khalaji S, Ghasemi-Jirdehi A, Foroudi F. Investigation on the effects of various protein levels with constant ratio of digestible sulfur amino acids and threonine to lysine on performance, egg quality and protein retention in two strains of laying hens. Ital J Anim Sci 2013;12:e2. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e2
crossref
7. Sun M, Ma N, Liu H, et al. The optimal dietary arginine level of laying hens fed with low-protein diets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2022;13:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00719-x
crossref pmid pmc
8. Dong XY, Azzam MMM, Zou XT. Effects of dietary threonine supplementation on intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota of laying hens. Poult Sci 2017;96:3654–63. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex185
crossref pmid
9. Zhou J, Qiu K, Wang J, Zhang H, Qi G, Wu S. Effect of dietary serine supplementation on performance, egg quality, serum indices, and ileal mucosal immunity in laying hens fed a low crude protein diet. Poult Sci 2021;100:101465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101465
crossref pmid pmc
10. Torki M, Mohebbifar A, Ghasemi HA, Zardast A. Response of laying hens to feeding low-protein amino acid-supplemented diets under high ambient temperature: performance, egg quality, leukocyte profile, blood lipids, and excreta pH. Int J Biometeorol 2015;59:575–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0870-0
crossref pmid
11. Bunchasak C, Poosuwan K, Nukraew R, Markvichitr K, Choothesa A. Effect of dietary protein on egg production and immunity responses of laying hens during peak production period. Int J Poult Sci 2005;4:701–8. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.701.708
crossref
12. Zhang H, Xuan Y, Guo D, et al. Effects of dietary low protein levels and amino acid patterns on production performance, egg quality and intestinal function in laying hens. Poult Sci 2025;104:105578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105578
crossref pmid pmc
13. Iio W, Shimada R, Nonaka I, Ogino A. Effects of a low-protein diet supplemented with essential amino acids on egg production performance and environmental gas emissions from layer-manure composting in laying hens in the later laying period. Anim Sci J 2023;94:e13853. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13853
crossref pmid
14. Song JY, Heo YJ, Park J, et al. Effects of dietary additives on nitrogen balance, odor emissions, and yolk corticosterone in laying hens fed low-protein diets. Animals 2025;15:2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15142021
crossref pmid pmc
15. Ali U, Lee KJ, Cai D, Kim IH. Low protein diet with amino acid supplementation maintains laying performance and egg quality while reducing ammonia emissions in Hy-Line brown hens. Trop Anim Health Prod 2025;57:354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04611-4
crossref pmid
16. Liu H, Xu K, Wang H, et al. Effects of different forms of amino acid supplementation on the performance and intestinal barrier function of laying hens fed a low-protein diet. Poult Sci 2024;103:104375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104375
crossref pmid pmc
17. Liu Y, Wang D, Zhao L, Zhang J, Huang S, Ma Q. Effect of methionine deficiency on the growth performance, serum amino acids concentrations, gut microbiota and subsequent laying performance of layer chicks. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:878107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.878107
crossref pmid pmc
18. Zuberbuehler CA, Messikommer RE, Arnold MM, Forrer RS, Wenk C. Effects of selenium depletion and selenium repletion by choice feeding on selenium status of young and old laying hens. Physiol Behav 2006;87:430–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.11.007
crossref pmid
19. Guo S, Niu J, Xv J, et al. Interactive effects of vitamins A and K3 on laying performance, egg quality, tibia attributes and antioxidative status of aged Roman Pink laying hens. Animal 2021;15:100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100242
crossref pmid
20. Li X, Uyanga VA, Jiao H, et al. Effects of low dietary calcium and lipopolysaccharide challenges on production performance, eggshell quality, and bone metabolism of laying hens. Front Physiol 2024;15:1396301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1396301
crossref pmid pmc
21. Attia YA, Al-Harthi MA, Abo El-Maaty HM. Calcium and cholecalciferol levels in late-phase laying hens: effects on productive traits, egg quality, blood biochemistry, and immune responses. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00389
crossref pmid pmc
22. Park J, Heo YJ, Kim DH, et al. Nutritional and physiological responses to dietary phosphorus levels and phytase in pullets and laying hens. Poult Sci 2024;103:103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103886
crossref pmid pmc
23. Heo YJ, Park J, Kim YB, et al. Effects of dietary protein levels on performance, nitrogen excretion, and odor emission of growing pullets and laying hens. Poult Sci 2023;102:102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102798
crossref pmid pmc
24. Association of Official Analytical Chemists AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th edAOAC International; 2007.

25. Eklund B. Practical guidance for flux chamber measurements of fugitive volatile organic emission rates. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1992;42:1583–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467102
crossref
26. Lee HG, Kim YB, Lee SH, et al. In vivo recovery of bacteriophages and their effects on Clostridium perfringens-infected broiler chickens. Vet Sci 2022;9:119. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9030119
crossref pmid pmc
27. Kim YB, Lee SH, Kim DH, et al. Incorporation of dietary methyl sulfonyl methane into the egg albumens of laying hens. Antioxidants 2022;11:517. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030517
crossref pmid pmc
28. Junqueira OM, de Laurentiz AC, da Silva, Filardi R, Rodrigues EA, Casartelli CEM. Effects of energy and protein levels on egg quality and performance of laying hens at early second production cycle. J Appl Poult Res 2006;15:110–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.1.110
crossref
29. Torki M, Nasiroleslami M, Ghasemi HA. The effects of different protein levels in laying hens under hot summer conditions. Anim Prod Sci 2016;57:927–34. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15463
crossref
30. Gunawardana P, Roland DA Sr, Bryant MM. Effect of energy and protein on performance, egg components, egg solids, egg quality, and profits in molted Hy-Line W-36 hens. J Appl Poult Res 2008;17:432–9. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00085
crossref
31. Whitehead CC, Bowman AS, Griffin HD. The effects of dietary fat and bird age on the weights of eggs and egg components in the laying hen. Br Poult Sci 1991;32:565–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417381
crossref pmid
32. Gunawardana P, Roland DA Sr, Bryant MM. Effect of dietary energy, protein, and a versatile enzyme on hen performance, egg solids, egg composition, and egg quality of Hy-Line W-36 hens during second cycle, phase two. J Appl Poult Res 2009;18:43–53. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00047
crossref
33. Poosuwan K, Bunchasak C, Kaewtapee C. Long-term feeding effects of dietary protein levels on egg production, immunocompetence and plasma amino acids of laying hens in subtropical condition. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2010;94:186–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00898.x
crossref
34. Penz AM Jr, Jensen LS. Influence of protein concentration, amino acid supplementation, and daily time of access to high- or low-protein diets on egg weight and components in laying hens. Poult Sci 1991;70:2460–6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0702460
crossref pmid
35. Roberts JR. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J Poult Sci 2004;41:161–77. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.41.161
crossref
36. Samiullah S, Roberts JR, Chousalkar K. Eggshell color in brown-egg laying hens: a review. Poult Sci 2015;94:2566–75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev202
crossref pmid pmc
37. Technical Services and Supplies (TSS). QCM+ range [Internet] TSS. c1985. [cited 2025 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.tss-york.com/products/qcmrange#h.p_ID_150

38. Committee on Animal Nutrition, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th edNational Academies Press; 1994.

39. Onbaşılar EE, Yalçın S, Bakıcı C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of probiotic effects on laying hen physiology: from performance to bone and gut morphology. Animals 2025;15:2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15162408
crossref pmid pmc
40. Apajalahti J, Vienola K. Interaction between chicken intestinal microbiota and protein digestion. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;221:323–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.004
crossref
41. Palomar M, Garcés-Narro C, Piquer O, et al. Influence of free fatty acid content and degree of fat saturation on production performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal morphology of laying hens. Anim Nutr 2023;13:313–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2023.03.002
crossref pmid pmc
42. Ndazigaruye G, Kim DH, Kang CW, et al. Effects of low-protein diets and exogenous protease on growth performance, carcass traits, intestinal morphology, cecal volatile fatty acids and serum parameters in broilers. Animals 2019;9:226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050226
crossref pmid pmc
43. Jomard A, Osto E. High density lipoproteins: metabolism, function, and therapeutic potential. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020;7:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00039
crossref pmid pmc
44. Ding Y, Bu X, Zhang N, Li L, Zou X. Effects of metabolizable energy and crude protein levels on laying performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices of Fengda-1 layers. Anim Nutr 2016;2:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2016.03.006
crossref pmid pmc
45. Bezerra RM, Costa FGP, Givisiez PEN, Goulart CC, dos Santos RA, Lima MR. Glutamic acid supplementation on low protein diets for laying hens. Acta Sci Anim Sci 2015;37:129–34. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i2.25911
crossref
46. Song X, Anas MA, Kurniawati A, et al. Effects of reduced-protein diets with protease supplementation on growth, carcass yield, intestinal morphology, organ development, nutrient digestibility, and blood biochemical of broiler chickens. Transl Anim Sci 2023;7:txad098. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad098
crossref pmid pmc
47. de Faria, Viana E, de Carvalho, Mello HH, Carvalho FB, et al. Blood biochemical parameters and organ development of brown layers fed reduced dietary protein levels in two rearing systems. Anim Biosci 2021;35:444–52. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0145
crossref pmid pmc
48. Li Y, Li M, Zeng Q, et al. Maternal low-protein diets influence sex-specific growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal morphology of broiler offspring. Poult Sci 2025;104:105618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105618
crossref pmid pmc
49. Jha R, Berrocoso JFD. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;212:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.12.002
crossref
50. Wang YC, Han MF, Jia TP, et al. Emissions, measurement, and control of odor in livestock farms: a review. Sci Total Environ 2021;776:145735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145735
crossref pmid
51. Vasconcelos MDC, Sousa LS, Lopes TSB, et al. Impact of increased pre-start diet density on broiler chick behavior, corticosterone levels, and performance responses under cold stress during early life. J Therm Biol 2024;124:103974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103974
crossref pmid
52. Yan C, Xiao J, Chen D, et al. Feed restriction induced changes in behavior, corticosterone, and microbial programming in slow- and fast-growing chicken breeds. Animals 2021;11:141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010141
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 1 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 751 View
  • 69 Download
Related articles


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2026 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next